Jakob Neubauer
University of Freiburg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jakob Neubauer.
Investigative Radiology | 2014
Jakob Neubauer; Johannes M. Voigt; Hannah Lang; Carsten Scheuer; Sebastian M. Goerke; Mathias Langer; Martin Fiebich; Elmar Kotter
ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the image quality of a compact mobile flat-panel computed tomography (FPCT) capable of extremity imaging and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in examinations with the same radiation dose. Material and MethodsImaging with the FPCT was performed with default settings. Monte Carlo simulations were used to calculate equivalent dose settings for the 320-row MDCT. Simulations were based on and validated by dose measurements. Homogeneity, geometric distortion, artifacts, accuracy of Hounsfield values, contrast, and spatial resolution were evaluated in different imaging phantoms. Whitney-Mann U Test and Spearman &rgr; were used for statistical analysis. ResultsHomogeneity reached 2.5% for the FPCT and 0.5% for the MDCT. Hounsfield values were more accurate and contrast to noise ratios were higher for the MDCT than the FPCT (P ⩽ 0.001). The MDCT depicted more rod inserts than the FPCT did. No significant geometric distortion was detected in either modality. The FPCT was more prone to artifacts around Krischner wires with a diameter of 2 mm (P = 0.05-0.001), whereas the MDCT showed a higher amount of artifacts around wires with a diameter of 0.8 mm (P ⩽ 0.001). Spatial resolution was 1 lp/mm (xy), 1.7 lp/mm (z) for the FPCT and 1 lp/mm (xy), less than 1 lp/mm (z) for the MDCT. ConclusionsWe compared a mobile FPCT and a 320-row MDCT by using the same radiation dose for scans. We found the spatial resolution to be higher in the FPCT. Hounsfield units were more accurate and homogeneity and contrast resolution were better in MDCT. The MDCT was also less prone to artifacts from thick Kirschner wires but showed comparably more artifacts around thin wires.
Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2016
Jörg Bayer; Jakob Neubauer; Ulrich Saueressig; Norbert P. Südkamp; Kilian Reising
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of paediatric pelvic injury is low, yet they are often indicative of accompanying injuries, and an instable pelvis at presentation is related to long-term poor outcome. Judging diastasis of the sacroiliac joint in paediatric pelvic computed tomography is challenging, as information on their normal appearance is scarce. We therefore sought to generate age- and gender-related standard width measurements of the sacroiliac joint in children for comparison. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 427 pelvic computed tomography scans in paediatric patients (<18 years old) were retrospectively evaluated. After applying exclusion criteria, 350 scans remained for measurements. Taking a standard approach we measured the sacroiliac joint width bilaterally in axial and coronal planes. RESULTS We illustrate age- and gender-related measurements of the sacroiliac joint width as a designated continuous 3rd, 15th, 50th, 85th and 97th centile graph, respectively. Means and standard deviations in the joint width are reported for four age groups. There are distinct changes in the sacroiliac joints appearance during growth. In general, male children exhibit broader sacroiliac joints than females at the same age, although this difference is significant only in the 11 to 15-year-old age group. CONCLUSION The sacroiliac joint width in children as measured in coronal and axial CT scans differs in association with age and gender. When the sacroiliac joint width is broader than the 97th centile published in our study, we strongly encourage considering a sacroiliac joint injury.
Medicine | 2015
Jakob Neubauer; Matthias Benndorf; Hannah Lang; Florian Lampert; Lars Kemna; Lukas Konstantinidis; Claudia Neubauer; Kilian Reising; Horst Zajonc; Elmar Kotter; Mathias Langer; Sebastian M. Goerke
Abstract To compare the visualization of cortical fractures, cortical defects, and orthopedic screws in a dedicated extremity flat-panel computed tomography (FPCT) scanner and a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. We used feet of European roe deer as phantoms for cortical fractures, cortical defects, and implanted orthopedic screws. FPCT and MDCT scans were performed with equivalent dose settings. Six observers rated the scans according to number of fragments, size of defects, size of defects opposite orthopedic screws, and the length of different screws. The image quality regarding depiction of the cortical bone was assessed. The gold standard (real number of fragments) was evaluated by autopsy. The correlation of reader assessment of fragments, cortical defects, and screws with the gold standard was similar for FPCT and MDCT. Three readers rated the subjective image quality of the MDCT to be higher, whereas the others showed no preferences. Although the image quality was rated higher in the MDCT than in the FPCT by 3 out of 6 observers, both modalities proved to be comparable regarding the visualization of cortical fractures, cortical defects, and orthopedic screws and of use to musculoskeletal radiology regarding fracture detection and postsurgical evaluation in our experimental setting.
Archive | 2018
Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Simon Hein; Daniel Schlager; Fabian Adams; Matthias Benndorf; Benjamin Fritz; Mathias Langer; Albrecht Hesse; Martin Schoenthaler; Jakob Neubauer
Abstract Objectives: To validate AutoMated UroLithiasis Evaluation Tool (AMULET) software for kidney stone volumetry and compare its performance to standard clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Maximum diameter and volume of 96 urinary stones were measured as reference standard by three independent urologists. The same stones were positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom and CT scans acquired in standard settings. Three independent radiologists blinded to the reference values took manual measurements of the maximum diameter and automatic measurements of maximum diameter and volume. An “expected volume” was calculated based on manual diameter measurements using the formula: \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}
Journal of Endourology | 2018
Konrad Wilhelm; Arkadiusz Miernik; Simon Hein; Daniel Schlager; Fabian Adams; Matthias Benndorf; Benjamin Fritz; Mathias Langer; Albrecht Hesse; Martin Schoenthaler; Jakob Neubauer
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2017
Denise Schaffner; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Peter Deibert; Adhara Lazaro; Irmgard Merfort; Lisa Lutz; Jakob Neubauer; Manfred W. Baumstark; Wolfgang Kreisel; Wilfried Reichardt
V = \frac ...
Medicine | 2016
Jakob Neubauer; Eva Maria Spira; Juliane Strube; Mathias Langer; Christian Voss; Elmar Kotter
Abstract Objectives: To validate AutoMated UroLithiasis Evaluation Tool (AMULET) software for kidney stone volumetry and compare its performance to standard clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Maximum diameter and volume of 96 urinary stones were measured as reference standard by three independent urologists. The same stones were positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom and CT scans acquired in standard settings. Three independent radiologists blinded to the reference values took manual measurements of the maximum diameter and automatic measurements of maximum diameter and volume. An “expected volume” was calculated based on manual diameter measurements using the formula: \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}
Injury-international Journal of The Care of The Injured | 2016
Jakob Neubauer; Kilian Reising; Ulrich Saueressig; Norbert P. Südkamp; Jörg Bayer
computer assisted radiology and surgery | 2017
Matthias Benndorf; Jakob Neubauer; Mathias Langer; Elmar Kotter
V = \frac ...
PLOS ONE | 2016
Jakob Neubauer; Matthias Benndorf; Carolin Reidelbach; Tobias Krauß; Florian Lampert; Horst Zajonc; Elmar Kotter; Mathias Langer; Martin Fiebich; Sebastian M. Goerke
To test a magnetic resonance (MR) scanning protocol as a noninvasive tool to determine hepatic hemodynamics and to assess the degree of liver fibrosis in an animal model of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.