Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jack A. Dunkle is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jack A. Dunkle.


Science | 2011

Structures of the bacterial ribosome in classical and hybrid states of tRNA binding.

Jack A. Dunkle; Leyi Wang; Michael B. Feldman; Arto Pulk; Vincent B. Chen; Gary J. Kapral; Jonas Noeske; Jane S. Richardson; Scott C. Blanchard; Jamie H. D. Cate

Two crystal structures indicate how conformational changes in the ribosome assist protein synthesis. During protein synthesis, the ribosome controls the movement of tRNA and mRNA by means of large-scale structural rearrangements. We describe structures of the intact bacterial ribosome from Escherichia coli that reveal how the ribosome binds tRNA in two functionally distinct states, determined to a resolution of ~3.2 angstroms by means of x-ray crystallography. One state positions tRNA in the peptidyl-tRNA binding site. The second, a fully rotated state, is stabilized by ribosome recycling factor and binds tRNA in a highly bent conformation in a hybrid peptidyl/exit site. The structures help to explain how the ratchet-like motion of the two ribosomal subunits contributes to the mechanisms of translocation, termination, and ribosome recycling.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2010

Structures of the Escherichia coli ribosome with antibiotics bound near the peptidyl transferase center explain spectra of drug action.

Jack A. Dunkle; Liqun Xiong; Alexander S. Mankin; Jamie H. D. Cate

Differences between the structures of bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic ribosomes account for the selective action of antibiotics. Even minor variations in the structure of ribosomes of different bacterial species may lead to idiosyncratic, species-specific interactions of the drugs with their targets. Although crystallographic structures of antibiotics bound to the peptidyl transferase center or the exit tunnel of archaeal (Haloarcula marismortui) and bacterial (Deinococcus radiodurans) large ribosomal subunits have been reported, it remains unclear whether the interactions of antibiotics with these ribosomes accurately reflect those with the ribosomes of pathogenic bacteria. Here we report X-ray crystal structures of the Escherichia coli ribosome in complexes with clinically important antibiotics of four major classes, including the macrolide erythromycin, the ketolide telithromycin, the lincosamide clindamycin, and a phenicol, chloramphenicol, at resolutions of ∼3.3 Å–3.4 Å. Binding modes of three of these antibiotics show important variations compared to the previously determined structures. Biochemical and structural evidence also indicates that interactions of telithromycin with the E. coli ribosome more closely resembles drug binding to ribosomes of bacterial pathogens. The present data further argue that the identity of nucleotides 752, 2609, and 2055 of 23S ribosomal RNA explain in part the spectrum and selectivity of antibiotic action.


Science | 2009

Structures of the ribosome in intermediate states of ratcheting

Wen Zhang; Jack A. Dunkle; Jamie H. D. Cate

Translational Rearrangements Conformational changes in the ribosome are required to translocate messenger RNA and transfer RNA (tRNA) during protein biosynthesis. For example, after peptide bond formation, rotation of the large and small subunits results in a hybrid state of tRNA binding—tRNAs are bound respectively in the aminoacyl-tRNA (A) and peptidyl-tRNA (P) sites in the small subunit, but in the P and exit-tRNA (E) sites on the large subunit. Zhang et al. (p. 1014) now describe x-ray structures of the intact Escherichia coli ribosome, either in the apo form or with one or two anticodon stem-loop tRNA mimics bound, which show intermediate states of intersubunit rotation. The structures provide insight into how the interface between the large and small subunits rearranges in discrete steps to reach the hybrid state. Structures of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome show how the large and small subunits rotate to facilitate protein synthesis. Protein biosynthesis on the ribosome requires repeated cycles of ratcheting, which couples rotation of the two ribosomal subunits with respect to each other, and swiveling of the head domain of the small subunit. However, the molecular basis for how the two ribosomal subunits rearrange contacts with each other during ratcheting while remaining stably associated is not known. Here, we describe x-ray crystal structures of the intact Escherichia coli ribosome, either in the apo-form (3.5 angstrom resolution) or with one (4.0 angstrom resolution) or two (4.0 angstrom resolution) anticodon stem-loop tRNA mimics bound, that reveal intermediate states of intersubunit rotation. In the structures, the interface between the small and large ribosomal subunits rearranges in discrete steps along the ratcheting pathway. Positioning of the head domain of the small subunit is controlled by interactions with the large subunit and with the tRNA bound in the peptidyl-tRNA site. The intermediates observed here provide insight into how tRNAs move into the hybrid state of binding that precedes the final steps of mRNA and tRNA translocation.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2010

Binding and Action of CEM-101, a New Fluoroketolide Antibiotic That Inhibits Protein Synthesis

Beatriz Llano-Sotelo; Jack A. Dunkle; Dorota Klepacki; Wen Zhang; Prabhavathi Fernandes; Jamie H. D. Cate; Alexander S. Mankin

ABSTRACT We characterized the mechanism of action and the drug-binding site of a novel ketolide, CEM-101, which belongs to the latest class of macrolide antibiotics. CEM-101 shows high affinity for the ribosomes of Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria. The ketolide shows high selectivity in its inhibitory action and readily interferes with synthesis of a reporter protein in the bacterial but not eukaryotic cell-free translation system. Binding of CEM-101 to its ribosomal target site was characterized biochemically and by X-ray crystallography. The X-ray structure of CEM-101 in complex with the E. coli ribosome shows that the drug binds in the major macrolide site in the upper part of the ribosomal exit tunnel. The lactone ring of the drug forms hydrophobic interactions with the walls of the tunnel, the desosamine sugar projects toward the peptidyl transferase center and interacts with the A2058/A2509 cleft, and the extended alkyl-aryl arm of the drug is oriented down the tunnel and makes contact with a base pair formed by A752 and U2609 of the 23S rRNA. The position of the CEM-101 alkyl-aryl extended arm differs from that reported for the side chain of the ketolide telithromycin complexed with either bacterial (Deinococcus radiodurans) or archaeal (Haloarcula marismortui) large ribosomal subunits but closely matches the position of the side chain of telithromycin complexed to the E. coli ribosome. A difference in the chemical structure of the side chain of CEM-101 in comparison with the side chain of telithromycin and the presence of the fluorine atom at position 2 of the lactone ring likely account for the superior activity of CEM-101. The results of chemical probing suggest that the orientation of the CEM-101 extended side chain observed in the E. coli ribosome closely resembles its placement in Staphylococcus aureus ribosomes and thus likely accurately reflects interaction of CEM-101 with the ribosomes of the pathogenic bacterial targets of the drug. Chemical probing further demonstrated weak binding of CEM-101, but not of erythromycin, to the ribosome dimethylated at A2058 by the action of Erm methyltransferase.


Annual review of biophysics | 2010

Ribosome Structure and Dynamics During Translocation and Termination

Jack A. Dunkle; Jamie H. D. Cate

Protein biosynthesis, or translation, occurs on the ribosome, a large RNA-protein assembly universally conserved in all forms of life. Over the last decade, structures of the small and large ribosomal subunits and of the intact ribosome have begun to reveal the molecular details of how the ribosome works. Both cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography continue to provide fresh insights into the mechanism of translation. In this review, we describe the most recent structural models of the bacterial ribosome that shed light on the movement of messenger RNA and transfer RNA on the ribosome after each peptide bond is formed, a process termed translocation. We also discuss recent structures that reveal the molecular basis for stop codon recognition during translation termination. Finally, we review recent advances in understanding how bacteria handle errors in both translocation and termination.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Molecular recognition and modification of the 30S ribosome by the aminoglycoside-resistance methyltransferase NpmA

Jack A. Dunkle; Kellie Vinal; Pooja M. Desai; Natalia Zelinskaya; Miloje Savic; Dayne M. West; Graeme L. Conn; Christine M. Dunham

Significance Increasing global spread of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria threatens a postantibiotic era in healthcare. Detailed studies of resistance mechanisms are therefore urgently required. The ribosome is a major antibiotic target, but bacteria can acquire resistance by modification of drug-binding sites. Here, we describe, to our knowledge, the first molecular snapshot of bacterial ribosome recognition by a pathogen-derived, aminoglycoside-resistance rRNA methyltransferase. Our results support a model in which initial rigid docking on a highly conserved ribosome tertiary surface drives conformational changes in the enzyme that capture the target base within a remodeled active site. Extreme conservation of the ribosome-docking surface suggests there is no impediment to the spread of this resistance activity but also presents a target for specific inhibitor development. Aminoglycosides are potent, broad spectrum, ribosome-targeting antibacterials whose clinical efficacy is seriously threatened by multiple resistance mechanisms. Here, we report the structural basis for 30S recognition by the novel plasmid-mediated aminoglycoside-resistance rRNA methyltransferase A (NpmA). These studies are supported by biochemical and functional assays that define the molecular features necessary for NpmA to catalyze m1A1408 modification and confer resistance. The requirement for the mature 30S as a substrate for NpmA is clearly explained by its recognition of four disparate 16S rRNA helices brought into proximity by 30S assembly. Our structure captures a “precatalytic state” in which multiple structural reorganizations orient functionally critical residues to flip A1408 from helix 44 and position it precisely in a remodeled active site for methylation. Our findings provide a new molecular framework for the activity of aminoglycoside-resistance rRNA methyltransferases that may serve as a functional paradigm for other modification enzymes acting late in 30S biogenesis.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Structural insights into +1 frameshifting promoted by expanded or modification-deficient anticodon stem loops

Tatsuya Maehigashi; Jack A. Dunkle; Stacey J. Miles; Christine M. Dunham

Significance Biological fitness is dependent on the accurate flow of genetic information from DNA to mRNA to protein. Breakdown in ribosome translational fidelity is detrimental because of its central role in the production of proteins. Altering the 3-base genetic code usually results in the expression of aberrant or nonsense proteins that are degraded. Here, we describe molecular snapshots of the ribosome in the process of decoding a 4-base codon by a frameshift suppressor tRNA that results in a +1-nt shift of the mRNA reading frame. Conformational dynamics of the anticodon stem loop seem to drive remodeling of the tRNA–mRNA interaction to promote the +1 movement, which we predict occurs after accommodation of the tRNA onto the ribosome. Maintenance of the correct reading frame on the ribosome is essential for accurate protein synthesis. Here, we report structures of the 70S ribosome bound to frameshift suppressor tRNASufA6 and N1-methylguanosine at position 37 (m1G37) modification-deficient anticodon stem loopPro, both of which cause the ribosome to decode 4 rather than 3 nucleotides, resulting in a +1 reading frame. Our results reveal that decoding at +1 suppressible codons causes suppressor tRNASufA6 to undergo a rearrangement of its 5′ stem that destabilizes U32, thereby disrupting the conserved U32–A38 base pair. Unexpectedly, the removal of the m1G37 modification of tRNAPro also disrupts U32–A38 pairing in a structurally analogous manner. The lack of U32–A38 pairing provides a structural correlation between the transition from canonical translation and a +1 reading of the mRNA. Our structures clarify the molecular mechanism behind suppressor tRNA-induced +1 frameshifting and advance our understanding of the role played by the ribosome in maintaining the correct translational reading frame.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2013

Reorganization of an intersubunit bridge induced by disparate 16S ribosomal ambiguity mutations mimics an EF-Tu-bound state

Crystal E. Fagan; Jack A. Dunkle; Tatsuya Maehigashi; Mai N. Dang; Aishwarya Devaraj; Stacey J. Miles; Daoming Qin; Kurt Fredrick; Christine M. Dunham

After four decades of research aimed at understanding tRNA selection on the ribosome, the mechanism by which ribosomal ambiguity (ram) mutations promote miscoding remains unclear. Here, we present two X-ray crystal structures of the Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosome containing 16S rRNA ram mutations, G347U and G299A. Each of these mutations causes miscoding in vivo and stimulates elongation factor thermo unstable (EF-Tu)-dependent GTP hydrolysis in vitro. Mutation G299A is located near the interface of ribosomal proteins S4 and S5 on the solvent side of the subunit, whereas G347U is located 77 Å distant, at intersubunit bridge B8, close to where EF-Tu engages the ribosome. Despite these disparate locations, both mutations induce almost identical structural rearrangements that disrupt the B8 bridge—namely, the interaction of h8/h14 with L14 and L19. This conformation most closely resembles that seen upon EF-Tu⋅GTP⋅aminoacyl-tRNA binding to the 70S ribosome. These data provide evidence that disruption and/or distortion of B8 is an important aspect of GTPase activation. We propose that, by destabilizing B8, G299A and G347U reduce the energetic cost of attaining the GTPase-activated state and thereby decrease the stringency of decoding. This previously unappreciated role for B8 in controlling the decoding process may hold relevance for many other ribosomal mutations known to influence translational fidelity.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015

Defining the mRNA recognition signature of a bacterial toxin protein

Marc A. Schureck; Jack A. Dunkle; Tatsuya Maehigashi; Stacey J. Miles; Christine M. Dunham

Significance Bacteria have a tremendous capacity to rapidly adapt their gene expression profiles and metabolic rates through global regulatory responses. Toxin–antitoxin complexes regulate their own expression under exponential growth but inhibit energy-demanding processes like protein synthesis during stress. A majority of toxins display exquisite endonucleolytic specificity for mRNAs but only in the context of the ribosome. The molecular basis for this selectivity is unclear given their simple microbial RNase architecture. Here, we demonstrate the mechanistic determinants for host inhibition of growth B (HigB) toxin selection of mRNA substrates. Moreover, we propose that ribosome-dependent toxins recognize their mRNA substrates primarily through identification of the third nucleotide of the codon, contrary to how tRNAs and other translation factors also recognize the A site. Bacteria contain multiple type II toxins that selectively degrade mRNAs bound to the ribosome to regulate translation and growth and facilitate survival during the stringent response. Ribosome-dependent toxins recognize a variety of three-nucleotide codons within the aminoacyl (A) site, but how these endonucleases achieve substrate specificity remains poorly understood. Here, we identify the critical features for how the host inhibition of growth B (HigB) toxin recognizes each of the three A-site nucleotides for cleavage. X-ray crystal structures of HigB bound to two different codons on the ribosome illustrate how HigB uses a microbial RNase-like nucleotide recognition loop to recognize either cytosine or adenosine at the second A-site position. Strikingly, a single HigB residue and 16S rRNA residue C1054 form an adenosine-specific pocket at the third A-site nucleotide, in contrast to how tRNAs decode mRNA. Our results demonstrate that the most important determinant for mRNA cleavage by ribosome-dependent toxins is interaction with the third A-site nucleotide.


Biochimie | 2015

Mechanisms of mRNA frame maintenance and its subversion during translation of the genetic code

Jack A. Dunkle; Christine M. Dunham

Important viral and cellular gene products are regulated by stop codon readthrough and mRNA frameshifting, processes whereby the ribosome detours from the reading frame defined by three nucleotide codons after initiation of translation. In the last few years, rapid progress has been made in mechanistically characterizing both processes and also revealing that trans-acting factors play important regulatory roles in frameshifting. Here, we review recent biophysical studies that bring new molecular insights to stop codon readthrough and frameshifting. Lastly, we consider whether there may be common mechanistic themes in -1 and +1 frameshifting based on recent X-ray crystal structures of +1 frameshift-prone tRNAs bound to the ribosome.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jack A. Dunkle's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander S. Mankin

University of Illinois at Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge