Richard Young

Antagonism of the effects of the hallucinogen dom and the purported 5-HT agonist quipazine by 5-HT2 antagonists

Rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) from saline in a two-lever operant choice task were administered doses of mescaline, LSD, 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-OMe DMT), quipazine, TFMPP and RU-24969. The DOM-stimulus generalized to the three hallucinogenic agents and to quipazine, but not to the purported serotonin agonists TFMPP or RU-24969. Pretreatment of the animals with the 5-HT2 antagonists ketanserin and pirenperone antagonized the effect produced by DOM. Pirenperone also blocked DOM-stimulus generalization to mescaline, LSD, 5-OMe DMT and quipazine. The results of this study suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of DOM, the three hallucinogenic agents to which DOM-stimulus generalization occurred, and quipazine, may involve those sub-populations of serotonin receptors that are labeled by tritiated ketanserin (i.e. 5-HT2 sites).

A fully automated light/dark apparatus useful for comparing anxiolytic agents

The effects of known anxiolytic agents and putative anxiolytic agents were assessed in mice in a fully automated 2-compartment light/dark test. Significant increases in lit area activities (e.g., time spent in the lit area, locomotor activity, rearing behavior) were used as possible indicators of anxiolytic-like action. The measurement found most consistent and useful for assessing antianxiety-like activity was the time mice spent in the lit area. The benzodiazepine, diazepam; the 5-HT1A agent, ipsapirone; and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron, produced significant anxiolytic-like activity between doses of 1.0 to 10.0 mg/kg, 17.8 to 31.6 mg/kg, and 0.0001 to 1.0 mg/kg respectively. The 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH DPAT, also exhibited anxiolytic-like action between doses of 0.0005 to 3.16 mg/kg. In contrast, the peripheral 5-HT3 receptor agonist, N-phenylbiguanide; the antidepressant, imipramine; the neuroleptic, chlorpromazine; and the CNS stimulant, S(+)-amphetamine, did not display antianxiety-like activity. The positive results obtained for the three types of compounds (benzodiazepine, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT3) indicate that this fully automated light/dark apparatus may be useful for identifying known and putative anxiolytic agents.

Further investigation of the discriminative stimulus properties of MDA

Rats trained to discriminate either (+)-amphetamine or (+/-)-MDA from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task, were used to study the stimulus effects of MDA and its two optical isomers. Amphetamine-stimulus generalization occurred to S(+)-MDA, but not to its enantiomer R(-)-MDA. This, coupled with our earlier finding of DOM-stimulus generalization to R(-)-MDA but not to S(+)-MDA, suggests that the stimulus effects of S(+)-MDA are predominantly amphetamine-like while those of R(-)-MDA are more DOM-like. Thus, animals trained to discriminate racemic MDA from saline can apparently recognize members of both classes of agents.

Cathinone: An Investigation of Several N -Alkyl and Methylenedioxy-Substituted Analogs

Structurally, methcathinone is to cathinone what methamphetamine is to amphetamine. Due to increased interest in the abuse of such agents we wished to determine if certain derivatives of cathinone would behave in a manner consistent with what is known about their amphetamine counterparts; that is, can amphetamine structure-activity relationships be extrapolated to cathinone analogs? As expected on the basis of known structure-activity relationships for amphetaminergic agents, both N-monoethylcathinone and N-mono-n-propylcathinone (N-Et CAT and N-Pr CAT; ED50 = 0.77 and 2.03 mg/kg, respectively) produced amphetamine-like stimulus effects in rats trained to discriminate 1 mg/kg of (+)amphetamine from vehicle and were somewhat less potent than racemic methcathinone. In contrast, (-)N,N-dimethylcathinone or (-)Di Me CAT (ED50 = 0.44 mg/kg) was more potent than expected; although (+)N,N-dimethylamphetamine is sevenfold less potent than (+)methamphetamine, (-)Di Me CAT is only about 1.6-fold less potent than (-)methcathinone, and is essentially equipotent with (-)cathinone. In addition, although it has been previously demonstrated that 1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDA) results in stimulus generalization in rats trained to discriminate (+)amphetamine or DOM from vehicle, the cathinone counterpart of MDA (i.e., MDC) resulted in partial (maximum: 58%) generalization in (+)amphetamine-trained animals, and failed to produce >7% DOM-appropriate responding in rats trained to discriminate DOM from vehicle. On the other hand, the N-methyl analog of MDC (i.e., MDMC) behaved in a manner similar to that of the N-methyl analog of MDA (i.e., MDMA); that is, a (+)amphetamine stimulus (MDMC: ED50 = 2.36 mg/kg) but not a DOM stimulus generalized to MDMC. In MDMA-trained rats, stimulus generalization occured both to MDC and MDMC (ED50 = 1.64 and 1.60 mg/kg, respectively). Although this and previous studies have demonstrated that significant parallelisms exist between the structure-activity relationships of amphetamine analogs and cathinone analogs, we now report several unexpected qualitative and/or quantitative differences. It is suggested that caution be used in attempting to draw conclusions or make predictions about the activity and potency of novel cathinone analogs by analogy to the structure-activity relationships derived from amphetamine-related agents; it would appear that each new cathinone analog will require individual investigation.

Behavioral and biochemical investigations of bupropion metabolites.

The stimulus effects of bupropion metabolites were examined in a drug discrimination procedure using (-)nicotine- and (+)amphetamine-trained rats. (+)- and (-)threohydrobupropion partially substituted in each group. R,R-hydroxybupropion produced vehicle-appropriate responding in (-)nicotine animals but, when given in combination with the training dose of (-)nicotine, resulted in an attenuated effect. S,S-Hydroxybupropion partially (66%) substituted for (-)nicotine. In (+)amphetamine-trained animals, S,S-hydroxybupropion (ED50=4.4 mg/kg) generalized completely and was similar in potency to bupropion (ED50=5.4 mg/kg). Bupropion and its metabolites lacked affinity for nicotinic acetylcholinergic receptors, but all antagonized (-)nicotine-induced 86Rb+ efflux in cells expressing alpha3beta4 nicotinic cholinergic receptors. S,S-Hydroxybupropion possessed affinity at the dopamine transporter comparable to bupropion, and was also found to bind at the norepinephrine transporter. Although it is unlikely that any metabolite isomer is chiefly responsible for the stimulus actions of bupropion, some probably play a role in the complex actions of this agent.

Nicotine and bupropion share a similar discriminative stimulus effect

Bupropion is a weakly potent central nervous system (CNS) stimulant that is marketed both as an antidepressant and as an anti-smoking aid. The mechanism(s) by which it produces its effects is not well understood. In the present study, the effect of bupropion was examined in rats trained to discriminate the stimulus effect of 0.60 mg/kg of (-)-nicotine from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination task. In tests of stimulus generalization (substitution), the nicotine (ED(50)=0.17 mg/kg) stimulus completely generalized to bupropion (ED(50)=5.50 mg/kg). In addition, interaction studies were conducted that evaluated the effect of 3.0 mg/kg of bupropion, a dose that when given alone produced saline-appropriate responding, in combination with various doses of nicotine. This application resulted in an enhancement of the potency of nicotine (ED(50)=0.05 mg/kg), as indicated by a leftward shift of the nicotine dose-effect function. In tests of stimulus antagonism, various doses of bupropion were administered prior to the training dose of nicotine and were found to be ineffective as antagonists of the nicotine stimulus. In contrast, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nicotine receptor) antagonist mecamylamine (AD(50)=0.40 mg/kg) completely blocked the stimulus effect of nicotine. Mecamylamine did not attenuate the stimulus generalization of bupropion. The results demonstrated that bupropion can produce a nicotine-like response in nicotine-trained animals, but it does so via a mechanism of action that is unlike that of nicotine. It is speculated that bupropion may be somewhat effective as an anti-smoking treatment in people who are motivated to quit smoking because low doses of bupropion produce a nicotine-like effect(s) that serve as a suitable substitute for nicotine.

Methcathinone (“cat”): An enantiomeric potency comparison

With regard to its chemical structure, methcathinone is to cathinone what methamphetamine is to amphetamine. Although it is a drug of abuse outside the United States, methcathione is only recently making an appearance on the clandestine market in this country and has just been classified a Schedule I substance under the Emergency Scheduling Act. We have previously demonstrated that racemic methcathinone produces locomotor stimulation in mice, and substitutes for cocaine and (+)amphetamine in rats trained to discriminate either cocaine or (+)amphetamine, respectively, from saline in tests of stimulus generalization. Because an enantiomeric potency comparison has never been reported for the optical isomers of methcathinone, in the present investigation we synthesized samples of S(-)- and R(+)methcathinone and compared them for their ability: a) to produce locomotor stimulation in mice, b) to elicit cocaine-like responding in rats trained to discriminate 8.0 mg/kg of cocaine from saline vehicle, and c) to elicit (+)-amphetamine-appropriate responding in rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of (+)amphetamine from saline vehicle. S(-)Methcathinone was about twice as potent as S(+)amphetamine and three to five times more potent than R(+)methcathinone in the three pharmacologic assays. We conclude that both optical isomers possess central stimulant character, but that S(-)methcathinone is somewhat more potent than R(+)methcathinone.

Investigation of hallucinogenic and related β-carbolines

Abstract Certain β-carbolines are known to be hallucinogenic in humans, and several produce stimulus effects in animals similar to those of the classical hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM). Classical hallucinogens bind at 5-HT2 serotonin receptors and these receptors are thought to play a role in their mechanism of action. In the present study, we examined the binding of 15 β-carbolines at rat 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Affinities (Ki values) of the β-carbolines ranged from about 100 nM to greater than 10 000 nM depending upon the degree of saturation of the pyridyl ring, and upon the presence and location of methoxy substituents in the benzenoid ring. In a further study, six rats were trained to discriminate the hallucinogenic β-carboline harmaline (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from vehicle using a VI-15s schedule of reinforcement. This represents the first time a hallucinogenic β-carboline has been used as a training drug in a drug discrimination study. Administration of DOM to the harmaline-trained animals resulted in 76% harmaline-appropriate responding at 1.25 mg/kg DOM and disruption of behavior at a higher dose. Taken together, the results of the present investigation demonstrate that: (a) certain β-carbolines bind at 5-HT2 receptors; (b) that harmaline serves as a training drug at 3.0 mg/kg in drug discrimination studies with rats as subjects; and that (c) there is some similarity between the stimulus effects produced by harmaline and DOM.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the serotonin agonist 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (TFMPP)

Using a standard two-lever drug discrimination procedure, twelve rats were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of the serotonin (5-HT) agonist TFMPP from saline. Once trained, the animals displayed a dose-related decrease in discriminative performance upon administration of lower doses of TFMPP. Tests of stimulus generalization were performed using the purported 5-HT agonist RU-24, 969 and 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM). While TFMPP produced stimulus effects similar to those of RU-24,969, these effects seem to be dissimilar to those of DOM. The results of the present study suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of TFMPP may involve a 5-HT1-related mechanism.

DOM-stimulus generalization to LSD and other hallucinogenic indolealkylamines

Stimulus generalization studies were conducted using rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of the phenalkylamine hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) from saline in a two-lever operant procedure. The results suggest that certain indolealkylamine hallucinogens, including LSD and several alpha-methyltryptamine, N,N-dialkyltryptamine and beta-carboline derivatives, are capable of producing stimulus effects similar to those produced by DOM. Furthermore, for twelve agents where human data are available, a significant correlation exists between discrimination-derived ED50 values and hallucinogenic potency.