Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. Scott Magnuson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. Scott Magnuson.


Laryngoscope | 2012

Transoral robotic surgery: A multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins

Gregory S. Weinstein; Bert W. O'Malley; J. Scott Magnuson; William R. Carroll; Kerry D. Olsen; Lixia Daio; Eric J. Moore; F. Christopher Holsinger

Our objective was to determine the safety, feasibility, and the adequacy of surgical margins for transoral robotic surgery (TORS), by reviewing the early results from independent institutional review board‐approved clinical trials in three separate institutions.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

Factors associated with long-term dysphagia after definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

Jimmy J. Caudell; Philip Schaner; Ruby F. Meredith; Julie L. Locher; Lisle Nabell; William R. Carroll; J. Scott Magnuson; S.A. Spencer; James A. Bonner

PURPOSE The use of altered fractionation radiotherapy (RT) regimens, as well as concomitant chemotherapy and RT, to intensify therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer can lead to increased rates of long-term dysphagia. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 122 patients who had undergone definitive RT for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer, after excluding those who had been treated for a second or recurrent head-and-neck primary, had Stage I-II disease, developed locoregional recurrence, had <12 months of follow-up, or had undergone postoperative RT. The patient, tumor, and treatment factors were correlated with a composite of 3 objective endpoints as a surrogate for severe long-term dysphagia: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence at the last follow-up visit; aspiration on a modified barium swallow study or a clinical diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia; or the presence of a pharyngoesophageal stricture. RESULTS A composite dysphagia outcome occurred in 38.5% of patients. On univariate analysis, the primary site (p = 0.01), use of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.01), RT schedule (p = 0.02), and increasing age (p = 0.04) were significantly associated with development of composite long-term dysphagia. The use of concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.01), primary site (p = 0.02), and increasing age (p = 0.02) remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION The addition of concurrent chemotherapy to RT for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer resulted in increased long-term dysphagia. Early intervention using swallowing exercises, avoidance of nothing-by-mouth periods, and the use of intensity-modulated RT to reduce the dose to the uninvolved swallowing structures should be explored further in populations at greater risk of long-term dysphagia.


Laryngoscope | 2008

Pretreatment Swallowing Exercises Improve Swallow Function After Chemoradiation

William R. Carroll; Julie L. Locher; Cheri L. Canon; Isaac A. Bohannon; Nancy L. McColloch; J. Scott Magnuson

Objectives/Hypothesis: Swallowing dysfunction is a devastating complication of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We have previously demonstrated that pretreatment swallowing exercises improve posttreatment swallowing‐related quality of life. This study evaluates the effect of pretreatment swallowing exercises on posttreatment swallow function as measured by videofluoroscopy.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2009

Robot-Assisted Surgery for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Neoplasms

Bridget A. Boudreaux; Eben L. Rosenthal; J. Scott Magnuson; J. Robert Newman; Renee Desmond; Lisa Clemons; William R. Carroll

OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility and safety of performing robot-assisted resections of head and neck tumors, and to predict which variables lead to successful robot-assisted resection and better functional outcome. DESIGN Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. SETTING Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Thirty-six patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, or laryngeal tumors. INTERVENTION Robot-assisted resection of indicated tumors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Ability to perform robot-assisted resection, final pathologic margin status, ability to extubate postoperatively, need for tracheotomy tube, and need for gastrostomy tube. Any clinically significant complications were recorded. RESULTS Thirty-six patients participated in the study. Eight patients had previously been treated for head and neck cancer. Twenty-nine patients (81%) underwent successful robotic resection. Negative margins were obtained in all 29 patients. Twenty-one of 29 patients were safely extubated prior to leaving the operating room. One patient required short-term tracheotomy tube placement. A total of 9 patients were gastrostomy tube dependent (2 preoperatively, 7 postoperatively). Factors associated with successful robotic resection were lower T classification (P = .01) and edentulism (P = .07). Factors associated with gastrostomy tube dependence were advanced age (P = .02), tumor location in the larynx (P < .001), higher T classification (P = .02), and lower preoperative M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted surgery is feasible and safe for the resection of select head and neck tumors. This clinical series demonstrates that robotic surgery can be utilized successfully in patients with T1 to T4 lesions located in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx with good preservation of swallow function.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2010

Transoral Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: One- and 2-Year Survival Analysis

Hilliary N. White; Eric J. Moore; Eben L. Rosenthal; William R. Carroll; Kerry D. Olsen; Renee A. Desmond; J. Scott Magnuson

OBJECTIVE to report 2-year survival outcomes for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma using transoral robotic-assisted resection. DESIGN prospective case study. SETTING two tertiary care centers. PATIENTS eighty-nine patients from 2 tertiary care centers (University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota) with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of all stages and subsites, who underwent transoral robotic-assisted resection between March 2007 and December 2008, with a median follow-up time of 26 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES disease-free survival, cancer recurrence, and gastrostomy tube dependence RESULTS seventy-one patients had T1 (n = 29) or T2 (n = 42) tumors while 18 patients had T3 (n = 8) or T4 (n = 10) tumors. There were 24 patients with overall stage I or II disease and 65 with stage III or IV disease. At the time of the last follow-up visit (median, 26 months), there had been a total of 11 patients with recurrent cancer: 3 with local; 7, regional (2 of whom also had distant metastases); and 1, distant. Seven patients were treated for recurrent disease. Eighty-two patients had no evidence of disease, 1 patient died of the disease, 2 died of other disease, and 4 were alive with disease at the last follow-up visit. Results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate for the cohort was 86.5%. None of the patients were gastrostomy tube dependent at the last follow-up visit. CONCLUSION the 2-year functional and oncologic results justify the continued treatment of select patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with robotic-assisted surgical resection.


Laryngoscope | 2007

Free tissue transfer to manage salvage laryngectomy defects after organ preservation failure

Kirk P. Withrow; Eben L. Rosenthal; Christine G. Gourin; Glenn E. Peters; J. Scott Magnuson; David J. Terris; William W. Carroll

Objective: Salvage laryngectomy to treat organ preservation failures results in significantly higher local wound complications. Even in the absence of extralaryngeal disease, primary closure of laryngeal defects can result in protracted wound care problems. We hypothesize that even when sufficient mucosa is present to close the defect primarily, introduction of vascularized tissue to close the defect may improve outcomes.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2015

Oncologic Outcomes After Transoral Robotic Surgery : A Multi-institutional Study

John R. de Almeida; Ryan Li; J. Scott Magnuson; Richard V. Smith; Eric J. Moore; Georges Lawson; Marc Remacle; Ian Ganly; Dennis H. Kraus; Marita S. Teng; Brett A. Miles; Hilliary N. White; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L. Ferris; Vikas Mehta; Krista Kiyosaki; Edward J. Damrose; Steven J. Wang; Michael E. Kupferman; Yoon Woo Koh; Eric M. Genden; F. Christopher Holsinger

IMPORTANCE Large patient cohorts are necessary to validate the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the management of head and neck cancer. OBJECTIVES To review oncologic outcomes of TORS from a large multi-institutional collaboration and to identify predictors of disease recurrence and disease-specific mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective review of records from 410 patients undergoing TORS for laryngeal and pharyngeal cancers from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2012, was performed. Pertinent data were obtained from 11 participating medical institutions. INTERVENTIONS Select patients received radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy before or after TORS. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Locoregional control, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were calculated. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank testing to evaluate individual variable association with these outcomes, followed by multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression modeling to identify independent predictors. RESULTS Of the 410 patients treated with TORS in this study, 364 (88.8%) had oropharyngeal cancer. Of these 364 patients, information about post-operative adjuvant therapy was known about 338: 106 (31.3) received radiation therapy alone, and 72 (21.3%) received radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Neck dissection was performed in 323 patients (78.8%). Mean follow-up time was 20 months. Local, regional, and distant recurrence occurred in 18 (4.4%), 15 (3.7%), and 10 (2.4%) of 410 patients, respectively. Seventeen (4.1%) died of disease, and 13 (3.2%) died of other causes. The 2-year locoregional control rate was 91.8% (95% CI, 87.6%-94.7%), disease-specific survival 94.5% (95% CI, 90.6%-96.8%), and overall survival 91% (95% CI, 86.5%-94.0%). Multivariate analysis identified improved survival among women (P = .05) and for patients with tumors arising in tonsil (P = .01). Smoking was associated with worse overall all-cause mortality (P = .01). Although advanced age and tobacco use were associated with locoregional recurrence and disease-specific survival, they, as well as tumor stage and other adverse histopathologic features, did not remain significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This large, multi-institutional study supports the role of TORS within the multidisciplinary treatment paradigm for the treatment of head and neck cancer, especially for patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Favorable oncologic outcomes have been found across institutions. Ongoing comparative clinical trials funded by the National Cancer Institute will further evaluate the role of robotic surgery for patients with head and neck cancers.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2007

Influence of social support on health-related quality of life outcomes in head and neck cancer.

Lucy Hynds Karnell; Alan J. Christensen; Eben L. Rosenthal; J. Scott Magnuson; Gerry F. Funk

Evidence that social support influences health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in oncologic patients could be particularly important for head and neck cancer because this disease can affect speech, eating, and facial aesthetics.


Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck | 2004

Simplifying head and neck microvascular reconstruction

Eben L. Rosenthal; William R. Carroll; Mathew Dobbs; J. Scott Magnuson; Mark K. Wax; Glenn E. Peters

Free‐tissue transfer has become the preferred method of head and neck reconstruction but is a technique that is considered to use excessive hospital resources.


Archives of Otolaryngology-head & Neck Surgery | 2013

Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Cancers of the Oropharynx Comparing TORS With Standard Open Surgical Approaches

Hilliary N. White; Samuel E. Ford; Benjamin D. Bush; F. Christopher Holsinger; Eric J. Moore; Tamer Ghanem; William R. Carroll; Eben L. Rosenthal; J. Scott Magnuson

IMPORTANCE Surgical salvage may be the only viable treatment option for recurrent tumors of the oropharynx. To our knowledge, there have been no published reports directly comparing the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients with recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with transoral robotic-assisted surgery (TORS) with those treated with traditional open surgical approaches. OBJECTIVE To compare the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients with recurrent oropharyngeal SCC treated with TORS with those treated with traditional open surgical approaches. DESIGN Retrospective multi-institutional case-control study; study dates, March 2003 through October 2011. SETTING Four tertiary care institutions (University of Alabama at Birmingham; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan). PARTICIPANTS Sixty-four patients who underwent salvage TORS for recurrent oropharyngeal SCC were matched by TNM stage to 64 patients who underwent open salvage resection. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: Salvage TORS for recurrent SCC of the oropharynx. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Patient demographics, operative data, functional, and oncologic outcomes were recorded and compared with a similarly TNM-matched patient group that underwent salvage surgical resection by traditional open surgical approaches. RESULTS Patients treated with TORS were found to have a significantly lower incidence of tracheostomy use (n = 14 vs n = 50; P < .001), feeding tube use (n = 23 vs n = 48; P < .001), shorter overall hospital stays (3.8 days vs 8.0 days; P < .001), decreased operative time (111 minutes vs 350 minutes; P < .001), less blood loss (49 mL vs 331 mL; P < .001), and significantly decreased incidence of positive margins (n = 6 vs n = 19; P = .007). The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TORS group than in the open approach group (74% and 43%, respectively) (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study demonstrates that TORS offers an alternative surgical approach to recurrent tumors of the oropharynx with acceptable oncologic outcomes and better functional outcomes than traditional open surgical approaches. This adds to the growing amount of clinical evidence to support the use of TORS in selected patients with recurrent oropharyngeal SCC as a feasible and oncologically sound method of treatment.

Collaboration


Dive into the J. Scott Magnuson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William R. Carroll

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric M. Genden

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Glenn E. Peters

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nichole R. Dean

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Renee A. Desmond

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hilliary N. White

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Larissa Sweeny

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lisa Clemons

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge