Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J Turian is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J Turian.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2010

Estimated risk of perihippocampal disease progression after hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy: Safety profile for RTOG 0933

Vinai Gondi; Wolfgang A. Tomé; James C. Marsh; Aaron F. Struck; Amol Ghia; J Turian; Søren M. Bentzen; John S. Kuo; Deepak Khuntia; Minesh P. Mehta

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE RTOG 0933 is a phase II clinical trial of hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) to prevent radiation-induced neurocognitive decline. By quantifying baseline incidence of perihippocampal or hippocampal metastasis, we sought to estimate the risk of developing metastases in the hippocampal avoidance region (the hippocampus plus 5mm margin). MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with < or = 10 brain metastases treated at two separate institutions were reviewed. Axial images from pre-treatment, post-contrast MRIs were used to contour each metastasis and hippocampus according to a published protocol. Clinical and radiographic variables were correlated with perihippocampal metastasis using a binary logistical regression analysis, with two-sided p<0.05 for statistical significance. RESULTS 1133 metastases were identified in 371 patients. Metastases within 5mm of the hippocampus were observed in 8.6% of patients (95% CI 5.7-11.5%) and 3.0% of brain metastases. None of the metastases lay within the hippocampus. A 1-cm(3) increase in the aggregate volume of intra-cranial metastatic disease was associated with an odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 1.006-1.034, p=0.003) for the presence of perihippocampal metastasis. CONCLUSION With an estimated perihippocampal metastasis risk of 8.6%, we deem HA-WBRT safe for clinical testing in patients with brain metastases as part of RTOG 0933.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010

Tomotherapy and Multifield Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Planning Reduce Cardiac Doses in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients With Unfavorable Cardiac Anatomy

Alan B. Coon; Adam Dickler; Michael C. Kirk; Y Liao; Anand P. Shah; Jonathan B. Strauss; Sea Chen; J Turian; Katherine L. Griem

PURPOSE For patients with left-sided breast cancers, radiation treatment to the intact breast results in high doses to significant volumes of the heart, increasing the risk of cardiac morbidity, particularly in women with unfavorable cardiac anatomy. We compare helical tomotherapy (TOMO) and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using opposed tangents (3D-CRT) for reductions in cardiac volumes receiving high doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifteen patients with left-sided breast cancers and unfavorable cardiac anatomy, determined by a maximum heart depth (MHD) of >or=1.0 cm within the tangent fields, were planned for TOMO and IMRT with five to seven beam angles, in addition to 3D-CRT. The volumes of heart and left ventricle receiving >or=35 Gy (V35) were compared for the plans, as were the mean doses to the contralateral breast and the volume receiving >or=20 Gy (V20) for the ipsilateral lung. RESULTS The mean MHD was 1.7 cm, and a significant correlation was observed between MHD and both heart and left ventricle V35. The V35s for IMRT (0.7%) and TOMO (0.5%) were significantly lower than for 3D-CRT (3.6%). The V20 for IMRT (22%) was significantly higher than for 3D-CRT (15%) or TOMO (18%), but the contralateral breast mean dose for TOMO (2.48 Gy) was significantly higher than for 3D-CRT (0.93 Gy) or IMRT (1.38 Gy). CONCLUSIONS Both TOMO and IMRT can significantly reduce cardiac doses, with modest increases in dose to other tissues in left-sided breast cancer patients with unfavorable cardiac anatomy.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel Guidelines for the delineation of the clinical target volume in the postoperative treatment of pancreatic head cancer

Karyn A. Goodman; William F. Regine; Laura A. Dawson; Edgar Ben-Josef; Karin Haustermans; Walter R. Bosch; J Turian; Ross A. Abrams

PURPOSE To develop contouring guidelines to be used in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 0848, a Phase III randomized trial evaluating the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients with resected head of pancreas cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS A consensus committee of six radiation oncologists with expertise in gastrointestinal radiotherapy developed stepwise contouring guidelines and an atlas for the delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in the postoperative treatment of pancreas cancer, based on identifiable regions of interest and margin expansions. Areas at risk for subclinical disease to be included in the CTV were defined, including nodal regions, anastomoses, and the preoperative primary tumor location. Regions of interest that could be reproducibly contoured on postoperative imaging after a pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified. Standardized expansion margins to encompass areas at risk were developed after multiple iterations to determine the optimal margin expansions. RESULTS New contouring recommendations based on CT anatomy were established. Written guidelines for the delineation of the postoperative CTV and normal tissues, as well as a Web-based atlas, were developed. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative abdomen has been a difficult area for effective radiotherapy. These new guidelines will help physicians create fields that better encompass areas at risk and minimize dose to normal tissues.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010

Intracranial Metastatic Disease Spares the Limbic Circuit: A Review of 697 Metastatic Lesions in 107 Patients

James C. Marsh; Arnold M. Herskovic; Benjamin T. Gielda; Frank F. Hughes; Thomas J. Hoeppner; J Turian; Ross A. Abrams

PURPOSE We report the incidence of metastatic involvement of the limbic circuit in a retrospective review of patients treated at our institution. This review was performed to assess the feasibility of selectively sparing the limbic system during whole-brain radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 697 intracranial metastases in 107 patients after reviewing contrast-enhanced CT and/or MR image sets for each patient. Lesions were localized to the limbic circuit or to the rest of the brain/brain stem. Patients were categorized by tumor histology (e.g., non-small-cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and other) and by total number of intracranial metastases (1-3, oligometastatic; 4 or more, nonoligometastatic). RESULTS Thirty-six limbic metastases (5.2% of all metastases) were identified in 22 patients who had a median of 16.5 metastases/patient (limbic metastases accounted for 9.9% of their lesions). Sixteen metastases (2.29%) involved the hippocampus, and 20 (2.86%) involved the rest of the limbic circuit; 86.2% of limbic metastases occurred in nonoligometastatic patients, and 13.8% occurred in oligometastatic patients. The incidence of limbic metastases by histologic subtype was similar. The incidence of limbic metastases in oligometastatic patients was 4.9% (5/103): 0.97%, hippocampus; 3.9%, remainder of the limbic circuit. One of 53 oligometastatic patients (1.9%) had hippocampal metastases, while 4/53 (7.5%) had other limbic metastases. CONCLUSIONS Metastatic involvement of the limbic circuit is uncommon and limited primarily to patients with nonoligometastatic disease, supporting our hypothesis that it is reasonable to selectively exclude or reduce the dose to the limbic circuit when treating patients with prophylactic cranial irradiation or whole-brain radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease not involving these structures.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010

Sparing of the Neural Stem Cell Compartment During Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy: A Dosimetric Study Using Helical Tomotherapy

James C. Marsh; Rohit Godbole; Arnold M. Herskovic; Benjamin T. Gielda; J Turian

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of dosimetrically sparing the hippocampus and neural stem cell (NSC) compartment during whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). METHODS AND MATERIALS We contoured the brain/brainstem on fused magnetic resonance /computed tomography images as the planning target volume (PTV) in 10 patients, excluding the hippocampus and NSC compartment as organs at risk. PCI and WBRT helical tomotherapy plans were prepared for each patient, with 1.0-cm field width, a pitch of 0.285, and a modulation factor of 2.5. We attempted to maximally spare the hippocampus and NSC compartment while treating the rest of the brain to 30 Gy in 15 fractions (PCI) or 35 Gy in 14 fractions (WBRT) with a V(100) of ≥95%. Plan quality was assessed by calculating mean dose, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and biologically equivalent dose (BED) for organs at risk and the percent volume of the PTV receiving the prescribed dose of V(100). RESULTS In the PCI plans, mean doses/EUD/BED for the hippocampus and NSC compartment were 11.5 Gy/13.1 Gy/15.7 Gy(2) (BED assuming alpha/beta ratio of 2Gy) and 11.5 Gy/13.1 Gy/12.3 Gy(10) (BED assuming alpha/beta ratio of 10Gy), respectively. In the WBRT plans, mean doses/EUD/BED for the hippocampus and NSC compartment were 11.8 Gy/14.8 Gy/16.8 Gy(2) and 11.8 Gy/14.8 Gy/12.8 Gy(10), respectively. The mean V(95) for the rest of the brain (PTV) was 96.9% for both the PCI and WBRT plans. Mean PCI and WBRT treatment times were 15.93 min (range, 14.28 min-17.50 min) and 20.18 min (range, 18.43 min-22.32 min), respectively. CONCLUSIONS It is dosimetrically feasible to spare the hippocampus and NSC compartment using helical tomotherapy during the administration of whole-brain irradiation.


Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2011

Sparing of the hippocampus, limbic circuit and neural stem cell compartment during partial brain radiotherapy for glioma: A dosimetric feasibility study

James C. Marsh; Rohit Godbole; Aidnag Z. Diaz; Benjamin T. Gielda; J Turian

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of sparing contralateral or bilateral neural stem cell (NSC) compartment, hippocampus and limbic circuit during partial brain radiotherapy (PBRT).


Oral Oncology | 2014

Patterns-of-failure after helical tomotherapy-based chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: implications for CTV margin, elective nodal dose and bilateral parotid sparing.

Virag Dandekar; Tiffany Morgan; J Turian; Mary J. Fidler; John Showel; Thomas Nielsen; Joy L. Coleman; Aidnag Z. Diaz; David J. Sher

OBJECTIVES There is debate about the optimal clinical target volume (CTV) expansion and prophylactic nodal dose (PND) in head and neck IMRT. We evaluated our patterns-of-failure (POF) after helical tomotherapy-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to assess the oncologic safety of reducing the CTV, PND, and bilateral parotid sparing (BPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with curative intent CCRT between January 2007 and April 2013 at a single institution were included in this retrospective study. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) were overlaid on the treatment plan, and POF was determined relative to planned dose. RESULTS One hundred and fourteen patients treated with CCRT were evaluated, 74% of whom underwent BPS. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 29.3 months. The 3-year cumulative incidence of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, progression-free and overall survival were 20%, 20%, 56% and 73% respectively. The local failures (n = 12) were either entirely contained within or centered on the original gross tumor volume (GTV), and all but 2 regional recurrences were in GTV. There were no nodal failures in the low-dose or peri-parotid neck (including ipsilateral neck). DISCUSSION Nearly all LRR were located within the GTV suggesting that minimal-to-zero margin is required for CTV 70. The nodal recurrence pattern suggests the safety of routine bilateral parotid sparing and relatively low biologically equivalent dose (54 Gy in 33fx) to the low-risk neck.


Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2010

Sparing of the hippocampus and limbic circuit during whole brain radiation therapy: A dosimetric study using helical tomotherapy.

James C. Marsh; Benjamin T. Gielda; Arnold M. Herskovic; Julie A. Wendt; J Turian

Introduction:  The study aims to assess the feasibility of dosimetrically sparing the limbic circuit during whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI).


Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2012

Dosimetric characteristics of the small diameter BrainLab™ cones used for stereotactic radiosurgery

Gocha Khelashvili; James C.H. Chu; Aidnag Z. Diaz; J Turian

The purpose was to study the dosimetric characteristics of the small diameter (≤10.0 mm) BrainLAB cones used for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments in conjunction with a Varian Trilogy accelerator. Required accuracy and precision in dose delivery during SRS can be achieved only when the geometric and dosimetric characteristics of the small radiation fields is completely understood. Although a number of investigators have published the dosimetric characteristics of SRS cones, to our knowledge, there is no generally accepted value for the relative output factor (ROF) for the 5.0 mm diameter cone. Therefore, we have investigated the dosimetric properties of the small (≤10.0 mm) diameter BrainLAB SRS cones used in conjunction with the iPlan TPS and a Trilogy linear accelerator with a SRS beam mode. Percentage depth dose (PDD), off‐axis ratios (OAR), and ROF were measured using a SRS diode and verified with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The dependence of ROF on detector material response was studied. The dependence of PDD, OAR, and ROF on the alignment of the beam CAX with the detector motion line was also investigated using MC simulations. An agreement of 1% and 1 mm was observed between measurements and MC for PDD and OAR. The calculated ROF for the 5.0 mm diameter cone was 0.692±0.008 — in good agreement with the measured value of 0.683±0.007 after the diode response was corrected. Simulations of the misalignment between the beam axis and detector motion axis for angles between 0.5°–1.0° have shown a deviation > 2% in PDD beyond a certain depth. We have also provided a full set of dosimetric data for BrainLAB SRS cones. Monte Carlo calculated ROF values for cones with diameters less than 10.0 mm agrees with measured values to within 1.8%. Care should be exercised when measuring PDD and OAR for small cones. We recommend the use of MC to confirm the measurement under these conditions. PACS numbers: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.K‐


Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | 2013

Integral dose delivered to normal brain with conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and helical tomotherapy IMRT during partial brain radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas with and without selective sparing of the hippocampus, limbic circuit and neural stem cell compartment

James C. Marsh; G Ellis Ziel; Aidnag Z. Diaz; Julie A. Wendt; Rohit Gobole; J Turian

We compared integral dose with uninvolved brain (IDbrain) during partial brain radiotherapy (PBRT) for high‐grade glioma patients using helical tomotherapy (HT) and seven field traditional inverse‐planned intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with and without selective sparing (SPA) of contralateral hippocampus, neural stem cell compartment (NSC) and limbic circuit.

Collaboration


Dive into the J Turian's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J Chu

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Y Liao

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A Templeton

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C. Marsh

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin T. Gielda

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James C.H. Chu

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aidnag Z. Diaz

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D Bernard

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arnold M. Herskovic

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael C. Kirk

Rush University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge