Jagadeesh Babu Rangisetty

PMMA-stimulus generalization to the optical isomers of MBDB and 3,4-DMA

Psychoactive phenylisopropylamines can produce one or more of several different stimulus effects in animals. These effects are typified by the hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM), the central stimulant amphetamine, and by N-methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (PMMA), an agent whose actions are not yet well understood. The optical isomers of two phenylisopropylamines known to lack DOM and amphetamine-stimulus character, that is N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminobutane (MBDB) and 1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (3,4-DMA), were examined in rats trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg of PMMA from vehicle. The PMMA stimulus (ED(50)=0.4 mg/kg) generalized to all four agents: S(+)-MBDB (ED(50)=0.8 mg/kg), R(-)-MBDB (ED(50)=2.0 mg/kg), S(+)-3,4-DMA (ED(50)=2.6 mg/kg) and R(-)-3,4-DMA (ED(50)=3.9 mg/kg). The results show that these agents produce stimulus effects similar to those produced by PMMA. Both isomers of MBDB have been previously demonstrated to substitute for N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA) in rats trained to discriminate MDMA from vehicle, but MBDB-trained animals failed to recognize DOM or amphetamine. Similar results were obtained with the 3,4-DMA optical isomers in the present investigation using rats trained to discriminate MDMA, DOM or (+)-amphetamine from vehicle; both isomers of 3,4-DMA substituted for an MDMA stimulus, but not for a DOM or amphetamine stimulus. Taken together, the evidence suggests that PMMA, S(+)-MBDB, R(-)-MBDB, S(+)-3,4-DMA, R(-)-3,4-DMA, and S(+)-MDMA can produce common stimulus effects in rats. The present findings also better define the PMMA stimulus and the structural requirements necessary to produce this type of stimulus effect.

Further characterization of the stimulus properties of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinoline

This investigation is based on the premise that conformational restriction of abused phenylalkylamines in a tetrahydroisoquinoline conformation alters their pharmacology in such a manner that their original action is lost and that a new action emerges. TDIQ or 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1,3-dioxolo[4,5-g]isoquinoline, is a conformationally constrained phenylalkylamine that serves as a discriminative stimulus in animals. Although TDIQ bears structural resemblance to phenylalkylamine stimulants (e.g., amphetamine), hallucinogens (e.g., 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane [DOM]), and designer drugs (e.g., N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane [MDMA], N-methyl-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane [PMMA]), the TDIQ stimulus failed to generalize to (+)amphetamine or MDMA. In the present investigation, further evaluations were made of the stimulus nature of TDIQ. Specifically, the stimulus similarities of TDIQ, PMMA, and DOM were examined. In no case was stimulus generalization (substitution) observed. The results confirm that TDIQ produces stimulus effects distinct from those of the abovementioned phenylalkylamines. We also examined the structure-activity relationships of a series of TDIQ analogs, including several that might be viewed as conformationally restricted (CR) analogs of phenylalkylamine hallucinogens, stimulants, and designer drugs. These agents were examined in rats trained to discriminate either DOM (1.0 mg/kg), (+)amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg), MDMA (1.5 mg/kg), or TDIQ (5.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle. Whereas we have demonstrated that none of these agents retains their respective phenylalkylamine stimulus actions, several of these agents were found to substitute for TDIQ. N-Methylation abolished TDIQ-stimulus action. These results, coupled with previous findings, imply that TDIQ derivatives represent a novel class of phenylalkylamines analogs with unique stimulus properties. Preliminary radioligand binding studies suggest that an alpha2-adrenergic mechanism might underlie the stimulus effects produced by TDIQ.