J. Paige Adams

Rap1 Couples cAMP Signaling to a Distinct Pool of p42/44MAPK Regulating Excitability, Synaptic Plasticity, Learning, and Memory

Learning-induced synaptic plasticity commonly involves the interaction between cAMP and p42/44MAPK. To investigate the role of Rap1 as a potential signaling molecule coupling cAMP and p42/44MAPK, we expressed an interfering Rap1 mutant (iRap1) in the mouse forebrain. This expression selectively decreased basal phosphorylation of a membrane-associated pool of p42/44MAPK, impaired cAMP-dependent LTP in the hippocampal Schaffer collateral pathway induced by either forskolin or theta frequency stimulation, decreased complex spike firing, and reduced the p42/44MAPK-mediated phosphorylation of the A-type potassium channel Kv4.2. These changes correlated with impaired spatial memory and context discrimination. These results indicate that Rap1 couples cAMP signaling to a selective membrane-associated pool of p42/44MAPK to control excitability of pyramidal cells, the early and late phases of LTP, and the storage of spatial memory.

The A‐Type Potassium Channel Kv4.2 Is a Substrate for the Mitogen‐Activated Protein Kinase ERK

Abstract: The mitogen‐activated protein kinase ERK has recentlybecome a focus of studies of synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Dueto the prominent role of potassium channels in regulating the electricalproperties of membranes, modulation of these channels by ERK could play animportant role in mediating learning‐related synaptic plasticity in the CNS.Kv4.2 is a Shal‐type potassium channel that passes an A‐type current and islocalized to dendrites and cell bodies in the hippocampus. The sequence ofKv4.2 contains several consensus sites for ERK phosphorylation. In the presentstudies, we tested the hypothesis that Kv4.2 is an ERK substrate. Wedetermined that the Kv4.2 C‐terminal cytoplasmic domain is an effective ERK2substrate, and that it is phosphorylated at three sites: Thr602,Thr607, and Ser616. We used this information to developantibodies that recognize Kv4.2 phosphorylated by ERK2. One of ourphospho‐site‐selective antibodies was generated using a triply phosphorylatedpeptide as the antigen. We determined that this antibody recognizesERK‐phosphorylated Kv4.2 in COS‐7 cells transfected with Kv4.2 and nativeERK‐phosphorylated Kv4.2 in the rat hippocampus. These observations indicatethat Kv4.2 is a substrate for ERK in vitro and in vivo, and suggest that ERKmay regulate potassium‐channel function by direct phosphorylation of thepore‐forming α subunit.

Leitmotifs in the biochemistry of LTP induction: amplification, integration and coordination

Hippocampal long‐term potentiation (LTP) is a robust and long‐lasting form of synaptic plasticity that is the leading candidate for a cellular mechanism contributing to mammalian learning and memory. Investigations over the past decade have revealed that the biochemistry of LTP induction involves mechanisms of great subtlety and complexity. This review highlights themes that have emerged as a result of our increased knowledge of the signal transduction pathways involved in the induction of NMDA receptor‐dependent LTP in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Among these themes are signal amplification, signal integration and signal coordination. Here we use these themes as an organizing context for reviewing the profusion of signaling mechanisms involved in the induction of LTP.

Late-phase long-term potentiation: getting to the nucleus

New mRNA must be transcribed in order to consolidate changes in synaptic strength. But how are events at the synapse communicated to the nucleus? Some research has shown that proteins can move from activated synapses to the nucleus. However, other work has shown that action potentials can directly inform the nucleus about cellular activation. Here we contend that action potential-induced signalling to the nucleus best meets the requirements of the consolidation of synapse-specific plasticity, which include both timing and stoichiometric constraints.

Pattern-Dependent Role of NMDA Receptors in Action Potential Generation: Consequences on Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Activation

Synaptic long-term potentiation is maintained through gene transcription, but how the nucleus is recruited remains controversial. Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) 1 and 2 with synaptic stimulation has been shown to require NMDA receptors (NMDARs), yet stimulation intensities sufficient to recruit action potentials (APs) also appear to be required. This has led us to ask the question of whether NMDARs are necessary for AP generation as they relate to ERK activation. To test this, we examined the effects of NMDAR blockade on APs induced with synaptic stimulation using whole-cell current-clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells in hippocampal slices. NMDAR antagonists were found to potently inhibit APs generated with 5 and 100 Hz synaptic stimulation. Blockade of APs and ERK activation could be overcome with the addition of the GABAA antagonist bicuculline, indicating that APs are sufficient to activate signals such as ERK in the nucleus and throughout the neuron in the continued presence of NMDAR antagonists. Interestingly, no effects of the NMDAR antagonists were observed when theta-burst stimulation (TBS) was used. This resistance to the antagonists is conferred by temporal summation during the bursts. These results clarify findings from a previous study showing that ERK activation induced with TBS is resistant to 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate, in contrast to that induced with 5 or 100 Hz stimulation, which is sensitive. By showing that NMDAR blockade inhibits AP generation, we demonstrate that a major role that NMDARs play in cell-wide and nuclear ERK activation is through their contribution to action potential generation.

Role of Action Potentials in Regulating Gene Transcription: Relevance to LTP

The late phase of Long Term Potentiation (LTP) appears to require transcription, but how the nucleus is informed remains unknown. We propose that calcium elevation from multiple action potentials serves as the signal rather than an NMDA receptor-dependent signal transported from synapses. We find that NMDA receptor antagonists interfere with action potential generation and thus do not resolve the issue. Pharmacologic restoration of action potentials in the presence of NMDA receptor antagonists shows that ERK activation, transcription factor binding, and arc gene expression, previously all shown or thought to be NMDA receptor dependent, are maintained. These data demonstrate that types of signaling in the nucleus, previously attributed to NMDA-receptor dependent synapse-to-nucleus signals, can be initiated by action potentials. Action potential-mediated calcium increases can provide a fast and effective signal in the nucleus that may be an important factor in LTP consolidation.