J. Jerauld

A ground level gamma-ray burst observed in association with rocket-triggered lightning

energetic radiation was observed at much earlier times, up to 160 ms before the return strokes. Because for such times, the dart leader tip must have been about 1000 m above the ground, it cannot be ruled out that for these events a gamma-ray (>1 MeV) component also originated from the cloud. [3] In this paper, we report an unusual event that occurred during the last rocket-triggered flash of the 2003 season. For this flash, an intense burst of MeV gamma-rays was observed from a distance of 650 m from the lightning channel, not in association with the dart leader or return stroke, but in association with a large current pulse (11 kA) occurring during the initial-stage (during the initial continuous current), about 20 ms after the vaporization of the triggering wire. In triggered lightning, the initial-stage is characterized by a steady current, preceding the return strokes, with superimposed pulses up to several kA in amplitude [Wang et al., 1999]. Considering the large distance of the detectors and the high energy of the gamma-rays, it is plausible that the burst originated in the cloud processes, perhaps many thousands of meters above the ground. This result may greatly facilitate the study of runaway breakdown of air inside thunderclouds [Gurevich et al., 1992], since it implies that observations of this phenomenon from the ground at sea level may be practical.

Co‐location of lightning leader x‐ray and electric field change sources

[2] Although X-ray emission from lightning was long predicted [Wilson, 1925], only recently was the production of X rays in cloud-to-ground lightning confirmed. Moore et al. [2001] first reported the detection of energetic radiation emissions immediately preceding the return stroke of natural cloud-to-ground negative lightning, followed by a similar discovery by Dwyer et al. [2003] for rockettriggered lightning. Dwyer et al. [2004] reported that these emissions were composed of multiple, brief bursts of X rays in the 30–250 keV range, with each burst typically lasting less than 1 ms. Further, they showed that the sources of the X-ray bursts traveled from the cloud toward the ground, supporting the view that the leader front is the source of the X rays. Dwyer et al. [2005] compared X-ray and electric field records simultaneously obtained during the stepped leaders of natural negative cloud-to-ground lightning. The conclusion from this analysis was that the production of X-rays is associated with the electric field changes accompanying the stepping of the leader that initiates the first return stroke. Although an obvious temporal correspondence was observed, uncertainties in measurement time delays and oscilloscope trigger times prevented any accurate determination of the exact temporal relationship between the X-ray bursts and the stepping of the leader. Observations of the similarity in X-ray emissions from natural and triggered lightning imply a common mechanism for different types of negative leaders [Dwyer et al., 2005]. The aforementioned discoveries have had an impact on views of lightning electrical breakdown in air, in that lightning can no longer necessarily be considered a conventional low-energy (eV) discharge, but often involves an electron distribution function that includes a significant high-energy (keV to MeV) component. These recent advancements highlight many unknowns regarding leader propagation, the stepping process, and their association with X rays. Among the most pressing of these issues are the intensity of the X rays at the source, the electric field at the leader front, the directionality and attenuation of the X-ray emissions, and the spatial and temporal relationship between the sources of X rays and leader steps. This paper addresses the issue of independently locating the sources of X-ray emissions and the corresponding leader step electric field changes via time-of-arrival (TOA) measurements, which may allow advancement on many of these issues. Leadersinbothnaturalandtriggeredlightningareconsidered.

Lightning induced disturbances in buried cables - part II: experiment and model validation

This paper presents experimental results obtained at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) at Camp Blanding, Florida during the summers of 2002 and 2003. Currents induced by triggered and natural lightning events were measured at the terminations of a buried power cable, in the cable shield, and in the inner cable conductor. Measurements of the horizontal component of the magnetic field above the ground surface for both natural and triggered lightning are also presented. For distant natural lightning events, locations of ground strike points were determined using the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). Based on the theoretical developments presented in Part I of this paper , the field-to-buried cable coupling equations are solved in both the time domain and in the frequency domain. The obtained experimental results are then used to validate the numerical simulations provided by the relevant developed codes.

Distribution of Currents in the Lightning Protective System of a Residential Building—Part I: Triggered-Lightning Experiments

We present the results of structural lightning protective system (LPS) tests conducted in 2004 and 2005 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) at Camp Blanding, FL. Lightning was triggered using the rocket-and- wire technique, and its current was directly injected into the LPS. The test configurations in 2004 and 2005 differed in the lightning current injection point, number of down conductors, grounding system at the test house, and the use of surge protective devices. The primary objective was to examine the division of the injected lightning current between the grounding system of the test house, and remote ground accessible via the neutral of the power-supply cable. In 2004, the mean value of the peak current entering the electrical circuit neutral in search of its way to remote ground was about 22% of the injected lightning current peak, while in 2005, it was about 59%. For comparison, more than 80% of the injected peak current was observed to enter the electrical circuit neutral in similar 1997 tests at the ICLRT in which a different test house with a different (poorer) grounding system was used (Rakov et al. 2002 [1]). An attempt to model the 2004 and 2005 experiments is presented in a companion paper.

Test of the transmission line model and the traveling current source model with triggered lightning return strokes at very close range

We test the two simplest and most conceptually different return stroke models, the transmission line model (TLM) and the traveling current source model (TCSM), by comparing the first microsecond of model-predicted electric and magnetic field wave forms and field derivative wave forms at 15 m and 30 m with the corresponding measured wave forms from triggered lightning return strokes. In the TLM the return stroke process is modeled as a current wave injected at the base of the lightning channel and propagating upward along the channel with neither attenuation nor dispersion and at an assumed constant speed. In the TCSM the return stroke process is modeled as a current source traveling upward at an assumed constant speed and injecting a current wave into the channel, which then propagates downward at the speed of light and is absorbed at ground without reflection. The electric and magnetic fields were calculated from Maxwells equations given the measured current or current derivative at the channel base, an assumed return stroke speed, and the temporal and spatial distribution of the channel current specified by the return stroke model. Electric and magnetic fields and their derivatives were measured 15 m and 30 m from rocket-triggered lightning during the summer of 2001 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing at Camp Blanding, Florida. We present data from a five-stroke flash, S0105, and compare the measured fields and field derivatives with the model-predicted ones for three assumed lightning return stroke speeds, v = 1 x 10 8 m/s, v = 2 x 10 8 m/s, and v = 2.99 × 10 8 m/s (essentially the speed of light). The results presented show that the TLM works reasonably well in predicting the measured electric and magnetic fields (field derivatives) at 15 m and 30 m if return stroke speeds during the first microsecond are chosen to be between 1 × 10 8 m/s and 2 x 10 8 m/s (near 2 x 10 8 m/s). In general, the TLM works better in predicting the measured field derivatives than in predicting the measured fields. The TCSM does not adequately predict either the measured electric fields or the measured electric and magnetic field derivatives at 15 and 30 m during the first microsecond or so.

Testing of Lightning Protective System of a Residential Structure: Comparison of Data Obtained in Rocket-Triggered Lightning and Current Surge Generator Experiments

We present a comparison of data obtained during testing of lightning protective system of a residential structure in rocket-triggered lightning experiment at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) at Camp Blanding, Florida, and current surge generator experiment at Rzeszow University of Technology in Poland. Three different configurations of LPS were tested in Poland with the dc grounding resistances of the entire system 4.09 Omega (LPS 1a), 1.65 Omega (LPS 1b), and 2.88 Omega (LPS 2). For LPS 1a with three ground rods the value of the peak current entering the electrical circuit neutral was about 56% of the injected current peak, and for LPS 1b with two additional ground rods, each connected by a buried horizontal conductor 5 m long, was about 16%. For LPS 2 with five ground rods interconnected by a buried loop conductor this ratio was 21%. The current waveshapes in the ground rods differed from the injected current waveshapes and the current waveshapes in other parts of the test system, especially, for poorer LPS 1a. The surge-generator results are consistent with those of triggered-lightning experiments at Camp Blanding, Florida (DeCarlo et al., 2006 [2]).

Direct Lightning Strikes to Test Power Distribution Lines—Part I: Experiment and Overall Results

The interaction of rocket-triggered lightning with two unenergized power distribution lines of about 800 m length was studied at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing in Florida. A horizontally configured line was tested in 2000, and a vertically configured line in 2001, 2002, and 2003. The horizontally and vertically configured lines were equipped with six and four arrester stations, respectively, and, additionally, in 2003, the vertical line with a pole-mounted transformer. During the 2000, 2001, and 2002 experiments, arresters were frequently rendered inoperable by disconnector operation during triggered lightning strokes, but there was no disconnector operation during the 2003 experiment when the transformer was on the line. In all four years, there were commonly flashovers from the struck phase-conductor to the closest phase-conductor not subjected to direct lightning current injection. The self-consistency of measurements is assessed via comparison of the injected lightning current with: 1) the total current flowing to Earth through the multiple line groundings and 2) the total phase-to-neutral current flowing through the line arresters and line terminations. This paper is part one of two related papers.

Experimental Study of Lightning-Induced Currents in a Buried Loop Conductor and a Grounded Vertical Conductor

Currents induced in: (1) a 100 mtimes30 m buried rectangular loop conductor (counterpoise) and (2) a grounded vertical conductor of 7-m height by natural and rocket-triggered lightning at distances ranging from 60 to 300 m were recorded in 2005 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT). The peak values of 12 triggered lightning channel-base currents and the peak values of the induced currents in the counterpoise are strongly correlated. The first few microseconds of the current induced in the vertical conductor by triggered lightning return strokes 100 m away resemble electric field time-derivative waveforms simultaneously measured at the ICLRT. During a close natural lightning flash, five pre-first-return-stroke current pulses with peak currents up to 140 A were measured in the vertical conductor. These are apparently associated with multiple attempts of an upward-moving unconnected leader occurring in response to the charge lowered by downward-propagating leader steps.

Direct Lightning Strikes to Test Power Distribution Lines—Part II: Measured and Modeled Current Division Among Multiple Arresters and Grounds

The division of return stroke current among the arresters and groundings of two unenergized test distribution lines, one horizontally configured and the other vertically configured, was studied at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing in Florida. The division of return stroke currents for the vertically configured line was initially similar to the division on the horizontally configured line: at the time the return stroke current reached peak value (after one microsecond, or so) the two closest arresters/grounds on both lines passed about 90% of the total current. However, the time during which the return stroke current flowed primarily through the closest arresters to the neutral conductor was significantly shorter on the vertically configured line. On that line, the arrester current was about equally divided among all four arresters after several tens of microseconds. The arrester current division as a function of time measured on the vertical line was successfully modeled using the published VI-characteristic, while the division on the horizontal line after some tens of microseconds was only successfully modeled if the residual voltage of the two arresters closest to the current injection point was reduced by 20%. Based on the triggered lightning current division observed on our line, the minimum energy absorbed in each of the two arresters closest to the strike point during a typical natural first stroke is estimated to be 40 kJ.

Lightning Currents Flowing in the Soil and Entering a Test Power Distribution Line Via Its Grounding

Current from nearby rocket-triggered lightning that flowed through the soil and into an unenergized test power distribution line was studied based on experimental data acquired in 2003 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing in Florida. The 15-pole, three-phase line was 812 m long, was equipped with four arrester stations, at poles 2, 6, 10, and 14, and was terminated in its characteristic impedance at poles 1 and 15. The neutral conductor of the line was grounded at each arrester station and at both line terminations. Measurements suggest that a significant fraction of the lightning current injected into the earth a distance of 11 m from pole 15 entered the line through the grounding system of pole 15. The peak value of the microsecond-scale return stroke current entering the line through the pole 15 line ground was 7% of the peak value of the return stroke current injected into the earth. The peak value of the millisecond-scale triggered lightning initial stage current and the millisecond-scale return-stroke and initial-stage charge transfer to the line through the pole 15 line ground was between 12% and 19% of the lightning peak current/charge transfer, indicating that the percentage values for the injected peak currents are dependent on the current waveshape: for microsecond-scale return stroke currents, possibly due to electromagnetic coupling effects, a smaller fraction of the current peak enters the line compared to millisecond-scale initial stage currents. In the latter case, any influence of electromagnetic coupling to the line on ground currents is expected to be negligible.