Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James E. Bray is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James E. Bray.


Nature | 2006

Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nevan J. Krogan; Gerard Cagney; Haiyuan Yu; Gouqing Zhong; Xinghua Guo; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Joyce Li; Shuye Pu; Nira Datta; Aaron Tikuisis; Thanuja Punna; José M. Peregrín-Alvarez; Michael Shales; Xin Zhang; Michael Davey; Mark D. Robinson; Alberto Paccanaro; James E. Bray; Anthony Sheung; Bryan Beattie; Dawn Richards; Veronica Canadien; Atanas Lalev; Frank Mena; Peter Y. Wong; Andrei Starostine; Myra M. Canete; James Vlasblom; Samuel Wu; Chris Orsi

Identification of protein–protein interactions often provides insight into protein function, and many cellular processes are performed by stable protein complexes. We used tandem affinity purification to process 4,562 different tagged proteins of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Each preparation was analysed by both matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to increase coverage and accuracy. Machine learning was used to integrate the mass spectrometry scores and assign probabilities to the protein–protein interactions. Among 4,087 different proteins identified with high confidence by mass spectrometry from 2,357 successful purifications, our core data set (median precision of 0.69) comprises 7,123 protein–protein interactions involving 2,708 proteins. A Markov clustering algorithm organized these interactions into 547 protein complexes averaging 4.9 subunits per complex, about half of them absent from the MIPS database, as well as 429 additional interactions between pairs of complexes. The data (all of which are available online) will help future studies on individual proteins as well as functional genomics and systems biology.


Molecular Cell | 2004

High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes.

Nevan J. Krogan; Wen-Tao Peng; Gerard Cagney; Mark D. Robinson; Robin Haw; Gouqing Zhong; Xinghua Guo; Xin Zhang; Veronica Canadien; Dawn Richards; Bryan Beattie; Atanas Lalev; Wen Zhang; Armaity P. Davierwala; Sanie Mnaimneh; Andrei Starostine; Aaron Tikuisis; Jörg Grigull; Nira Datta; James E. Bray; Timothy R. Hughes; Andrew Emili; Jack Greenblatt

A remarkably large collection of evolutionarily conserved proteins has been implicated in processing of noncoding RNAs and biogenesis of ribonucleoproteins. To better define the physical and functional relationships among these proteins and their cognate RNAs, we performed 165 highly stringent affinity purifications of known or predicted RNA-related proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We systematically identified and estimated the relative abundance of stably associated polypeptides and RNA species using a combination of gel densitometry, protein mass spectrometry, and oligonucleotide microarray hybridization. Ninety-two discrete proteins or protein complexes were identified comprising 489 different polypeptides, many associated with one or more specific RNA molecules. Some of the pre-rRNA-processing complexes that were obtained are discrete sub-complexes of those previously described. Among these, we identified the IPI complex required for proper processing of the ITS2 region of the ribosomal RNA primary transcript. This study provides a high-resolution overview of the modular topology of noncoding RNA-processing machinery.


Nature | 2007

Crystal structures of histone demethylase JMJD2A reveal basis for substrate specificity.

Stanley S. Ng; K.L. Kavanagh; Michael A. McDonough; Danica Butler; E.S. Pilka; Benoı̂t M. R. Liénard; James E. Bray; P. Savitsky; O. Gileadi; F von Delft; Nathan R. Rose; John Offer; J C Scheinost; Tomasz Borowski; M. Sundstrom; Christopher J. Schofield; U. Oppermann

Post-translational histone modification has a fundamental role in chromatin biology and is proposed to constitute a ‘histone code’ in epigenetic regulation. Differential methylation of histone H3 and H4 lysyl residues regulates processes including heterochromatin formation, X-chromosome inactivation, genome imprinting, DNA repair and transcriptional regulation. The discovery of lysyl demethylases using flavin (amine oxidases) or Fe(ii) and 2-oxoglutarate as cofactors (2OG oxygenases) has changed the view of methylation as a stable epigenetic marker. However, little is known about how the demethylases are selective for particular lysyl-containing sequences in specific methylation states, a key to understanding their functions. Here we reveal how human JMJD2A (jumonji domain containing 2A), which is selective towards tri- and dimethylated histone H3 lysyl residues 9 and 36 (H3K9me3/me2 and H3K36me3/me2), discriminates between methylation states and achieves sequence selectivity for H3K9. We report structures of JMJD2A–Ni(ii)–Zn(ii) inhibitor complexes bound to tri-, di- and monomethyl forms of H3K9 and the trimethyl form of H3K36. The structures reveal a lysyl-binding pocket in which substrates are bound in distinct bent conformations involving the Zn-binding site. We propose a mechanism for achieving methylation state selectivity involving the orientation of the substrate methyl groups towards a ferryl intermediate. The results suggest distinct recognition mechanisms in different demethylase subfamilies and provide a starting point to develop chemical tools for drug discovery and to study and dissect the complexity of reversible histone methylation and its role in chromatin biology.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2003

The CATH database: an extended protein family resource for structural and functional genomics

Frances M. G. Pearl; C. F. Bennett; James E. Bray; Andrew P. Harrison; Nigel J. Martin; Adrian J. Shepherd; Ian Sillitoe; Janet M. Thornton; Christine A. Orengo

The CATH database of protein domain structures (http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/bsm/cath_new) currently contains 34 287 domain structures classified into 1383 superfamilies and 3285 sequence families. Each structural family is expanded with domain sequence relatives recruited from GenBank using a variety of efficient sequence search protocols and reliable thresholds. This extended resource, known as the CATH-protein family database (CATH-PFDB) contains a total of 310 000 domain sequences classified into 26 812 sequence families. New sequence search protocols have been designed, based on these intermediate sequence libraries, to allow more regular updating of the classification. Further developments include the adaptation of a recently developed method for rapid structure comparison, based on secondary structure matching, for domain boundary assignment. The philosophy behind CATHEDRAL is the recognition of recurrent folds already classified in CATH. Benchmarking of CATHEDRAL, using manually validated domain assignments, demonstrated that 43% of domains boundaries could be completely automatically assigned. This is an improvement on a previous consensus approach for which only 10-20% of domains could be reliably processed in a completely automated fashion. Since domain boundary assignment is a significant bottleneck in the classification of new structures, CATHEDRAL will also help to increase the frequency of CATH updates.


Chemico-Biological Interactions | 2009

The SDR (Short-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase and Related Enzymes) Nomenclature Initiative

Bengt Persson; Yvonne Kallberg; James E. Bray; Elspeth A. Bruford; Stephen L. Dellaporta; Angelo D. Favia; Roser Gonzalez Duarte; Hans Jörnvall; K.L. Kavanagh; Natalia Y. Kedishvili; Michael Kisiela; Edmund Maser; Rebekka Mindnich; Sandra Orchard; Trevor M. Penning; Janet M. Thornton; Jerzy Adamski; U. Oppermann

Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR) constitute one of the largest enzyme superfamilies with presently over 46,000 members. In phylogenetic comparisons, members of this superfamily show early divergence where the majority have only low pairwise sequence identity, although sharing common structural properties. The SDR enzymes are present in virtually all genomes investigated, and in humans over 70 SDR genes have been identified. In humans, these enzymes are involved in the metabolism of a large variety of compounds, including steroid hormones, prostaglandins, retinoids, lipids and xenobiotics. It is now clear that SDRs represent one of the oldest protein families and contribute to essential functions and interactions of all forms of life. As this field continues to grow rapidly, a systematic nomenclature is essential for future annotation and reference purposes. A functional subdivision of the SDR superfamily into at least 200 SDR families based upon hidden Markov models forms a suitable foundation for such a nomenclature system, which we present in this paper using human SDRs as examples.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2000

Assigning genomic sequences to CATH.

Frances M. G. Pearl; David A. Lee; James E. Bray; Ian Sillitoe; Annabel E. Todd; Andrew P. Harrison; Janet M. Thornton; Christine A. Orengo

We report the latest release (version 1.6) of the CATH protein domains database (http://www.biochem.ucl. ac.uk/bsm/cath ). This is a hierarchical classification of 18 577 domains into evolutionary families and structural groupings. We have identified 1028 homo-logous superfamilies in which the proteins have both structural, and sequence or functional similarity. These can be further clustered into 672 fold groups and 35 distinct architectures. Recent developments of the database include the generation of 3D templates for recognising structural relatives in each fold group, which has led to significant improvements in the speed and accuracy of updating the database and also means that less manual validation is required. We also report the establishment of the CATH-PFDB (Protein Family Database), which associates 1D sequences with the 3D homologous superfamilies. Sequences showing identifiable homology to entries in CATH have been extracted from GenBank using PSI-BLAST. A CATH-PSIBLAST server has been established, which allows you to scan a new sequence against the database. The CATH Dictionary of Homologous Superfamilies (DHS), which contains validated multiple structural alignments annotated with consensus functional information for evolutionary protein superfamilies, has been updated to include annotations associated with sequence relatives identified in GenBank. The DHS is a powerful tool for considering the variation of functional properties within a given CATH superfamily and in deciding what functional properties may be reliably inherited by a newly identified relative.


Journal of Structural Biology | 2010

High-throughput production of human proteins for crystallization: the SGC experience.

P. Savitsky; James E. Bray; C.D.O. Cooper; Brian D. Marsden; P. Mahajan; N. Burgess-Brown; O. Gileadi

Producing purified human proteins with high yield and purity remains a considerable challenge. We describe the methods utilized in the Structural Genomics Consortium (SGC) in Oxford, resulting in successful purification of 48% of human proteins attempted; of those, the structures of ∼40% were solved by X-ray crystallography. The main driver has been the parallel processing of multiple (typically 9–20) truncated constructs of each target; modest diversity in vectors and host systems; and standardized purification procedures. We provide method details as well as data on the properties of the constructs leading to crystallized proteins and the impact of methodological variants. These can be used to formulate guidelines for initial approaches to expression of new eukaryotic proteins.


Proteomics | 2002

The CATH protein family database: a resource for structural and functional annotation of genomes.

Christine A. Orengo; James E. Bray; Daniel W. A. Buchan; Andrew P. Harrison; David A. Lee; Frances M. G. Pearl; Ian Sillitoe; Annabel E. Todd; Janet M. Thornton

Over the last decade, there have been huge increases in the numbers of protein sequences and structures determined. In parallel, many methods have been developed for recognising similarities between these proteins, arising from their common evolutionary background, and for clustering such relatives into protein families. Here we review some of the protein family resources available to the biologist and describe how these can be used to provide structural and functional annotations for newly determined sequences. In particular we describe recent developments to the CATH domain database of protein structural families which have facilitated genome annotation and which have also revealed important caveats that must be considered when transferring functional data between homologous proteins.


Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2011

Structural and Evolutionary Basis for the Dual Substrate Selectivity of Human Kdm4 Histone Demethylase Family.

Lars Hillringhaus; W.W. Yue; Nathan R. Rose; Stanley S. Ng; C. Gileadi; Christoph Loenarz; Simon H. Bello; James E. Bray; Christopher J. Schofield; U. Oppermann

Background: Lysine demethylases reverse Nϵ-methylation in a sequence- and methylation-selective manner. Results: Enzyme-histone interactions away from the conserved oxygenase active site are important in determining sequence selectivity in the JMJD2 (KDM4) subfamily. Conclusion: The catalytic JmjC domain determines sequence selectivity for at least some JmjC demethylases. Significance: This work might be a basis for the development of selective inhibitors. Nϵ-Methylations of histone lysine residues play critical roles in cell biology by “marking” chromatin for transcriptional activation or repression. Lysine demethylases reverse Nϵ-methylation in a sequence- and methylation-selective manner. The determinants of sequence selectivity for histone demethylases have been unclear. The human JMJD2 (KDM4) H3K9 and H3K36 demethylases can be divided into members that act on both H3K9 and H3K36 and H3K9 alone. Kinetic, crystallographic, and mutagenetic studies in vitro and in cells on KDM4A–E reveal that selectivity is determined by multiple interactions within the catalytic domain but outside the active site. Structurally informed phylogenetic analyses reveal that KDM4A–C orthologues exist in all genome-sequenced vertebrates with earlier animals containing only a single KDM4 enzyme. KDM4D orthologues only exist in eutherians (placental mammals) where they are conserved, including proposed substrate sequence-determining residues. The results will be useful for the identification of inhibitors for specific histone demethylases.


Chemico-Biological Interactions | 2009

The human short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily: a bioinformatics summary.

James E. Bray; Brian D. Marsden; U. Oppermann

The short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily represents one of the largest protein superfamilies known to date. Enzymes of this family usually catalyse NAD(P)(H) dependent reactions with a substrate spectrum ranging from polyols, retinoids, steroids and fatty acid derivatives to xenobiotics. We have currently identified 73 SDR superfamily members within the human genome. A status report of the human SDR superfamily is provided in terms of 3D structure determination, co-factor preferences, subcellular localisation and functional annotation. A simple scoring system for measuring structural and functional information (SFS score) has also been introduced to monitor the status of 5 key metrics. Currently there are 17 SDR members with an SFS score of zero indicating that almost a quarter of the human SDR superfamily lacks substantial functional annotation.

Collaboration


Dive into the James E. Bray's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janet M. Thornton

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annabel E. Todd

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephen D. Bentley

Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge