Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where James E. Richardson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by James E. Richardson.


Science | 2011

EPOXI at Comet Hartley 2

Michael F. A'Hearn; Michael Belton; W. Alan Delamere; Lori Michelle Feaga; D. L. Hampton; J. Kissel; Kenneth P. Klaasen; Lucy A. McFadden; Karen J. Meech; H. Jay Melosh; Peter H. Schultz; Jessica M. Sunshine; Peter C. Thomas; Joseph Veverka; Dennis D. Wellnitz; D. K. Yeomans; Sebastien Besse; D. Bodewits; Timothy Bowling; Brian T. Carcich; Steven M. Collins; Tony L. Farnham; Olivier Groussin; Brendan Hermalyn; Michael Shawn Kelley; Jian-Yang Li; Don J. Lindler; Carey Michael Lisse; Stephanie McLaughlin; Frederic Merlin

In situ observations show that comet Hartley 2 is an unusually hyperactive comet. Understanding how comets work—what drives their activity—is crucial to the use of comets in studying the early solar system. EPOXI (Extrasolar Planet Observation and Deep Impact Extended Investigation) flew past comet 103P/Hartley 2, one with an unusually small but very active nucleus, taking both images and spectra. Unlike large, relatively inactive nuclei, this nucleus is outgassing primarily because of CO2, which drags chunks of ice out of the nucleus. It also shows substantial differences in the relative abundance of volatiles from various parts of the nucleus.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2011

Modeling impact ejecta plume evolution: A comparison to laboratory studies

James E. Richardson

This study demonstrates the efficacy of a recently developed, impact crater“excavation flow properties model” (EFPM) that accomplishes the following goals:(1) uses hydrodynamic streamline theory to develop the expressions that extend theclassic impact ejecta scaling relationships into regions near the crater rim, wheretarget strength and/or gravity bring crater excavation flow to a halt; (2) links this new,general ejecta position/velocity scaling relationship to the existing general cratersize/volume scaling relationship, including the transition region between gravity‐ andstrength‐dominated cratering; (3) provides a means for estimating impact ejecta plumemass‐density and ejecta blanket thickness, as a function of azimuth and distance from theimpact site, in conditions ranging from low to high target strength; and (4) brings inour experimentally derived knowledge of impact ejection angles and the effects of obliqueimpact to develop a useful 2‐D and 3‐D model of both leading‐edge and trailing‐edgeejecta plume behavior. In this work, this excavation flow properties model is used tosimulate the images and data produced by three laboratory impact studies which utilizedmodern, laser‐based, non‐intrusive means to investigate ejecta plume formation,expansion, and fallout from three different perspectives.


Icarus | 2013

Shape, density, and geology of the nucleus of Comet 103P/Hartley 2

Peter C. Thomas; Michael F. A'Hearn; Joseph Veverka; Michael Belton; J. Kissel; Kenneth P. Klaasen; Lucy A. McFadden; H. Jay Melosh; Peter H. Schultz; Sebastien Besse; Brian T. Carcich; Tony L. Farnham; Olivier Groussin; Brendan Hermalyn; Jian-Yang Li; Don J. Lindler; Carey Michael Lisse; Karen J. Meech; James E. Richardson


Icarus | 2013

The nucleus of Comet 9P/Tempel 1: Shape and geology from two flybys

Peter C. Thomas; Michael F. A’Hearn; Michael J. S. Belton; D. E. Brownlee; Brian T. Carcich; Brendan Hermalyn; Kenneth P. Klaasen; S. Sackett; Peter H. Schultz; J. Veverka; Shyam Bhaskaran; D. Bodewits; S. R. Chesley; B. C. Clark; Tony L. Farnham; Olivier Groussin; Alan W. Harris; J. Kissel; J.-Y. Li; Karen J. Meech; J. Melosh; A. Quick; James E. Richardson; Jessica M. Sunshine; Dennis D. Wellnitz


Icarus | 2013

Return to Comet Tempel 1: Overview of Stardust-NExT results

J. Veverka; Kenneth P. Klaasen; Michael F. A’Hearn; Michael J. S. Belton; D. E. Brownlee; S. R. Chesley; B. C. Clark; Thanasis E. Economou; R. Farquhar; Simon F. Green; Olivier Groussin; Alan W. Harris; J. Kissel; J.-Y. Li; Karen J. Meech; J. Melosh; James E. Richardson; Peter H. Schultz; J. Silén; Jessica M. Sunshine; Peter C. Thomas; Shyam Bhaskaran; D. Bodewits; Brian T. Carcich; A. R. Cheuvront; Tony L. Farnham; S. Sackett; Dennis D. Wellnitz; A. Wolf


Icarus | 2013

An examination of the Deep Impact collision site on Comet Tempel 1 via Stardust-NExT: Placing further constraints on cometary surface properties

James E. Richardson; H. Jay Melosh


Icarus | 2014

Investigating the combined effects of shape, density, and rotation on small body surface slopes and erosion rates

James E. Richardson; Timothy Bowling


Archive | 2007

Modeling the Cratering Records of Hyperion and Phoebe: Indications of a Shallow-sloped Impactor Population

James E. Richardson; Peter C. Thomas


Archive | 2012

Laboratory simulations of Maritan meteorite impacts and their seismic signatures : how hard do we need to hit Mars to see what it's made of?

Sharon Kedar; James E. Richardson; Nathaniel Harvey; Doug Perry; Timothy Bowling; Frank H. Webb; Hiroo Kanamori; Ed Garnero


Archive | 2006

Large Impact Features on Phoebe and Hyperion: Early Analysis Results

James E. Richardson; Joseph Frank Veverka; Peter C. Thomas

Collaboration


Dive into the James E. Richardson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter C. Thomas

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth P. Klaasen

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge