Jane Goodall

Tumor clone dynamics in lethal prostate cancer

Independent clones with distinct genomic patterns show complex dynamics over the lethal course of prostate cancer, with gradual emergence of drug-resistant clones. Treacherous Evolution of Prostate Cancer As cancers grow and evolve, they develop a variety of mutations, some of which enable resistance to anticancer therapeutics. Now, Carreira et al. have shown that lethal prostate cancer contains a mixture of independent clones with different genetic makeup and different ability to survive drug treatment, which evolves over time. As the cancer progresses and is exposed to different drugs, the resulting selection pressure results in the emergence of clones that are activated by some of the drugs, indicating the importance of careful monitoring and timely changes in therapeutic regimens to avoid giving the cancer cells an unwanted boost. It is unclear whether a single clone metastasizes and remains dominant over the course of lethal prostate cancer. We describe the clonal architectural heterogeneity at different stages of disease progression by sequencing serial plasma and tumor samples from 16 ERG-positive patients. By characterizing the clonality of commonly occurring deletions at 21q22, 8p21, and 10q23, we identified multiple independent clones in metastatic disease that are differentially represented in tissue and circulation. To exemplify the clinical utility of our studies, we then showed a temporal association between clinical progression and emergence of androgen receptor (AR) mutations activated by glucocorticoids in about 20% of patients progressing on abiraterone and prednisolone or dexamethasone. Resistant clones showed a complex dynamic with temporal and spatial heterogeneity, suggesting distinct mechanisms of resistance at different sites that emerged and regressed depending on treatment selection pressure. This introduces a management paradigm requiring sequential monitoring of advanced prostate cancer patients with plasma and tumor biopsies to ensure early discontinuation of agents when they become potential disease drivers.

Plasma AR and abiraterone-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen receptor mutations and amplifications in circulating tumor DNA provide clues to prostate cancer drug resistance. Detecting resistance before it starts Androgen receptor targeting is the cornerstone of prostate cancer treatment. Even when the tumors become “castration-resistant” or no longer sensitive to androgen deprivation, androgen signaling can still be effectively targeted by newer drugs such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, which also inhibit the androgen signaling axis. Romanel et al. analyzed tumor DNA samples from the blood of 97 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer at different times during the course of treatment with abiraterone. Although some new mutations emerged during therapy, the authors found that androgen receptor amplifications were present from the beginning and correlated with abiraterone resistance, suggesting that detection of these amplifications should be useful for identifying abiraterone-resistant cancers before starting treatment. Androgen receptor (AR) gene aberrations are rare in prostate cancer before primary hormone treatment but emerge with castration resistance. To determine AR gene status using a minimally invasive assay that could have broad clinical utility, we developed a targeted next-generation sequencing approach amenable to plasma DNA, covering all AR coding bases and genomic regions that are highly informative in prostate cancer. We sequenced 274 plasma samples from 97 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with abiraterone at two institutions. We controlled for normal DNA in patients’ circulation and detected a sufficiently high tumor DNA fraction to quantify AR copy number state in 217 samples (80 patients). Detection of AR copy number gain and point mutations in plasma were inversely correlated, supported further by the enrichment of nonsynonymous versus synonymous mutations in AR copy number normal as opposed to AR gain samples. Whereas AR copy number was unchanged from before treatment to progression and no mutant AR alleles showed signal for acquired gain, we observed emergence of T878A or L702H AR amino acid changes in 13% of tumors at progression on abiraterone. Patients with AR gain or T878A or L702H before abiraterone (45%) were 4.9 and 7.8 times less likely to have a ≥50 or ≥90% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), respectively, and had a significantly worse overall [hazard ratio (HR), 7.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.51 to 15.34; P = 1.3 × 10−9) and progression-free (HR, 3.73; 95% CI, 2.17 to 6.41; P = 5.6 × 10−7) survival. Evaluation of plasma AR by next-generation sequencing could identify cancers with primary resistance to abiraterone.

Serial Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Evaluating Tumor Clone Response To Molecularly Targeted Drug Administration

Purpose: We evaluated whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be used for patient selection and as a tumor clone response biomarker in patients with advanced cancers participating in early-phase clinical trials of targeted drugs. Experimental Design: Plasma samples from patients with known tumor mutations who completed at least two courses of investigational targeted therapy were collected monthly, until disease progression. NGS was performed sequentially on the Ion Torrent PGM platform. Results: cfDNA was extracted from 39 patients with various tumor types. Treatments administered targeted mainly the PI3K–AKT–mTOR pathway (n = 28) or MEK (n = 7). Overall, 159 plasma samples were sequenced with a mean sequencing coverage achieved of 1,685X across experiments. At trial initiation (C1D1), 23 of 39 (59%) patients had at least one mutation identified in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1–5). Out of the 44 mutations identified at C1D1, TP53, PIK3CA and KRAS were the top 3 mutated genes identified, with 18 (41%), 9 (20%), 8 (18%) different mutations, respectively. Out of these 23 patients, 13 received a targeted drug matching their tumor profile. For the 23 patients with cfDNA mutation at C1D1, the monitoring of mutation allele frequency (AF) in consecutive plasma samples during treatment with targeted drugs demonstrated potential treatment associated clonal responses. Longitudinal monitoring of cfDNA samples with multiple mutations indicated the presence of separate clones behaving discordantly. Molecular changes at cfDNA mutation level were associated with time to disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential clinical utility to monitor the delivery of targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(20); 4586–96. ©2015 AACR.

Circulating Cell-Free DNA to Guide Prostate Cancer Treatment with PARP Inhibition

Biomarkers for more precise patient care are needed in metastatic prostate cancer. We have reported a phase II trial (TOPARP-A) of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer, demonstrating antitumor activity associating with homologous recombination DNA repair defects. We now report targeted and whole-exome sequencing of serial circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples collected during this trial. Decreases in cfDNA concentration independently associated with outcome in multivariable analyses (HR for overall survival at week 8: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.56; P = 0.003). All tumor tissue somatic DNA repair mutations were detectable in cfDNA; allele frequency of somatic mutations decreased selectively in responding patients (χ2P < 0.001). At disease progression, following response to olaparib, multiple subclonal aberrations reverting germline and somatic DNA repair mutations (BRCA2, PALB2) back in frame emerged as mechanisms of resistance. These data support the role of liquid biopsies as a predictive, prognostic, response, and resistance biomarker in metastatic prostate cancer.Significance: We report prospectively planned, serial, cfDNA analyses from patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated on an investigator-initiated phase II trial of olaparib. These analyses provide predictive, prognostic, response, and resistance data with second hit mutations first detectable at disease progression, suggesting clonal evolution from treatment-selective pressure and platinum resistance. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 1006-17. ©2017 AACR.See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937See related article by Kondrashova et al., p. 984See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920.

Abstract CT322: DNA repair defects and antitumor activity with PARP inhibition: TOPARP, a phase II trial of olaparib in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

Introduction: Next generation sequencing (NGS) has identified genomic aberrations causing DNA repair defects in sporadic metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We hypothesized that single agent olaparib would have antitumor activity in a sub-population of mCRPC patients (pts) and that exome and transcriptome studies would identify this population. Methods: TOPARP is an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II trial with a novel multi-step adaptive design (CRUK/11/029). The first part of the study (TOPARP-A) has a two-stage design evaluating the antitumor activity of single agent olaparib in unselected mCRPC pts (p0 = 0.05; p1 = 0.20; α = 0.02; β = 0.10) with a preplanned analysis to identify a biomarker defined sensitive subgroup. Primary endpoint, response rate (RR), was defined as objective response by RECIST 1.1 and/or PSA fall ≥50% and/or confirmed circulating tumor cell (CTC) count falls from ≥5 to Results: Fifty pts were enrolled from 7 UK centers; all had had prior docetaxel, 48 (96%) prior abiraterone and 29 (58%) prior cabazitaxel. Overall, 16 of 49 evaluable pts experienced a response (RR 32.7%, 95% CI: 20.0 to 47.5), with 11 and 4 pts having been on treatment for >6 and >12 months respectively at data cut-off. NGS identified homozygous deletions and/or putatively deleterious mutations in DNA repair genes in 15/49 (30.6%) evaluable pts. While a majority of these genomic aberrations occurred in BRCA2 and ATM, biallelic loss of other relevant genes, including members of the Fanconi Anemia complementation group and CHEK2, were also observed. Among these fifteen pts, 13 (86.7%) responded to olaparib. All seven pts with BRCA2 loss (somatic [4/7] or germline [3/7]) and 4/5 pts with ATM truncating mutations responded to olaparib. The specificity of the biomarker suite was 94% in this population. Conversely, PTEN loss and ERG rearrangements were not associated with response. Finally, consistent with previous studies of olaparib, anemia (10/50, 20%) and fatigue (6/50, 12%) were the most common grade>3 adverse events, with 13 (26%) pts requiring a dose reduction. Conclusions: Olaparib has durable antitumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts with sporadic mCRPC with a 32.7% overall response rate. Genomic defects in DNA repair genes associate with olaparib sensitivity in sporadic mCRPC, offering a possibility for the very first molecular treatment stratification of advanced prostate cancer. Citation Format: Joaquin Mateo, Shahneen Sandhu, Susana Miranda, Suzanne Carreira, Suneil Jain, Christy Ralph, Andrew Protheroe, Syed Hussain, Robert Jones, Tony Elliot, Ursula McGovern, Alexa Gillman, Claire Paulding, Helen Mossop, Nuria Porta, Diletta Bianchini, Zafeiris Zafeiriou, Gunther Boysen, Daniel Nava Rodrigues, Penelope Flohr, George Seed, Jane Goodall, Ines Figueiredo, Raquel Perez-Lopez, Nina Tunariu, Aurelius Omlin, Roberta Ferraldeschi, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Rosalind Eeles, Gerhardt Attard, Dan Robinson, Arul Chinnaiyan, Emma Hall, Johann S. de Bono. DNA repair defects and antitumor activity with PARP inhibition: TOPARP, a phase II trial of olaparib in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT322. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT322

Plasma Cell-free DNA Concentration and Outcomes from Taxane Therapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer from Two Phase III Trials (FIRSTANA and PROSELICA)

Background Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to guide metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment. Objective To clinically qualify baseline and on-treatment cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations as biomarkers of patient outcome following taxane chemotherapy. Design, setting, and participants Blood for cfDNA analyses was prospectively collected from 571 mCRPC patients participating in two phase III clinical trials, FIRSTANA (NCT01308567) and PROSELICA (NCT01308580). Patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2) or cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m2) as first-line chemotherapy (FIRSTANA), and cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m2) as second-line chemotherapy (PROSELICA). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Associations between cfDNA concentration and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were tested using logistic regression models. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods for cfDNA concentration grouped by quartile. Cox proportional hazard models, within each study, tested for associations with radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS), with multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline prognostic variables. Two-stage individual patient meta-analysis combined results for cfDNA concentrations for both studies. Results and limitations In 2502 samples, baseline log10 cfDNA concentration correlated with known prognostic factors, shorter rPFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.08; p = 0.004), and shorter OS on taxane therapy (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.18–1.97; p = 0.001). In multivariable analyses, baseline cfDNA concentration was an independent prognostic variable for rPFS and OS in both first- and second-line chemotherapy settings. Patients with a PSA response experienced a decline in log10 cfDNA concentrations during the first four cycles of treatment (per cycle −0.03; 95% CI: −0.044 to −0.009; p = 0.003). Study limitations included the fact that blood sample collection was not mandated for all patients and the inability to specifically quantitate tumour-derived cfDNA fraction in cfDNA. Conclusions We report that changes in cfDNA concentrations correlate with both rPFS and OS in patients receiving first- and second-line taxane therapy, and may serve as independent prognostic biomarkers of response to taxanes. Patient summary In the past decade, several new therapies have been introduced for men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. Although metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable, these novel agents have extended patient survival and improved their quality of life in comparison with the last decade. To further optimise treatment allocation and individualise patient care, better tests (biomarkers) are needed to guide the delivery of improved and more precise care. In this report, we assessed cfDNA in over 2500 blood samples from men with prostate cancer who were recruited to two separate international studies and received taxane chemotherapy. We quantified the concentration of cfDNA fragments in blood plasma, which partly originates from tumour. We identified that higher concentrations of circulating cfDNA fragments, prior to starting taxane chemotherapy, can be used to identify patients with aggressive prostate cancer. A decline in cfDNA concentration during the first 3–9 wk after initiation of taxane therapy was seen in patients deriving benefit from taxane chemotherapy. These results identified circulating cfDNA as a new biomarker of aggressive disease in metastatic prostate cancer and imply that the study of cfDNA has clinical utility, supporting further efforts to develop blood-based tests on this circulating tumour-derived DNA.

Single-Cell Analyses of Prostate Cancer Liquid Biopsies Acquired by Apheresis

Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have clinical relevance, but their study has been limited by their low frequency. Experimental Design: We evaluated liquid biopsies by apheresis to increase CTC yield from patients suffering from metastatic prostate cancer, allow precise gene copy-number calls, and study disease heterogeneity. Results: Apheresis was well tolerated and allowed the separation of large numbers of CTCs; the average CTC yield from 7.5 mL of peripheral blood was 167 CTCs, whereas the average CTC yield per apheresis (mean volume: 59.5 mL) was 12,546 CTCs. Purified single CTCs could be isolated from apheresis product by FACS sorting; copy-number aberration (CNA) profiles of 185 single CTCs from 14 patients revealed the genomic landscape of lethal prostate cancer and identified complex intrapatient, intercell, genomic heterogeneity missed on bulk biopsy analyses. Conclusions: Apheresis facilitated the capture of large numbers of CTCs noninvasively with minimal morbidity and allowed the deconvolution of intrapatient heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5635–44. ©2018 AACR.

Abstract A051: Liquid biopsy by apheresis: Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells and their organoid culture reflects intrapatient heterogeneity and clonal evolution

Liquid biopsy components from blood, such as cell free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs), are prognostic for overall survival in advanced prostate cancer patients and allow the study of clonal evolution. cfDNA is easily obtained and has been widely used for molecular characterization and reflects pooled genomic profiles in a patient, but has limitations regarding gene copy number calls. CTC single-cell genomic studies generate precise gene copy number calls and elucidate intrapatient intercellular genomic heterogeneity. The main limitation of CTC analyses has been the low CTC count found in many cancer patients. We elected to study whether liquid biopsy by apheresis in advanced prostate cancer patients increases the yield of CTC to study tumor genomics, intrapatient heterogeneity, and ex vivo organotypic 3D models. Advanced metastatic prostate cancer patients being considered for clinical trials were invited to consent to apheresis. Apheresis CTC counts using CellSearchTM (Menarini) were acquired from 16 patients. The contents of the CellSearch cartridges were sorted into pure single cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and subsequently assessed by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH, Agilent Technology) for copy number aberrations (CNA). Exome and aCGH from tissue biopsies were compared to the single cell aCGH results. We generated patient-derived organoid (PDOs) cultures from apheresis products by preenrichment using density gradient (Lymphoprep) and subsequent CTC enrichment by EpCAM positive selection (EasySep StemCell Technologies). PDOs were characterized by immunofluorescence (IF) as DAPI+/CK+/EpCAM+ and CD45- cells and subsequently by aCGH for CNA. All sixteen patients (median age of 70 years; range 60-77 years) tolerated apheresis without any adverse effects. CTC counts from peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis ranged from 13 to 711 (median = 96), and did not significantly change post apheresis. The estimated CTC yield per apheresis ranged from 660-35473 per apheresis product (median = 3351). This constitutes an increase of 102-fold when compared to median CTC capture from 7.5mL of PB. A total of 170 single CTCs from 15 apheresis patients were genomically profiled and the copy number aberration profiles confirmed prostate cancer with multiple genomic hallmarks including CNAs such as AR amplification, chromosome 8q gain (MYC locus), and PTEN, RB1, BRCA2, TP53, CHD1 loss. CNA profiles of PDOs showed similar genomic aberrations to same patient CTCs and also reflected intrapatient heterogeneity detected by single CTC analysis. In conclusion, apheresis from advanced prostate cancer patients is a well-tolerated procedure and in our study increased the CTC yield by 102-fold when compared to PB. CTC and PDOs from apheresis products shared similar CNA profile compared with tissues biopsies and furthermore gave us an insight of the tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution. Citation Format: Maryou B.K. Lambros, Veronica Gil, Mateus Crespo, Mariane S. Fontes, Alan Mackay, Gemma Folwer, Gemma Folwer, Berni Ebbs, Rui Neves, Penny Flohr, Susana Miranda, Semini Sumanasuriya, Daniel N. Rodrigues, Rita Pereira, Geroge Seed, Wei Yuan, Joanne Hunt, Deirdre Moloney, Dionne Ayanda, Niven Mehra, Jane Goodall, Claudia Bertan, Suzanne Carreira, Nikolas H. Stoecklein, Leon W.M.M. Terstappen, Gunther Boysen, Joahnn S. De Bono. Liquid biopsy by apheresis: Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells and their organoid culture reflects intrapatient heterogeneity and clonal evolution [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A051.

Abstract 4340: DNA repair genes aberrations in germline DNA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

INTRODUCTION: DNA repair defects are found in mCRPC and are therapeutically actionable; germline BRCA mutation-associated (gBRCA) prostate cancer has a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is enriched for germline DNA repair mutations and that these may be relevant to patient outcome. METHODS: Targeted-sequencing for DNA repair genes was conducted in germline DNA from patients consenting to 3 clinical trials between 2013-2015. Germline DNA was extracted from saliva or buccal swabs using the Oragene kit; libraries were constructed using a customized Qiagen panel and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq. Family history and clinical data were prospectively collected. For time to event analyses unadjusted Cox regression models were used and comparisons were made using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Germline samples from 154 mCRPC patients were available. Median age at diagnosis was 61years (y), median time to castration-resistance was 14.5 months (m) and median overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis of prostate cancer was 106.8m; 69% (91/131; 24 N/A) of patients were initially diagnosed with Gleason≥8 tumors. 130/154 (84.4%) and 131/154 (85.0%) received Docetaxel and Abiraterone respectively. Of 154 patients, 4 were previously known to be gBRCA2 mutation carriers and were removed from the prevalence analysis but included in the clinical analyses; 22/150 (14.7%, 95%CI 9.4-21.4%) harboured a truncating or frameshift mutation in a DNA repair gene (9 BRCA2, 6%; 4 ATM, 2.7%; 2 PALB2, 1.3%, 1 each for CHEK2, FANCI, MRE11A, NBN, RAD51C, RAD51D and MSH6). Overall, patients with any germline DNA repair aberrations had a worse median OS (75.8 vs 106.8 m; log-rank p = 0.04). Time to resistance to primary hormonal ablation was shorter specifically for gBRCA2 mutations carriers (11.0 vs 14.8 m; log-rank p = 0.01) but not for non-BRCA2 repair aberrations. Age at diagnosis was similar in patients with or without DNA repair germline mutations (median 61.3 vs 61.7y, Mann-Whitney p = 0.41) as well as frequency of Gleason≥8 tumors (16/21 [76%] vs 75/109 [68%]; Mann-Whitney p = 0.23) Response rates to Docetaxel (14/18 [77.8%] vs 64/94 [68.1%]; Fisher exact p = 0.67) and Abiraterone (10/21 [47.6%] vs 44/94 [46.8%]; Fisher exact p = 0.73) were similar among individuals with and without mutations. Family cancer history was collected in 125/154 cases (81%). While having cases of ovarian/prostate/breast/pancreas cancers in these patients’ families associated with a higher likelihood of finding a germline mutation (Odds Ratio 3.36, p = 0.03), 5 of 68 (7.4%) men with no cases of ovarian/prostate/breast/pancreas cancers registered in their families carried a germline mutation in a DNA repair gene. CONCLUSIONS: mCRPC is enriched for patients with germline mutations in DNA repair genes (15%), with 6% having gBRCA2 mutation. Germline DNA repair aberrations are associated with a worse prognosis from mCRPC. Citation Format: JOAQUIN MATEO, Suzanne Carreira, Helen Mossop, Pasquale Rescigno, Michael Kolinsky, Elena Castro, Ada Balasopoulou, Jo Hunt, Desamparados Roda, Claudia Bertan, Jane Goodall, Susana Miranda, Penny Flohr, Nuria Porta, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, David Olmos, Christopher J. Lord, Emma Hall, Ros Eeles, Johann S. de Bono. DNA repair genes aberrations in germline DNA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4340.