James P. Hollenberg

Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass: A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure

BACKGROUND The objective of this randomized clinical trial of elective coronary artery bypass grafting was to investigate whether intraoperative mean arterial pressure below autoregulatory limits of the coronary and cerebral circulations was a principal determinant of postoperative complications. The trial compared the impact of two strategies of hemodynamic management during cardiopulmonary bypass on outcome. Patients were randomized to a low mean arterial pressure of 50 to 60 mm Hg or a high mean arterial pressure of 80 to 100 mm Hg during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS A total of 248 patients undergoing primary, nonemergency coronary bypass were randomized to either low (n = 124) or high (n = 124) mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass. The impact of the mean arterial pressure strategies on the following outcomes was assessed: mortality, cardiac morbidity, neurologic morbidity, cognitive deterioration, and changes in quality of life. All patients were observed prospectively to 6 months after the operation. RESULTS The overall incidence of combined cardiac and neurologic complications was significantly lower in the high pressure group at 4.8% than in the low pressure group at 12.9% (p = 0.026). For each of the individual outcomes, the trend favored the high pressure group. At 6 months after coronary bypass for the high and low pressure groups, respectively, total mortality rate was 1.6% versus 4.0%, stroke rate 2.4% versus 7.2%, and cardiac complication rate 2.4% versus 4.8%. Cognitive and functional status outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION Higher mean arterial pressures during cardiopulmonary bypass can be achieved in a technically safe manner and effectively improve outcomes after coronary bypass.

The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients

OBJECTIVE (1) To determine chronic illness costs for large cohort of primary care patients, (2) to develop prospective model predicting total costs over one year, using demographic and clinical information including widely used comorbidity index. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Data including diagnostic, medication, and resource utilization were obtained for 5,861 patients from practice-based computer system over a 1-year period beginning December 1, 1993, for retrospective analysis. Hospital cost data were obtained from hospital cost accounting system. RESULTS Average annual per patient cost was

Randomized Trial of Hypotensive Epidural Anesthesia in Older Adults

2,655. Older patients and those with Medicare or Medicaid had higher costs. Hospital costs were

Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States.

1,558, accounting for 58.7% of total costs. In the predictive model, individuals with higher comorbidity incurred exponentially higher annual costs, from

Diagnosis, treatment, comorbidity, and resource utilization of depressed patients in a general medical practice

4,317 with comorbidity score of two, to

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Positive-Affect Induction to Promote Physical Activity After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

5,986 with score of three, to

Increasing Physical Activity in Patients With Asthma Through Positive Affect and Self-affirmation: A Randomized Trial

13,326 with scores greater than seven. To use an adapted comorbidity index to predict total yearly costs, four conditions should be added to the index: hypertension, depression, and use of warfarin with a weight of one, skin ulcers/cellulitis, a weight of two. CONCLUSION The adapted comorbidity index can be used to predict resource utilization. Predictive models may help to identify targets for reducing high costs, by prospectively identifying those at high risk.

Patient Care Outside of Office Visits: A Primary Care Physician Time Study

BACKGROUND Data are sparse on the incidence of postoperative cognitive, cardiac, and renal complications after deliberate hypotensive anesthesia in elderly patients. METHODS This randomized, controlled clinical trial included 235 older adults with comorbid medical illnesses undergoing elective primary total hip replacement with epidural anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two levels of intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure management: either to a markedly hypotensive mean arterial blood pressure range of 45-55 mmHg or to a less hypotensive range of 55-70 mmHg. Cognitive outcome was assessed by within-patient change on 10 neuropsychologic tests assessing memory, psychomotor, and language skills from before surgery to 1 week and 4 months after surgery. Prospective standardized surveillance was performed for cardiovascular and renal outcomes, delirium, thromboembolism, and blood loss and replacement. RESULTS The two groups were similar at baseline in terms of age (mean, 72 yr), sex (50% women), comorbid conditions, and cognitive function. After operation, no significant differences in the incidence of early or long-term cognitive dysfunction were observed between the two blood pressure management groups. There were no significant differences in the rates of other adverse consequences, including cardiac, renal, and thromboembolic complications. In addition, no differences occurred in the duration of surgery, intraoperative estimated blood loss, or transfusion rates. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients can safely receive controlled hypotensive epidural anesthesia with this protocol. There was no evidence of greater risks, or early benefits, with the use of the more markedly hypotensive range.

The medical orthopaedic trauma service: an innovative multidisciplinary team model that decreases in-hospital complications in patients with hip fractures.

We analyzed the variations in the rates of elective total hip and total knee arthroplasties for 1988 in the United States to determine whether the rates correlated with the numbers of surgeons. There were 56,204 total hip arthroplasties and 68,491 total knee arthroplasties, performed in the home states of the patients among all of the Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries include most people who are more than sixty-five years old in the United States and a small proportion of younger people who are eligible for Medicare for other reasons. Seventy-nine per cent of the patients who had had a total hip arthroplasty and 89 per cent of those who had had a total knee arthroplasty had been managed with the operation because of osteoarthrosis. Both operations were most common in the seventy to seventy-four-year age-group. We calculated the rate of operations per 100 beneficiaries for each state and age-adjusted the results. Across all of the states, bilateral procedures constituted 1.6 per cent of the total hip arthroplasties and 4.8 per cent of the total knee arthroplasties. The in-hospital rates of mortality were 0.72 per cent for total hip arthroplasties and 0.45 per cent for total knee arthroplasties. The destinations after discharge from the hospital were similar for the two groups of patients, with more than 65 per cent of the patients being discharged directly to their homes. There were no significant differences among states in terms of the length of stay in the hospital or reimbursement of the hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Does experience matter? A comparison of the practice of attendings and residents.

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the effect of depression on the utilization of health care resources, after adjusting for age and comorbidity from data obtained on routine clinical practice. Method: The study is an observational cohort of 15,186 patients followed over a one-year period beginning December 1993. Comprehensive demographic, clinical, and utilization data were available from the computerized medical information system generated database of a general internal medicine practice in an urban academic medical center. Results: Four point seven percent of patients carried a provider-coded diagnosis of depression. With regards to utilization of health care resources, even after controlling for age and comorbidity, depressed patients had more primary care visits (5.3 vs. 2.9 visits, p < .001), higher rates of referral to specialists (1.1 vs. 0.5, p < .002), and radiologic tests (0.9 vs. 0.4 tests, p < .001). They had higher total outpatient charges (