Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James C. Carlson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James C. Carlson.


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2010

Laboratory Efficacy of Chemical Repellents for Reducing Blackbird Damage in Rice and Sunflower Crops

Scott J. Werner; George M. Linz; Shelagh K. Tupper; James C. Carlson

Abstract Nonlethal alternatives are needed to manage blackbird (Icterids) damage to rice and sunflower production in the United States. We evaluated 4 registered fungicides on rice seeds (i.e., Allegiance® FL, Thiram 42-S, Trilex®, and Vitavax® 200 preplant seed treatments) and 2 foliar pesticides on sunflower seeds (Cobalt™ insecticide and Flock Buster bird repellent) as candidate blackbird repellents. Red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) preferred untreated rice relative to rice treated with Thiram (P < 0.001) and Vitavax (P < 0.001), and untreated sunflower relative to sunflower treated with Cobalt (P < 0.001). Blackbirds preferred untreated sunflower relative to sunflower treated with Flock Buster repellent on day 1 of a 4-day preference test (P < 0.001). We observed no difference in consumption of treated versus untreated rice during the Allegiance preference test (P  =  0.928), and blackbirds preferred rice treated with Trilex relative to untreated rice (P  =  0.003). Although repellency was positively related to tested concentrations of Thiram (P  =  0.010), Trilex (P  =  0.026), and Vitavax (P < 0.001), maximum repellency was <50% during our concentration-response tests of these seed treatments. Repellency was also positively related to tested concentrations of Cobalt (P < 0.001), and we observed >80% repellency of sunflower treated with Cobalt at ≥50% of the label rate. We observed no concentration-response relationship for the Allegiance seed treatment (P  =  0.341) and Flock Buster repellent (P  =  0.952). We recommend implementation of supplemental field studies to compare laboratory efficacy, repellency, and chemical residues of effective avian repellents throughout periods of needed crop protection.


BMC Veterinary Research | 2011

Efficacy of European starling control to reduce Salmonella enterica contamination in a concentrated animal feeding operation in the Texas panhandle

James C. Carlson; Richard M. Engeman; Doreene R. Hyatt; Rickey L. Gilliland; Thomas J. DeLiberto; Larry Clark; Michael J Bodenchuk; George M. Linz

BackgroundEuropean starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) are an invasive bird species known to cause damage to plant and animal agriculture. New evidence suggests starlings may also contribute to the maintenance and spread of diseases within livestock facilities. Identifying and mitigating the risk pathways that contribute to disease in livestock is necessary to reduce production losses and contamination of human food products. To better understand the impact starlings have on disease transmission to cattle we assessed the efficacy of starling control as a tool to reduce Salmonella enterica within a concentrated animal feeding operation. We matched a large facility, slated for operational control using DRC-1339 (3-chloro-4-methylaniline hydrochloride, also 3-chloro p-toluidine hydrochloride, 3-chloro-4-methylaniline), with a comparable reference facility that was not controlling birds. In both facilities, we sampled cattle feed, cattle water and cattle feces for S. enterica before and after starling control operations.ResultsWithin the starling-controlled CAFO, detections of S. enterica contamination disappeared from feed bunks and substantially declined within water troughs following starling control operations. Within the reference facility, detections of S. enterica contamination increased substantially within feed bunks and water troughs. Starling control was not observed to reduce prevalence of S. enterica in the cattle herd. Following starling control operations, herd prevalence of S. enterica increased on the reference facility but herd prevalence of S. enterica on the starling-controlled CAFO stayed at pretreatment levels.ConclusionsWithin the starling-controlled facility detections of S. enterica disappeared from feed bunks and substantially declined within water troughs following control operations. Since cattle feed and water are obvious routes for the ingestion of S. enterica, starling control shows promise as a tool to help livestock producers manage disease. Yet, we do not believe starling control should be used as a stand alone tool to reduce S. enterica infections. Rather starling control could be used as part of a comprehensive disease management plan for concentrated animal feeding operations.


Veterinary Microbiology | 2015

Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella enterica transmission associated with starling-livestock interactions

James C. Carlson; Doreene R. Hyatt; Jeremy W. Ellis; David R. Pipkin; Anna M. Mangan; Michael Russell; Denise Bolte; Richard M. Engeman; Thomas J. DeLiberto; George M. Linz

Bird-livestock interactions have been implicated as potential sources for bacteria within concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO). European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in particular are known to contaminate cattle feed and water with Salmonella enterica through their fecal waste. We propose that fecal waste is not the only mechanisms through which starlings introduce S. enterica to CAFO. The goal of this study was to assess if starlings can mechanically move S. enterica. We define mechanical movement as the transportation of media containing S. enterica, on the exterior of starlings within CAFO. We collected 100 starlings and obtained external wash and gastrointestinal tract (GI) samples. We also collected 100 samples from animal pens. Within each pen we collected one cattle fecal, feed, and water trough sample. Isolates from all S. enterica positive samples were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. All sample types, including 17% of external starling wash samples, contained S. enterica. All sample types had at least one antimicrobial resistant (AMR) isolate and starling GI samples harbored multidrug resistant S. enterica. The serotypes isolated from the starling external wash samples were all found in the farm environment and 11.8% (2/17) of isolates from positive starling external wash samples were resistant to at least one class of antibiotics. This study provides evidence of a potential mechanism of wildlife introduced microbial contamination in CAFO. Mechanical movement of microbiological hazards, by starlings, should be considered a potential source of bacteria that is of concern to veterinary, environmental and public health.


Journal of Dairy Science | 2012

Producer survey of bird-livestock interactions in commercial dairies.

Stephanie A. Shwiff; James C. Carlson; Jason Suckow; Martin S. Lowney; K. M. Moxcey; Bruce Larson; George M. Linz

The objective of this producer survey was to identify and estimate damage caused by bird-livestock interactions in commercial dairies. The interactions between birds and livestock have previously been implicated in causing economic damage while contributing to the environmental dissemination of microorganisms pathogenic to livestock and humans. Very little research exists to help producers understand what bird species use dairies, why they use dairies, or the scope and nature of damage created as a result of bird-livestock interactions. To better characterize these interactions, we surveyed dairy operators within Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin. Survey results suggest that the most common and destructive bird species found on commercial dairies are invasive to North America, and their use of dairies is associated with the loss of cattle feed, increased operating costs, and an increase in dairies self-reporting Salmonella spp. and Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis. Cattle feed loss estimates generated from this survey were used to parameterize an input-output (IO) economic model using data from 10 counties in the state of Pennsylvania (Bedford, Berks, Blair, Bradford, Chester, Cumberland, Franklin, Lancaster, Lebanon, and Somerset). This IO model allowed us to estimate direct, indirect, and induced economic effects of feed loss from bird damage to dairies within these counties. The IO model output suggests that feed loss costs Pennsylvania between


Veterinary Parasitology | 2011

The role of European starlings in the spread of coccidia within concentrated animal feeding operations

James C. Carlson; George M. Linz; Lora R. Ballweber; Stacey A. Elmore; Susan E. Pettit; Alan B. Franklin

4.11 and


Veterinary Microbiology | 2015

Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica isolates associated with starling-livestock interactions.

James C. Carlson; Doreene R. Hyatt; Kevin T. Bentler; Anna M. Mangan; Michael Russell; Antoinette J. Piaggio; George M. Linz

12.08 million (mean


Journal of Dairy Science | 2018

Nutritional depletion of total mixed rations by European starlings: Projected effects on dairy cow performance and potential intervention strategies to mitigate damage

James C. Carlson; Randal S. Stahl; Shelagh T. DeLiberto; J. J. Wagner; T.E. Engle; Richard M. Engeman; C. S. Olson; Jeremy W. Ellis; Scott J. Werner

10.6 million) in total economic damage, with approximately 43 to 128 jobs (mean 112) forgone statewide in 2009.


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2011

The role of starlings in the spread of Salmonella within concentrated animal feeding operations

James C. Carlson; Alan B. Franklin; Doreene R. Hyatt; Susan E. Pettit; George M. Linz

To investigate the relationship between European starlings and bovine coccidiosis we collected samples from European starlings, cattle feed bunks, cattle water troughs, and cattle feces within concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). These samples were screened for coccidia spp. to investigate (i) the prevalence of coccidia in starlings using CAFOs; (ii) if there is a relationship between bovine coccidiosis and starling numbers; (iii) if coccidia contamination of cattle feed and water is related to the number of starlings observed on CAFOs. Coccidia belonging to the genus Eimeria were detected in cattle feces and one water sample but no Eimeria spp. were detected in European starlings or cattle feed. However, many European starling samples were positive for Isospora. Starling use of CAFOs did not appear to be associated with coccidia spp. shedding by cattle and there was no correlation between starling numbers and contamination of cattle feed and water, suggesting that starling do not contribute to the amplification and spread of Eimeria in CAFOs.


Crop Protection | 2005

Caffeine for reducing bird damage to newly seeded rice

Michael L. Avery; Scott J. Werner; John L. Cummings; John S. Humphrey; Michael P. Milleson; James C. Carlson; Thomas M. Primus; Margaret J. Goodall

Bird-livestock interactions have been implicated as potential sources for bacteria within concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO). In this study we characterized XbaI-digested genomic DNA from Salmonella enterica using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The PFGE analysis was conducted using 182 S. enterica isolates collected from a single CAFO between 2009 and 2012. Samples collected in 2012 were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The analysis was limited to S. enterica serotypes, with at least 10 isolates, known to occur in both European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and cattle (Bos taurus) within this CAFO. A total of five different serotypes were screened; S. Anatum, S. Kentucky, S. Meleagridis, S. Montevideo, S. Muenchen. These samples were recovered from five different sample types; starling gastrointestinal tracts (GI), starling external wash, cattle feces, cattle feed and cattle water troughs. Indistinguishable S. enterica PFGE profiles were recovered from isolates originating in all sample types. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was also associated with indistinguishable S. enterica isolates recovered from all samples types. These data suggests that AMR S. enterica is transmitted between cattle and starlings and that shared feed sources are likely contributing to infections within both species. Moreover we isolated indistinguishable PFGE profiles across all years of data collection, suggesting long-term environmental persistence may be mediated by starling visits to CAFO.


Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2011

Anthraquinone-based bird repellent for sunflower crops

Scott J. Werner; George M. Linz; James C. Carlson; Susan E. Pettit; Shelagh K. Tupper; Michele M. Santer

European starlings are an invasive bird species in North America that are known to cause damage to commercial dairies through the consumption of total mixed rations (TMR) destined for dairy cows. We hypothesized that large foraging flocks of starlings alter the physical composition of TMR, and that this change may be significant enough to affect milk production. To better determine if production losses could potentially occur in commercial dairies as a consequence of feed consumption by foraging flocks of starlings, we conducted controlled feeding experiments using a TMR sourced from a commercial dairy that is chronically plagued with seasonal starling damage. European starlings selected the high-energy fraction of the TMR and reduced starch and crude fat availability. Using the dairy National Research Council production model equations, the nutritional changes measured in the controlled feeding experiments could potentially reduce the productivity of dairies. Model output suggests that for Holsteins producing 32 kg of milk/d, total required net energy intake (NEI) was 31.5 Mcal/d. Within the reference TMR, NEI supplied was 29.3 Mcal/d, whereas within the starling-consumed TMR NEI supplied was 27.7 Mcal/d. Following our nutrition experiments, we assessed the efficacy of pelleted feed as a deterrent strategy for bird damage management in commercial dairies. Six different pelleted feed treatments of differing diameter were offered to starlings. All pellets of 0.95 cm diameter or larger inhibited starling consumption by ≥79%.

Collaboration


Dive into the James C. Carlson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George M. Linz

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Scott J. Werner

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan E. Pettit

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shelagh K. Tupper

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy W. Ellis

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna M. Mangan

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard M. Engeman

United States Department of Agriculture

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shelagh T. DeLiberto

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan B. Franklin

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge