Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Janet E. Hiller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Janet E. Hiller.


British Journal of Surgery | 2005

Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins

Linda Mundy; Tracy Merlin; Robert Fitridge; Janet E. Hiller

The safety and effectiveness of endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) for varicose veins are not yet fully evaluated.


British Journal of Surgery | 2003

Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery

Tracy Merlin; Janet E. Hiller; Guy J. Maddern; G. G. Jamieson; A. R. Brown; A. Kolbe

A systematic review was conducted to determine which of the methods of obtaining peritoneal access and establishing pneumoperitoneum is the safest and most effective.


Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2000

Epidemiological evidence for a relationship between life events, coping style, and personality factors in the development of breast cancer

Phyllis Butow; Janet E. Hiller; Melanie A. Price; Sarah Thackway; Anne Kricker; Christopher Tennant

OBJECTIVE Review empirical evidence for a relationship between psychosocial factors and breast cancer development. METHODS Standardised quality assessment criteria were utilised to assess the evidence of psychosocial predictors of breast cancer development in the following domains: (a) stressful life events, (b) coping style, (c) social support, and (d) emotional and personality factors. RESULTS Few well-designed studies report any association between life events and breast cancer, the exception being two small studies using the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule (LEDS) reporting an association between severely threatening events and breast cancer risk. Seven studies show anger repression or alexithymia are predictors, the strongest evidence suggesting younger women are at increased risk. There is no evidence that social support, chronic anxiety, or depression affects breast cancer development. With the exception of rationality/anti-emotionality, personality factors do not predict breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION The evidence for a relationship between psychosocial factors and breast cancer is weak. The strongest predictors are emotional repression and severe life events. Future research would benefit from theoretical grounding and greater methodological rigour. Recommendations are given.


British Journal of Surgery | 2004

Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence

Linda Mundy; Tracy Merlin; Guy J. Maddern; Janet E. Hiller

The aim was to determine the safety and effectiveness of the implantation of an artificial bowel sphincter for the treatment of severe faecal incontinence.


PLOS Medicine | 2012

Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial

Caroline A Crowther; Jodie M Dodd; Janet E. Hiller; Ross Haslam; Jeffrey S. Robinson

A study conducted in Australia provides new data on the outcomes for mother and baby associated with either planned vaginal birth, or elective repeat caesarean section following a previous caesarean section.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 1999

Determinants of infant feeding practices in a low socio-economic area: identifying environmental barriers to breastfeeding

Ellen McIntyre; Janet E. Hiller; Deborah Turnbull

Objective: To identify environmental barriers to breastfeeding.


Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2013

A systematic review of elastography, electrical impedance scanning, and digital infrared thermography for breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Thomas D. Vreugdenburg; Cameron D Willis; Linda Mundy; Janet E. Hiller

The objective of this study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate all the available evidence of safety, effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy for three emerging classes of technology promoted for breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI), electrical impedance scanning (EIS) and elastography. A systematic search of seven biomedical databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CRD, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Current Contents Connect) was conducted through March 2011, along with a manual search of reference lists from relevant studies. The principal outcome measures were safety, effectiveness, and diagnostic accuracy. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and validated for accuracy by the secondary authors. Study quality was appraised using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool, while heterogeneity was assessed using forest plots, Cooks’ distance and standardised residual scatter plots, and I2 statistics. From 6,808 search results, 267 full-text articles were assessed, of which 60 satisfied the inclusion criteria. No effectiveness studies were identified. Only one EIS screening accuracy study was identified, while all other studies involved symptomatic populations. Significant heterogeneity was present among all device classes, limiting the potential for meta-analyses. Sensitivity and specificity varied greatly for DITI (Sens 0.25–0.97, Spec 0.12–0.85), EIS (Sens 0.26–0.98, Spec 0.08–0.81) and ultrasound elastography (Sens 0.35–1.00, Spec 0.21–0.99). It is concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of these technologies for breast cancer screening. Moreover, the high level of heterogeneity among studies of symptomatic women limits inferences that may be drawn regarding their use as diagnostic tools. Future research employing standardised imaging, research and reporting methods is required.


