Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jane Cross is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jane Cross.


Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2009

Environmental factors and hospitalisation for COPD in a rural county of England

Violet Sauerzapf; Andrew Jones; Jane Cross

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global cause of morbidity and mortality. Studies in urban areas have shown associations between air pollutants and hospital admissions for COPD. Whether temporal variations in air quality are associated with hospital admissions for COPD in a rural region with lower concentrations of air pollutants than previously studied was investigated. Methods: Daily COPD admissions were recorded for patients attending three hospitals in the county of Norfolk, UK, between January 2006 and February 2007. Records were combined with daily information on concentrations of six air pollutants (carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide, oxides of nitrogen, ozone and fine particulates), airborne pollens, temperature and influenza incidence. A case–crossover analysis was used to examine the association between air pollution and daily admissions. Results: There were 1050 admissions for COPD over the study period. After adjustment for temperature, pollen and respiratory infections, each 10 μg/m3 increase in CO was associated with a 2% increase in the odds of admission. V3alues of 17%, 22% and 9% were observed for NO, NO2 and oxides of nitrogen respectively. No associations were observed with O3 or particulates. Conclusion: Among a population of a less urbanised area than previously investigated, this study found evidence that ambient pollutant concentrations were still associated with the risks of hospital admission for COPD.


Health Technology Assessment | 2010

A randomised controlled equivalence trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-utility of manual chest physiotherapy techniques in the management of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (MATREX).

Jane Cross; Frances Elender; Garry Barton; Allan Clark; Lee Shepstone; Annie Blyth; Max Bachmann; Ian Harvey

OBJECTIVES To estimate the effect, if any, of manual chest physiotherapy (MCP) administered to patients hospitalised with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation on both disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life. To compare the health service costs for those receiving and not receiving MCP. DESIGN A pragmatic, randomised controlled trial powered for equivalence. It was not possible to blind participants, clinicians or research staff to study arm allocation during the intervention. SETTING Four UK hospitals in Norwich, Great Yarmouth, Kings Lynn and Liverpool. PARTICIPANTS 526 participants aged 34-91 years were recruited between November 2005 and April 2008; of these, 372 provided evaluable data for the primary outcome. All persons hospitalised with COPD exacerbation and evidence of sputum production on examination were eligible for the trial providing there were no contraindications to performing MCP. INTERVENTIONS Participants were allocated to either MCP or no MCP on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. However, active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) was used in both arms. Participants allocated to the intervention were guided to perform ACBT while the physiotherapist delivered MCP. Participants allocated to the control arm received instruction on ACBT only. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was COPD-specific quality of life, measured using the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at 6 months post randomisation. The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to calculate the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain associated with MCP compared with no MCP. Secondary physiological outcome measures were also used. RESULTS Of the 526 participants, 261 were allocated to MCP and 264 to control, with 186 participants evaluable in each arm. ITT analyses indicated no significant difference at 6 months post randomisation in total SGRQ score [adjusted effect size (no MCP - MCP) 0.03 (95% confidence interval, CI -0.14 to 0.19)], SGRQ symptom score [adjusted effect size 0.04 (95% CI -0.15 to 0.23)], SGRQ activity score [adjusted effect size -0.02 (95% CI -0.20 to 0.16)] or SGRQ impact score [adjusted effect size 0.02 (95% CI -0.15 to 0.18)]. The imputed ITT and per-protocol results were similar. No significant differences were observed in any of the outcome measures or subgroup analyses. Compared with no MCP, employing MCP was associated with a slight loss in quality of life (0.001 QALY loss) but lower health service costs (cost saving of 410.79 pounds). Based on these estimates, at a cost-effectiveness threshold of lambda = 20,000 pounds per QALY, MCP would constitute a cost-effective use of resources (net benefit = 376.14 pounds). There was, however, a high level of uncertainty associated with these results and it is possible that the lower health service costs could have been due to other factors. CONCLUSIONS In terms of longer-term quality of life the use of MCP did not appear to affect outcome. However, this does not mean that MCP is of no therapeutic value to patients with COPD in specific circumstances. Although the cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that its use was cost-effective, much uncertainty was associated with this finding and it would be difficult to justify providing MCP therapy on the basis of cost-effectiveness alone. Future research should include evaluation of MCP for patients with COPD producing high volumes of sputum, and an evaluation of the effectiveness of ACBT in COPD exacerbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13825248.


Age and Ageing | 2014

Systematic review investigating the reporting of comorbidities and medication in randomized controlled trials of people with dementia

Toby O. Smith; Ian Maidment; Jennifer Hebding; Tairo Madzima; Francine M Cheater; Jane Cross; Fiona Poland; Jacqueline White; John Young; Chris Fox

OBJECTIVES dementia is a debilitating condition characterised by global loss of cognitive and intellectual functioning, which reduces social and occupational performance. This population frequently presents with medical co-morbidities such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The CONSORT statement outlines recommended guidance on reporting of participant characteristics in clinical trials. It is, however, unclear how much these are adhered to in trials assessing people with dementia. This paper assesses the reporting of medical co-morbidities and prescribed medications for people with dementia within randomised controlled trial (RCT) reports. DESIGN a systematic review of the published literature from the databases AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Registry from 1 January 1997 to 9 January 2014 was undertaken in order to identify RCTs detailing baseline medical co-morbidities and prescribed medications . Eligible studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT appraisal tool, and descriptive statistical analyses were calculated to determine point prevalence. RESULTS nine trials, including 1474 people with dementia, were identified presenting medical co-morbidity data. These indicated neurological disorders (prevalence 91%), vascular disorders (prevalence 91%), cardiac disorders (prevalence 74%) and ischaemic cerebrovascular disease (prevalence 53%) were most frequently seen. CONCLUSIONS published RCTs poorly report medical co-morbidities and medications for people with dementia. Future trials should include the report of these items to allow interpretation of whether the results are generalisable to frailer older populations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42013006735.


Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics | 2013

Assessment of people with cognitive impairment and hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis☆

Toby O. Smith; Yasir Hameed; Jane Cross; Opinder Sahota; Chris Fox

This study systematically assesses the literature pertaining to the diagnostic test accuracy of assessment instruments to evaluate patients following hip fracture surgery who present with cognitive impairment. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies assessing the reliability, validity, sensitivity or specificity of assessment tools for patients following hip fracture who were cognitively impaired were included. An assessment of published (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, AMED, Cochrane library, PEDro) and unpublished/trial registry (OpenGrey, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials, the UK National Research Register Archive) databases were undertaken. Methodological quality of the literature was assessed using the QUADAS-2 appraisal tool. Nine studies including 690 participants, with a mean age of 82.1 years were included. The literature demonstrated a high risk of bias for study methodology, but low risk of bias for applicability. Two assessment domains were recognized: pain and delirium. For pain, the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) and DOLOPLUS-2 tools possessed strong inter-rater reliability and internal consistency, with the FACS demonstrating concurrent validity with other pain scales. For delirium, the Delirium Rating Scale-Revisited-98 (DRS-R-98) demonstrated high inter-rater reliability and sensitivity and specificity, with the NEECHAM Confusion Scale possessing high internal consistency. To conclude, there is a paucity of literature assessing the reliability, validity and diagnostic test accuracy of instruments to assess people with cognitive impairment following hip fracture surgery. Based on the current available data, delirium may be best assessed using the NEECHAM Confusion Scale or DRS-R-98. Pain is most accurately evaluated using the FACS.


BMC Pulmonary Medicine | 2012

Evaluation of the effectiveness of manual chest physiotherapy techniques on quality of life at six months post exacerbation of COPD (MATREX): a randomised controlled equivalence trial

Jane Cross; Frances Elender; Gary Barton; Allan Clark; Lee Shepstone; Annie Blyth; Max Bachmann; Ian Harvey

BackgroundManual chest physiotherapy (MCP) techniques involving chest percussion, vibration, and shaking have long been used in the treatment of respiratory conditions. However, methodological limitations in existing research have led to a state of clinical equipoise with respect to this treatment. Thus, for patients hospitalised with an exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), clinical preference tends to dictate whether MCP is given to assist with sputum clearance. We standardised the delivery of MCP and assessed its effectiveness on disease-specific quality of life.MethodsIn this randomised, controlled trial powered for equivalence, 526 patients hospitalised with acute COPD exacerbation were enrolled from four centres in the UK. Patients were allocated to receive MCP plus advice on airway clearance or advice on chest clearance alone. The primary outcome was a COPD specific quality of life measure, the Saint Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at six months post randomisation. Analyses were by intention to treat (ITT). This study was registered, ISRCTN13825248.ResultsAll patients were included in the analyses, of which 372 (71%) provided evaluable data for the primary outcome. An effect size of 0·3 standard deviations in SGRQ score was specified as the threshold for superiority. The ITT analyses showed no significant difference in SGRQ for patients who did, or did not receive MCP (95% CI −0·14 to 0·19).ConclusionsThese data do not lend support to the routine use of MCP in the management of acute exacerbation of COPD. However, this does not mean that MCP is of no therapeutic value to COPD patients in specific circumstances.


Social Science & Medicine | 2016

Promoting physical activity interventions in communities with poor health and socio-economic profiles: A process evaluation of the implementation of a new walking group scheme

Sarah Hanson; Jane Cross; Andrew Jones

Walking groups have known health benefits but may not operate in communities with the greatest health needs, leading to the potential for increasing health inequity. This study examined the process of implementing a new volunteer led walking group scheme in a deprived community in England with poor physical activity, health and socio-economic indicators. Documentary evidence and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and volunteer walk leaders undertaken at the beginning and end of the funding period were analysed thematically. It was found that utilising community-based assets, forming collaborative partnerships with health and non-health organisations and ongoing sustainability issues were all factors that affected the schemes effective implementation. Passive recruitment methods and mass publicity did not attract participants who were representative of their community. The findings firstly suggest the necessity of identifying and mobilising community based assets at the ‘grass roots’ in deprived communities during the preparatory stage to access those in greatest need and to plan and build capacity. Secondly, the findings highlight the key role that health professionals have in referring those in poorest health and the inactive into walking interventions. In the new era of fiscally constrained public health embedded within local authorities these findings are pertinent in supporting the utilisation of local assets to address entrenched physical inactivity and inequity within deprived communities.


Age and Ageing | 2014

The importance of detecting and managing comorbidities in people with dementia

Chris Fox; Toby O. Smith; Ian Maidment; Jennifer Hebding; Tairo Madzima; Francine M Cheater; Jane Cross; Fiona Poland; Jacqueline White; John Young

Dementia is a debilitating condition characterised by global loss of cognitive and intellectual functioning, which gradually interferes with social and occupational performance. It is a common worldwide condition with a significant impact on society. There are currently 36 million people worldwide with Alzheimers disease (AD) and other dementias [1]. This is expected to more than double by 2030 (65 million) and reach ∼115 million in 2050, unless a major breakthrough is made. The worldwide societal costs were estimated at USD 604 billion in 2010 and rising [2]. To date research on the specific physical healthcare needs of people with dementia has been neglected. Yet, physical comorbidities are reported as common in people with dementia [3] and have been shown to lead to increased disability and reduced quality of life for the affected person and their carer [4]. Dementia is most frequently associated with older people who often present with other medical conditions, known as co-morbidities. Such co-morbidities include diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, musculoskeletal disorders and chronic cardiac failure and are common, 61% of people with …


Knee | 2015

Rehabilitation following first-time patellar dislocation: a randomised controlled trial of purported vastus medialis obliquus muscle versus general quadriceps strengthening exercises.

Toby O. Smith; Rachel Chester; Jane Cross; Nathan J. Hunt; Allan Clark; Simon T. Donell

BACKGROUND We aimed to define whether distal vastus medialis (VM) muscle strengthening improves functional outcomes compared to general quadriceps muscle strengthening following first-time patellar dislocation (FTPD). METHODS Fifty patients post-FTPD were randomised to either a general quadriceps exercise or rehabilitation programme (n=25) or a specific-VM exercise and rehabilitation regime (n=25). The primary outcome was the Lysholm knee score, and secondary outcomes included the Tegner Level of Activity score, the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score, and isometric knee extension strength at various knee flexion ranges of motion. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, six weeks, six months and 12months. RESULTS There were statistically significant differences in functional outcome and activity levels with the Lysholm knee score and Tegner Level of Activity score at 12months in the general quadriceps exercise group compared to the VM group (p=0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): -14.0 to 0.0/p=0.04; 95% CI: -3.0 to 0.0). This did not reach a clinically important difference. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the NPI score and isometric strength at any follow-up interval. The trial experienced substantial participant attrition (52% at 12months). CONCLUSIONS Whilst there was a statistical difference in the Lysholm knee score and Tegner Level of Activity score between general quadriceps and VM exercise groups at 12months, this may not have necessarily been clinically important. This trial highlights that participant recruitment and retention are challenges which should be considered when designing future trials in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic study, Level I.


International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry | 2017

Factors predicting incidence of post-operative delirium in older people following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Toby O. Smith; Alethea Cooper; Guy Peryer; Richard Griffiths; Chris Fox; Jane Cross

Delirium is one of the most common complications following hip fracture surgery in older people. This study identified pre‐ and peri‐operative factors associated with the development of post‐operative delirium following hip fracture surgery.


Qualitative Health Research | 2015

Challenging Social Cognition Models of Adherence: Cycles of Discourse, Historical Bodies, and Interactional Order

Jamie Murdoch; Charlotte Salter; Fiona Poland; Jane Cross

Attempts to model individual beliefs as a means of predicting how people follow clinical advice have dominated adherence research, but with limited success. In this article, we challenge assumptions underlying this individualistic philosophy and propose an alternative formulation of context and its relationship with individual actions related to illness. Borrowing from Scollon and Scollon’s three elements of social action—historical body, interaction order, and discourses in place—we construct an alternative set of research methods and demonstrate their application with an example of a person talking about asthma management. We argue that talk- or illness-related behavior, both viewed as forms of social action, manifest themselves as an intersection of cycles of discourse, shifting as individuals move through these cycles across time and space. We conclude by discussing how these dynamics of social action can be studied and how clinicians might use this understanding when negotiating treatment with patients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jane Cross's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Fox

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allan Clark

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandy Thomas

University of the West of England

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Opinder Sahota

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon T. Donell

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Chester

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge