Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. Thadeus Meeks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. Thadeus Meeks.


Journal of Individual Differences | 2009

Exploring the Relations Among Executive Functions, Fluid Intelligence, and Personality

Nash Unsworth; Joshua D. Miller; Chad E. Lakey; Diana L. Young; J. Thadeus Meeks; W. Keith Campbell; Adam S. Goodie

Executive functions (EFs) are important for goal-directed behavior and have been linked with a number of important constructs like intelligence. The current study examined the link between EFs and ...


Psychological Research-psychologische Forschung | 2010

Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks

J. Thadeus Meeks; Richard L. Marsh

Implementation intentions are detailed and systematic plans that are developed during intention formation. We compared two different implementation intentions to standard event-based prospective memory instructions using three different kinds of intentions. Two of these intentions involved nonfocal cues whereas the remaining intention was about specific, focal cues. Implementation intentions dramatically increased detection performance for the nonfocal intentions. Because the exact cues could not be specified during intention formation, we argue that cue salience and that strengthening the cue to target action association are not very viable mechanisms to explain all instances of the beneficial consequences of forming implementation intentions.


Consciousness and Cognition | 2007

Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory.

J. Thadeus Meeks; Jason L. Hicks; Richard L. Marsh

This study examined peoples ability to predict and postdict their performance on an event-based prospective memory task. Using nonfocal cues, one group of participants predicted their success at finding animal words and a different group predicted their ability to find words with a particular syllable in it. The authors also administered a self-report questionnaire on everyday prospective and retrospective memory failures. Based on the different strategies adopted by the two groups and correlations among the dependent variables, the authors concluded that people do have a basic awareness of their prospective memory abilities, but that this awareness is far from accurate. The importance of metamemory concerning ones prospective memory is discussed in terms of how it influences the strategies that people might choose for actually completing their various everyday intentions.


Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 2011

An Observation on the Spontaneous Noticing of Prospective Memory Event-Based Cues

Justin B. Knight; J. Thadeus Meeks; Richard L. Marsh; Gabriel I. Cook; Gene A. Brewer; Jason L. Hicks

In event-based prospective memory, current theories make differing predictions as to whether intention-related material can be spontaneously noticed (i.e., noticed without relying on preparatory attentional processes). In 2 experiments, participants formed an intention that was contextually associated to the final phase of the experiment, and lures that overlapped to differing degrees with the features of the intention-related cues were embedded in the initial phase. When participants were outside of the appropriate responding context (i.e., the initial phase), they exhibited slower latencies to lures that exactly matched the features of their intention compared with other types of lures and control words. In addition, on a final remember/know recognition test, participants reported having greater subjective recollection for the occurrence of the exact-match lures. These results suggest that exact-match lures were spontaneously noticed and differentially processed in the absence of any observable preparatory attentional processes. The findings have implications for the theoretical debate over whether preparatory attention must always be relied upon to notice intention-related material.


Consciousness and Cognition | 2011

On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory

Gene A. Brewer; Justin B. Knight; J. Thadeus Meeks; Richard L. Marsh

The role of imagery in encoding event-based prospective memories has yet to be fully clarified. Herein, it is argued that imagery augments a cue-to-context association that supports event-based prospective memory performance. By this account, imagery encoding not only improves prospective memory performance but also reduces interference to intention-related information that occurs outside of context. In the current study, when lure words occurred outside of the appropriate responding context, the use of imagery encoding strategies resulted in less interference when compared with a standard event-based intention condition. This difference was eliminated when participants were not given a specific context to associate their intention (i.e., lures occurred within the appropriate responding context). These results support a cue-to-context association account of how imagery operates in certain event-based prospective memory tasks.


Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2007

Learning is impaired by activated intentions

Gabriel I. Cook; Richard L. Marsh; Arlo Clark-Foos; J. Thadeus Meeks

Two experiments examined the task interference that sometimes accrues from having an intention. In standard prospective memory tasks, latency is often slower to an ongoing task performed concurrently with having an intention than it is when no intention is given. If the locus of this slowing resulted from different attentional allocation policies in the two cases, we predicted that the process of learning a word list would be impaired if participants had an intention rather than if they did not. Four different event-based prospective memory tasks were used in Experiment 1 to demonstrate that worse free recall of a word list resulted when studied with a concurrent intention than with a control condition that had no intention. In that experiment, linking an intention to a distal context that was to occur after learning did not impair free recall. Two time-based tasks were used in Experiment 2 to demonstrate that possessing a time-based prospective memory also hinders learning, unless the intention is linked to a future context that is expected to occur after the study session. In the latter case, no impairment was obtained.


Memory & Cognition | 2007

Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel

Richard L. Marsh; Gabriel I. Cook; J. Thadeus Meeks; Arlo Clark-Foos; Jason L. Hicks

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the fate of intention-related material processed in a to-beignored channel. Participants were given an intention to respond to cues in a visual-processing stream while simultaneously trying to ignore information being presented in an auditory stream. Subsequent to the ongoing activity, a surprise recognition test for information presented in the to-be-ignored auditory modality was administered. As compared with comparable neutral information, corrected recognition memory for intention-related material was significantly better, depending on the type of event-based prospective memory task. These results suggest that holding certain kinds of intentions can bias attentional processes in a manner consistent with a perceptual readiness for uptake of intention-related material.


Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition | 2006

Concreteness and Item-to-List Context Associations in the Free Recall of Items Differing in Context Variability.

Richard L. Marsh; J. Thadeus Meeks; Jason L. Hicks; Gabriel I. Cook; Arlo Clark-Foos

Context variability can be defined as the number of preexperimental contexts in which a given concept appears. Following M. Steyvers and K. J. Malmbergs (2003) work, the authors have shown that concepts that are experienced in fewer preexperimental contexts generally are better remembered in episodic memory tasks than concepts that are experienced in a greater number of preexperimental contexts. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate that low context variability confers its memorial advantage because of stronger item-to-list context associations as compared with high context variability. Three experiments that use environmental context changes from study to test demonstrate that the low context variability advantage is eliminated when item-to-list context associations are not available because of environmental changes at test. In addition, the low context variability advantage is eliminated when inward processing at study prevents the formation of item-to-list context associations.


Memory & Cognition | 2011

The reactivation of associated information affects source monitoring

B. Hunter Ball; Richard L. Marsh; J. Thadeus Meeks; Jason L. Hicks

In this study, we examined a source-monitoring phenomenon that arises from reactivated related information from the study phase. Three experiments showed that source attributions for target events were influenced not only by the target item itself, but also by studied information about related items. In Experiment 1, source memory for target items that have a high forward association value to a single related study item (e.g., credit) were affected by the source of the associated information (e.g., card), so that memory performance was better when associated items were presented in the same source rather than a different source. A similar effect occurred with bidirectional associates (Exp. 2), as well as with synonymous pairs of words (Exp. 3). We argue that the source information of the reactivated material can be commingled with information about a candidate during a source judgment at retrieval and thereby can affect performance.


Journal of Memory and Language | 2009

Retrieval constraints on the front end create differences in recollection on a subsequent test

Richard L. Marsh; J. Thadeus Meeks; Gabriel I. Cook; Arlo Clark-Foos; Jason L. Hicks; Gene A. Brewer

Collaboration


Dive into the J. Thadeus Meeks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriel I. Cook

Claremont McKenna College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gene A. Brewer

Arizona State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason L. Hicks

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexia Overton

Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea D. Somers

Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew M. Pomerantz

Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge