Jakob Lüker

Five-Year Follow-Up After Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using the Stepwise Approach and Prognostic Factors for Success

Background—In the meantime, catheter ablation is widely used for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). There is a paucity of data about long-term outcomes. This study evaluates (1) 5-year single and multiple procedure success and (2) prognostic factors for arrhythmia recurrences after catheter ablation of persistent AF using the stepwise approach aiming at AF termination. Methods and Results—A total of 549 patients with persistent AF underwent de novo catheter ablation using the stepwise approach (2007–2009). A total of 493 patients were included (Holter ECGs ≥every 6 months). Mean follow-up was 59±16 months with 2.1±1.1 procedures per patient. Single and multiple procedure success rates were 20.1% and 55.9%, respectively (80% off antiarrhythmic drug). Antiarrhythmic drug–free multiple procedure success was 46%. Long-term recurrences (n=171) were paroxysmal AF in 48 patients (28%) and persistent AF/atrial tachycardia in 123 patients (72%). Multivariable recurrent event analysis revealed the following factors favoring arrhythmia recurrence: failure to terminate AF during index procedure (hazard ratio [HR], 1.279; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.093–1.497; P=0.002), number of procedures (HR, 1.154; 95% CI, 1.051–1.267; P=0.003), female sex (HR, 1.263; 95% CI, 1.027–1.553; P=0.027), and the presence of structural heart disease (HR, 1.236; 95% CI, 1.003–1.524; P=0.047). AF termination was correlated with a higher rate of consecutive procedures because of atrial tachycardia recurrences (P=0.003; HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20–2.43). Conclusions—Catheter ablation of persistent AF using the stepwise approach provides limited long-term freedom of arrhythmias often requiring multiple procedures. AF termination, the number of procedures, sex, and the presence of structural heart disease correlate with outcome success. AF termination is associated with consecutive atrial tachycardia procedures.

Loss of Pace Capture on the Ablation Line During Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus “Dormant Conduction”: Is Adenosine Expendable?

Permanent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains an essential goal of ablation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. Aim of this study was the intraindividual comparison of unexcitability to pacing along the ablation line versus dormant conduction (DC) as additional procedural endpoints.

Impact of biatrial defragmentation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results from a randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND Single procedure success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) are still unsatisfactory. In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) after PVI results in improved outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate if PAF-patients with intraprocedurally sustained AF after PVI might benefit from additional CFAE ablation. METHODS A total of 1134 consecutive patients underwent a first catheter ablation procedure of PAF between June 2008 and December 2012. In most patients, AF was either not inducible or terminated during PVI. In 68 patients (6%), AF sustained after successful PVI. These patients were randomized to either cardioversion (PVI-alone group; n = 33) or additional CFAE ablation (PVI+CFAE group; n = 35) and followed up every 1-3 months and serial Holter recordings were also obtained. The primary end point was the recurrence of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS Procedure duration (127 ± 6 minutes vs 174 ± 10 minutes), radiofrequency application time (44 ± 3 minutes vs 74 ± 5 minutes), and fluoroscopy time (26 ± 2 minutes vs 41 ± 3 minutes) were longer in the PVI+CFAE group (all P < .001). In 30 of 35 patients (86%) in the PVI+CFAE group, ablation terminated AF. There was no significant group difference with respect to freedom from AF/AT (22 of 33 [67%] vs 22 of 35 [63%]; P = .66). Subsequently, 10 of 11 patients in the PVI-alone group (91%) and 11 of 13 patients in PVI+CFAE group (85%) underwent repeat ablation (P = 1.00). Overall, 29 of 33 [88%] vs 30 of 35 [86%] patients (P = 1.00) were free from AF/AT after 1.4 ± 0.1 vs 1.4 ± 0.2 (P = .87) procedures. CONCLUSION Patients with sustained AF after PVI in a PAF cohort are rare. Regarding AF/AT recurrence, these patients did not benefit from further CFAE ablation compared to PVI alone, but are exposed to longer procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and radiofrequency application time.

Propofol sedation administered by cardiologists for patients undergoing catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia

AIMS Propofol sedation has been shown to be safe for atrial fibrillation ablation and internal cardioverter-defibrillator implantation but its use for catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has yet to be evaluated. Here, we tested the hypothesis that VT ablation can be performed using propofol sedation administered by trained nurses under a cardiologists supervision. METHODS AND RESULTS Data of 205 procedures (157 patients, 1.3 procedures/patient) undergoing CA for sustained VT under propofol sedation were analysed. The primary endpoint was change of sedation and/or discontinuation of propofol sedation due to side effects and/or haemodynamic instability. Propofol cessation was necessary in 24 of 205 procedures. These procedures (Group A; n = 24, 11.7%) were compared with those with continued propofol sedation (Group B; n = 181, 88.3%). Propofol sedation was discontinued due to hypotension (n = 22; 10.7%), insufficient oxygenation (n = 1, 0.5%), or hypersalivation (n = 1, 0.5%). Procedures in Group A were significantly longer (210 [180-260] vs. 180 [125-220] min, P = 0.005), had a lower per hour propofol rate (3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 mg/kg of body weight/h, P = 0.004), and higher cumulative dose of fentanyl administered (0.15 [0.13-0.25] vs. 0.1 [0.05-0.13] mg, P < 0.001), compared with patients in Group B. Five (2.4%) adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION Sedation using propofol can be safely performed for VT ablation under the supervision of cardiologists. Close haemodynamic monitoring is required, especially in elderly patients and during lengthy procedures, which carrying a higher risk for systolic blood pressure decline.

Incidence of intracardiac thrombus formation prior to electrical cardioversion in respect to the mode of oral anticoagulation

To evaluate the incidence of newly diagnosed intracardiac thrombi (ICT) in respect to the mode of OAC in patients undergoing cardioversion (CV).

Combination of a subcutaneous ICD in a patient with a baroreceptor activation device: Feasibility, safety, and precautions: A Case Report: KUFFER et al .

We present a case of a patient with a baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) receiving a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD). We anticipated two possible hazardous interactions between the two devices. Stimulation by the BAT could be adjudicated as noise and result in underdetection of ventricular arrhythmias or it might be misinterpreted as ventricular arrhythmias and lead to inappropriate shocks. Postop ensing occurred, the upper limit of pulse width of the BAT was limited because of noise detection by the S‐ICD, but the upper limit of amplitude was limited by patients discomfort. In this patient, the combination of a BAT and an S‐ICD was safe.

Implantation of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator with right parasternal electrode position in a patient with D-transposition of the great arteries and concomitant AAI pacemaker: a case report

Abstract Background Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is indicated in patients with structural heart disease who have had an aborted cardiac arrest (ACA). After atrial repair of d-transposition of the great arteries (d-TGA, Mustard repair) patients seem to be at a higher risk of failing intraoperative subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) shock testing. Case summary We report the case of a 45-year-old patient with congenital heart disease (CHD) who suffered a cardiac arrest from ventricular fibrillation and was subsequently implanted with a S-ICD. We describe the challenges of ICD therapy in patients after Mustard procedure for d-TGA, with the additional challenge of concomitant AAI pacemaker therapy. In this patient, we opted for the implantation of an S-ICD, and detail the necessary considerations and operative technique employed in this patient. A right parasternal electrode position was chosen and intraoperative shock testing was successful. Discussion Patients after atrial switch surgery for d-TGA and ACA require careful consideration of the appropriate type of ICD therapy. Subcutaneous ICD implantation with right parasternal electrode position may be a viable option in these patients.

Ablation von persistierendem und lange persistierendem Vorhofflimmern@@@Catheter ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: Optimales Vorgehen und Ergebnisse@@@Strategies and results

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a meanwhile established therapy option, which is most frequently performed using radiofrequency ablation. Mid-term success rate of 70 % are achievable with a single ablation procedure. However, the mechanistics of persistent atrial fibrillation are less well understood and catheter ablation is a far more challenging procedure. Different ablation approaches are being performed to treat persistent atrial fibrillation ranging from sole pulmonary vein isolation to additional ablation of fractionated electrograms aiming for termination of atrial fibrillation. Thus far, it has not been investigated which strategy is most successful in treating persistent atrial fibrillation. After extended ablation of atrial fibrillation, occurrence of organized atrial arrhythmias is not uncommon and can be successfully ablated. These consecutive arrhythmias can be considered as a next step towards stable sinus rhythm after repeat ablation. Improvement of mapping methods as well as a better understanding of mechanisms of atrial fibrillation may increase success rate of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and may also help to improve success rate of these complex procedures.

Ablation von persistierendem und lange persistierendem Vorhofflimmern

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a meanwhile established therapy option, which is most frequently performed using radiofrequency ablation. Mid-term success rate of 70 % are achievable with a single ablation procedure. However, the mechanistics of persistent atrial fibrillation are less well understood and catheter ablation is a far more challenging procedure. Different ablation approaches are being performed to treat persistent atrial fibrillation ranging from sole pulmonary vein isolation to additional ablation of fractionated electrograms aiming for termination of atrial fibrillation. Thus far, it has not been investigated which strategy is most successful in treating persistent atrial fibrillation. After extended ablation of atrial fibrillation, occurrence of organized atrial arrhythmias is not uncommon and can be successfully ablated. These consecutive arrhythmias can be considered as a next step towards stable sinus rhythm after repeat ablation. Improvement of mapping methods as well as a better understanding of mechanisms of atrial fibrillation may increase success rate of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and may also help to improve success rate of these complex procedures.

Catheter ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Strategies and results

Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a meanwhile established therapy option, which is most frequently performed using radiofrequency ablation. Mid-term success rate of 70 % are achievable with a single ablation procedure. However, the mechanistics of persistent atrial fibrillation are less well understood and catheter ablation is a far more challenging procedure. Different ablation approaches are being performed to treat persistent atrial fibrillation ranging from sole pulmonary vein isolation to additional ablation of fractionated electrograms aiming for termination of atrial fibrillation. Thus far, it has not been investigated which strategy is most successful in treating persistent atrial fibrillation. After extended ablation of atrial fibrillation, occurrence of organized atrial arrhythmias is not uncommon and can be successfully ablated. These consecutive arrhythmias can be considered as a next step towards stable sinus rhythm after repeat ablation. Improvement of mapping methods as well as a better understanding of mechanisms of atrial fibrillation may increase success rate of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and may also help to improve success rate of these complex procedures.