Jan Hourfar
Heidelberg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jan Hourfar.
European Journal of Orthodontics | 2015
Jan Hourfar; Georgios Kanavakis; Dirk Bister; Marc Schätzle; Layla Awad; Manuel Nienkemper; Christine Goldbecher; Björn Ludwig
AIM The aim of this retrospective investigation was to measure vertical bone thickness on the hard palate, determine areas with adequate bone for the insertion of orthodontic mini-implants (MIs), and provide clinical guidelines for identification of those areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pre-treatment records of 1007 patients were reviewed by a single examiner. A total of 125 records fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were further investigated. Bone measurements were performed on cone-beam computed tomography scans, at a 90° angle to the bone surface, on 28 predetermined and standardized points on the hard palate. Bone thickness at various areas was associated to clinically identifiable areas on the hard palate by means of pre-treatment plaster models. RESULTS Bone thickness ranged between 1.51 and 13.86 mm (total thickness) and 0.33 and 1.65 mm (cortical bone thickness), respectively. Bone thickness was highest in the anterior palate and decreased significantly towards more posterior areas. Plaster model analysis revealed that bone thickness was highest at the level of the third palatal ruga. CONCLUSIONS The areas on the anterior palate with adequate bone thickness for successful insertion of orthodontic MI correspond to the region of the third palatal ruga. These results provide stable and clinically identifiable landmarks for the insertion of palatal MIs.
Head & Face Medicine | 2014
Jan Hourfar; Georgios Kanavakis; Peter Goellner; Ludwig B
IntroductionThe initial stability and survival rate of orthodontic mini-implants are highly dependent on the amount of cortical bone at their insertion site. In areas with limited bone availability, mini-plates are preferred to provide effective skeletal anchorage. The purpose of this paper was to present a new clinical technique for the insertion of mini-plates.MethodsIn order to apply this new technique, a cone-beam image of the insertion area is required. A software (Galaxy Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) is used to construct a three-dimensional image of the scanned area and to virtually determine the exact location of the mini-plate as well as the position of the fixation screws. A stereolithographic model (STL) is then created by means of a three-dimensional scanner.Prior to its surgical insertion, the bone plate is adapted to the stereo-lithographic model. Finally, a custom transfer jig is fabricated in order to assist with accurate placement of the mini-plate intra-operatively.ResultsThe presented technique minimizes intra-operative decision making, because the final position of the bone plate is determined pre-surgically. This significantly reduces the duration of the surgical procedure and improves its outcome.ConclusionsA novel method for surgical placement of orthodontic mini-plates is presented. The technique facilitates accurate adaptation of mini-plates and insertion of retaining surgical screws; thereby enabling clinicians to more confidently increase the use of bone plates, especially in anatomical areas where the success of non-osseointegrated mini-screws is less favorable.
European Journal of Orthodontics | 2015
Jan Hourfar; Björn Ludwig; Dirk Bister; Anna Braun; Georgios Kanavakis
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the stability and bone availability of the most distal (third) palatal ruga, as an anatomical region for safe insertion of orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) in the anterior palate. STUDY DESIGN Orthodontic records of 35 patients were analysed. Initial (T1) and final (T2) study models were bisected and the outline of the palatal contour was marked on the surface. Models were scanned and the palatal contours were superimposed on the palatal structures on the respective initial and final cephalometric images. Cephalometric measurements were used to assess vertical (3rdRug-PP, 2ndRug-PP, and 1stRug-PP), and oblique bone levels (3rdRug-U1, 2ndRug-U1, 1stRug-U1, and 3rdRug-U1(o)). Paired Students t-test was used to compare measurements between T1 and T2. RESULTS The position of the third palatal ruga remained stable during orthodontic treatment (Δ2ndRug-3rdRug P = 0.1mm; P = 0.61 and Δ1stRug-3rdRug P = 0.2mm; P = 0.39). Bone availability also remained adequate (3rdRug-U1T2 (o) = 9.9mm). CONCLUSION The third palatal ruga is a reliable clinical landmark to evaluate bone availability for the placement of OMIs in the anterior palate.
Journal of Orthodontics | 2014
Georgios Kanavakis; Björn Ludwig; Marco Rosa; Björn U. Zachrisson; Jan Hourfar
The objective of this article is to review the fabrication and activation procedures of the ‘T’-Mesialslider and to present the clinical outcomes in cases where canine substitution is the treatment of choice for missing maxillary lateral incisors. The ‘T’-Mesialslider allows for effective mesial translation of the canines and the posterior dentition, without significant loss of anterior anchorage and with good vertical control. Possible adverse effects of the appliance and clinical recommendations for their management are also discussed. In canine substitution cases with high anchorage demands, the ‘T’-Mesialslider provides an effective treatment option.
Journal of Orthodontics | 2014
Jan Hourfar; Björn Ludwig; Georgios Kanavakis
Objective The objective of this investigation was to evaluate treatment outcomes of the skeletally anchored ‘Frog’ appliance. Design A single-centre, retrospective study was performed. Setting Private orthodontic practice. Participants Patients who had undergone comprehensive orthodontic treatment with the skeletally anchored ‘Frog’ appliance. Methods 43 participants (20 males and 23 females) who had received treatment with the skeletally anchored ‘Frog’ appliance where included. In order to explore dentoalveolar and skeletal treatment outcomes, pre- (T1) and post- (T2) treatment measurements were performed on patients’ plaster models and cephalometric images. Comparisons between T1 and T2 were made by means of a Students t-test. All statistical analyses were conducted at the 0·05 level of statistical significance. Results Study model analysis revealed a statistically significant derotation of maxillary molars (μΔT2−T1 = 9·5°, P<0·001) as well as an increase in transverse arch dimensions at the end of treatment (μΔT2–T1 = 2·2 mm, P<0·001). Cephalometric changes included bodily distalization of maxillary molars (μΔ(T2–T1) = −1·9 mm, P<0·001), as well as noticeable angular displacement (μΔT2–T1 = 4·1°, P = 0·004). No significant anchorage loss was observed, as displayed by the limited change in maxillary incisor position (μΔ(T1–T2) = 0·2 mm, P = 0·45). In addition, excellent vertical control of the maxillary molars was achieved, with no change in the mandibular plane (ML/NSL) angle (μΔT2–T1 = 0·3°, P = 0·38). Conclusions The skeletal ‘Frog’ is effective in derotating and distalizing maxillary molars without anchorage loss and with excellent vertical control.
Head & Face Medicine | 2017
Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Jörg A. Lisson; Björn Ludwig
BackgroundThe aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the incidence of loss to pulp sensibility testing (PST) of maxillary front teeth after paramedian (3 to 5 mm away from the suture) orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) insertion in the anterior palate.MethodsA total of 284 patients (102 males, 182 females; mean age was 14.4 years (±8.8) years at time of OMI-Insertion) with a total of 568 OMIs (1.7 mm diameter, length 8 mm) were retrospectively investigated. A binomial regression analysis was performed to explore covariates, such as age, gender, inclination of upper central incisors, dentition status and insertion position of OMIs that could have contributed to loss of sensibility. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsLoss of response to PST was encountered during retention in 3 out of 284 patients and the respective OMIs had been placed at height of the second rugae (R-2). Affected teeth were a right canine, a left lateral and a left central incisor. Subsequent root canal treatment was successful. Results of the binomial regression analysis revealed that the covariate insertion position (R-2) of OMIs (p = 0.008) had statistically significant influence on loss of response to PST.Conclusions(1) Although there was no radiographic evidence for direct root injury, the proximity of the implants to the anterior teeth was nevertheless statistically related to loss of PST. (2) In all cases of PST loss OMIs were inserted at the second rugae. Therefore OMIs should be placed either more posteriorly, at the third rugae or in the median plane. (3). Loss of PST was not increased for patients with palatal OMI (0.18%) compared to samples without OMI (0.25%).
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2017
Jan Hourfar; Dirk Bister; Christopher J. Lux; Bouthayna Al-Tamimi; Björn Ludwig
Introduction: Increasing numbers of orthodontic mini‐implants are placed in the anterior maxilla. To our knowledge, bone levels and root proximity of patients with cephalometrically short maxillae have not been investigated before. The first, second, and third rugae were used as clinical reference lines, and the aim of this study was to measure bone availability in that area by comparing patients with short and normal maxillary body lengths. Methods: The sample consisted of 21 patients in each group: short maxillary body length and normal maxillary body length. The patients’ study models were bisected, and the outline of the palatal contour was marked on the surface. The models were scanned, and the palatal contours were superimposed on the palatal structures of their respective initial cephalometric headfilms, and the vertical and oblique bone levels of the sagittal plane were compared using the Student t test. The level of significance was set at P <0.05. Results: Compared with maxillae of normal maxillary body length, less bone was available in maxillae of short maxillary body length. However, the differences did not reach clinical or statistical significance (P >0.05) at the third rugae. Conclusions: Almost equivalent average bone depth at the third rugae in patients with normal and short maxillary body lengths suggests that this site can be used for 8‐mm long obliquely inserted orthodontic mini‐implants. HighlightsBone availability was similar in short and normal maxillae at the third palatal rugae.Bone height was less at first and second rugae in short compared with normal maxillae.Insert 8‐mm OMIs obliquely at the third rugae in patients with short or normal maxillae.
European Journal of Dental Education | 2016
B. Ludwig; D. Bister; T. C. Schott; J. A. Lisson; Jan Hourfar
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie | 2016
Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Ludwig B; Julia Spindler; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie | 2017
Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson