Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mark A. Hurley is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mark A. Hurley.


Journal of Animal Ecology | 2011

Neonatal mortality of elk driven by climate, predator phenology and predator community composition

Kathleen Griffin; Mark Hebblewhite; Hugh S. Robinson; Peter Zager; Shannon M. Barber-Meyer; David Christianson; Scott Creel; Nyeema C. Harris; Mark A. Hurley; Dewaine H. Jackson; Bruce K. Johnson; Woodrow L. Myers; Jarod D. Raithel; Mike Schlegel; Bruce L. Smith; Craig White; P. J. White

1. Understanding the interaction among predators and between predation and climate is critical to understanding the mechanisms for compensatory mortality. We used data from 1999 radio-marked neonatal elk (Cervus elaphus) calves from 12 populations in the north-western United States to test for effects of predation on neonatal survival, and whether predation interacted with climate to render mortality compensatory. 2. Weibull survival models with a random effect for each population were fit as a function of the number of predator species in a community (3-5), seven indices of climatic variability, sex, birth date, birth weight, and all interactions between climate and predators. Cumulative incidence functions (CIF) were used to test whether the effects of individual species of predators were additive or compensatory. 3. Neonatal elk survival to 3 months declined following hotter previous summers and increased with higher May precipitation, especially in areas with wolves and/or grizzly bears. Mortality hazards were significantly lower in systems with only coyotes (Canis latrans), cougars (Puma concolor) and black bears (Ursus americanus) compared to higher mortality hazards experienced with gray wolves (Canis lupus) and grizzly bears (Ursus horribilis). 4. In systems with wolves and grizzly bears, mortality by cougars decreased, and predation by bears was the dominant cause of neonatal mortality. Only bear predation appeared additive and occurred earlier than other predators, which may render later mortality by other predators compensatory as calves age. Wolf predation was low and most likely a compensatory source of mortality for neonatal elk calves. 5. Functional redundancy and interspecific competition among predators may combine with the effects of climate on vulnerability to predation to drive compensatory mortality of neonatal elk calves. The exception was the evidence for additive bear predation. These results suggest that effects of predation by recovering wolves on neonatal elk survival, a contentious issue for management of elk populations, may be less important than the composition of the predator community. Future studies would benefit by synthesizing overwinter calf and adult-survival data sets, ideally from experimental studies, to test the roles of predation in annual compensatory and additive mortality of elk.


Wildlife Monographs | 2011

Demographic Response of Mule Deer to Experimental Reduction of Coyotes and Mountain Lions in Southeastern Idaho

Mark A. Hurley; James W. Unsworth; Peter Zager; Mark Hebblewhite; Edward O. Garton; Debra M. Montgomery; John R. Skalski; Craig L. Maycock

ABSTRACT Manipulating predator populations is often posed as a solution to depressed ungulate populations. However, predator—prey dynamics are complex and the effect on prey populations is often an interaction of predator life history, climate, prey density, and habitat quality. The effect of predator removal on ungulate and, more specifically, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations has not been adequately investigated at a management scale. We tested the efficacy of removing coyotes (Cams latrans) and mountain lions (Puma concolor) for increasing survival and population growth rate of mule deer in southeastern Idaho, USA, during 1997–2003. We assigned 8 game management units (GMUs) to treatments under a 2 × 2 factorial design (treatments of coyote removal and lion removal) with 2 replicates of each treatment or reference area combination. We used methods typically available to wildlife managers to achieve predator removals and a combination of extensive and intensive monitoring in these 8 GMUs to test the hypothesis that predator removal increased vital rates and population growth rate of mule deer. We determined effects of predator removal on survival and causes of mortality in 2 intensive study sites, one with coyote and mountain lion removal and one without. We also considered the effects of other variables on survival including lagomorph abundance and climatic conditions. In these 2 intensive study areas, we monitored with radiotelemetry 250 neonates, 284 6-month-old fawns, and 521 adult females. At the extensive scale, we monitored mule deer population trend and December fawn ratios with helicopter surveys. Coyote removal decreased neonate mortality only when deer were apparently needed as alternate prey, thus removal was more effective when lagomorph populations were reduced. The best mortality model of mule deer captured at 6 months of age included summer precipitation, winter precipitation, fawn mass, and mountain lion removal. Over-winter mortality of adult female mule deer decreased with removal of mountain lions. Precipitation variables were included in most competing mortality models for all age classes of mule deer. Mountain lion removal increased fawn ratios and our models predicted fawn ratios would increase 6% at average removal rates (3.53/1,000 km2) and 27% at maximum removal rates (14.18/1,000 km). Across our extensive set of 8 GMUs, coyote removal had no effect on December fawn ratios. We also detected no strong effect of coyote or mountain lion removal alone on mule deer population trend; the best population-growth-rate model included previous years mountain lion removal and winter severity, yet explained only 27% of the variance in population growth rate. Winter severity in the current and previous winter was the most important influence on mule deer population growth. The lack of response in fawn ratio or mule deer abundance to coyote reduction at this extensive (landscape) scale suggests that decreased neonate mortality due to coyote removal is partially compensatory. Annual removal of coyotes was not an effective method to increase mule deer populations in Idaho because coyote removal increased radiocollared neonate fawn survival only under particular combinations of prey densities and weather conditions, and the increase did not result in population growth. Coyote-removal programs targeted in areas where mortality of mule deer fawns is known to be additive and coyote-removal conditions are successful may influence mule deer population vital rates but likely will not change direction of population trend. Although mountain lion removal increased mule-deer survival and fawn ratios, we were unable to demonstrate significant changes in population trend with mountain lion removal. In conclusion, benefits of predator removal appear to be marginal and short term in southeastern Idaho and likely will not appreciably change long-term dynamics of mule deer populations in the intermountain west.


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2013

Relative influence of human harvest, carnivores, and weather on adult female elk survival across western North America

Jedediah F. Brodie; Heather E. Johnson; Michael S. Mitchell; Peter Zager; Kelly M. Proffitt; Mark Hebblewhite; Matthew J. Kauffman; Bruce K. Johnson; John A. Bissonette; Chad J. Bishop; Justin A. Gude; Jeff Herbert; Kent R. Hersey; Mark A. Hurley; Paul M. Lukacs; Scott McCorquodale; Eliot J. B. McIntire; Josh Nowak; Hall Sawyer; Douglas W. Smith; P. J. White

Summary 1. Well-informed management of harvested species requires understanding how changing ecological conditions affect demography and population dynamics, information that is lacking for many species. We have limited understanding of the relative influence of carnivores, harvest, weather and forage availability on elk Cervus elaphus demography, despite the ecological and economic importance of this species. We assessed adult female survival, a key vital rate for population dynamics, from 2746 radio-collared elk in 45 populations across western North America that experience wide variation in carnivore assemblage, harvest, weather and habitat conditions. 2. Proportional hazard analysis revealed that ‘baseline’ (i.e. not related to human factors) mortality was higher with very high winter precipitation, particularly in populations sympatric with wolves Canis lupus. Mortality may increase via nutritional stress and heightened vulnerability to predation in snowy winters. Baseline mortality was unrelated to puma Puma concolor presence, forest cover or summer forage productivity. 3. Cause-specific mortality analyses showed that wolves and all carnivore species combined had additive effects on baseline elk mortality, but only reduced survival by <2%. When human factors were included, ‘total’ adult mortality was solely related to harvest; the influence of native carnivores was compensatory. Annual total mortality rates were lowest in populations sympatric with both pumas and wolves because managers reduced female harvest in areas with abundant or diverse carnivores.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B | 2014

Functional analysis of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index curves reveals overwinter mule deer survival is driven by both spring and autumn phenology

Mark A. Hurley; Mark Hebblewhite; Stéphane Dray; Kyle A. Taylor; W. K. Smith; Pete Zager; Christophe Bonenfant

Large herbivore populations respond strongly to remotely sensed measures of primary productivity. Whereas most studies in seasonal environments have focused on the effects of spring plant phenology on juvenile survival, recent studies demonstrated that autumn nutrition also plays a crucial role. We tested for both direct and indirect (through body mass) effects of spring and autumn phenology on winter survival of 2315 mule deer fawns across a wide range of environmental conditions in Idaho, USA. We first performed a functional analysis that identified spring and autumn as the key periods for structuring the among-population and among-year variation of primary production (approximated from 1 km Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)) along the growing season. A path analysis showed that early winter precipitation and direct and indirect effects of spring and autumn NDVI functional components accounted for 45% of observed variation in overwinter survival. The effect size of autumn phenology on body mass was about twice that of spring phenology, while direct effects of phenology on survival were similar between spring and autumn. We demonstrate that the effects of plant phenology vary across ecosystems, and that in semi-arid systems, autumn may be more important than spring for overwinter survival.


Journal of Mammalogy | 2015

Cascading effects of habitat on maternal condition and life-history characteristics of neonatal mule deer

Jessie R. T. Shallow; Mark A. Hurley; Kevin L. Monteith; R. Terry Bowyer

The condition of maternal female mammals greatly influences life-history characteristics of their young, but interactions between habitat and maternal condition and their combined influences on birth characteristics and survival of neonates are less well understood, especially in free-ranging populations. We monitored survival of neonatal mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) inhabiting 2 contrasting ecotypes in Idaho: aspen woodlands (Populus tremuloides) in southeast Idaho (Caribou Mountains) and mixed-conifer grasslands (lodge-pole pine, Pinus contorta; Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii) in central Idaho (Salmon River Mountains). We expected the Caribou Mountains to offer better forage and greater concealment cover than the Salmon River Mountains. We tested for an array of maternal influences on neonatal deer inhabiting those dissimilar ecosystems. We monitored 96 neonates from date of capture to 5 months of age (n = 44 in the Caribou Mountains, 2010; n = 52 in the Salmon River Mountains, 2011). Survival and birth characteristics consistently diverged between study areas, whereas timing of births was similar. Female deer from the Salmon River Mountains exhibited poor maternal condition and small litter sizes compared with females from the Caribou Mountains. Young from the Salmon River Mountains exhibited lower rates of growth, occupied bedding sites with less concealment cover, and subsequently experienced lower survival from birth to 5 months of age, compared with neonates from the Caribou Mountains. Cause of deaths for young mule deer on both study sites was mostly from predation. Our findings emphasize the potential role that habitat plays in the population dynamics of mule deer via cascading effects on physical condition, reproduction, and survival. Changes in habitat, potentially associated with changing climate, fire regimes, and land uses, probably have contributed to the widespread declines in populations of mule deer during recent decades.


Science | 2018

Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals

Brett R. Jesmer; Jerod A. Merkle; Jacob R. Goheen; Ellen O. Aikens; Jeffrey L. Beck; Alyson B. Courtemanch; Mark A. Hurley; Douglas E. McWhirter; Hollie M. Miyasaki; Kevin L. Monteith; Matthew J. Kauffman

Learning where and when Large ungulate migrations occur across continents and inspire curiosity about how these animals know when to leave and where to go. Jesmer et al. took advantage of regional extinctions and reintroductions of several North American ungulate species to determine the role of learning in migrations (see the Perspective by Festa-Bianchet). Reintroduced populations of bighorn sheep and moose did not migrate as historical herds had. However, after several decades, newly established herds were better able to track the emergence of vegetation in the environment and were increasingly migratory. Thus, newly introduced animals learned about their environment and shared the information through social exchange. Science, this issue p. 1023; see also p. 972 Bighorn sheep and moose learn their migration routes through culture and experience. Ungulate migrations are assumed to stem from learning and cultural transmission of information regarding seasonal distribution of forage, but this hypothesis has not been tested empirically. We compared the migratory propensities of bighorn sheep and moose translocated into novel habitats with those of historical populations that had persisted for hundreds of years. Whereas individuals from historical populations were largely migratory, translocated individuals initially were not. After multiple decades, however, translocated populations gained knowledge about surfing green waves of forage (tracking plant phenology) and increased their propensity to migrate. Our findings indicate that learning and cultural transmission are the primary mechanisms by which ungulate migrations evolve. Loss of migration will therefore expunge generations of knowledge about the locations of high-quality forage and likely suppress population abundance.


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2018

Factors influencing elk recruitment across ecotypes in the Western United States: Factors Influencing Elk Recruitment

Paul M. Lukacs; Michael S. Mitchell; Mark Hebblewhite; Bruce K. Johnson; Heather E. Johnson; Matthew J. Kauffman; Kelly M. Proffitt; Peter Zager; Jedediah F. Brodie; Kent R. Hersey; A. Andrew Holland; Mark A. Hurley; Scott McCorquodale; Arthur D. Middleton; Matthew Nordhagen; J. Joshua Nowak; Daniel P. Walsh; P. J. White


Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2018

Customized software to streamline routine analyses for wildlife management: Apps for Wildlife Management

J. Joshua Nowak; Paul M. Lukacs; Mark A. Hurley; Andrew J. Lindbloom; Kevin Robling; Justin A. Gude; Hugh S. Robinson


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2018

Integrated population model to improve knowledge and management of Idaho wolves: Wolf Integrated Population Model

Jon S. Horne; David E. Ausband; Mark A. Hurley; Jennifer Struthers; Jodi E. Berg; Kayte Groth


Archive | 2016

Can a low carrying capacity and a highly stochastic environment induce a predator pit in elk populations

Jon S. Horne; Scott Bergen; Mark A. Hurley

Collaboration


Dive into the Mark A. Hurley's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Zager

Idaho Department of Fish and Game

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce K. Johnson

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Justin A. Gude

Montana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Craig White

Idaho Department of Fish and Game

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hollie M. Miyasaki

Idaho Department of Fish and Game

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge