Janet Tomcavage

How Geisinger’s Advanced Medical Home Model Argues The Case For Rapid-Cycle Innovation

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 provides for a number of major payment and delivery system initiatives. These potential changes need to be tested, scaled, and adapted with an urgency not evident in previous demonstration projects of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We discuss lessons learned from our iterative tests of care reengineering at Geisinger--specifically, through our advanced medical home model, ProvenHealth Navigator, and the way we continuously modified the model to improve quality and value. We hypothesize that the most important ingredient in our model has been the embedding of nurse case managers into our community practices and the real-time feedback of data on the use of health services by the most complex patients.

Can a Patient-Centered Medical Home Lead to Better Patient Outcomes? The Quality Implications of Geisinger’s ProvenHealth Navigator

One of the primary goals of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is to provide higher quality care that leads to better patient outcomes. Currently, there is only limited evidence regarding the ability of PCMHs to achieve this goal. This article demonstrates the effect of PCMHs in improving certain clinical outcomes, as shown by the ProvenHealth Navigator (PHN), an advanced PCMH model developed and implemented by Geisinger Health System. In this study, the authors examined the claims data from Geisinger Health Plan between 2005 and 2009 and estimated the effect of PHN on reducing amputation rates among patients with diabetes, end-stage renal disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The results show that, despite its relatively short period of existence, PHN has led to significant improvements in certain outcomes, further illustrating its potential as a care delivery model to be adopted on a wider scale.

Postdischarge monitoring using interactive voice response system reduces 30-day readmission rates in a case-managed Medicare population.

Background:Automated home monitoring systems have been used to coordinate care to improve patient outcomes and reduce rehospitalizations, but with little formal study of efficacy. The Geisinger Monitoring Program (GMP) interactive voice response protocol is a post-hospital discharge telemonitoring system used as an adjunct to existing case management in a primary care Medicare population to reduce emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Objectives:To determine if use of GMP reduced 30-day hospital readmission rates among case-managed patients. Research Design:A pre-post parallel quasi-experimental study. Methods:A total of 875 Medicare patients who were enrolled in the combined case-management and GMP program were compared with 2420 matched control patients who were only case managed. Claims data were used to document an acute care admission followed by a readmission within 30 days in the preintervention and postintervention periods (ie, before and during 2009). Regression modeling was used to estimate the within-patient effect of the intervention on readmission rates. Results:The use of GMP with case management was associated with a 44% reduction in 30-day readmissions in the study cohort (95% confidence interval, 23%−60%, P=0.0004), when using the control group to control for secular trends. Similar estimates were obtained when using different propensity score adjustment methods or different approaches to handling dropout observations. Conclusions:Investing in automated monitoring systems may reduce hospital readmission rates among primary care case-managed patients. Evidence from this quasi-experimental study demonstrates that the combination of telemonitoring and case management, as compared with case management alone, may significantly reduce readmissions in a Medicare Advantage population.

Reduced Acute Inpatient Care Was Largest Savings Component Of Geisinger Health System’s Patient-Centered Medical Home

Early evidence suggests that the patient-centered medical home has the potential to improve patient outcomes while reducing the cost of care. However, it is unclear how this care model achieves such desirable results, particularly its impact on cost. We estimated cost savings associated with Geisinger Health Systems patient-centered medical home clinics by examining longitudinal clinic-level claims data from elderly Medicare patients attending the clinics over a ninety-month period (2006 through the first half of 2013). We also used these data to deconstruct savings into its main components (inpatient, outpatient, professional, and prescription drugs). During this period, total costs associated with patient-centered medical home exposure declined by approximately 7.9 percent; the largest source of this savings was acute inpatient care (

Challenges to care coordination posed by the use of multiple health IT applications

34, or 19 percent savings per member per month), which accounts for about 64 percent of the total estimated savings. This finding is further supported by the fact that longer exposure was also associated with lower acute inpatient admission rates. The results of this study suggest that patient-centered medical homes can lead to sustainable, long-term improvements in patient health outcomes and the cost of care.

