J. R. Russell
Iowa State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by J. R. Russell.
Journal of Animal Science | 2017
C. P. Blank; J. R. Russell; Steven M. Lonergan; S. L. Hansen
Enhancing feed efficiency (FE) in cattle continues to be an important goal in the beef industry. Previous research suggests improving FE may alter calpain system activity, potentially having negative effects on meat tenderness. The objective of this study was to assess the potential influence of beef cattle FE on postmortem meat tenderness. During the growing phase, 181 crossbred steers were fed for 76 d at the University of Missouri on a whole shell corn-based diet (MU-Corn; = 90) or a roughage-based diet (MU-Rough; = 91). Within diet, steers were classified for FE based on residual feed intake (RFI) calculations. Within each growing phase diet, the 12 most feed efficient (HFE; average RFI -3.33 ± 0.77) and 12 least feed efficient (LFE; average RFI 2.90 ± 0.94) steers (48 steers total) were selected and shipped to Iowa State University for the finishing phase. Steers were fed in pens with GrowSafe bunks and equally assigned to a cracked corn-based finishing diet (ISU-Corn) or a byproduct-based finishing diet (ISU-Byp) for the 87-d finishing phase. After a 24-h chill, rib sections were collected from all carcasses and aged for 2 or 14 d prior to analysis of calpastatin activity and calpain 1 autolysis (d 2), troponin-T degradation (d 2 and 14), proximate composition (d 2), and Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF; d 14). Data were analyzed as a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial, with steer or steak as the experimental unit ( = 6 per treatment combination). There were no 3- or 2-way interactions ( ≥ 0.12) noted for any data, with the exception of steak lipid content, which tended ( = 0.08) to be affected by FE × Iowa State University diet. Steaks from LFE steers had greater lipid content compared with steaks from HFE steers within ISU-Byp, with no differences due to FE within ISU-Corn. Growing diet did not affect calpastatin activity, calpain 1 autolysis, or troponin T degradation ( ≥ 0.12); however, MU-Rough had greater WBSF than MU-Corn ( = 0.05). Day-2 calpastatin activity tended ( = 0.10) to be greater in steaks from HFE vs. LFE steers, although no differences due to FE classification were observed for calpain 1 protein, troponin-T degradation, or WBSF ( ≥ 0.13). Finishing diet did not affect calpastatin activity, calpain 1 autolysis, d-2 troponin-T degradation, or WBSF ( ≥ 0.24); however, d-14 troponin-T degradation was greater in ISU-Corn than in ISU-Byp ( = 0.005). In this study, using phenotypic extremes for FE revealed a tendency for greater calpastatin activity only in highly feed-efficient steers; however, these data indicate that high-fiber diets may negatively impact meat tenderness, and further work is needed to clarify the influence of diet type on parameters of meat tenderness.
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
J. R. Russell; Erika L. Lundy; N. O. Minton; W. J. Sexten; M. S. Kerley; S. L. Hansen
A 5-yr study was conducted using 985 crossbred steers (464 kg [SD 32]) fed in 6 separate, replicated groups to determine the influence of growing phase (GP) feed efficiency (FE) classification and diet type on finishing phase (FP) FE of steers. During the GP at the University of Missouri, steers were fed either a whole shell corn-based diet (G-Corn; 528 steers) or a roughage-based diet (G-Rough; 457 steers) using GrowSafe feed bunks to measure DMI for 69 to 89 d. At the end of the GP, steers were ranked by residual feed intake (RFI) within diet, shipped to Iowa State University, and blocked into FP pens (5 to 6 steers/pen) by GP diet and RFI rank (upper, middle, or lower one-third). Steers were transitioned to either FP cracked corn- or byproduct-based diets and fed until 1.27 cm backfat was reached. After completion of the sixth group, average GP G:F within GP diet was calculated for each FP pen (168 total pens) using GP initial BW as a covariate (G-Corn: 0.207 [SD 0.038]; G-Rough: 0.185 [SD 0.036]). Pens were classified as highly feed efficient (HFE; >0.5 SD from the G:F mean; 58 pens), mid feed efficient (MFE; ±0.5 SD from the G:F mean; 60 pens), or lowly feed efficient (LFE; <0.5 SD from the G:F mean; 50 pens). Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS. Experimental unit was FP pen and the model included the fixed effects of GP diet, FE classification, FP diet, and the interactions. Group (1 to 6) was included as a fixed effect. There were no 3-way interactions ( ≥ 0.2) for any measured traits. Finishing phase G:F was not affected by any interactions ( ≥ 0.5) but was greater ( ≤ 0.03) for HFE versus MFE and LFE and greater ( = 0.02) for MFE versus LFE. Growing phase diet × FE classification effects were detected ( ≤ 0.01) for FP final BW (FBW), ADG, and DMI. Among G-Rough steers, HFE and MFE had greater ( ≤ 0.04) FBW and ADG than LFE, but among G-Corn steers, LFE had heavier ( = 0.03) FBW than HFE whereas ADG was unaffected ( ≥ 0.2) by FE classification. Dry matter intake was unaffected ( ≥ 0.3) by FE classification among G-Rough steers, but among G-Corn steers, LFE had greater ( ≤ 0.003) DMI than MFE and HFE. Overall, differences in FP G:F between FE classifications were driven by different factors depending on diet; ADG differed among roughage-grown steers and DMI differed among corn-grown steers. Ultimately, steers classified as HFE during the GP still had superior FE during the FP.
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
J. R. Russell; W. J. Sexten; M. S. Kerley; S. L. Hansen
Journal of Animal Science | 2017
B. T. Stokes; J. R. Russell; Patrick J. Gunn; Lee L. Schulz
Journal of Animal Science | 2017
S. L. Hansen; M. S. Kerley; J. R. Russell
Animal Industry Report | 2017
C. P. Blank; J. R. Russell; Steven M. Lonergan; S. L. Hansen
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
J. R. Russell; Justin J. Bisinger; Wendy J. Powers
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
Jennifer J. Michal; J. R. Russell; S. L. Hansen; J. F. Taylor; M. S. Kerley; K. A. Johnson
Journal of Animal Science | 2016
C. P. Blank; J. R. Russell; Steven M. Lonergan; S. L. Hansen
Animal Industry Report | 2015
J. R. Russell; S. L. Hansen