J. Watermann

Relationship between Birkeland current regions, particle precipitation, and electric fields

Data from eight DMSP F7 satellite passes coincident with Sondrestrom radar observations have been examined to determine how the large-scale dayside Birkeland currents are related to the particle precipitation regions and to the convection pattern. The classification schemes recently developed from DMSP particle data were adopted. The observations were limited to the prenoon local time hours and led to the following conclusions: (1) The local time of the mantle currents (which were traditionally called cusp currents) is not limited to the longitude of the cusp proper, but covers a larger local time extent. (2) The mantle currents flow entirely on open field lines (where “open field lines” is defined as a region where the ion precipitation and electron precipitation have the characteristics of plasma mantle, cusp, or polar rain.) This confirms and extends to all local times similar results obtained from other observations. (3) About half of region 1 currents flow on open field lines. This is consistent with the assumption that the region 1 currents are generated by the solar wind dynamo and flow within the surface that separates open and closed field lines. (4) More than 80% of the Birkeland current boundaries do not correspond to particle precipitation boundaries. Region 2 currents extend beyond the plasma sheet poleward boundary; region 1 currents flow in part on open field lines; mantle currents and mantle particles are not coincident. (5) On most passes when a triple current sheet is observed (region 2, region 1, and mantle currents), the convection reversal is located on closed field lines. When only two current sheets are observed (either region 2/region 1, or region 1/mantle currents), the convection reversal is on open field lines. (6) The data appear to be more consistent with a topology such that mantle currents are an extension of region 1 currents, rather than a separate system located poleward of the region 1 current system.

Comparison of ionospheric electrical conductances inferred from coincident radar and spacecraft measurements and photoionization models

Abstract Height-integrated electrical conductivities (conductances) inferred from coincident Sondrestrom incoherent scatter radar and DMSP-F7 observations in the high-latitude ionosphere during solar minimum are compared with results from photoionization models. We use radar and spacecraft measurements in combination with atmospheric and ionospheric models to distinguish between the contributions of the two main sources of ionization of the thermosphere, namely, solar UV/EUV radiation and auroral electron precipitation. The model of Robinson et al. (1987, J. geophys. Res. 89 , 3951) of Pedersen and Hall conductances resulting from electron precipitation appears to be in accordance with radar measurements. Published models of the conductances resulting from photoionization that use the solar zenith angle and the solar 10.7-cm radio flux as scaling parameters are, however, in discrepancy with radar observations. At solar zenith angles of less than 90°, the solar radiation components of the Pedersen and Hall conductances are systematically overestimated by most of these models. Geophysical conditions that have some bearing on the state of the high-latitude thermosphere (e.g. geomagnetic and substorm activity and a seasonal variation of the neutral gas distribution) seem to influence the conductivity distribution but are to our knowledge not yet sufficiently well modelled.

Space-time structure of the morning aurora inferred from coincident DMSP-F6,-F8, and Søndrestrøm incoherent scatter radar observations

Abstract On rare occasions, observations from the DMSP-F6 and -F8 spacecraft and the Sondrestrom incoherent scatter radar coincide in space. Such coincidence offers a unique opportunity to study temporal vs spatial variations on a small scale. We discuss data from one of those occasions, with observations made in the dawn sector in the presence of moderate auroral precipitation during a magnetically quiet period. The DMSP satellites measured vertical electron and ion flux and cross-track plasma drift while the radar measured the ionospheric electron density distribution and line-of-sight plasma velocities. We combine these data sets to construct a two-dimensional map of a possible auroral pattern above Sondrestrom. It is characterized by the following properties. No difference is seen between the gross precipitation patterns measured along the DMSP-F6 and -F8 trajectories (separated by 32 km in magnetic east-west direction and some 4 s in travel time in magnetic north-south direction), except that they are not exactly aligned with the L shells. However, F6 and F8 observed minor differences in the small-scale structures. More significant differences are found between small-scale features in the DMSP precipitation measurements and in radar observations of the E-region plasma density distribution. These measurements are separated by 74 km, equivalent to 2.4°, in magnetic longitude, and 0–40 s in time along the spacecraft trajectories (varying with magnetic latitude). Large-scale magnetospheric-ionospheric surfaces such as plasma flow reversal, poleward boundary of the keV ion and electron precipitation, and poleward boundary of E-region ionization, coincide. The combined data suggest that the plasma flow reversal delineates the polar cap boundary, that is, the boundary between precipitation characteristic for the plasma mantle and for the plasma sheet boundary layer.