Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Ja Nousek is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Ja Nousek.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Evidence for a canonical GRB afterglow light curve in the Swift/XRT data

Ja Nousek; Vanessa Mangano; Paul T. O'Brien; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; S. D. Barthelmy; Mike R. Goad; Sergio Campana; G. Cusumano; J. P. Osborne; A. P. Beardmore; A. Falcone; Jonathan Granot; G. Tagliaferri; Milvia Capalbi; David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Guido Chincarini; Dirk Grupe; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandy Patel; Kim L. Page; Alan A. Wells; Chryssa Kouveliotou; A. Moretti; N. Gehrels

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments. These power law segments are separated by two corresponding break times. On top of this canonical behavior of the early X-ray light curve, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long lasting sporadx activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission: from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve. This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f greater than or approx. equal to 4, and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission.


Nature | 2006

A new γ-ray burst classification scheme from GRB 060614

N. Gehrels; Jay P. Norris; S. D. Barthelmy; Jonathan Granot; Yuki Kaneko; C. Kouveliotou; Craig B. Markwardt; P. Meszaros; Ehud Nakar; Ja Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; A. M. Parsons; P. W. A. Roming; Takanori Sakamoto; Craig L. Sarazin; Patricia Schady; M. Stamatikos; S. E. Woosley

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are known to come in two duration classes, separated at ∼2u2009s. Long-duration bursts originate from star-forming regions in galaxies, have accompanying supernovae when these are near enough to observe and are probably caused by massive-star collapsars. Recent observations show that short-duration bursts originate in regions within their host galaxies that have lower star-formation rates, consistent with binary neutron star or neutron star–black hole mergers. Moreover, although their hosts are predominantly nearby galaxies, no supernovae have been so far associated with short-duration GRBs. Here we report that the bright, nearby GRBu2009060614 does not fit into either class. Its ∼102-s duration groups it with long-duration GRBs, while its temporal lag and peak luminosity fall entirely within the short-duration GRB subclass. Moreover, very deep optical observations exclude an accompanying supernova, similar to short-duration GRBs. This combination of a long-duration event without an accompanying supernova poses a challenge to both the collapsar and the merging-neutron-star interpretations and opens the door to a new GRB classification scheme that straddles both long- and short-duration bursts.Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are known to come in two duration classes, separated at {approx}2 s. Long bursts originate from star forming regions in galaxies, have accompanying supernovae (SNe) when near enough to observe and are likely caused by massive-star collapsars. Recent observations show that short bursts originate in regions within their host galaxies with lower star formation rates, consistent with binary neutron star (NS) or NS - black hole (BH) mergers. Moreover, although their hosts are predominantly nearby galaxies, no SNe have been so far associated with short GRBs. We report here on the bright, nearby GRB 060614 that does not fit in either class. Its {approx}102 s duration groups it with long GRBs, while its temporal lag and peak luminosity fall entirely within the short GRB subclass. Moreover, very deep optical observations exclude an accompanying supernova, similar to short GRBs. This combination of a long duration event without accompanying SN poses a challenge to both a collapsar and merging NS interpretation and opens the door on a new GRB classification scheme that straddles both long and short bursts.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2013

The prompt-afterglow connection in gamma-ray bursts: a comprehensive statistical analysis of Swift X-ray light curves

R. Margutti; Elena Zaninoni; M. G. Bernardini; Guido Chincarini; F. Pasotti; C. Guidorzi; L. Angelini; D. N. Burrows; Milvia Capalbi; Phil Evans; N. Gehrels; J. A. Kennea; Vanessa Mangano; A. Moretti; Ja Nousek; Julian P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; Matteo Perri; Judith Lea Racusin; Patrizia Romano; Boris Sbarufatti; S. Stafford; M. Stamatikos

We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of Swift X-ray light-curves of GammaRay Bursts (GRBs) collecting data from more than 650 GRBs discovered by Swift and other facilities. The unprecedented sample size allows us to constrain the rest-frame X-ray properties of GRBs from a statistical perspective, with particular reference to intrinsic time scales and the energetics of the different light-curve phases in a common rest-frame 0.3-30 keV energy band. Temporal variability episodes are also studied and their properties constrained. Two fundamental questions drive this effort: i) Does the X-ray emission retain any kind of “memory” of the prompt γ-ray phase? ii) Where is the dividing line between long and short GRB X-ray properties? We show that short GRBs decay faster, are less luminous and less energetic than long GRBs in the X-rays, but are interestingly characterized by similar intrinsic absorption. We furthermore reveal the existence of a number of statistically significant relations that link the X-ray to prompt γ-ray parameters in long GRBs; short GRBs are outliers of the majority of these 2-parameter relations. However and more importantly, we report on the existence of a universal 3-parameter scaling that links the X-ray and the γ-ray energy to the prompt spectral peak energy of both long and short GRBs: EX,iso ∝ E 1.00±0.06 γ,iso /E 0.60±0.10 pk .


web science | 2006

Testing the curvature effect and internal origin of gamma-ray burst prompt emissions and X-ray flares with Swift data

En-Wei Liang; Bing Zhang; Paul T. O'Brien; R. Willingale; L. Angelini; D. N. Burrows; Sergio Campana; Guido Chincarini; A. Falcone; N. Gehrels; Goad; Dirk Grupe; Shiho Kobayashi; P. I. Meszaros; Ja Nousek; J. P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; G. Tagliaferri

The X-ray light curves of many GRBs have a steep tail following the gamma-rays and have some erratic flares. We assume that these tails and flares are of internal origin and that their decline behaviors are dominated by the curvature effect. This effect suggests that the decay slope of the late steep decay part of the light curves is � ¼ 2 þ � , whereis the X-ray spectral index. We present a self-consistency test for this scenario with a sample of 36 prompt emission tails/flares in 22 light curves observed by the Swift XRT. We derive the zero time (t0) for each steep decay component by fitting the light curves with the constraint of � ¼2 þ � . Our results show that the t0values of the prompt emission tails and the tails of well-separated flares are self-consistent with the expectation of the internal dissipation models, indicating that each X-ray flare forms a distinct episode of the central engine activity and the central engine remains active after the prompt emission is over, sometimes up to � 1 day after the GRB trigger. This challenges the conventional models and calls for new ideas to restart the central engine. We further show that the onset time of the late central engine activity does not depend on the GRB duration. We also identify a minority group of GRBs whose combined BAT-XRT light curves are smoothly connected, without an abrupt transition between the prompt emission and the afterglow. These GRBs may have an external origin for both the prompt emission and the afterglow. Subject headings: gamma rays: bursts — methods: statistical Online material: color figuresONLINE MATERIALCOLOR FIGURES


Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2006

Swift observations of the prompt X-ray emission and afterglow from GRB050126 and GRB050219A

Michael R. Goad; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Kim L. Page; A. Moretti; Julian P. Osborne; Shiho Kobayashi; Pawan Kumar; P. Meszaros; Guido Chincarini; Takanori Sakamoto; Bing Zhang; S. D. Barthelmy; Andrew P. Beardmore; David N. Burrows; Sergio Campana; Milvia Capalbi; L.R. Cominsky; G. Cusumano; Neil Gehrels; Paolo Giommi; Olivier Godet; J. E. Hill; J. A. Kennea; Hans A. Krimm; V. La Parola; Vanessa Mangano; T. Mineo; David C. Morris; Kallol Mukerjee; Ja Nousek

We report on the temporal and spectral characteristics of the early X-ray emission from the Gamma Ray Bursts GRB050126 and GRB050219A as observed by Swift . The X-ray light-curves of these 2 bursts both show remarkably steep early decays (


Scopus | 2011

A statistical comparison of the optical/UV and X-ray afterglows of gamma-ray bursts using the Swift Ultraviolet Optical and X-ray Telescopes

M. J. Page; Patricia Schady; M. De Pasquale; P. A. Curran; N. P. M. Kuin; S. Zane; P. A. Evans; Kim L. Page; M. M. Chester; T. S. Koch; P. W. A. Roming; Michael Hiram Siegel; Ja Nousek

F(t)propto t^{-3}


Scopus | 2006

Swift X-ray telescope observations of the deep impact collision

R Wlllingale; Paul T. O'Brien; Swh Cowley; J. P. Osborne; Alan A. Wells; G. H. Jones; D. J. McComas; K. O. Mason; M. M. Chester; Sally D. Hunsberger; D. N. Burrows; Ja Nousek; N. Gehrels; L. Angelini; S. L. Snowden; Lynn R. Cominsky; Guido Chincarini

), breaking to flatter slopes on timescales of a few hundred seconds. For GRB050126 the burst shows no evidence of spectral evolution in the 20–150xa0keV band, and the spectral index of the γ -ray and X-ray afterglows are significantly different suggesting a separate origin. By contrast the BAT spectrum of GRB050219A displays significant spectral evolution, becoming softer at later times, with Γ evolving toward the XRT photon index seen in the early X-ray afterglow phase. For both bursts, the 0.2–10xa0keV spectral index pre- and post-break in the X-ray decay light-curve are consistent with no spectral evolution. We suggest that the steep early decline in the X-ray decay light-curve is either the curvature tail of the prompt emission; X-ray flaring activity; or external forward shock emission from a jet with high density regions of small angular size (


Nature | 2006

Swift Detects a Remarkable Gamma-Ray Burst, GRB 060614, That Introduces a New Classification Scheme

Neil Gehrels; Jay P. Norris; Vanessa Mangano; S. D. Barthelmy; David N. Burrows; Jonathan Granot; Yuki Kaneko; C. Kouveliotou; Craig B. Markwardt; P. I. Meszaros; Ehud Nakar; Ja Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; M. J. Page; D. M. Palmer; Ann Marie Parsons; Pwa Roming; T. Sakamoto; C.L. Sarazin; Patricia Schady; M. Stamatikos; Goddard Nasa; Brera Observ.; Menlo Park Kipac; Huntsville Usra; Marshall Nasa; U Leicester; Mullard Space Sci. Lab.; Astron. Dept. Virginia U.; Santa Cruz Uc

{>}Gamma^{-1}


Nature | 2009

GRB 090423 reveals an exploding star at the epoch of re-ionization

R. Salvaterra; F. E. Marshall; S. T. Holland; P. Ferrero; E. Palazzi; Dino Fugazza; E. Maiorano; P. Giommi; Sergio Campana; M. Della Valle; Alberto Fernandez-Soto; G. Cusumano; L. A. Antonelli; Raffaella Margutti; Ja Nousek; S. Marinoni; L. Stella; G. Andreuzzi; S. Covino; Emilio Molinari; L. K. Hunt; G. L. Israel; S. D. Barthelmy; G. Tagliaferri; Valerio D'Elia; F. Mannucci; Vincenzo Testa; F. Fiore; Craig B. Markwardt; Judith Lea Racusin

). The late slope we associate with the forward external shock.


Nature | 2009

GRB 090423 at a redshift of z approximately 8.1.

Salvaterra R; Valle; Campana S; Chincarini G; Covino S; D'Avanzo P; Fernández-Soto A; Guidorzi C; Mannucci F; Margutti R; Thöne Cc; Antonelli La; Sd Barthelmy; de Pasquale M; D'Elia; Fiore F; Fugazza D; Hunt Lk; Maiorano E; Marinoni S; F. E. Marshall; Molinari E; Ja Nousek; Pian E; Racusin Jl; Stella L; Amati L; Andreuzzi G; Cusumano G; Fenimore Ee

We present the systematic analysis of the Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) and X-ray Telescope (XRT) light curves for a sample of 26 Swift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). By comparing the optical/UV and X-ray light curves, we found that they are remarkably different during the first 500 s after the Burst Alert Telescope trigger, while they become more similar during the middle phase of the afterglow, i.e. between 2000 and 20 000 s. nIf we take literally the average properties of the sample, we find that the mean temporal indices observed in the optical/UV and X-rays after 500 s are consistent with a forward-shock scenario, under the assumptions that electrons are in the slow cooling regime, the external medium is of constant density and the synchrotron cooling frequency is situated between the optical/UV and X-ray observing bands. While this scenario describes well the averaged observed properties, some individual GRB afterglows require different or additional assumptions, such as the presence of late energy injection. nWe show that a chromatic break (a break in the X-ray light curve that is not seen in the optical) is present in the afterglows of three GRBs and demonstrate evidence for chromatic breaks in a further four GRBs. The average properties of these breaks cannot be explained in terms of the passage of the synchrotron cooling frequency through the observed bands, nor a simple change in the external density. It is difficult to reconcile chromatic breaks in terms of a single component outflow and instead, more complex jet structure or additional emission components are required.

Collaboration


Dive into the Ja Nousek's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. N. Burrows

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

P. Giommi

Agenzia Spaziale Italiana

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Kennea

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim L. Page

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge