Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. Peischl is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. Peischl.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012

Chemical data quantify Deepwater Horizon hydrocarbon flow rate and environmental distribution

Thomas B. Ryerson; John D. Kessler; Elizabeth B. Kujawinski; Christopher M. Reddy; David L. Valentine; Elliot Atlas; D. R. Blake; Joost A. de Gouw; Simone Meinardi; D. D. Parrish; J. Peischl; Jeffrey S. Seewald; Carsten Warneke

Detailed airborne, surface, and subsurface chemical measurements, primarily obtained in May and June 2010, are used to quantify initial hydrocarbon compositions along different transport pathways (i.e., in deep subsurface plumes, in the initial surface slick, and in the atmosphere) during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Atmospheric measurements are consistent with a limited area of surfacing oil, with implications for leaked hydrocarbon mass transport and oil drop size distributions. The chemical data further suggest relatively little variation in leaking hydrocarbon composition over time. Although readily soluble hydrocarbons made up ∼25% of the leaking mixture by mass, subsurface chemical data show these compounds made up ∼69% of the deep plume mass; only ∼31% of the deep plume mass was initially transported in the form of trapped oil droplets. Mass flows along individual transport pathways are also derived from atmospheric and subsurface chemical data. Subsurface hydrocarbon composition, dissolved oxygen, and dispersant data are used to assess release of hydrocarbons from the leaking well. We use the chemical measurements to estimate that (7.8 ± 1.9) × 106 kg of hydrocarbons leaked on June 10, 2010, directly accounting for roughly three-quarters of the total leaked mass on that day. The average environmental release rate of (10.1 ± 2.0) × 106 kg/d derived using atmospheric and subsurface chemical data agrees within uncertainties with the official average leak rate of (10.2 ± 1.0) × 106 kg/d derived using physical and optical methods.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2015

The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign

M. C. Barth; C. A. Cantrell; William H. Brune; Steven A. Rutledge; J. H. Crawford; Heidi Huntrieser; Lawrence D. Carey; Donald R. MacGorman; Morris L. Weisman; Kenneth E. Pickering; Eric C. Bruning; Bruce E. Anderson; Eric C. Apel; Michael I. Biggerstaff; Teresa L. Campos; Pedro Campuzano-Jost; R. C. Cohen; John D. Crounse; Douglas A. Day; Glenn S. Diskin; F. Flocke; Alan Fried; C. Garland; Brian G. Heikes; Shawn B. Honomichl; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; L. Gregory Huey; Jose L. Jimenez; Timothy J. Lang; Michael Lichtenstern

AbstractThe Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field experiment produced an exceptional dataset on thunderstorms, including their dynamical, physical, and electrical structures and their impact on the chemical composition of the troposphere. The field experiment gathered detailed information on the chemical composition of the inflow and outflow regions of midlatitude thunderstorms in northeast Colorado, west Texas to central Oklahoma, and northern Alabama. A unique aspect of the DC3 strategy was to locate and sample the convective outflow a day after active convection in order to measure the chemical transformations within the upper-tropospheric convective plume. These data are being analyzed to investigate transport and dynamics of the storms, scavenging of soluble trace gases and aerosols, production of nitrogen oxides by lightning, relationships between lightning flash rates and storm parameters, chemistry in the upper troposphere that is affected by the convection, and related source character...


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016

Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States

Katherine R. Travis; Daniel J. Jacob; Jenny A. Fisher; Patrick S. Kim; Eloise A. Marais; Lei Zhu; Karen Yu; Christopher Miller; Robert M. Yantosca; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Anne M. Thompson; Paul O. Wennberg; John D. Crounse; Jason M. St. Clair; R. C. Cohen; Joshua L. Laughner; Jack E. Dibb; Samuel R. Hall; Kirk Ullmann; G. M. Wolfe; I. B. Pollack; J. Peischl; J. A. Neuman; X. Zhou

Ozone pollution in the Southeast US involves complex chemistry driven by emissions of anthropogenic nitrogen oxide radicals (NOx ≡ NO + NO2) and biogenic isoprene. Model estimates of surface ozone concentrations tend to be biased high in the region and this is of concern for designing effective emission control strategies to meet air quality standards. We use detailed chemical observations from the SEAC4RS aircraft campaign in August and September 2013, interpreted with the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model at 0.25°×0.3125° horizontal resolution, to better understand the factors controlling surface ozone in the Southeast US. We find that the National Emission Inventory (NEI) for NOx from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is too high. This finding is based on SEAC4RS observations of NOx and its oxidation products, surface network observations of nitrate wet deposition fluxes, and OMI satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns. Our results indicate that NEI NOx emissions from mobile and industrial sources must be reduced by 30-60%, dependent on the assumption of the contribution by soil NOx emissions. Upper tropospheric NO2 from lightning makes a large contribution to satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 that must be accounted for when using these data to estimate surface NOx emissions. We find that only half of isoprene oxidation proceeds by the high-NOx pathway to produce ozone; this fraction is only moderately sensitive to changes in NOx emissions because isoprene and NOx emissions are spatially segregated. GEOS-Chem with reduced NOx emissions provides an unbiased simulation of ozone observations from the aircraft, and reproduces the observed ozone production efficiency in the boundary layer as derived from a regression of ozone and NOx oxidation products. However, the model is still biased high by 8±13 ppb relative to observed surface ozone in the Southeast US. Ozonesondes launched during midday hours show a 7 ppb ozone decrease from 1.5 km to the surface that GEOS-Chem does not capture. This bias may reflect a combination of excessive vertical mixing and net ozone production in the model boundary layer.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions

J. Peischl; T. B. Ryerson; K. C. Aikin; J. A. de Gouw; J. B. Gilman; John S. Holloway; R. Nadkarni; J. A. Neuman; J. B. Nowak; M. Trainer; Carsten Warneke; D. D. Parrish

We present measurements of methane (CH4) taken aboard a NOAA WP-3D research aircraft in 2013 over the Haynesville shale region in eastern Texas/northwestern Louisiana, the Fayetteville shale region in Arkansas, and the northeastern Pennsylvania portion of the Marcellus shale region, which accounted for the majority of Marcellus shale gas production that year. We calculate emission rates from the horizontal CH4 flux in the planetary boundary layer downwind of each region after subtracting the CH4 flux entering the region upwind. We find 1 day CH4 emissions of (8.0 ± 2.7) × 107 g/h from the Haynesville region, (3.9 ± 1.8) × 107 g/h from the Fayetteville region, and (1.5 ± 0.6) × 107 g/h from the Marcellus region in northeastern Pennsylvania. Finally, we compare the CH4 emissions to the total volume of natural gas extracted from each region to derive a loss rate from production operations of 1.0–2.1% from the Haynesville region, 1.0–2.8% from the Fayetteville region, and 0.18–0.41% from the Marcellus region in northeastern Pennsylvania. The climate impact of CH4 loss from shale gas production depends upon the total leakage from all production regions. The regions investigated in this work represented over half of the U.S. shale gas production in 2013, and we find generally lower loss rates than those reported in earlier studies of regions that made smaller contributions to total production. Hence, the national average CH4 loss rate from shale gas production may be lower than values extrapolated from the earlier studies.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2010

Biogenic emission measurement and inventories determination of biogenic emissions in the eastern United States and Texas and comparison with biogenic emission inventories

Carsten Warneke; J. A. de Gouw; L. A. Del Negro; J. Brioude; S. A. McKeen; Harald Stark; William C. Kuster; Paul D. Goldan; M. Trainer; F. C. Fehsenfeld; Christine Wiedinmyer; Alex Guenther; Armin Hansel; Armin Wisthaler; E. Atlas; John S. Holloway; T. B. Ryerson; J. Peischl; L. G. Huey; A. T. Case Hanks

During the NOAA Southern Oxidant Study 1999 (SOS1999), Texas Air Quality Study 2000 (TexAQS2000), International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation (ICARTT2004), and Texas Air Quality Study 2006 (TexAQS2006) campaigns, airborne measurements of isoprene and monoterpenes were made in the eastern United States and in Texas, and the results are used to evaluate the biogenic emission inventories BEIS3.12, BEIS3.13, MEGAN2, and WM2001. Two methods are used for the evaluation. First, the emissions are directly estimated from the ambient isoprene and monoterpene measurements assuming a well-mixed boundary layer and are compared with the emissions from the inventories extracted along the flight tracks. Second, BEIS3.12 is incorporated into the detailed transport model FLEXPART, which allows the isoprene and monoterpene mixing ratios to be calculated and compared to the measurements. The overall agreement for all inventories is within a factor of 2 and the two methods give consistent results. MEGAN2 is in most cases higher, and BEIS3.12 and BEIS3.13 lower than the emissions determined from the measurements. Regions with clear discrepancies are identified. For example, an isoprene hot spot to the northwest of Houston, Texas, was expected from BEIS3 but not observed in the measurements. Interannual differences in emissions of about a factor of 2 were observed in Texas between 2000 and 2006. Copyright 2010 by the American Geophysical Union.


Science | 2016

Methane emissions from the 2015 Aliso Canyon blowout in Los Angeles, CA

S. Conley; G. Franco; I. Faloona; D. R. Blake; J. Peischl; T. B. Ryerson

The magnitude of a major methane leak The Aliso Canyon underground gas storage facility outside Los Angeles, CA, houses enormous natural gas reserves. One well at the site experienced a blowout in late October 2015 and began leaking gas until it was sealed in February 2016. Over the course of 13 flights in the region, Conley et al. sampled the air column and determined daily release rates of methane (a powerful greenhouse gas) and ethane throughout the leak. The methane release rates were nearly double that of the entire Los Angeles region combined. Thus, single vulnerabilities can have major implications for state and federal climate policy. Science, this issue p. 1317 Methane release rates from a single leak were nearly double that of the entire rest of the Los Angeles region. Single-point failures of natural gas infrastructure can hamper methane emission control strategies designed to mitigate climate change. The 23 October 2015 blowout of a well connected to the Aliso Canyon underground storage facility in California resulted in a massive release of natural gas. Analysis of methane and ethane data from dozens of plume transects, collected during 13 research-aircraft flights between 7 November 2015 and 13 February 2016, shows atmospheric leak rates of up to 60 metric tons of methane and 4.5 metric tons of ethane per hour. At its peak, this blowout effectively doubled the methane emission rate of the entire Los Angeles basin and, in total, released 97,100 metric tons of methane to the atmosphere.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2011

Impact of Fuel Quality Regulation and Speed Reductions on Shipping Emissions: Implications for Climate and Air Quality

D. A. Lack; Christopher D. Cappa; Justin M. Langridge; Roya Bahreini; Gina Buffaloe; C. A. Brock; K. Cerully; D. J. Coffman; Katherine Hayden; John S. Holloway; Paola Massoli; Shao-Meng Li; Robert McLaren; Ann M. Middlebrook; R. H. Moore; Athanasios Nenes; I. Nuaaman; Timothy B. Onasch; J. Peischl; A. E. Perring; Patricia K. Quinn; T. B. Ryerson; Joshua P. Schwartz; Ryan Spackman; Steven C. Wofsy; D. R. Worsnop; B. Xiang; Eric Williams

Atmospheric emissions of gas and particulate matter from a large ocean-going container vessel were sampled as it slowed and switched from high-sulfur to low-sulfur fuel as it transited into regulated coastal waters of California. Reduction in emission factors (EFs) of sulfur dioxide (SO₂), particulate matter, particulate sulfate and cloud condensation nuclei were substantial (≥ 90%). EFs for particulate organic matter decreased by 70%. Black carbon (BC) EFs were reduced by 41%. When the measured emission reductions, brought about by compliance with the California fuel quality regulation and participation in the vessel speed reduction (VSR) program, are placed in a broader context, warming from reductions in the indirect effect of SO₄ would dominate any radiative changes due to the emissions changes. Within regulated waters absolute emission reductions exceed 88% for almost all measured gas and particle phase species. The analysis presented provides direct estimations of the emissions reductions that can be realized by California fuel quality regulation and VSR program, in addition to providing new information relevant to potential health and climate impact of reduced fuel sulfur content, fuel quality and vessel speed reductions.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012

Air quality implications of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

Ann M. Middlebrook; D. M. Murphy; Ravan Ahmadov; Elliot Atlas; Roya Bahreini; D. R. Blake; J. Brioude; Joost A. de Gouw; Fred C. Fehsenfeld; G. J. Frost; John S. Holloway; D. A. Lack; Justin M. Langridge; Rich Lueb; S. A. McKeen; J. F. Meagher; Simone Meinardi; J. Andrew Neuman; J. B. Nowak; D. D. Parrish; J. Peischl; A. E. Perring; Ilana B. Pollack; James M. Roberts; Thomas B. Ryerson; Joshua P. Schwarz; J. Ryan Spackman; Carsten Warneke; A. R. Ravishankara

During the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill, a wide range of gas and aerosol species were measured from an aircraft around, downwind, and away from the DWH site. Additional hydrocarbon measurements were made from ships in the vicinity. Aerosol particles of respirable sizes were on occasions a significant air quality issue for populated areas along the Gulf Coast. Yields of organic aerosol particles and emission factors for other atmospheric pollutants were derived for the sources from the spill, recovery, and cleanup efforts. Evaporation and subsequent secondary chemistry produced organic particulate matter with a mass yield of 8 ± 4% of the oil mixture reaching the water surface. Approximately 4% by mass of oil burned on the surface was emitted as soot particles. These yields can be used to estimate the effects on air quality for similar events as well as for this spill at other times without these data. Whereas emission of soot from burning surface oil was large during the episodic burns, the mass flux of secondary organic aerosol to the atmosphere was substantially larger overall. We use a regional air quality model to show that some observed enhancements in organic aerosol concentration along the Gulf Coast were likely due to the DWH spill. In the presence of evaporating hydrocarbons from the oil, NOx emissions from the recovery and cleanup operations produced ozone.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Thunderstorms enhance tropospheric ozone by wrapping and shedding stratospheric air

Laura L. Pan; Cameron R. Homeyer; Shawn B. Honomichl; B. A. Ridley; Morris L. Weisman; M. C. Barth; Johnathan W. Hair; Marta A. Fenn; Carolyn Butler; Glenn S. Diskin; J. H. Crawford; Thomas B. Ryerson; Ilana B. Pollack; J. Peischl; Heidi Huntrieser

A significant source of ozone in the troposphere is transport from the stratosphere. The stratospheric contribution has been estimated mainly using global models that attribute the transport process largely to the global scale Brewer-Dobson circulation and synoptic scale dynamics associated with upper tropospheric jet streams. We report observations from research aircraft that reveal additional transport of ozone-rich stratospheric air downward into the upper troposphere by a leading-line-trailing-stratiform (LLTS) mesoscale convective system (MCS) with convection overshooting the tropopause altitude. The fine-scale transport demonstrated by these observations poses a significant challenge to global models that currently do not resolve storm scale dynamics. Thus the upper tropospheric ozone budget simulated by global chemistry-climate models where large-scale dynamics and photochemical production from lightning-produced NO are the controlling factors may require modification.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Upper tropospheric ozone production from lightning NOx-impacted convection: Smoke ingestion case study from the DC3 campaign

Eric C. Apel; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; Alan J. Hills; Nicola J. Blake; M. C. Barth; Andrew J. Weinheimer; C. A. Cantrell; S. Rutledge; Brett Basarab; J. H. Crawford; Glenn S. Diskin; Cameron R. Homeyer; Teresa L. Campos; F. Flocke; Alan Fried; D. R. Blake; William H. Brune; Ilana B. Pollack; J. Peischl; T. B. Ryerson; Paul O. Wennberg; John D. Crounse; Armin Wisthaler; Tomas Mikoviny; Greg Huey; Brian G. Heikes; Daniel W. O'Sullivan; Daniel D. Riemer

As part of the Deep Convective Cloud and Chemistry (DC3) experiment, the National Science Foundation/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Gulfstream-V (GV) and NASA DC-8 research aircraft probed the chemical composition of the inflow and outflow of two convective storms (north storm, NS, south storm, SS) originating in the Colorado region on 22 June 2012, a time when the High Park wildfire was active in the area. A wide range of trace species were measured on board both aircraft including biomass burning (BB) tracers hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and acetonitrile (ACN). Acrolein, a much shorter lived tracer for BB, was also quantified on the GV. The data demonstrated that the NS had ingested fresh smoke from the High Park fire and as a consequence had a higher VOC OH reactivity than the SS. The SS lofted aged fire tracers along with other boundary layer ozone precursors and was more impacted by lightning NO_x (LNO_x) than the NS. The NCAR master mechanism box model was initialized with measurements made in the outflow of the two storms. The NS and SS were predicted to produce 11 and 14 ppbv of O_3, respectively, downwind of the storm over 2 days. Sensitivity tests revealed that the ozone production potential of the SS was highly dependent on LNO_x. Normalized excess mixing ratios, ΔX/ΔCO, for HCN and ACN were determined in both the fire plume and the storm outflow and found to be 7.0 ± 0.5 and 2.3 ± 0.5 pptv ppbv^(−1), respectively, and 1.4 ± 0.3 pptv ppbv^(−1) for acrolein in the outflow only.

Collaboration


Dive into the J. Peischl's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. R. Blake

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. B. Nowak

Langley Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. de Gouw

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. D. Parrish

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Neuman

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. C. Aikin

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. B. Ryerson

Earth System Research Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joost A. de Gouw

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge