J. T. Pilkey

Lightning attachment processes of an “anomalous” triggered lightning discharge

Using a high-speed optical imaging system specifically designed for observing the lightning attachment process, we have documented the process for stepped, dart, and dart-stepped leaders in an anomalous rocket-triggered lightning flash that terminated on a 10 m grounded utility pole. The initiation of the first return stroke was found to occur at a height of 23 ± 3 m above the top of the utility pole and was associated with three “slow front” dE/dt pulses. A time of 1.5 µs later, a fast rise in luminosity at 18 ± 2 m was associated with a “fast transition” dE/dt pulse. The first return stroke propagated bidirectionally from its initiation height, as did subsequent return strokes from their initiation heights of 8 ± 1 m to 16 ± 2 m above the top of the utility pole. The initial upward speed of the first return stroke was 1.4 × 108 m/s, while its initial downward speed was 2.2 × 107 m/s. The channel bottom luminosity of the first return stroke rose more slowly to a two or more times larger amplitude than that of the subsequent stroke luminosities. In contrast, the National Lightning Detection Network-derived first-return-stroke peak current is smaller than that of the second and the third strokes, and our electric field records at 45 km show similar behavior for the initial field peaks of the first and subsequent strokes.

Evaluation of the GLD360 performance characteristics using rocket‐and‐wire triggered lightning data

We estimated the performance characteristics of the Global Lightning Dataset (GLD360) using rocket-and-wire triggered lightning data acquired at Camp Blanding, Florida, in 2011–2013. The data set consisted of 201 return strokes and 84 kiloampere-scale (≥1 kA) superimposed pulses (initial continuous current pulses and M components) in 43 flashes. All the events transported negative charge to ground. The GLD360 detected 75 strokes and 4 superimposed pulses in 29 flashes. The resultant detection efficiencies were 67% for flashes, 37% for strokes, and 4.8% for superimposed pulses. Out of 75 detected strokes, one (1.3%) was reported with incorrect polarity. The median location error was 2.0 km, and the median absolute current estimation error was 27%. This is the first comprehensive evaluation of GLD360 performance characteristics relative to absolute ground truth, with all previous evaluations being at least in part relative to other locating systems. The results presented in this work may be applicable to regions in and around Florida.

Does the lightning current go to zero between ground strokes? Is there a current “cutoff”?

At the end of 120 prereturn stroke intervals in 27 lightning flashes triggered by rocket-and-wire in Florida, residual currents with an arithmetic mean of 5.3 mA (standard derivation 2.8 mA) were recorded. Average time constants of the current decay following return strokes were found to vary between 160 µs and 550 µs, increasing with decreasing current magnitude. These results represent the most sensitive measurements of interstroke lightning current to date, 2 to 3 orders of magnitude more sensitive than previously reported measurements, and contradict the common view found in the literature that there is a no current interval. Possible sources of the residual current are discussed.

Coordinated lightning, balloon-borne electric field, and radar observations of triggered lightning flashes in North Florida

This study examines coordinated storm and triggered lightning observations made in July–August 2013 at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing to determine why triggered flashes in Florida typically transition from an upward vertical channel entering the cloud to horizontal structure near the storms melting level. Data from a balloon-borne electric field meter, a mobile 5 cm wavelength radar, and a small-baseline VHF Lightning Mapping Array acquired during a period in which three flashes were triggered on 1 August confirmed the hypothesis that the transition to horizontal lightning structure just above the melting level occurred in a layer of negative charge. This experiment was the first to provide vertical profiles of the electric field in Florida storms, from which their vertical charge distribution could be inferred. Three dissipating storms observed on different days all had negative charge near the melting level, but a growing mature storm had positive charge there.

Luminosity in the initial breakdown stage of cloud‐to‐ground and intracloud lightning

We present simultaneously measured luminosity and electric field data from the initial breakdown (IB) stage in seven cloud-to-ground (CG) and eight intracloud (IC) lightning discharges along with, in three cases, radar and Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) data. The data were taken in north-central Florida in 2013 and 2014. Seven CG discharges had an arithmetic mean (standard deviation, SD) IB stage luminosity pulse train duration of 3 ms (2 ms), and within the seven CG discharges, 30 luminosity pulses had the following means (SD): 10% to 90% risetime 25 µs (16 µs), full width at half maximum 68 µs (21 µs), and delay between onset of the electric field pulse and associated luminosity pulse 8 µs (8 µs). Eight IC discharges had a mean (SD) IB stage luminosity pulse train duration of 11 ms (4 ms), and within the 8 IC discharges, 37 luminosity pulses exhibited mean risetimes, widths, and delays of 59 µs (36 µs), 176 µs (70 µs), and 34 µs (20 µs), all significantly greater than in the CG case. The roughly 10 LMA sources associated with each of the three IB stages in 2014 are grouped horizontally within about 1 km2. The mean altitude (SD) of the LMA points during two CG IB stages is 5 km (600 m) and 4.3 km (250 m) and during one IC discharge is 6.2 km (550 m). We discuss the role of optical scattering in delaying and distorting the observed luminosity waveforms.

Estimation of triggered‐lightning dart‐stepped‐leader currents from close multiple‐station dE/dt pulse measurements

The modified transmission line model is used to derive the vertically propagating leader-step currents necessary to radiate measured dart-stepped-leader dE/dt pulses from triggered lightning at close range (<400 m) and low altitude (<70 m). The model-predicted dE/dt pulses were compared with measured dE/dt pulses at nine locations ranging from 27 to 391 m from the channel base for four dE/dt pulses radiated from two triggered dart-stepped leaders. The dE/dt pulses at the closest station, 27 m, were unipolar, dominated by electrostatic and induction components of the radiated dE/dt, and of opposite polarity to the more distant initial dE/dt peaks. The other, more distant, eight stations exhibited bipolar dE/dt pulses, being more or less dominated by the dE/dt radiation component. The derived leader-step current has a slow front that precedes a fast transition to peak amplitude followed by a slow decay to zero after several microseconds. For the four modeled dE/dt pulses, the estimated causative leader-step current peak amplitudes varied from 0.9 to 1.8 kA, the half-peak widths ranged from 370 to 560 ns, the charge transfers were about 1 mC, and the peak current derivatives were about 10 kA/µs. The upward propagation speeds of the leader-step current were from 1.1 to 1.5 × 108 m/s with exponential spatial current decay constants from 13 to 27 m. One dE/dt pulse is analyzed in more detail by studying changes in model-predicted waveforms versus current initiation altitude and by examining the effect of varying model input parameters.

Evaluation of ENTLN Performance Characteristics Based on the Ground Truth Natural and Rocket‐Triggered Lightning Data Acquired in Florida

The performance characteristics of the Earth Networks Total Lightning Network (ENTLN) were evaluated by using as ground-truth natural cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning data acquired at the Lightning Observatory in Gainesville (LOG) and rocket-triggered lightning data obtained at Camp Blanding (CB), Florida, in 2014 and 2015. Two ENTLN processors (data processing algorithms) were evaluated. The old processor (P2014) was put into use in June 2014 and the new one (P2015) has been operational since August 2015. Based on the natural-CG-lightning dataset (219 flashes containing 608 strokes), the flash detection efficiency (DE), flash classification accuracy (CA), stroke DE, and stroke CA for the new processor were found to be 99%, 97%, 96%, and 91%, respectively, and the corresponding values for the old processor were 99%, 91%, 97%, and 68%. The stroke DE and stroke CA for first strokes are higher than those for subsequent strokes. Based on the rocket-triggered lightning dataset (36 CG flashes containing 175 strokes), the flash DE, flash CA, stroke DE, and stroke CA for the new processor were found to be 100%, 97%, 97%, and 86%, respectively, while the corresponding values for the old processor were 100%, 92%, 97%, and 42%. The median values of location error and absolute peak current estimation error were 215 m and 15% for the new processor, and 205 m and 15% for the old processor. For both natural and triggered CG lightning, strokes with higher peak currents were more likely to be both detected and correctly classified by the ENTLN.

Do cosmic ray air showers initiate lightning? : A statistical analysis of cosmic ray air showers and lightning mapping array data

It has been argued in the technical literature, and widely reported in the popular press, that cosmic ray air showers (CRASs) can initiate lightning via a mechanism known as relativistic runaway electron avalanche (RREA), where large numbers of high energy and low energy electrons can, somehow, cause the local atmosphere in a thundercloud to transition to a conducting state. In response to this claim, other researchers have published simulations showing that the electron density produced by RREA is far too small to be able to affect the conductivity in the cloud sufficiently to initiate lightning. In this paper, we compare 74 days of cosmic ray air shower data collected in north central Florida during 2013, 2014, and 2015, the recorded CRASs having primary energies on the order of 1016 eV to 1018 eV and zenith angles less than 38 degrees, with Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) data, and we show that there is no evidence that the detected cosmic ray air showers initiated lightning. Furthermore, we show that the average probability of any of our detected cosmic ray air showers to initiate a lightning flash can be no more than 5 percent. If all lightning flashes were initiated by cosmic ray air showers, then about 1.6 percent of detected CRASs would initiate lightning, therefore we do not have enough data to exclude the possibility that lightning flashes could be initiated by cosmic ray air showers.

Flash propagation and inferred charge structure relative to radar‐observed ice alignment signatures in a small Florida mesoscale convective system

A series of vertical cross-sections taken through a small Mesoscale Convective System (MCS) observed over Florida by the dual-polarimetric SMART radar were combined with VHF radiation source locations from a lightning mapping array (LMA) to examine the lightning channel propagation paths relative to the radar-observed ice alignment signatures associated with regions of negative specific differential phase (KDP). Additionally, charge layers inferred from analysis of LMA sources were related to the ice alignment signature. It was found that intracloud flashes initiated near the upper zero-KDP boundary surrounding the negative KDP region. The zero-KDP boundary also delineated the propagation path of the lightning channel with the negative leaders following the upper boundary and positive leaders following the lower boundary. Very few LMA sources were found in the negative KDP region. We conclude that rapid dual-polarimetric radar observations can diagnose strong electric fields and may help identify surrounding regions of charge.

An analysis of ELF sferics produced by rocket-triggered lightning

Lightning regularly generates ELF radio atmospherics (sferics) in the 5-500 Hz frequency range. The processes that produce ELF sferics have been studied for more than 50 years. Rocket-triggered lightning experiments at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) located at Camp Blanding, Florida provide a unique data set for comparing the source characteristics of a lightning return stroke to the ELF sferic measured at great (>3,000 km) distances. In this paper, we present experimental observations of rocket-triggered lightning observed at the ICLRT, including the lightning channel-base current and lightning mapping array sources, together with observations of the ELF sferics detected at Sondrestromfjord, Greenland and at Stanford, California. These observations are critically compared with model predictions (using a modified version of the Long Wavelength Propagation Capability code). We demonstrate that the effective length of the lightning channel varies between return strokes and has a detectable influence on the amplitude of the ELF sferic observed at great distances. Additionally, we demonstrate that the lateral distribution of vertical sources (within the cloud) can reproduce the relative differences in sferic amplitudes observed at Sondrestromfjord and Stanford.