Jaime Murillo

Admission to Hospitals With On-Site Cardiac Catheterization Facilities Impact on Long-Term Costs and Outcomes

BACKGROUND Admission to a hospital with a capability for cardiac procedures is associated with a higher likelihood of referral for a cardiac procedure but not with a better short-term clinical outcome. Whether there are differences in long-term mortality and resource consumption is not clear. We sought to determine whether elderly Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities have lower long-term hospital costs and better outcomes than patients admitted to hospitals without such facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS As part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot in Connecticut, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files. The study sample included 2521 patients with acute myocardial infarction covered by Medicare from 1992 to 1993. The cardiac catheterization rate was higher in the hospitals with facilities (38.6% versus 26.9%; P<0.001), but the revascularization rate was similar (20.5% versus 19.5%) during the initial episode of care and at 3 years (29.7% versus 29.7%). Mortality rates were similar for patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals at 30 days (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.42) and at 3 years (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.26). The adjusted readmission rates were significantly lower among patients admitted to hospitals with cardiac catheterization facilities (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94). However, the overall mean days in the hospital for the 3 years after admission was 25.9 for patients admitted to hospitals with facilities and 24.6 for the other patients (P=0.234). Adjusting for baseline patient characteristics, there was no significant difference in the 3-year costs between patients admitted to the 2 types of hospitals. CONCLUSIONS With higher rates of cardiac catheterization and lower readmission rates, patients admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities did not have significantly different hospital costs compared with patients admitted to hospitals without these facilities. There was also no significant difference in short- or long-term mortality rates.

Use and effectiveness of intravenous heparin therapy for treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly

OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the use and association with 30-day mortality of intravenous heparin for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients not treated with a reperfusion strategy and without contraindications to anticoagulation. BACKGROUND The benefit of using full-dose intravenous heparin for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly is not known. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using hospital medical records of all Medicare beneficiaries admitted to the hospital with an acute myocardial infarction in Alabama, Connecticut, Iowa and Wisconsin from June 1992 through February 1993. RESULTS Among the 6,935 patients > or = 65 years old who had no absolute chart-documented contraindications to heparin, 3,227 (47%) received early full-dose intravenous heparin therapy. After adjustment for baseline differences in demographic, clinical and treatment factors between patients with and without heparin, the use of heparin (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.18) was not associated with a significantly better 30-day mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS Although intravenous heparin was commonly used for treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly, it was not associated with an improved 30-day mortality rate. Although the findings of this observational study must be interpreted with care, they lead us to question whether the prevalent use of intravenous heparin has therapeutic effectiveness in this population.

Trends in the Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries Admitted to the Hospital With Unstable Angina

OBJECTIVES We sought to 1) determine the proportion of appropriate elderly patients admitted to the hospital with unstable angina who are treated with aspirin and heparin; 2) identify patient factors associated with the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) guideline-based use of aspirin and heparin; and 3) compare practice patterns and patient outcomes before and after publication of the AHCPR guidelines. BACKGROUND Improving the care of patients with unstable angina may provide immediate opportunities to mitigate the adverse consequences of unstable angina. However, despite the importance of this diagnosis, there is a paucity of information on the patterns of treatment and outcomes across diverse sites and recent trends in practice that have occurred, especially since the publication of the AHCPR practice guidelines. METHOD We performed a retrospective cohort study using data created from medical charts and administrative files. The sample included 300 consecutive patients admitted to one of three Connecticut hospitals in the period 1993 to 1994 and 150 consecutive patients admitted in 1995 with a principal discharge diagnosis of unstable angina or chest pain. RESULTS Of the 384 patients > or =65 years old who had no contraindications to aspirin on hospital admission, 276 (72%) received it. Of the 369 patients > or =65 years old who had no contraindications to heparin on admission, 88 (24%) received it. Among the 321 patients > or =65 years old who had no contraindications to aspirin at hospital discharge, 208 (65%) were prescribed it. When 1995 was compared with 1993 to 1994, the use of aspirin (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 4.0) and heparin (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.9) on hospital admission significantly increased, and the use of aspirin at discharge (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8 to 2.4) increased. Concomitantly, there was a significant reduction in 30-day readmission (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99). CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate an improvement in the care and outcomes of elderly patients with unstable angina, but there remain opportunities for further improvement.

Clinical correlates of in-hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age and older

Although cost estimates for acute myocardial infarction are necessary for decisions about allocating scarce resources, there is a relative paucity of studies that estimate these costs across the entire spectrum of hospitals in actual clinical practice. This study sought to determine the correlates of in-hospital costs for acute myocardial infarction in patients 65 years of age and older. In the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project pilot, medical records were abstracted for acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations in Connecticut from June 1, 1992, through May 20, 1993. In-hospital costs were calculated by multiplying charges from cost centers by the Medicare ratio of cost-to-charge. Among the 2628 patients in the study sample, the total mean in-hospital cost was

Thrombolytic therapy for eligible elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

14,772, and the median in-hospital cost was

Racial Disparities in Health Literacy and Access to Care among Patients with Heart Failure

10,409 (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile,

Cardiac Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

6960 to

Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly with diabetes

17,225). The largest proportion of the costs were concentrated in room costs (43% of the total). Although several demographic and clinical characteristics were significantly associated with cost, they accounted for only 7% of the variation. In-hospital procedures and adverse outcomes accounted for 53% of the variation.