Jan W. van Ree

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the 1990s: A population-based study in the Maastricht area on incidence, characteristics and survival

OBJECTIVES We sought to describe the incidence, characteristics and survival of out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in the Maastricht area of The Netherlands. BACKGROUND Incidence and survival rates of out-of-hospital SCA in different communities are often based on the number of victims resuscitated by the emergency medical services. Our population-based study in the Maastricht area allows information on all victims of witnessed and unwitnessed SCA occurring outside the hospital. METHODS Incidence, patient characteristics and survival rates were determined by prospectively collecting information on all cases of SCA occurring in the age group 20 to 75 years between January 1, 1991 and December 31, 1994. Survival rates were related to the site of the event (at home vs. outside the home) and the presence or absence of a witness and rhythm at the time of the resuscitation attempt in out-of-hospital SCA. RESULTS Five hundred fifteen patients were included (72% men, 28% women). In 44% of men and 53% of women, SCA was most likely the first manifestation of heart disease. In patients known to have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI), the mean interval between the MI and SCA was 6.5 years, with >50% having a left ventricular ejection fraction >30%. The mean yearly incidence of SCA was 1 in 1,000 inhabitants. Of all deaths in the age groups studied, 18.5% were sudden. Nearly 80% of SCAs occurred at home. In 60% of all cases of SCA a witness was present. Cardiac resuscitation, which was attempted in 51% of all subjects, resulted overall in 32 (6%) of 515 patients being discharged alive from the hospital. Survival rates for witnessed SCA were 8% (16 of 208 subjects) at home and 18% (15 of 85 subjects) outside the home (95% confidence interval 1% to 18.8%). CONCLUSIONS The majority of victims of SCA cannot be identified before the event. Sudden cardiac arrest usually occurs at home, and the survival of those with a witnessed SCA at home was low compared with that outside the home, indicating the necessity of optimizing out-of-hospital resuscitation, especially in the at-home situation.

Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND A substantial part of cardiovascular disease prevention is delivered in primary care. Special attention should be paid to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. According to the Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management, the heavy workload of cardiovascular risk management for GPs could be shared with advanced practice nurses. AIM To investigate the clinical effectiveness of practice nurses acting as substitutes for GPs in cardiovascular risk management after 1 year of follow-up. DESIGN OF STUDY Prospective pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING Primary care in the south of the Netherlands. Six centres (25 GPs, six nurses) participated. METHOD A total of 1626 potentially eligible patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were randomised to a practice nurse group (n = 808) or a GP group (n = 818) in 2006. In total, 701 patients were included in the trial. The Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management was used as the protocol, with standardised techniques for risk assessment. Changes in the following risk factors after 1 year were measured: lipids, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. In addition, patients in the GP group received a brief questionnaire. RESULTS A larger decrease in the mean level of risk factors was observed in the practice nurse group compared with the GP group. After controlling for confounders, only the larger decrease in total cholesterol in the practice nurse group was statistically significant (P = 0.01, two-sided). CONCLUSION Advanced practice nurses are achieving results, equal to or better than GPs for the management of risk factors. The findings of this study support the involvement of practice nurses in cardiovascular risk management in Dutch primary care.

Risk Indicators for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). A retrospective case-control study was performed consisting of a group of unselected patients who had suffered SCA and had a clinical history of CAD, and a group of unselected age- and gender-matched CAD control patients living in the region of Maastricht. Information about previous myocardial infarction (MI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and coffee and alcohol consumption was collected. A logistic regression model was fitted to all mentioned variables including age and genders. Included were 117 SCA cases (84% men, mean age 65 years [+/-7]) and 144 control patients (83% men, mean age 63 years [+/-8]). Previous MI (odds ratio [OR] 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-9.3), hypertension (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-6.1), heavy coffee consumption (>10 cups per day) (OR 55.7, 95% CI 6.4-483), and a LVEF <40% (OR 11.2, CI 4.4-28.5) were independent risk indicators for SCA in patients with CAD. Alcohol consumption (1-21 glasses per week) seemed to protect patients with CAD from SCA (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.98). These observations suggest that changes in lifestyle factors can be of potential importance in protecting patients with CAD from dying suddenly.

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prognostic value of signs, symptoms, and the ankle-brachial pressure index.

Objectives . To determine whether different levels of the ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) are associated with an increased risk for progressive limbischemia, nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events. To investigate the prognostic value of signs and symptoms associated with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Design . Prospective follow-up study. Setting . Eighteen general practice centers in the Netherlands. Participants . Three thousand six hundred forty-nine participants (53% female) with a mean age of 59 years (range: 40-78 years). Main outcome measures . Progressive limbischemia, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Results . At baseline, 458 participants had PAOD, defined as an ABPI < 0.95. Among these, 148 (32.2%) had an ABPI < 0.70. Cox proportional hazards models showed that after a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years, PAOD patients with an ABPI < 0.70 were at higher risk for cardiovascular death, compared with participants with a moderately reduced ABPI (< 0.95 - 0.70): HR 2.3 versus 1.2. Older age, complaints of intermittent claudication, abnormal pedal pulses, elevated blood pressure, and coexisting cardiovascular disease at baseline were also significant independent prognostic factors for one or more of the adverse outcome events in these patients. Conclusion . The ABPI is inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality in PAOD patients. A low ABPI is an independent predictor for cardiovascular mortality in PAOD patients.

Development of blood pressure and the incidence of hypertension in men and women over an 18-year period: results of the Nijmegen cohort study

The objective of this study was to determine the factors that influence diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the incidence of hypertension. In 1977, DBP and cardiovascular risk factors were measured in 7092 men and women. In 1995, 2335 subjects participated at a second screening. Those patients already under hypertension treatment in 1977 were excluded. The DBP tracking was studied in subjects not under hypertension treatment during the study. Hypertension was defined on two ways in the analysis: under current hypertension treatment or a DBP > 95 mmHg measured at rescreening in 1995. Forty-seven percent of the subjects with a DBP < 75 mmHg in 1977 remained in the same category of DBP in 1995, and 7% had become hypertensive. Of the 75-84 mmHg group in 1977, 40% stayed in the same category in 1995 and 15% became hypertensive. Of the 85-94 mmHg category, 30% stayed in the same category and 30% became hypertensive in 1995. Of the highest category in 1977 (> 95 mmHg), 64% were still in that category in 1995. Baseline DBP in 1977 had the highest predictive value for future DBP. Weight gain over the years increased the risk for future hypertension: in contrast, there was no risk at a low DBP without weight gain. There is no need for regular check-ups for those patients with a low DBP who experience no weight gain. Borderline DBP (85-95 mmHg), together with weight gain, increases the risk of development of hypertension. The risk was especially high for men in the lower socioeconomic class.

Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: A comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses

BACKGROUND Patient non-compliance with prescribed treatment is an important factor in the lack of success in cardiovascular prevention. Another important cause is non-adherence of caregivers to the guidelines. It is not known how doctors and nurses differ in the application of guidelines. Patient compliance to treatment may vary according to the type of caregiver. OBJECTIVE To compare adherence to cardiovascular prevention delivered by practice nurses and by general practitioners. SETTING Six primary health care centres in the Netherlands (25 general practitioners, six practice nurses). METHODS 701 high risk patients were included in a randomised trial. Half of the patients received nurse-delivered care and half received care by general practitioners. For 91% of the patients treatment concerned secondary prevention. The Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention was used as protocol. A structured self-administered questionnaire was sent by post to patients. Data were extracted from the practice database and the questionnaire. RESULTS Intervention was received by 77% of respondents who visited the practice nurse compared to 57% from the general practitioner group (OR = 2.56, p < 0.01). More lifestyle intervention was given by the practice nurse; 46% of patients received at least one lifestyle intervention (weight, diet, exercise, and smoking) compared to 13% in general practitioner group (OR = 3.24, p < 0.001). In addition, after one year more patients from the practice nurse group used cardiovascular drugs (OR = 1.9, p = 0.03). Nurses inquired more frequently about patient compliance to medical treatment (OR = 2.1, p < 0.01). Regarding patient compliance, no statistical difference between study groups in this trial was found. CONCLUSION Practice nurses adhered better to the Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention than general practitioners did. Lifestyle intervention advice was more frequently given by practice nurses. Improvement of cardiovascular prevention is still necessary. Both caregivers should inquire about patient adherence on a regular basis.

Is a Series of Blood Pressure Measurements by the General Practitioner or the Patient a Reliable Alternative to Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement?* A Study in General Practice With Reference to Short-term and Long-term Between-Visit Variability

We studied the reproducibility of a series of blood pressure measurements by general practitioner (GP) and patient in comparison with that of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM), with reference to short-term and long-term between-visit variability using a prospective, comparative diagnostic study. The study group was 88 potentially hypertensive primary care patients (initial systolic blood pressure [SBP] between 160 and 200 mm Hg or with diastolic blood pressure [DBP] between 95 and 115 mm Hg). ABPMs were measured on 2 separate days (at a 6 month interval). Two series of measurements by the doctor (at 1 to 6 month intervals), and the patient (at a 1 week interval) were measured. Mean differences and standard deviations of mean differences (SDD) between two successive series of measurements, and between two ABPMs were computed. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test was used to compare these standard deviations. Mean initial office-blood pressures were 161 (SBP) and 102 (DBP) mm Hg. Long-term between-visit variability (measurements by GP) was larger than short-term between-visit variability: SDDs were 16 v 11 mm Hg (SBP), and 10 v 8 mm Hg (DBP). The differences in average SBP and DBP between successive ABPMs and between successive series of office measurements by GP and home measurements by patient were not statistically significant. Mean differences between two series of measurements by GP and patient, and between two ABPMs, were 0 +/- 1 mm Hg. SDDs between successive ABPMs and series of measurements by GP and patient ranged from 8 to 11 mm Hg (SBP), and were 6 mm Hg (DBP). No statistically significant differences were found between the SDDs of the studied measurement procedures (SBP and DBP). In our study the reproducibility of ambulatory blood pressure measurement was not found to be better than that of a series of four duplicate measurements by GP or patient. Long-term (6 months interval) between-visit variability was larger than the short-term (1 week interval) between-visit variability.

Fielding incognito standardised patients as 'known' patients in a controlled trial in general practice.

Background  Incognito standardised patients (SPs) have only been used to represent new patients so far. The few trials with incognito SPs provide little detail on the method used for fielding them.

Experiences of doctors and nurses implementing nurse‐delivered cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a qualitative study

AIM This paper reports on a study of the experiences of general practitioners and practice nurses implementing nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention to high risk patients in primary care. BACKGROUND Difficulties may arise when innovations are introduced into routine daily practice. Whether or not implementation is successful is determined by different factors related to caregivers, patients, type of innovation and context. METHODS A qualitative study nested in a randomized trial (2006-2008) to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention. Six primary health care centres in the Netherlands (25 general practitioners, 6 practice nurses) participated in the trial. Interviews were held on two occasions: at 3 and at 18 months after commencement of consultation. The first occasion was a group interview with six practice nurses. The second consisted of semi-structured interviews with one general practitioner and one practice nurse from each centre. FINDINGS Main barriers to the implementation included: lack of knowledge about the guideline, attitudes towards treatment targets, lack of communication, insufficient coaching by doctors, content of life style advice. At the start of the consultation project, practice nurses expressed concern of losing nursing tasks. Other barriers were related to patients (lack of motivation), the guideline (target population) and organizational issues (insufficient patient recording and computer systems). CONCLUSIONS Both general practitioners and practice nurses were positive about nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention in primary care. Nurses could play an important role in successive removal of barriers to implementation of cardiovascular prevention. Mutual confidence between care providers in the healthcare team is necessary.

Primary Prevention of Arterial Thromboembolism in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation: The PATAF Trial Study Design

Patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (NRAF) have a higher risk of thromboembolism than patients in sinus rhythm. Several trials have been conducted to establish the best preventive regimen in patients with NRAF, but not in the primary-care setting. The Primary Prevention of Arterial Thromboembolism in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation (PATAF) study, a primary-care-based trial, was set up to compare the preventive efficacy of low-intensity anticoagulation (AC), target range International Normalized Ratio (INR) 1.1 < INR < 1.6 and regular-intensity AC (2.5 < INR < 3.5) therapies with that of aspirin 150 mg/d for the occurrence of thromboembolism in NRAF patients. Patients eligible for regular-intensity AC were randomly assigned to aspirin at 150 mg/d, low-intensity AC, or regular AC in group I. In cases of noneligibility for regular AC, the trial randomized patients between aspirin and low-intensity AC (assigned to group II). Primary outcome events were stroke (including intracranial hemorrhage), systemic embolism, major hemorrhage, or vascular death. Analysis of the data was based on Cox regression to compute the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval, using the likelihood ratio test. The trial randomized 729 patients. Patient enrollment and follow-up has been stopped, and the final analysis is now complete. We shall publish the main results as soon as possible.