J. S. Virk

Feeding potential of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri against the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis

Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is an exotic species native to the USA, damaging cotton and other plant families. The feeding potential of different development stages of Cryptolaemus montrouzieri Mulsant, a biological control agent against mealybugs, was investigated on different development stages of P. solenopsis. Fourth instar grubs and adults of C. montrouzieri were the most voracious feeders on different instars of mealybug. The number of 1st instar nymphs of mealybug consumed by 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th instar larvae and adult beetles of C. montrouzieri was 15.56, 41.01, 125.38, 162.69 and 1613.81, respectively. The respective numbers of 2nd and 3rd instar nymphs of mealybug consumed were 11.15 and 1.80, 26.35 and 6.36, 73.66 and 13.32, 76.04 and 21.16, 787.95 and 114.66. The corresponding figures for adult female mealybugs were 0.94, 3.23, 8.47, 12.71 and 73.40, respectively. The results indicate that C. montrouzieri has the potential to be exploited as a biocontrol agent in North India; inoculative releases of 4th instar larvae and adults may provide instant control of P. solenopsis. Field experiments should be conducted to determine the efficiency of the ladybird on this mealybug.

Field evaluation of eco-friendly biocontrol package for the management of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hubner, and fusarium wilt in chickpea, Cicer arietinum

Helicoverpa armigera is a serious pest of chickpea and causes great damage to crop. Extensive and indiscriminate use of insecticides has led to the development of resistance in H. armigera. Among the several alternative methods for management of H. armigera, the nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) is promising, whereas Trichoderma sp. have shown promising results against chickpea wilt. The experiments to evaluate biocontrol package against H. armigera and wilt disease under field conditions were conducted. Lowest H. armigera larval population (0.71 larvae/plant) was recorded in chemical control, which was at a par with biocontrol package (0.91 larvae/plant), and both the treatments were significantly better than control. Lowest per cent pod damage (3.85%) was recorded in chemical control followed by biocontrol treatment (5.08%) and unsprayed control (8.61%). The yields from biocontrol package (13.45 q/ha) and chemical control (15.37 q/ha) were significantly higher than unsprayed control (10.7 q/ha). There was no disease incidence in all treatments in both 2008 and 2009.