James A. Sterns
University of Florida
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James A. Sterns.
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2013
Mary Clare Ahearn; James A. Sterns
Given the geography and agroclimatic conditions of the Southeast, coupled with continued population expansion from in-migration, local foods markets may be a promising niche market for some farms in the region. The Southeast has more small farms than any other U.S. region. Using farm-level data, we address the question of how successful southeastern farms engaged in direct sales to consumers differ from other farms. We also include a case study of a marketing association in the panhandle of Florida. In both analyses, we focus on the role of the supply chain for direct sales in explaining farm returns.
Journal of Economic Issues | 2012
Veronique Theriault; James A. Sterns
Applying John R. Commonss institutional economic framework, this paper analyzes the evolution of key institutions in the Malian cotton sector, starting with Malis independence in 1960 to the ongoing market-oriented reforms in the 2000s. In accordance with Commonss economic theory, institutional changes in the Malian cotton sector have led to both intended and unintended consequences, impacting economic performance at the farm, gin, and state levels. This has, in turn, contributed to the emergence of new limiting factors. At present, lack of adequate technical advising, indebtedness, issues related to input access, discordance between farmers and their union leader representatives, unreasonable seed cotton prices, delays in payment, and low cotton yields are the current limiting factors to desired economic performance. Based on these findings, we draw policy recommendations for revitalizing the Malian cotton sector.
The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review | 2000
James A. Sterns; Donald J. Ricks
Many U.S. agricultural commodity industries are currently considering if and how they might implement a mandatory national generic promotion program. As U.S. industries consider how to finance these programs, one of the key decisions they face is the choice to include or exempt imported products from promotional assessment fees. Free-riders, unwilling riders, exclusion costs, economies of scale, market share, seasonality of production, storage constraints, and the role of government are reviewed within the context of this choice. The paper concludes that perceptions of fairness and ownership of decision processes, commonly held objectives, and effective communication links are key factors affecting decisions about the structures of generic commodity promotion programs.
Postharvest Handling (Second Edition)#R##N#A Systems Approach | 2009
Michael A. Gunderson; Allen F. Wysocki; James A. Sterns
Marketing in the food system has at least three broad categories: physical functions, exchange functions, and facilitating functions. Physical functions include those activities that alter the form or place utility of produce. Form utility refers to the appearance the produce will have. Manufacturing, processing, and packaging create additional value for the consumer that prefers the product in an altered state. Place utility refers to the time and location at which the produce is consumed. Some degree of physical transportation and storage is used in selling fresh produce. Exchange functions are activities related to the possession utility of a product. Individuals or firms with knowledge of buyers and sellers can facilitate exchange between these two groups. Buyers and sellers must agree on setting a price for the product and ownership transfer. Fluctuation risks are borne by the owner. In the case of fresh produce, facilitating functions can be thought of as the actions that allow the system to function at peak efficiency. Such types of actions provide conduits for information and capital flows in the produce supply chain. Private firms, government, and industry groups have all historically served in facilitating roles for fresh produce. Standards and grades can ensure the flow of uniform products; financing provides the capital needed to operate the system; market intelligence can drive competition and communication efforts serve to inform the final consumer.
2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI | 2005
Athur Mabiso; James A. Sterns; Lisa House; Allen F. Wysocki
Agricultural Economics | 2013
Veronique Theriault; Renata Serra; James A. Sterns
International Journal on Food System Dynamics | 2013
Rainer Haas; James A. Sterns; Oliver Meixner; Diane –Isis Nyob; Verena Traar
Staff Paper Series | 1999
James A. Sterns; Donald J. Ricks
Agribusiness | 2005
Andreas P. Christou; Richard L. Kilmer; James A. Sterns; Shiferaw T. Feleke
2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma | 2004
James A. Sterns; Lisa House; John J. VanSickle; Allen F. Wysocki