Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mary E. Charlson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mary E. Charlson.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 1994

Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Mary E. Charlson; Ted P. Szatrowski; Janey C. Peterson; Jeffrey P. Gold

The basic objective of this paper is to evaluate an age-comorbidity index in a cohort of patients who were originally enrolled in a prospective study to identify risk factors for peri-operative complications. Two-hundred and twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The participants were patients with hypertension or diabetes who underwent elective surgery between 1982 and 1985 and who survived to discharge. Two-hundred and eighteen patients survived until discharge. These patients were followed for at least five years post-operatively. The estimated relative risk of death for each comorbidity rank was 1.4 and for each decade of age was 1.4. When age and comorbidity were modelled as a combined age-comorbidity score, the estimated relative risk for each combined age-comorbidity unit was 1.45. Thus, the estimated relative risk of death from an increase of one in the comorbidity score proved approximately equal to that from an additional decade of age. The combined age-comorbidity score may be useful in some longitudinal studies to estimate relative risk of death from prognostic clinical covariates.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 1992

Supervised fitness walking in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. A randomized, controlled trial.

Pamela A. Kovar; John P. Allegrante; C Ronald MacKenzie; Margaret G. E. Peterson; Bernard Gutin; Mary E. Charlson

OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of a program of supervised fitness walking and patient education on functional status, pain, and use of medication in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. DESIGN An 8-week randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Inpatient and outpatient services of an orthopedic hospital in an academic medical center. PATIENTS A total of 102 patients with a documented diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis of one or both knees participated in the study. Data were obtained on 47 of 51 intervention patients and 45 of 51 control patients. INTERVENTIONS An 8-week program of supervised fitness walking and patient education or standard routine medical care. MEASUREMENTS Patients were evaluated and outcomes assessed before and after the intervention using a 6-minute test of walking distance and scores on the physical activity, arthritis impact, pain, and medication subscales of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (AIMS). RESULTS Patients randomly assigned to the walking program had a 70-meter increase in walking distance relative to their baseline assessment, which represents an improvement of 18.4% (95% Cl, 9.8% to 27.0%). In contrast, controls showed a 17-meter decrease in walking distance relative to their baseline assessment (P less than 0.001). Improvements in functional status as measured by the AIMS physical activity subscale were also observed in the walking group but not in the control group (P less than 0.001); patients assigned to the walking program improved 39% (Cl, 15.6% to 60.4%). Although changes in scores on the arthritis impact subscale were similar in the two groups (P = 0.093), the walking group experienced a decrease in arthritis pain of 27% (Cl, 9.6% to 41.4%) (P = 0.003). Medication use was less frequent in the walking group than in the control group at the post-test (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS A program of supervised fitness walking and patient education can improve functional status without worsening pain or exacerbating arthritis-related symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.


The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 1995

Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass: A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure

Jeffrey P. Gold; Mary E. Charlson; Pamela Williams-Russo; Ted P. Szatrowski; Janey C. Peterson; Paul A. Pirraglia; Gregg S. Hartman; Fun Sun F. Yao; James P. Hollenberg; Denise Barbut; Joseph G. Hayes; Stephen J. Thomas; Mary Helen Purcell; Steven Mattis; Larry Gorkin; Martin Post; Karl H. Krieger; O. Wayne Isom

