Ralph Levitt

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe chemotherapy-induced afebrile neutropenia

BACKGROUND Randomized trials of colony-stimulating factors in febrile patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy have not consistently shown clinical benefit. Nevertheless, the use of colony-stimulating factors to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is widespread. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in afebrile outpatients with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We measured the number of days of neutropenia, rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, number of days the patient received parenteral antibiotics, and number of culture-positive infections. RESULTS We randomly assigned 138 patients to receive G-CSF (n=71) or placebo (n=67). The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per cubic millimeter was significantly shorter for patients who received G-CSF (two days, vs. four days for the patients given placebo). However, there was no effect on the rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, duration of treatment with parenteral antibiotics, or number of culture-positive infections. CONCLUSIONS Routine therapeutic application of G-CSF in afebrile patients with severe neutropenia can reduce the duration of neutropenia, but this does not appear to provide practical clinical benefit.

Phase III Comparison of Twice-Daily Split-Course Irradiation Versus Once-Daily Irradiation for Patients With Limited Stage Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma

PURPOSE Because small-cell lung cancer is a rapidly proliferating tumor, it was hypothesized that it may be more responsive to thoracic irradiation (TI) given twice-daily than once-daily. This hypothesis was tested in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer were entered onto a phase III trial, and all patients initially received three cycles of etoposide (130 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). Subsequently, patients who did not have progression to a distant site (other than brain) were randomized to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI) versus once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI) given concomitantly with two additional cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m(2) x 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) x 3). The irradiation doses were TDTI, 48 Gy in 32 fractions, with a 2.5-week break after the initial 24 Gy, and ODTI, 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. After thoracic irradiation, the patients received a sixth cycle of etoposide/cisplatin, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (30 Gy/15 fractions) if they had a complete response. RESULTS Of 311 assessable patients enrolled in the trial, 262 underwent randomization to TDTI or ODTI. There were no differences between the two treatments with respect to local-only progression rates, overall progression rates, or overall survival. The patients who received TDTI had greater esophagitis (> or = grade 3) than those who received ODTI (12.3% v 5.3%; P =.05). Although patients received thoracic irradiation encompassing the postchemotherapy volumes, only seven of 90 local failures were out of the portal of irradiation. CONCLUSION When TI is delayed until the fourth cycle of chemotherapy, TDTI does not result in improvement in local control or survival compared with ODTI.

LACK OF EFFECT OF COUMARIN IN WOMEN WITH LYMPHEDEMA AFTER TREATMENT FOR BREAST CANCER

BACKGROUND Lymphedema of the arms can be a serious consequence of local and regional therapy in women with breast cancer. Coumarin has been reported to be effective for the treatment of women with lymphedema; we undertook a study in which we attempted to replicate those findings. METHODS We studied 140 women with chronic lymphedema of the ipsilateral arm after treatment for breast cancer. The women received 200 mg of oral coumarin or placebo twice daily for six months and then the other treatment for the following six months. The end points of the study consisted of the volume of the arm (calculated from measurements of hand and arm circumference) and the answers on a questionnaire completed by the patient about symptoms potentially related to lymphedema. RESULTS The volumes of the arms at 6 and 12 months, were virtually identical, regardless of whether coumarin or placebo was given first. After six months, the average volume of the affected arm increased by 21 ml during placebo treatment and 58 ml during coumarin treatment (P=0.80). In addition, answers to patient-completed questionnaires were similar in the two treatment groups. After six months only 15 percent of the women in the coumarin group and 10 percent of those in the placebo group reported that the study medication had helped a moderate or large amount (P=0.19). Coumarin was well tolerated, except that it resulted in serologic evidence of liver toxicity in 6 percent of the women. CONCLUSIONS Coumarin is not effective therapy for women who have lymphedema of the arm after treatment for breast cancer.

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Phase 3 Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE To prospectively assess whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) provides a survival benefit in patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between December 1998 and June 2001, we performed a randomized controlled study of patients with advanced cancer. Initially, the study was double blinded and placebo controlled, with the patients receiving daily injections of 5000 U of LMWH or saline. However, because of low accrual midway through the study, the placebo injection arm was eliminated, and the study became open labeled, with patients receiving either LMWH injections plus standard clinical care or standard clinical care alone. The primary study end point was overall survival. RESULTS Of 141 patients randomized to this clinical trial, 3 dropped out, leaving 138 patients. The median survival time was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval, 7.6-12.2 months) for the combined standard care and placebo groups. The median survival time for the combined LMWH arms was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval, 4.8-12.2 months). These median survival times were not significantly different (log-rank P =.46). The median survival times for the blinded and unblinded LMWH groups were 6.2 months and 9.0 months, respectively. The median survival times were 10.3 months for the blinded placebo arm and 10.5 months for the standard care arm. The rate of severe or life-threatening venous thromboembolism was 6% in the LMWH arms and 7% in the control arms. The rate of severe or life-threatening bleeding was 3% in the LMWH arms and 7% in the control arms. CONCLUSION This trial was unable to demonstrate any survival benefit for LMWH in patients with advanced cancer.

Thalidomide treatment in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia

Summary.  Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is uniquely characterized by macroscopic bone marrow stromal changes that are believed to be both reactive and cytokine mediated. Furthermore, a prognostically detrimental increase in bone marrow angiogenesis has recently been demonstrated. These observations suggest a potential therapeutic role for agents that are inhibitory to angiogenesis as well as cytokines that are pathogenetically implicated in MMM. In a prospective study of 15 patients with MMM, thalidomide treatment, starting at a dose of 200 mg/d, resulted in increased platelet counts (12 of 15 patients), increased haemoglobin level (3 of 15), a modest decrease in spleen size (3 of 12), increased bone marrow megakaryopoiesis (5 of 9) and decreased bone marrow angiogenesis (2 of 9). Undesirable haematological effects included pericardial extramedullary haematopoiesis in one patient, marked leucocytosis in two patients and extreme thrombocytosis in three patients. The thrombocytosis occurred in both patients with post‐thrombocythaemic myeloid metaplasia (PTMM) and was also associated with higher baseline levels of circulating CD34+ cells. Previously described toxicities of thalidomide were seen in the majority of patients and dose escalation to 400 mg/d was permitted in only two patients. In contrast, toxicity‐related dose reductions to 50 mg/d did not appear to lessen drug efficacy. We conclude that thalidomide has both beneficial and potentially adverse biological activity in MMM. A lower dose of the drug might be more tolerable without compromising therapeutic value. Patients with PTMM and/or markedly increased circulating CD34+ cell counts might be susceptible to thalidomide‐induced thrombocytosis.

Sucralfate in the Prevention of Treatment-Induced Diarrhea in Patients Receiving Pelvic Radiation Therapy: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

PURPOSE Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving pelvic RT to a minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT. RESULTS One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P =. 04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P =. 04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P =.03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after RT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P =.34). CONCLUSION Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms.

Evaluation of shark cartilage in patients with advanced cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial.

Shark cartilage has been a popular complementary or alternative medicine intervention. The basis for this popularity is the claim that sharks rarely get cancer because of the high proportion of cartilage in the sharks body. However, early studies were equivocal. Therefore, a clinical trial was conducted to look at the impact of shark cartilage in patients with advanced cancer. The primary goal of this trial was to determine whether a shark cartilage product improved overall survival for patients with advanced cancer who were getting standard care. Secondary research goals were to evaluate toxicities, tolerability, and quality of life associated with this shark cartilage product.

Comparison of nicotine patch alone versus nicotine nasal spray alone versus a combination for treating smokers: A minimal intervention, randomized multicenter trial in a nonspecialized setting

This multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted to determine whether the combined use of nicotine patch therapy and a nicotine nasal spray would improve smoking abstinence rates compared to either treatment alone, without behavioral counseling. Data were collected at 15 regional cancer control oncology centers within the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Of the 1384 smokers randomized to the study, 20% were abstinent from smoking at 6 weeks and 8% were abstinent at 6 months. At 6 weeks, the 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence rate for the patch alone (21.1%) was superior to the spray (13.6%) but was significantly lower than the rate for combination therapy (27.1%). At 6 months, the 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates were not significantly different among the three groups. Combination nicotine nasal spray and nicotine patches were delivered safely in a nonspecialized outpatient clinical setting and enhanced short-term smoking abstinence rates, but these rates were not sustained at 6 months.

