Jane Kennedy
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jane Kennedy.
Journal of Accounting Research | 1997
Jane Kennedy; Don N. Kleinmuntz; Mark E. Peecher
This paper examines determinants of justifiability of performance in an ill-structured audit task. Justifiability is the extent to which task performance can be defended and an ill-structured audit task is a nonroutine task that lacks definitive applicable authoritative guidance, has multiple alternative courses of action, and requires the auditor to exercise significant judgment (Abdolmohammadi and Wright [1987]). Performance evaluation for these tasks generally rests upon the perceived justifiability of either the decision process or actual choice (Davis and Solomon [1989] and Waller and Felix [1984]), so that understanding expert performance on these audit tasks requires understanding the determinants of justifiability (Solomon and Shields [1995]).
Journal of Accounting Research | 2002
Michael Eames; Steven M. Glover; Jane Kennedy
This study examines analyst forecast errors within the context of stock recommendations. We predict positive forecast error (i.e., optimism) for buy recommendations and negative forecast error (i.e., pessimism) for sell recommendations. We offer two explanations for this prediction: (1) the unconscious tendency to process information in a manner that supports one’s goal, which we refer to as the “objectivity illusion” hypothesis, and (2) the economic incentive to boost trade, which we refer to as the “trade boosting” hypothesis. The pattern of analyst forecast bias we predict (i.e., optimism for buys and pessimism for sells) is opposite in direction to that predicted by the management relations hypothesis—a commonly cited hypothesis for analyst forecast bias. We find broker‐analyst earnings forecast errors are significantly optimistic for buy recommendations and significantly pessimistic for sell recommendations, consistent with the objectivity illusion and trade boosting hypotheses. Our study indicates that the pattern of results reported in prior research (i.e., increasingly optimistic earnings forecasts as the stock recommendation becomes less favorable) is likely driven by a correlated omitted variable, actual earnings. Results of an analysis to distinguish between trade boosting and objectivity illusion appear more consistent with the objectivity illusion.
The Accounting Review | 2004
Frank D. Hodge; Jane Kennedy; Laureen A. Maines
Journal of Accounting Research | 1993
Jane Kennedy
The Accounting Review | 2007
W. Brooke Elliott; Frank D. Hodge; Jane Kennedy; Maarten Pronk
Accounting review: A quarterly journal of the American Accounting Association | 1995
Jane Kennedy
Journal of Accounting Research | 1998
Jane Kennedy; Terence R. Mitchell; Stephan E. Sefcik
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes | 1997
Lindsley G. Boiney; Jane Kennedy; Pete Nye
Journal of Accounting Research | 1997
Jane Kennedy; Mark E. Peecher
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making | 2002
Robert H. Ashton; Jane Kennedy