James B. Gerstner

Surgical adjuvant therapy of large-bowel carcinoma: an evaluation of levamisole and the combination of levamisole and fluorouracil. The North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

A total of 401 eligible patients with resected stages B and C colorectal carcinoma were randomly assigned to no-further therapy or to adjuvant treatment with either levamisole alone, 150 mg/d for 3 days every 2 weeks for 1 year, or levamisole plus fluorouracil (5-FU), 450 mg/m2/d intravenously (IV) for 5 days and beginning at 28 days, 450 mg/m2 weekly for 1 year. Levamisole plus 5-FU, and to a lesser extent levamisole alone, reduced cancer recurrence in comparison with no adjuvant therapy. These differences, after correction for imbalances in prognostic variables, were only suggestive for levamisole alone (P = .05) but quite significant for levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .003). Whereas both treatment regimens were associated with overall improvements in survival, these improvements reached borderline significance only for stage C patients treated with levamisole plus 5-FU (P = .03). Therapy was clinically tolerable with either regimen and severe toxicity was uncommon. These promising results have led to a large national intergroup confirmatory trial currently in progress.

Biochemical modulation of fluorouracil with leucovorin: confirmatory evidence of improved therapeutic efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer.

In a previous study (J Clin Oncol 7:1407-1417, 1989), we identified two dosage administration schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) combined with leucovorin that were superior to single-agent 5FU for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In this same study, a regimen of 5FU plus high-dose methotrexate (MTX) demonstrated a suggestive advantage over 5FU alone. To permit a more definitive comparison, we have extended our evaluation of these three regimens to involve an additional 259 patients. In all, 457 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following regimens: 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin, 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin, or 5FU plus high-dose MTX with leucovorin rescue. We have found that each of the 5FU/leucovorin regimens demonstrates a significant (P less than or equal to .01) advantage over 5FU plus high-dose MTX for objective tumor response and interval to tumor progression. Moreover, 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin confers a significant survival benefit (P less than or equal to .01) compared with 5FU plus high-dose MTX. The 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin regimen shows a survival benefit only in unadjusted analyses (P = .04), but this difference is not significant when adjusted for imbalances in prognostic variables (P = .44). Evaluation of the two 5FU/leucovorin regimens rules out a 10% decrease in death rate for the high-dose leucovorin regimen compared with the low-dose leucovorin regimen (P less than .05). The regimen of 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin has now been shown to offer a statistically significant survival advantage versus 5FU alone and versus 5FU plus high-dose MTX, a regimen that had shown promise in earlier trials. These data confirm the efficacy of leucovorin combined with 5FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and establish that it is not necessary to use high doses of leucovorin to achieve these results.

Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE To compare two commonly used schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. Each of these dosage administration schedules has been demonstrated to be superior to single-agent bolus 5FU in previous controlled trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred seventy-two ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were stratified according to performance status, and presence and location of any measurable indicator lesion(s). They were then randomized to receive chemotherapy with one of the following regimens: (1) intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin (5FU 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] push daily for 5 days with courses repeated at 4- to 5-week intervals); (2) weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin (5FU 600 mg/m2 IV push plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion weekly for 6 weeks with courses repeated every 8 weeks). RESULTS Three hundred sixty-two of 372 patients randomized (97.3%) were eligible and included in the analysis. Three hundred forty-six patients (95.6%) have died. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between the two 5FU/leucovorin regimens tested with respect to the following parameters: objective tumor response (35% v 31%), survival (median, 9.3 v 10.7 months), and palliative effects (as assessed by relief of symptoms, improved performance status, and weight gain). There were significant (P < .05) differences in toxicity, with more leukopenia and stomatitis seen with the intensive-course regimen, and more diarrhea and requirement for hospitalization to manage toxicity with the weekly regimen. Financial cost was also higher with the weekly regimen. CONCLUSION Intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin appears to have a superior therapeutic index compared with weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin using the dosage administration schedules applied in this study based on similar therapeutic effectiveness, but lower financial cost, and less need for hospitalization to manage chemotherapy toxicity.

Phase III Comparison of Twice-Daily Split-Course Irradiation Versus Once-Daily Irradiation for Patients With Limited Stage Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

PURPOSE Because small-cell lung cancer is a rapidly proliferating tumor, it was hypothesized that it may be more responsive to thoracic irradiation (TI) given twice-daily than once-daily. This hypothesis was tested in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a phase III trial, and all patients initially received three cycles of etoposide (130 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). Subsequently, patients who did not have progression to a distant site (other than brain) were randomized to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI) versus once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI) given concomitantly with two additional cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). The irradiation doses were TDTI, 48 Gy in 32 fractions, with a 2.5-week break after the initial 24 Gy, and ODTI, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After thoracic irradiation, the patients received a sixth cycle of etoposide/cisplatin, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy/15 fractions) if they had a complete response. RESULTS Of 311 assessable patients enrolled in the trial, 262 underwent randomization to TDTI or ODTI. There were no differences between the two treatments with respect to local-only progression rates, overall progression rates, or overall survival. The patients who received TDTI had greater esophagitis (> or = grade 3) than those who received ODTI (12.3% v 5.3%; P =.05). Although patients received thoracic irradiation encompassing the postchemotherapy volumes, only seven of 90 local failures were out of the portal of irradiation. CONCLUSION When TI is delayed until the fourth cycle of chemotherapy, TDTI does not result in improvement in local control or survival compared with ODTI.

Randomized placebo-controlled evaluation of hydrazine sulfate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE Hydrazine sulfate is a controversial agent that was originally studied in cancer patients approximately 20 years ago. Based on a series of recent trials that suggested that this drug might have utility in cancer patients, we conducted this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive hydrazine sulfate or placebo in a double-blinded manner. Protocol patients did not concurrently receive any other systemic antineoplastic treatment. RESULTS There were 127 assessable patients entered onto this clinical trial. Data from the study showed trends both for poorer survival and for poorer quality of life (QL) in the hydrazine group. There were no significant differences in the two study arms with regard to anorexia or weight loss. CONCLUSION This trial failed to demonstrate any benefit for hydrazine sulfate.

Phase III trial of recombinant interferon gamma in complete responders with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE We evaluated the effect of recombinant interferon gamma (rIFN-gamma) on survival and toxicity in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred patients in CR following treatment with six cycles of combination chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were studied. All patients had been enrolled onto a cooperative group trial (North Central Cancer Treatment Group [NCCTG] 86-20-51). Patients received observation only or rIFN-gamma at a dose of 4 x 10(6) U subcutaneously per day for 6 months. RESULTS Six patients (12%) did not comply with rIFN-gamma treatment. Substantial nonhematologic toxicities consisting of chills, myalgia, lethargy, and alteration of mood-personality were observed. No patient experienced life-threatening or fatal toxicity. The median times to progression for rIFN-gamma treatment or observation were 6.9 and 8.1 months (P = .54). The median survival times were 13.3 and 18.8 months, respectively (P = .43). Approximately 70% of all patients relapsed within 2 years. CONCLUSION Time to progression and survival were inferior in patients treated with rIFN-gamma compared with randomized control subjects, although this difference was not statistically significant. These data indicate that rIFN-gamma treatment is not associated with a 33% improvement in survival (P = .04). Because of the high rate of relapse, SCLC patients in CR are an ideal group in which to evaluate novel and minimally toxic agents.

Phase III controlled evaluation of sucralfate to alleviate stomatitis in patients receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE Stomatitis is a major dose-limiting toxicity of bolus fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy regimens, despite the use of oral cryotherapy. Pursuant to preliminary data that suggested a sucralfate oral solution could alleviate chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, we developed a prospective trial to test this contention. PATIENTS AND METHODS A phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed. Patients were entered onto the study at the time of the first cycle of 5FU-based chemotherapy. All patients received oral cryotherapy for 30 minutes with each dose of 5FU. In addition, each patient was randomized to receive either a sucralfate solution or a placebo solution to be used if they developed mouth tenderness or mouth sores. The study solution was to be used four times daily for 7 days starting on the first day of mouth tenderness or mouth sores. Stomatitis scores were determined by health care providers and by patients themselves. RESULTS There was a total of 131 assessable patients entered onto this trial, 50 of whom developed mucositis and used the study medication (27 sucralfate and 23 placebo). There was no suggestion of any difference in stomatitis severity or duration on either protocol arm. CONCLUSION The resultant data from this clinical trial did not support the prestudy hypothesis that sucralfate would be beneficial for the treatment of 5FU-induced stomatitis.

Phase II study of docetaxel in advanced soft tissue sarcomas

Because of its unusual mechanism of action, docetaxel was selected for study in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of adults as part of a search for new active antisarcoma agents. Patients at least 18 years old with measurable histologically proven advanced nonosseous sarcomas were enrolled if they had ECOG performance status of < or = 2 and satisfactory leukocyte and platelet counts, and hepatic and renal function. Patients with Kaposis sarcoma, mesothelioma, meningioma, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, and extraosseous Ewings sarcoma were excluded, as were patients with brain or leptomeningeal metastases. Other specific contraindications to participation included other active cancer, previous or concurrent cancer chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and known allergy to the drug vehicle, polysorbate 80. Women of childbearing potential were required to have a negative pregnancy test. Following premedication with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine hydrochloride, docetaxel 100 mg/m2 as a concentrated solution containing 40 mg/ml in polysorbate 80 was infused over 1 h in 250 ml of either dextrose 5% in water or 0.9% saline. Treatment was repeated at 3-week intervals using standard definitions for objective responses. Up to two separate 25% toxicity directed dose reductions were permitted. Between May and December 1993, nine men and nine women registered (median age, 44 years). They received a total of 51 cycles of docetaxel (median, 2.5 cycles). Toxicity included moderate leukopenia (median first cycle nadir, 1.5 x 10(9)/L) but no significant thrombocytopenia. Alopecia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were common side effects. Fever, minor skin rashes, stomatitis, and edema were also observed. One drug-related death occurred in a neutropenic patient. One partial regression was observed (5.9%, 95% C.I. 0.15-28.7%) among the 17 eligible patients in a patient with metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Paclitaxel and G-CSF in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Paclitaxel is an antimicrotubule agent that interferes with cell division. It has demonstrated promising single-agent activity against non-small-cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The study was designed as a two-stage phase II trial. All patients who entered received paclitaxel by intravenous infusion at a dose of 250 mg/m2 during 24 hours. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was also provided to ameliorate neutropenia. Cycles were repeated at 21-day intervals. Patients who achieved a complete response received a maximum of 10 cycles of treatment, whereas those who achieved a partial response/regression continued treatment until progression or undue toxicity developed. Patients who progressed or maintained stable disease for six cycles were crossed over to cisplatin and etoposide. Forty-three patients entered the study and all were evaluable for analysis. Responses were observed in 23 (53%) of the patients. There was no significant difference in the response rates in patients with measurable or evaluable disease (13/23 versus 10/20, p = 0.76). At the time of analysis, 39 patients had progressed with a median time to progression of 95 days, and 39 patients had died with a median survival of 278 days. The 1-year achieved survival rate was 24%. Significant neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1,000/microl) occurred in 24 (56%) of the patients, but only 2 patients experienced severe infection (grade > or = 3), and there were no septic deaths. The results indicate that paclitaxel is active against SCLC. Myelosuppression was the main side effect in this patient population. Response duration was short (median = 3.4 months), which suggests that paclitaxel is not sufficient as a single agent. Further studies of paclitaxel in combination with other agents against SCLC are currently in progress within the North Central Cancer Treatment Group and other cancer treatment groups. Key Words: Paclitaxel-G-CSF-Small-cell lung cancer-North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

Controlled clinical trial of interferon-gamma as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PURPOSE The primary goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) to prevent tumor relapse following potentially curative surgery in patients with high-risk colon cancer. A secondary goal was to determine the effect of IFN-gamma on immune function and to correlate alterations in immune parameters with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three to 4 weeks after undergoing resection of all known malignant disease, 99 patients with stage II, III, or IV colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive IFN-gamma 0.2 mg total dose by subcutaneous injection daily for 6 months or observation. Serial assessment of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression and Fc receptors on peripheral-blood monocytes was conducted in 24 patients who received IFN-gamma and 27 control patients. RESULTS With a median follow-up duration of 59 months in patients still alive, there was evidence of a detrimental effect on time to relapse (P = .03) among patients who received IFN-gamma. There was no significant difference in patient survival (P = .12). This study has sufficient power to rule out a 25% reduction in death rate for patients who received IFN-gamma (P < .05). Significant enhancement of immune function was observed in patients treated with IFN-gamma as measured by HLA-DR expression (P < .01) and Fc receptors (P < .001) on peripheral-blood monocytes. CONCLUSION This study effectively rules out any clinically meaningful benefit for IFN-gamma as surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer. Although significant enhancement of nonspecific immune function was seen with this dosage administration schedule of IFN-gamma, this was not associated with any demonstrable antitumor effect.