BMC Family Practice | 2013

Views and experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners with collaborative practice in primary health care – an integrative review

Verena Schadewaldt; Elizabeth McInnes; Janet E. Hiller; Anne Gardner

BackgroundThis integrative review synthesises research studies that have investigated the perceptions of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners working in primary health care. The aggregation of evidence on barriers and facilitators to working collaboratively and experiences about the processes of collaboration is of value to understand success factors and factors that impede collaborative working relationships.MethodsAn integrative review, which used systematic review processes, was undertaken to summarise qualitative and quantitative studies published between 1990 and 2012. Databases searched were the Cochrane Library, the Joanna Briggs Institute Library, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Informit and ProQuest. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality. Study findings were extracted relating to a) barriers and facilitators to collaborative working and b) views and experiences about the process of collaboration. The findings were narratively synthesised, supported by tabulation.Results27 studies conducted in seven different countries met the inclusion criteria. Content analysis identified a number of barriers and facilitators of collaboration between nurse practitioners and medical practitioners. By means of data comparison five themes were developed in relation to perceptions and understanding of collaboration. Nurse practitioners and medical practitioners have differing views on the essentials of collaboration and on supervision and autonomous nurse practitioner practice. Medical practitioners who have a working experience with NPs express more positive attitudes towards collaboration. Both professional groups report concerns and negative experiences with collaborative practice but also value certain advantages of collaboration.ConclusionsThe review shows that working in collaboration is a slow progression. Exposure to working together helps to overcome professional hurdles, dispel concerns and provide clarity around roles and the meaning of collaboration of NPs and MPs. Guidelines on liability and better funding strategies are necessary to facilitate collaborative practice whether barriers lie in individual behaviours or in broader policies.


Arthritis & Rheumatism | 2011

Smoking, body weight, physical exercise, and risk of lower limb total joint replacement in a population-based cohort of men

George Mnatzaganian; Philip Ryan; Paul Norman; David Davidson; Janet E. Hiller

OBJECTIVE To assess the associations of smoking, body weight, and physical activity with risk of undergoing total joint replacement (TJR) in a population-based cohort of men. METHODS A cohort study of 11,388 men that integrated clinical data with hospital morbidity data and mortality records was undertaken. The risk of undergoing TJR was modeled on baseline weight, height, comorbidity, socioeconomic status, years of smoking, and exercise in 3 separate age groups, using Cox proportional hazards regressions and competing risk regressions (CRRs). RESULTS Dose-response relationships between weight and risk of TJR and between smoking and risk of TJR were observed. Being overweight independently increased the risk of TJR, while smoking lowered the risk. The decreased risk among smokers was demonstrated in both Cox and CRR models and became apparent after 23 years of exposure. Men who were in the highest quartile (≥48 years of smoking) were 42-51% less likely to undergo TJR than men who had never smoked. Tests for trend in the log hazard ratios (HRs) across both smoking and weight quantiles yielded significant P values. Vigorous exercise increased the hazard of TJR; however, the association reached statistical significance only in the 70-74-year-old age group (adjusted HR 1.64 [95% confidence interval 1.19-2.24]). Adjusting for Deyo-Charlson Index or Elixhausers comorbidity measures did not eliminate these associations. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that being overweight and reporting vigorous physical activity increase the risk of TJR. This study is the first to demonstrate a strong inverse dose-response relationship between duration of smoking and risk of TJR. More research is needed to better understand the role of smoking in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis.


International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | 2013

The "linked evidence approach" to assess medical tests: A critical analysis

Tracy Merlin; Samuel Lehman; Janet E. Hiller; Philip Ryan

OBJECTIVES A linked evidence approach (LEA) is the synthesis of systematically acquired evidence on the accuracy of a medical test, its impact on clinical decision making and the effectiveness of consequent treatment options. We aimed to assess the practical utility of this methodology and to develop a decision framework to guide its use. METHODS As Australia has lengthy experience with LEA, we reviewed health technology assessment (HTA) reports informing reimbursement decisions by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (August 2005 to March 2012). Eligibility was determined according to predetermined criteria and data were extracted on test characteristics, evaluation methodologies, and reported difficulties. Fifty percent of the evidence-base was independently analyzed by a second reviewer. RESULTS Evaluations of medical tests for diagnostic (62 percent), staging (27 percent), and screening (6 percent) purposes were available for eighty-nine different clinical indications. Ninety-six percent of the evaluations used either the full LEA methodology or an abridged version (where evidence is linked through to management changes but not patient outcomes). Sixty-one percent had the full evidence linkage. Twenty-five percent of test evaluations were considered problematic; all involving LEA (n = 22). Problems included: determining test accuracy with an imperfect reference standard (41 percent); assessing likely treatment effectiveness in test positive patients when the new test is more accurate than the comparator (18 percent); and determining probable health benefits in those symptomatic patients ruled out using the test (13 percent). A decision framework was formulated to address these problems. CONCLUSIONS LEA is useful for evaluating medical tests but a stepped approach should be followed to determine what evidence is required for the synthesis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Janet E. Hiller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peng Bi

University of Adelaide

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ana Goode

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna Boltong

Cancer Council Victoria

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Roder

University of South Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erin Robson

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gita D. Mishra

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge