James F. Kachur
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James F. Kachur.
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 1983
Mark W. Musch; James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field; Jeffrey S. Stoff
Bradykinin (BK) increases short-circuit current (Isc) when added to the serosal side of rabbit or guinea pig ileum or rabbit colon. Significant effects on Isc are seen at concentrations as low as 10(-10) M. Anion substitution experiments and unidirectional 36Cl flux measurements indicate that this effect of BK on Isc is due to Cl secretion. The effect of BK on Isc can be partially blocked (60-70% inhibition) by cyclooxygenase inhibitors (indomethacin and/or naproxen) and completely blocked by the phospholipase inhibitor, mepacrine. The combined cyclooxygenase/lipoxygenase inhibitors BW 755 and eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraynoic acid (ETYA) also completely block the effect of BK on Isc but the slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A) antagonist FPL 55712 has no effect. None of the above inhibitors diminish the effect on Isc of other exogenously added secretory stimuli such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), theophylline, or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Prior desensitization of rabbit ileum to PGE2 blocks the effect on Isc of BK but not those of VIP or theophylline. Conversely, prior desensitization of rabbit ileum to BK greatly reduces the effect of PGE2 on Isc. BK also stimulates the synthesis of PGE2 in rabbit ileal and colonic mucosa and this effect can be blocked by prior addition of either indomethacin or mepacrine. These effects of BK are similar to those of exogenously added arachidonic acid (AA). AA also stimulates Cl secretion and increases PGE2 synthesis and its effect on Isc can be inhibited by prior desensitization to PGE2 or by prior addition of indomethacin. The above results indicate that BK stimulates active Cl secretion in both small and large intestine and suggest that this effect is due to the intracellular release of AA. Although the prostaglandins appear to be the major products of AA metabolism contributing to the secretory response, lipoxygenase products may also play a role.
European Journal of Pharmacology | 1982
James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller
Several opioid peptides and narcotic drugs reduced transepithelial potential difference (PD) and short circuit current (Isc) in guinea-pig ileal mucosa measured in vitro in Ussing chambers. [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin was the most potent peptide tested. Enkephalin analogues with altered C-terminal amino acids were less potent, as were beta-endorphin and dermorphin. Etorphine produced potent effects whereas morphine and SKF 10,047 were inactive. Ethylketazocine produced a biphasic dose-response curve. When added by themselves diprenorphine and naloxone produced small increases in Isc. This effect was not seen when Cl- and HCO3- in the Ringer were replaced by SO42-. Diprenorphine and naloxone were able to shift the dose response curves for all agonists to the right, with the exception of that for ethylketazocine. Diprenorphine was a more potent antagonist than naloxone. SKF 10,047 also acted as a pure antagonist. Morphine and ethylketazocine had no antagonist effects. It is concluded that the opiate receptor in the guinea-pig ileal mucosa is similar to a delta-opiate receptor as defined by ligand binding studies, but that some differences also exist.
Advances in Endogenous and Exogenous Opioids#R##N#Proceedings of the International Narcotic Research Conference (Satellite Symposium of the 8th International Congress of Pharmacology) Held in Kyoto, Japan on July 26–30, 1981 | 1981
Richard J. Miller; James F. Kachur; Michael Field
Enkephalins and their analogues reduced transepithelial potential difference (PD) and short circuit current (Isc) across guinea-pig ileal mucosa. These effects were blocked by naloxone, diprenorphine and SKF 10,047. Diprenorphine was the most potent antagonist used.
Nature | 1982
Donald C. Manning; Solomon H. Snyder; James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics | 1982
James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field; J. Rivier
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 1981
Richard J. Miller; James F. Kachur; Michael Field; Jean Rivier
Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics | 1982
James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field; J. Rivier
Federation proceedings | 1979
James F. Kachur; S. Guandalini; Michael Field; Richard J. Miller
Gastroenterology | 1981
James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field; J. Rivier
Archive | 1983
Mark W. Musch; James F. Kachur; Richard J. Miller; Michael Field; Jeffrey S. Stoff; Charles A. Dana