Role of Her-2/neu overexpression and clinical determinants of early mortality in glioblastoma multiforme.

Her-2/neu or c-erbB-2, a 185-kD protein is an important prognostic indicator/target for therapy in metastatic breast carcinoma. Recent reports have also identified a role for Her-2/neu overexpression in other solid tumors. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic role of Her-2/neu overexpression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Data collection (chart review) included demographic information, symptoms at presentation, histologic grade, survival time, and treatment offered. Testing for Her-2/neu overexpression was performed on paraffin-embedded archival tumor tissue using immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Hercep test). An IHC score of 2+ or greater was considered overexpression. An experienced pathologist who was blinded from the clinical history performed all the IHC testing. Between 1990 and 2001, 149 subjects (68 females, 81 males) with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of GBM were identified. Age range was 26 to 79 years (mean: 64 years) and overall mean survival was 12 months. Her-2/neu overexpression was detected in 23 patients (15.4%). Interestingly, the median survival for patients whose pathologic specimens revealed Her-2/neu overexpression was 4 months compared to those who lacked overexpression, in whom survival was 8 months. After adjusting for age, performance status, smoking history, and treatment, logistic regression analysis (with a survival of <3 months as the dependent variable) revealed that Her-2/neu overexpression significantly (p < 0.01) increased the odds of early mortality (<3 months). The results of our large study indicate that Her-2/neu overexpression may be a poor prognostic marker in patients with GBM. In addition, in a proportion of subjects (15.4%), Her-2/neu may be a potential target for tumor-specific monoclonal antibody therapy. The role of trastuzumab (alone or in combination with conventional therapy) needs to be evaluated.

Determination of HER-2/Neu Overexpression and Clinical Predictors of Survival in a Cohort of 347 Patients with Primary Malignant Brain Tumors

Introduction. HER-2/neu overexpression has been associated with poor prognosis in a variety of malignancies. The extent and relevance of HER-2/neu overexpression in human central nervous system (CNS) malignancies is unclear. We retrospectively analyzed a large cohort of patients with primary malignant brain tumors to evaluate the role of HER-2/neu overexpression, clinical characteristics at presentation, and other predisposing factors as predictors of survival. Materials and Methods. Records of 347 adult patients (193 males, 154 females) diagnosed and followed between 1986 and 2001 with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of a primary malignant brain tumor at a tertiary care oncology center were reviewed. Archival pathologic samples were analyzed for HER-2/neu overexpression using the Hercep immunohistochemical (IHC) assay (DAKO). A score of 2 + or greater on the assay was considered positive for HER-2/neu overexpression. Mortality and its predictors were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. (This study was approved and reviewed by the Institutional Review Board Committee [IRB] of University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences.) Results. Among the 347 adult patients with a mean age of 53 years (range; 41–73 years), overall mean survival was 23 months (range; 0–151 months). It was found that 10.4% of the archival pathologic samples showed presence of HER-2/neu overexpression by IHC. The HER-2/neu overexpression predicted significantly increased mortality [p = 0.01, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Other clinical predictors associated with increased mortality included site of tumor (occipital and parietal lobes) (p = 0.02, ANOVA), tumor histology (glioblastoma) (p < 0.01, ANOVA), and presenting symptom (nausea/vomiting) (p < 0.01, ANOVA). Also, there was a higher incidence of associated primary malignancies (outside the CNS) in the HER-2/neu overexpression group (30% vs. 7%). Conclusions. HER-2/neu overexpression seen in 10.4 % appears to predict a slight increased mortality in patients with primary malignant brain tumors, especially glioblastoma multiforme, and is associated with a high incidence of a second primary malignancy outside the CNS. Additionally, our data suggests that other clinical variables were predictive of increased mortality, including tumor location (occipital), histology (glioblastoma), and presenting symptoms (nausea/vomiting). The large, heterogeneous sample employed in our study allows more definitive conclusions to be made with regard to the usefulness of HER-2/neu and other clinical predictors of survival in patients with primary brain tumors.