J. Joshua Nowak
University of Montana
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. Joshua Nowak.
Ecology Letters | 2016
Marketa Zimova; L. Scott Mills; J. Joshua Nowak
Anthropogenic climate change has created myriad stressors that threaten to cause local extinctions if wild populations fail to adapt to novel conditions. We studied individual and population-level fitness costs of a climate change-induced stressor: camouflage mismatch in seasonally colour molting species confronting decreasing snow cover duration. Based on field measurements of radiocollared snowshoe hares, we found strong selection on coat colour molt phenology, such that animals mismatched with the colour of their background experienced weekly survival decreases up to 7%. In the absence of adaptive response, we show that these mortality costs would result in strong population-level declines by the end of the century. However, natural selection acting on wide individual variation in molt phenology might enable evolutionary adaptation to camouflage mismatch. We conclude that evolutionary rescue will be critical for hares and other colour molting species to keep up with climate change.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski; Hugh S. Robinson; María Abarca; Katherine A. Zeller; Grisel Velásquez; Evi A. D. Paemelaere; Joshua F. Goldberg; Esteban Payan; Rafael Hoogesteijn; Ernesto O. Boede; Krzysztof Schmidt; Margarita Lampo; Ángel Viloria; Rafael Carreño; Nathaniel D. Robinson; Paul M. Lukacs; J. Joshua Nowak; Franklin Castañeda; Valeria Boron; Howard Quigley
Broad scale population estimates of declining species are desired for conservation efforts. However, for many secretive species including large carnivores, such estimates are often difficult. Based on published density estimates obtained through camera trapping, presence/absence data, and globally available predictive variables derived from satellite imagery, we modelled density and occurrence of a large carnivore, the jaguar, across the species’ entire range. We then combined these models in a hierarchical framework to estimate the total population. Our models indicate that potential jaguar density is best predicted by measures of primary productivity, with the highest densities in the most productive tropical habitats and a clear declining gradient with distance from the equator. Jaguar distribution, in contrast, is determined by the combined effects of human impacts and environmental factors: probability of jaguar occurrence increased with forest cover, mean temperature, and annual precipitation and declined with increases in human foot print index and human density. Probability of occurrence was also significantly higher for protected areas than outside of them. We estimated the world’s jaguar population at 173,000 (95% CI: 138,000–208,000) individuals, mostly concentrated in the Amazon Basin; elsewhere, populations tend to be small and fragmented. The high number of jaguars results from the large total area still occupied (almost 9 million km2) and low human densities (< 1 person/km2) coinciding with high primary productivity in the core area of jaguar range. Our results show the importance of protected areas for jaguar persistence. We conclude that combining modelling of density and distribution can reveal ecological patterns and processes at global scales, can provide robust estimates for use in species assessments, and can guide broad-scale conservation actions.
Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Jessie D. Golding; J. Joshua Nowak; Victoria J. Dreitz
Abstract Conservation of biological communities requires accurate estimates of abundance for multiple species. Recent advances in estimating abundance of multiple species, such as Bayesian multispecies N‐mixture models, account for multiple sources of variation, including detection error. However, false‐positive errors (misidentification or double counts), which are prevalent in multispecies data sets, remain largely unaddressed. The dependent‐double observer (DDO) method is an emerging method that both accounts for detection error and is suggested to reduce the occurrence of false positives because it relies on two observers working collaboratively to identify individuals. To date, the DDO method has not been combined with advantages of multispecies N‐mixture models. Here, we derive an extension of a multispecies N‐mixture model using the DDO survey method to create a multispecies dependent double‐observer abundance model (MDAM). The MDAM uses a hierarchical framework to account for biological and observational processes in a statistically consistent framework while using the accurate observation data from the DDO survey method. We demonstrate that the MDAM accurately estimates abundance of multiple species with simulated and real multispecies data sets. Simulations showed that the model provides both precise and accurate abundance estimates, with average credible interval coverage across 100 repeated simulations of 94.5% for abundance estimates and 92.5% for detection estimates. In addition, 92.2% of abundance estimates had a mean absolute percent error between 0% and 20%, with a mean of 7.7%. We present the MDAM as an important step forward in expanding the applicability of the DDO method to a multispecies setting. Previous implementation of the DDO method suggests the MDAM can be applied to a broad array of biological communities. We suggest that researchers interested in assessing biological communities consider the MDAM as a tool for deriving accurate, multispecies abundance estimates.
Journal of Wildlife Management | 2015
Sarah N. Sells; Michael S. Mitchell; J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs; Neil J. Anderson; Jennifer Ramsey; Justin A. Gude; Paul R. Krausman
Journal of Wildlife Management | 2016
Rebecca M. McCaffery; J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs
Journal of Wildlife Management | 2018
Paul M. Lukacs; Michael S. Mitchell; Mark Hebblewhite; Bruce K. Johnson; Heather E. Johnson; Matthew J. Kauffman; Kelly M. Proffitt; Peter Zager; Jedediah F. Brodie; Kent R. Hersey; A. Andrew Holland; Mark A. Hurley; Scott McCorquodale; Arthur D. Middleton; Matthew Nordhagen; J. Joshua Nowak; Daniel P. Walsh; P. J. White
Diversity and Distributions | 2017
Marisa K. Lipsey; David E. Naugle; J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2018
J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs; Mark A. Hurley; Andrew J. Lindbloom; Kevin Robling; Justin A. Gude; Hugh S. Robinson
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2018
Michael S. Mitchell; Hilary S. Cooley; Justin A. Gude; Jay A. Kolbe; J. Joshua Nowak; Kelly M. Proffitt; Sarah N. Sells; Mike Thompson
Intermountain Journal of Sciences | 2016
J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs; Justin A. Gude; Mark A. Hurley; Chelsea Krause; Andy Lindbloom; Hugh S. Robinson; Kevin Robling