BACKGROUND The objective of this randomized clinical trial of elective coronary artery bypass grafting was to investigate whether intraoperative mean arterial pressure below autoregulatory limits of the coronary and cerebral circulations was a principal determinant of postoperative complications. The trial compared the impact of two strategies of hemodynamic management during cardiopulmonary bypass on outcome. Patients were randomized to a low mean arterial pressure of 50 to 60 mm Hg or a high mean arterial pressure of 80 to 100 mm Hg during cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS A total of 248 patients undergoing primary, nonemergency coronary bypass were randomized to either low (n = 124) or high (n = 124) mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass. The impact of the mean arterial pressure strategies on the following outcomes was assessed: mortality, cardiac morbidity, neurologic morbidity, cognitive deterioration, and changes in quality of life. All patients were observed prospectively to 6 months after the operation. RESULTS The overall incidence of combined cardiac and neurologic complications was significantly lower in the high pressure group at 4.8% than in the low pressure group at 12.9% (p = 0.026). For each of the individual outcomes, the trend favored the high pressure group. At 6 months after coronary bypass for the high and low pressure groups, respectively, total mortality rate was 1.6% versus 4.0%, stroke rate 2.4% versus 7.2%, and cardiac complication rate 2.4% versus 4.8%. Cognitive and functional status outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION Higher mean arterial pressures during cardiopulmonary bypass can be achieved in a technically safe manner and effectively improve outcomes after coronary bypass.


Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | 2008

The Charlson comorbidity index is adapted to predict costs of chronic disease in primary care patients

Mary E. Charlson; Robert E. Charlson; Janey C. Peterson; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; William M. Briggs; James P. Hollenberg

OBJECTIVE (1) To determine chronic illness costs for large cohort of primary care patients, (2) to develop prospective model predicting total costs over one year, using demographic and clinical information including widely used comorbidity index. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Data including diagnostic, medication, and resource utilization were obtained for 5,861 patients from practice-based computer system over a 1-year period beginning December 1, 1993, for retrospective analysis. Hospital cost data were obtained from hospital cost accounting system. RESULTS Average annual per patient cost was


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 1992

Post‐Operative Delirium: Predictors and Prognosis in Elderly Orthopedic Patients

Pamela Williams-Russo; Barbara Urquhart; Nigel E. Sharrock; Mary E. Charlson

2,655. Older patients and those with Medicare or Medicaid had higher costs. Hospital costs were


BMJ | 1984

Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.

Mary E. Charlson; Ralph I. Horwitz

1,558, accounting for 58.7% of total costs. In the predictive model, individuals with higher comorbidity incurred exponentially higher annual costs, from


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 1996

Severity of aortic atheromatous disease diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography predicts stroke and other outcomes associated with coronary artery surgery: a prospective study.

Gregg S. Hartman; Fun-Sun Yao; Mathias Bruefach; Denise Barbut; Janey C. Peterson; Mary Helen Purcell; Mary E. Charlson; Jeffrey P. Gold; Stephen J. Thomas; Ted P. Szatrowski

4,317 with comorbidity score of two, to


Journal of Arthroplasty | 1996

Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys.

Carol A. Mancuso; Chitranjan S. Ranawat; John M. Esdaile; Norman A. Johanson; Mary E. Charlson

5,986 with score of three, to


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2000

Effects of Depressive Symptoms on Health‐Related Quality of Life in Asthma Patients

Carol A. Mancuso; Margaret Peterson; Mary E. Charlson

13,326 with scores greater than seven. To use an adapted comorbidity index to predict total yearly costs, four conditions should be added to the index: hypertension, depression, and use of warfarin with a weight of one, skin ulcers/cellulitis, a weight of two. CONCLUSION The adapted comorbidity index can be used to predict resource utilization. Predictive models may help to identify targets for reducing high costs, by prospectively identifying those at high risk.


Annals of Surgery | 2013

Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients.

Koianka Trencheva; Kevin P. Morrissey; Martin T. Wells; Carol A. Mancuso; Sang W. Lee; Toyooki Sonoda; Fabrizio Michelassi; Mary E. Charlson; Jeffrey W. Milsom

To compare the effect of post‐operative analgesia using epidural versus intravenous infusions on the incidence of delirium after bilateral knee replacement surgery in elderly patients. Additional risk factors and impact on post‐operative recovery were also assessed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mary E. Charlson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol A. Mancuso

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey P. Gold

University of Nebraska Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C Ronald MacKenzie

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge