James T. Krohelski
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by James T. Krohelski.
Lake and Reservoir Management | 1996
Randall J. Hunt; James T. Krohelski
ABSTRACT Pretty Lake is a 64 acre, sandy-bottomed groundwater flow-through lake that has a history of hydrologic disturbance. Residents and regulators require a better understanding of lake-groundwater interaction to develop measures to protect the lakes hydrologic system and water quality. A groundwater flow model was constructed as a tool to synthesize field data collected at the site, delineate recharge areas that supply groundwater to the lake, and predict die effect of dredging an adjacent drainage ditch. The one layer, two-dimensional steady-state areal model used analytic element (AE) methods because they are quick to apply and include sophisticated simulation of groundwater-surface water interaction. The model calibrated well to groundwater heads (mean absolute difference = 0.05 m), lake stage (within 0.05 m) and ditch fluxes (mean absolute difference = 0.0023 m3·s−1). Model results showed that a single 1000 m wide recharge area supplies all the groundwater inflow to the lake. In addition, the mo...
Lake and Reservoir Management | 1987
Paul J. Garrison; Steve R. Greb; Douglas R. Knauer; Dennis A. Wentz; James T. Krohelski; James G. Bockheim; Steven A. Gherini; Cari W. Chen
ABSTRACT In the northern Great Lakes States, seepage lakes are considered more vulnerable to acidification than drainage lakes. The ILWAS model, which was developed for drainage lakes in the Adirondack Mountain Region of New York, has been revised for use in seepage lake systems. Contrasts were observed between the Wisconsin seepage lakes and the drainage lakes in the Adirondack Region of New York. (1) Atmospheric loading of hydrogen and sulfate ions was 77 and 62 percent respectively, lower in Wisconsin. (2) In contrast to the low alkalinity flow-through lakes in the Adirondacks, there are no observed spring pH depressions associated with snowmelt in Wisconsin seepage lakes. (3) Because of deep glacial deposits (32–190 m) at the Wisconsin sites, a longer contact time between groundwater and weatherable minerals provides a substantial buffering capacity via silicate hydrolysis. (4) Inlake alkalinity production by bacterial sulfate reduction in the sediments of Wisconsin seepage lakes plays a significant r...
Ground Water | 2003
Randall J. Hunt; Henk M. Haitjema; James T. Krohelski; Daniel T. Feinstein
Ground Water | 2002
Mary P. Anderson; Randall J. Hunt; James T. Krohelski; Kuopo Chung
Water-Resources Investigations Report | 2000
Randall J. Hunt; Y. Lin; James T. Krohelski; P.F. Juckem
Water-Resources Investigations Report | 2003
David J. Graczyk; Randall J. Hunt; Steven R. Greb; Cheryl A. Buchwald; James T. Krohelski
Water-Resources Investigations Report | 2002
James T. Krohelski; Yu-Feng Lin; William J. Rose; Randall J. Hunt
Fact Sheet | 2004
Daniel T. Feinstein; David J. Hart; James T. Krohelski
Fact Sheet | 2001
Randall J. Hunt; Kenneth R. Bradbury; James T. Krohelski
Water-Resources Investigations Report | 2002
James T. Krohelski; William J. Rose; Randall J. Hunt