Value-Based Reengineering: Twenty-first Century Chronic Care Models

Coordinating care for hospitalized patients requires the use of multiple sources of information. Using a macroergonomic framework (i.e. the work system model), we conducted interviews and observations of care managers involved in care coordination across transitions of care. When information is distributed across multiple health IT applications, care managers experience a range of challenges, including organizational barriers, technology design problems, skills and knowledge issues, and task performance demands (i.e. issues related to individual information processing and management and sharing of information). These challenges can be used as a checklist to evaluate the proposed IT infrastructure that will allow the integration of multiple health IT applications and, therefore, support coordination across transitions of care.

Advancing the Role of Nursing in the Medical Home Model

The need for improved models of chronic care is great and will become critical over the next years as the Medicare-aged population doubles. Many promising models have been developed by outstanding groups across the country. This article reviews key strategies used by successful models in chronic disease management and discusses in detail how Geisinger has evolved and organized its cohesive delivery model.

Care Managers’ Challenges in Using Multiple Health IT Applications

The patient-centered primary care model has been positioned to improve patient outcomes, enhance patient satisfaction, and reduce health care costs. The role of nursing in this care transformation is evident in ProvenHealth Navigator-one of the organizations primary care models. ProvenHealth Navigator incorporates primary care practice redesign, including team-delivered care, as the foundation for its model. Case managers, as one of the components of the care team, have demonstrated their value in reducing fragmentation, enhancing care transitions, and coordinating care for the most complex patients.Combining the strengths of a clinical delivery system with the population management expertise of a health plan, ProvenHealth Navigator capitalizes on the strengths of an integrated health care system to stratify the population, enhance access, optimize outpatient treatment, provide near real-time reporting, and deploy additional disease/case management resources for those most in need of additional health care services. Operational since 2006, ProvenHealth Navigator has been associated with significant reductions in all-cause admissions, readmissions, and total cost of care. In addition, quality indicators for chronic conditions and preventive care improved and patient and clinician satisfaction is high. Optimizing the role of primary care teams and focusing on population management services provides one method of improving quality and reducing costs thus increasing health care value.

Obstacles Experienced by Care Managers in Managing Information for the Care of Chronically Ill Patients

While care managers use multiple health IT applications to coordinate patient care across transitions of care, they experience challenges posed by these multiple health IT applications. We used a macroergonomic framework (i.e. the work system model), and conducted interviews and observations of care managers (inpatient, outpatient, transition of care) and a web-based survey to assess these challenges. The challenges were related to the care managers’ work system: technologies and tools (e.g., poor interface design of health IT), organization (e.g., no access to some health IT applications), and tasks (e.g., duplicate documentation). Care managers consider the following as major barriers: transferring patient-related information between multiple applications, finding correct information for medication reconciliation and other patient information (e.g., patient’s psychosocial background), and duplicate documentation and data entry. The next phase of the research focuses on how care managers deal with challenges posed by multiple health IT applications to perform their job of coordinating patient care across transitions of care.

The impact of a regional patient-centered medical home initiative on cost of care among commercially insured population in the US

ABSTRACT Care managers play a key role in coordinating care, especially for patients with chronic conditions. They use multiple health information technology (IT) applications in order to access, process, and communicate patient-related information. Using the work system model and its extension, the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, we describe obstacles experienced by care managers in managing patient-related information. A web-based questionnaire was used to collect data from 80 care managers (61% response rate) located in clinics, hospitals, and a call center. Care managers were more likely to consider “inefficiencies in access to patient-related information” and “having to use multiple information systems” as major obstacles than “lack of computer training and support” and “inefficient use of case management software.” Care managers who reported “inefficient use of case management software” as an obstacle were more likely to report high workload. Future research should explore strategies used by care managers to address obstacles, and efforts should be targeted at improving the health information technologies used by care managers.