G. Beusmans

Effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular risk management in primary care: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND A substantial part of cardiovascular disease prevention is delivered in primary care. Special attention should be paid to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors. According to the Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management, the heavy workload of cardiovascular risk management for GPs could be shared with advanced practice nurses. AIM To investigate the clinical effectiveness of practice nurses acting as substitutes for GPs in cardiovascular risk management after 1 year of follow-up. DESIGN OF STUDY Prospective pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING Primary care in the south of the Netherlands. Six centres (25 GPs, six nurses) participated. METHOD A total of 1626 potentially eligible patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease were randomised to a practice nurse group (n = 808) or a GP group (n = 818) in 2006. In total, 701 patients were included in the trial. The Dutch guideline for cardiovascular risk management was used as the protocol, with standardised techniques for risk assessment. Changes in the following risk factors after 1 year were measured: lipids, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. In addition, patients in the GP group received a brief questionnaire. RESULTS A larger decrease in the mean level of risk factors was observed in the practice nurse group compared with the GP group. After controlling for confounders, only the larger decrease in total cholesterol in the practice nurse group was statistically significant (P = 0.01, two-sided). CONCLUSION Advanced practice nurses are achieving results, equal to or better than GPs for the management of risk factors. The findings of this study support the involvement of practice nurses in cardiovascular risk management in Dutch primary care.

Checklist for cognitive and emotional consequences following stroke (CLCE-24): Development, usability and quality of the self-report version

OBJECTIVE In this paper a new checklist (CLCE-24) for identification of cognitive and emotional problems after stroke is presented. The CLCE-24 is intended to support a clinical interview by health care professionals other than the trained (neuro)psychologist. METHODS Patients were interviewed with the CLCE-24, 6 months post stroke. Usability was determined by interviews. Quality of the self-report version was determined using reference instruments (MMSE, CAMCOG). RESULTS Sixty-nine patients participated in the study (37 men; mean age 66 years). Both patients and assessors were positive about the use of the CLCE-24. Eighty percent of the patients had cognitive and/or emotional problems (73% cognitive; 51% emotional problems). Patients with complaints on the CLCE-24 also showed problems on the MMSE and the CAMCOG (p<0.05). The CLCE-24 was a predictor of the MMSE and CAMCOG (Adj. R(2)=0.13 and 0.16, respectively) at 12 months post stroke. Internal consistency of the CLCE-24 was good (alpha of 0.81). CONCLUSIONS The CLCE-24 is a usable and valid instrument for cognitive screening by health care professionals in the stroke service in the chronic phase after stroke.

Adherence to a guideline on cardiovascular prevention: A comparison between general practitioners and practice nurses

BACKGROUND Patient non-compliance with prescribed treatment is an important factor in the lack of success in cardiovascular prevention. Another important cause is non-adherence of caregivers to the guidelines. It is not known how doctors and nurses differ in the application of guidelines. Patient compliance to treatment may vary according to the type of caregiver. OBJECTIVE To compare adherence to cardiovascular prevention delivered by practice nurses and by general practitioners. SETTING Six primary health care centres in the Netherlands (25 general practitioners, six practice nurses). METHODS 701 high risk patients were included in a randomised trial. Half of the patients received nurse-delivered care and half received care by general practitioners. For 91% of the patients treatment concerned secondary prevention. The Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention was used as protocol. A structured self-administered questionnaire was sent by post to patients. Data were extracted from the practice database and the questionnaire. RESULTS Intervention was received by 77% of respondents who visited the practice nurse compared to 57% from the general practitioner group (OR = 2.56, p < 0.01). More lifestyle intervention was given by the practice nurse; 46% of patients received at least one lifestyle intervention (weight, diet, exercise, and smoking) compared to 13% in general practitioner group (OR = 3.24, p < 0.001). In addition, after one year more patients from the practice nurse group used cardiovascular drugs (OR = 1.9, p = 0.03). Nurses inquired more frequently about patient compliance to medical treatment (OR = 2.1, p < 0.01). Regarding patient compliance, no statistical difference between study groups in this trial was found. CONCLUSION Practice nurses adhered better to the Dutch guideline on cardiovascular prevention than general practitioners did. Lifestyle intervention advice was more frequently given by practice nurses. Improvement of cardiovascular prevention is still necessary. Both caregivers should inquire about patient adherence on a regular basis.

Multidisciplinary care for stroke patients living in the community: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for stroke patients living in the community. DATA SOURCES Databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 until July 2012. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials focused on multidisciplinary interventions for stroke patients living at home after hospitalization or inpatient rehabilitation were selected. The outcome domains were activities of daily living, social participation and quality of life. A total of 14 studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted the data and independently assessed the quality of reporting of the included studies using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement 2010. DATA SYNTHESIS None of the studies showed favourable effects of the intervention on activities of daily living and none assessed social participation. Furthermore, two studies reported favourable effects of the intervention in terms of quality of life. These concerned an intervention combining assessment with follow-up care and a rehabilitation intervention. CONCLUSION There is little evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for stroke patients being discharged home. Additional research should provide more insight into potentially effective multidisciplinary care for community-living stroke patients.

Not as transient: patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke experience cognitive and communication problems; an exploratory study

ABSTRACT Background: Patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke generally receive, besides secondary prevention, no regular follow up care after discharge directly home from the Emergency Room or TIA outpatient clinic; because it is believed that they will experience no consequences. Objectives: To explore whether the TIA and minor stroke patients have persistent problems due to the event. Methods: This study has a cross-sectional, comparative non-randomized, exploratory design. Patients with TIA or minor stroke, not requiring hospital admission, and a control group of stroke patients, recently discharged home, were selected and interviewed with a questionnaire by telephone or home visit, between one and eight months after the event. Patients with angina pectoris (AP) were recruited as a second control group. Results: Data showed that 51% of the TIA and minor stroke patients and 71% of the stroke patients experienced five or more problems, as opposed to 32% of patients with AP. Between 39 and 49% of the TIA, minor stroke and the stroke patients reported cognitive and communicative difficulties. Moreover, the TIA and minor stroke patients had more cognitive deficits (n = 27, 49%) and communicative limitations (n = 23, 42%) than the AP group (n = 7, 10% and n = 4, 6%, respectively). Conclusion: About half of the TIA and minor stroke patients experienced problems regarding cognition and communication, which were specific to the event. General practitioners should be aware of these potential problems and monitor patients regularly. Future research should focus on prognostic indicators to identify patients at risk.

Effect of a stroke-specific follow-up care model on the quality of life of stroke patients and caregivers: A controlled trial

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a stroke-specific follow-up care model on quality of life for stroke patients, being discharged home, and their caregivers. DESIGN A non-randomized, controlled trial, comparing an intervention group with a control group (usual care). SUBJECTS Stroke patients and their caregivers. METHODS Intervention involved 5 home visits by a stroke care coordinator over a period of 18 months, using a structured assessment tool. Outcome measures were conducted at baseline (T0) and every 6 months thereafter (T6, T12 and T18) in the domains of quality of life (primary), activities of daily living, social activities, depression, anxiety and caregiver strain. RESULTS The intervention group (n = 62) had significantly increased its social activities after 18 months, whereas the control group (n = 55) showed significantly decreased levels of social activities. In the first 6 months, levels of depression decreased significantly in caregivers of the intervention group. No differences were found for quality of life and the other outcome measures. CONCLUSION The intervention was not effective in improving quality of life, but was effective in improving levels of social activities. The intervention may have focussed too much on screening for stroke-related problems and not as much on adequate follow-up care and referral.

Experiences of doctors and nurses implementing nurse‐delivered cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a qualitative study

AIM This paper reports on a study of the experiences of general practitioners and practice nurses implementing nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention to high risk patients in primary care. BACKGROUND Difficulties may arise when innovations are introduced into routine daily practice. Whether or not implementation is successful is determined by different factors related to caregivers, patients, type of innovation and context. METHODS A qualitative study nested in a randomized trial (2006-2008) to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention. Six primary health care centres in the Netherlands (25 general practitioners, 6 practice nurses) participated in the trial. Interviews were held on two occasions: at 3 and at 18 months after commencement of consultation. The first occasion was a group interview with six practice nurses. The second consisted of semi-structured interviews with one general practitioner and one practice nurse from each centre. FINDINGS Main barriers to the implementation included: lack of knowledge about the guideline, attitudes towards treatment targets, lack of communication, insufficient coaching by doctors, content of life style advice. At the start of the consultation project, practice nurses expressed concern of losing nursing tasks. Other barriers were related to patients (lack of motivation), the guideline (target population) and organizational issues (insufficient patient recording and computer systems). CONCLUSIONS Both general practitioners and practice nurses were positive about nurse-delivered cardiovascular prevention in primary care. Nurses could play an important role in successive removal of barriers to implementation of cardiovascular prevention. Mutual confidence between care providers in the healthcare team is necessary.

Effectiveness of Teamwork in an Integrated Care Setting for Patients with COPD: Development and Testing of a Self-Evaluation Instrument for Interprofessional Teams

Introduction: Teamwork between healthcare providers is conditional for the delivery of integrated care. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of the conceptual framework Integrated Team Effectiveness Model for developing and testing of the Integrated Team Effectiveness Instrument. Theory and methods: Focus groups with healthcare providers in an integrated care setting for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were conducted to examine the recognisability of the conceptual framework and to explore critical success factors for collaborative COPD practice out of this framework. The resulting items were transposed into a pilot instrument. This was reviewed by expert opinion and completed 153 times by healthcare providers. The underlying structure and internal consistency of the instrument were verified by factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: The conceptual framework turned out to be comprehensible for discussing teamwork effectiveness. The pilot instrument measures 25 relevant aspects of teamwork in integrated COPD care. Factor analysis suggested three reliable components: teamwork effectiveness, team processes and team psychosocial traits (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.76 and 0.81). Conclusions and discussion: The conceptual framework Integrated Team Effectiveness Model is relevant in developing a practical full-spectrum instrument to facilitate discussing teamwork effectiveness. The Integrated Team Effectiveness Instrument provides a well-founded basis to self-evaluate teamwork effectiveness in integrated COPD care by healthcare providers. Recommendations are provided for the improvement of the instrument.

A process evaluation of a stroke-specific follow-up care model for stroke patients and caregivers; a longitudinal study

BackgroundThere is a need for follow-up care after stroke, but there is no consensus about the way to organise it. An intervention providing follow-up care for stroke patients and caregivers showed favourable effects on the level of social activities, but no other effects were found. The intervention consists of a maximum of five home visits to patients and caregivers during a period of 18 months post-discharge. The home visits are conducted by a stroke care coordinator (SCC) using a structured assessment tool. The objective of this study was to examine process-related factors that could have influenced the effectiveness of the intervention.Methods77 stroke patients, 59 caregivers and 4 SCCs participated in the study. Data on the organisational characteristics of and the satisfaction with the intervention were collected by means of structured assessments, interviews and self-administered questionnaires at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months of follow-up. The intervention was provided between April 2008 and June 2011.ResultsPatients received an average of 3.8 home visits (SD 1.4) and 55% of them had a follow-up period of a maximum of 18 months. There were 1074 problems identified and the SCCs initiated 363 follow-up care and referral options. Stroke patients and caregivers were very satisfied with the intervention. The SCCs were satisfied with the assessment tool, but would like to see a structured referral system.ConclusionsThe intervention was only partially performed in accordance with the protocol and was positively evaluated by patients, caregivers and SCCs. It is recommended to add a structured referral system to the intervention.

Quality improvement of nurse-led aftercare to outpatients with coronary heart disease: report of a case study

QUALITY ISSUE Improving preventive care for patients with coronary disease can be difficult to implement effectively with available resources. Assessing the implementation of a new improvement program can also be challenging when resources are constrained. INITIAL ASSESSMENT In 2006, a nurse-led outpatient clinic was introduced in the hospital. CHOICE OF SOLUTION The use of quality indicators (QIs), interviews and regular meetings to enable ongoing assessment of the success of implementation. IMPLEMENTATION Quality improvement was promoted by providing regular reports on QIs to the CARDIOCARE Steering and Working group. Interviews with stakeholders were held, medical records were investigated and minutes of meetings were analyzed. The main change in CARDIOCARE concerned the targeted patient group. EVALUATION CARDIOCARE performed well in meeting requirements of quality such as clinical effectiveness. There is, however, still room for improvement and some new QIs should be considered by stakeholders; for example, better registration of risk factors is needed. LESSONS LEARNED An initial period of time is necessary to examine whether QIs stated in the care protocol are realistic in clinical practice and whether it is feasible to collect data about these criteria. Stakeholders should communicate about these indicators on a regular basis. A Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle is needed in order to improve care processes and performance. In addition, systematic administration of data about indicators is required. For nurse-led outpatient secondary prevention, it is advisable to appoint a single nurse as a case manager who is responsible for checking the registration of QIs and their evaluation.