J. N. Drum

Progesterone-based fixed-time artificial insemination protocols for dairy cows: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone versus estradiol benzoate at initiation and estradiol cypionate versus estradiol benzoate at the end

Our objectives were to evaluate ovarian dynamics and fertility comparing 2 treatments at the start of a progesterone (P4)-based fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol and 2 treatments at the end of the protocol. Thus, 1,035 lactating Holstein cows were assigned in a random phase of the estrous cycle to 1 of 4 treatments using a completely randomized design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement. At the beginning of the protocol (d -10), cows received GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) and, at the end, EB (d -1) or estradiol cypionate (ECP; d -2), resulting in 4 treatments: GnRH-EB, GnRH-ECP, EB-EB, and EB-ECP. All cows received an intravaginal P4 device on d -10, which was removed on d -2. Cows also received PGF2α on d -3 and -2. The FTAI was performed on d 0. Ovaries were evaluated by ultrasound for corpus luteum (CL) presence and regression (d -10 and -3) and follicle measurements (d -10 and 0), as well as the uterus for percentage pregnant per AI (P/AI; d 32 and 60). Blood samples were collected (d -10 and -3) for P4 measurements. Treatment with GnRH rather than EB tended to increase P/AI on d 32 (38.2 vs. 33.7%) and on d 60 (32.9 vs. 28.9%). More cows treated with GnRH had CL on d -3 compared with EB-treated cows (77.3 vs. 58.3%), due to less CL regression between d -10 and -3 (24.7 vs. 43.8%) and more cows with a new CL on d -3 (35.9 vs. 25.0%). Cows treated with GnRH also had greater P4 concentrations on d -3 than EB cows (3.4 vs. 2.0 ng/mL). Increased circulating P4 at the start of the protocol (d -10) decreased the probability of ovulation to EB or GnRH at that time. Cows from GnRH group also ovulated a larger-diameter follicle at the end of the protocol (15.5 vs. 14.7mm). No difference between EB and ECP in P/AI on d 32 (34.8 vs. 37.0) and 60 (30.8 vs. 31.0%) or in pregnancy loss (11.1 vs. 15.4%) was detected and we found no interaction between treatments for P/AI. Independent of treatment, cows with CL on d -10 and -3 had the greatest P/AI on d 60 (36.9%). In conclusion, treatments at the end of the protocol were similar for ECP or EB and we found no additive effect or interactions on P/AI between treatments. However, cows treated with GnRH rather than EB on d -10 had less luteolysis and tended to have greater P/AI, probably because P4 concentrations were greater during the protocol. Finally, regardless of treatments, cows with CL at the beginning of the protocol as well as at the time of PGF2α had greater fertility.

Circulating progesterone concentrations in nonlactating Holstein cows during reuse of intravaginal progesterone implants sanitized by autoclave or chemical disinfection

The aim of this study was to compare plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations in nonlactating, multiparous Holstein cows (n = 24) treated with 2 types of intravaginal implants containing either 1.0 or 1.9 g of P4 either at the first use or during reuse of the implants after sanitizing the implant by autoclave or chemical disinfection. In a completely randomized design with a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement and 2 replicates, every cow underwent 2 of 6 treatments. Two sources of P4 [controlled internal drug release (1.9 g of P4) from Zoetis (São Paulo, Brazil), and Sincrogest (1.0 g of P4) from Ourofino (Cravinhos, Brazil)] and 3 types of processing, new (N), reused after autoclave (RA), and reused after chemical disinfection (RC), were used. After inducing luteolysis to avoid endogenous circulating P4, the cows were randomized in 1 of 6 treatments (1.9 g of N, 1.9 g of RA, 1.9 g of RC, 1.0 g of N, 1.0 g of RA, and 1.0 g RC). Cows were treated with the implants for 8 d and during this period blood samples were collected at 0, 2, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 192 h. Statistical analyses were performed using Proc-Mixed and the mean ± standard error of the mean P4 concentrations were calculated using the Proc-Means procedures of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). No interaction between treatments was observed. Comparing types of implant, average P4 concentrations during treatments were greater for 1.9 g than 1.0 g (1.46 vs. 1.14 ± 0.04 ng/mL). When types of processing were compared, average P4 concentrations did not differ between autoclaved and new inserts (1.46 vs. 1.37 ± 0.05 ng/mL; respectively), but both were greater than chemically disinfected implants (1.09 ± 0.04 ng/mL). Within 1.9-g P4 inserts, P4 concentrations from autoclaved implants were greater than new, which were greater than chemically disinfected (1.67 ± 0.06 vs. 1.49 ± 0.07 vs. 1.21 ± 0.05 ng/mL; respectively). For 1.0-g P4 implants, P4 concentrations from autoclaved did not differ from new, but both were greater than chemically disinfected (1.20 ± 0.08 vs. 1.24 ± 0.06 vs. 0.97 ± 0.05 ng/mL; respectively). In conclusion, the mean plasma P4 concentration in nonlactating Holstein cows was greater for 1.9 than 1.0 g of P4 and regardless of the type of implant, the autoclaving process provided greater circulating P4 in relation to chemical disinfection, and similar or greater P4 concentrations compared with a new implant.

Effect of different chorionic gonadotropins on final growth of the dominant follicle in Bos indicus cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of eCG or hCG on the final growth of the dominant follicle in Nelore (Bos indicus) cows submitted to fixed-time AI (FTAI). Eighty-four lactating cows with body condition score (BCS) of 2.9 (range 1-5) were used. At a random day of the estrous cycle (D0) cows received 2 mg estradiol benzoate and a reused intravaginal progesterone device (1.9 g). At D8, when the device was removed, 0.5 mg cloprostenol and 1 mg estradiol cypionate was given i.m., and cows were randomly assigned to receive on D8 one of the following treatments: Control (no treatment; n = 17), eCG (300 IU i.m.; n = 17), hCG 300 (300 IU i.m.; n = 18), hCG 200 IM (200 IU i.m.; n = 16) and hCG 200 SC (200 IU s.c.; n = 16). On the same day and 2 days later, cows were subjected to ovarian ultrasonography to evaluate the diameter of the largest follicle and to calculate follicular growth rate (D8 to D10). No differences were observed for the diameter of the largest follicle on D8 (P = 0.3) or D10 (P = 0.4) among treatments. However, the growth rate of the dominant follicle between D8 and D10 was greater for the groups eCG and hCG 300 and there were no differences between the other treatments (Control = 1.1 mm/day; eCG = 1.8 mm/day; hCG 300 = 1.8 mm/day; hCG 200 IM = 1.3 mm/day; hCG 200 SC = 1.3 mm/day; P = 0.02). In addition, more cows from the Group hCG 300 presented premature ovulation (44.4%) than cows from Control (5.8%), eCG (0%), or hCG 200 IM (12.5%), but did not differ from Group hCG 200 SC (18.7%). Regardless of treatment, the size of the largest follicle on D8 was different between cows that presented premature ovulation vs. cows that did not ovulate prematurely (11.3 mm vs. 9.9 mm, respectively; P = 0.01). Treatment with different hCG doses on D8 of a FTAI protocol failed to produce similar effects compared to eCG in terms of final follicular growth support and greater ovulatory follicle size. In addition, the groups hCG 300 and hCG 200 SC induced premature ovulation in a greater portion of cows. Thus, a single administration of hCG on D8 does not appear to be a reliable alternative to eCG treatment in FTAI protocols.

Follicular dynamics, circulating progesterone, and fertility in Holstein cows synchronized with reused intravaginal progesterone implants that were sanitized by autoclave or chemical disinfection

This experiment aimed to compare circulating progesterone (P4), follicular dynamics, and fertility during reuse of intravaginal P4 implants that were sanitized by autoclave or chemical disinfection in lactating Holstein cows submitted to fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI). For this, 123 primiparous and 226 multiparous cows from 2 farms, averaging (mean ± standard deviation) 163.9 ± 141.9 d in milk, 35.7 ± 11.3 kg of milk/d, and a body condition score of 2.9 ± 0.5, were enrolled in the study. Cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments using a completely randomized design and each cow received a reused implant (1.9 g of P4; previously used for 8 d) that was either autoclaved (AUT; n = 177) or chemically disinfected (CHEM; n = 172) on d -10. Also on d -10, cows received 2 mg of estradiol benzoate and 100 μg of GnRH. On d -3, cows received 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF2α). A second PGF2α was given on d -2, along with 1 mg of estradiol cypionate and P4 implant removal. Cows received FTAI on d 0. A subset of cows (n = 143) was evaluated by ultrasound on d -10, -8, -6, -3, -2, 0, and 5 to identify ovarian structures, and blood was sampled on d -10, -3, and -2 for P4 concentrations by RIA. Pregnancy diagnoses were performed at d 32 and 60. Statistical analyses was performed using PROC-MIXED for continuous variables and PROC-GLIMMIX of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for binomial variables. The treatments did not differ in circulating P4 on d -10 or -3, but P4 was greater on d -2 in CHEM cows. Ovulation to the treatments on d -10 was associated with lower circulating P4 on d -10 (2.0 vs. 3.1 ng/mL) and resulted in greater P4 on d -3 (4.0 vs. 2.4 ng/mL) and more cows with a corpus luteum on d -3 (100 vs. 40%) than nonovulating cows. Cows that ovulated to d -10 treatments were more likely to have a synchronized new follicular wave (97.9 vs. 63.2%) and had an earlier wave emergence (1.9 vs. 2.6 d), resulting in less cows ovulating a persistent follicle (0.0 vs. 35.7%). Type of P4 implant, corpus luteum presence on d -10, and ovulation to d -10 treatments did not affect fertility (pregnancy per AI; P/AI). However, P/AI on farm A was greater than on farm B at 32 (40.8 vs. 27.8%) and 60 d (35.8 vs. 24.3%), independent of treatment. In conclusion, P4 implants with different P4 release patterns did not produce detectable differences in follicular dynamics, synchronization rate, or P/AI. Nevertheless, presence of corpus luteum or ovulation at the beginning of the FTAI protocol affected reproductive variables, such as timing and synchronization of follicular wave emergence, and size of the ovulatory follicle. Beyond that, more overall synchronized cows became pregnant to the FTAI protocol.