Janis E. Gerkensmeyer
Indiana University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janis E. Gerkensmeyer.
Journal of Pediatric Nursing | 1996
Juanita F. Keck; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Betsy A. Joyce; Julia G. Schade
Reliability and validity of the Faces and Word Descriptor Scales to measure pain in verbal children undergoing painful procedures were assessed. Test-retest reliability and construct and discriminant validity were supported for both instruments among a sample of 118 children in three age groups (3-7, 8-12, 13-18). Construct validity was determined by comparisons with a visual analogue scale and a numerical scale with known validity. A majority of the children preferred to use the Faces scale when providing self-report of pain regardless of age. The Faces and Word Descriptor Scales are valid and reliable instruments to measure procedural pain intensity.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management | 1996
Julia G. Schade; Betsy A. Joyce; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Juanita F. Keck
The purposes of this study were to compare the reliability and validity of three pain measurement scales for assessing pain in preverbal and nonverbal children and to determine which of the scales was most appropriate in a clinical setting to evaluate pain for infants and young children regardless of developmental stage or cognitive or physical disability. Pain scales tested were revised versions of the Riley Infant Pain Scale (RIPS), the Nursing Assessment of Pain Intensity (NAPI), and the Postoperative Pain Score (POPS). Purposive sampling of 391 postoperative infants and children was used for evaluation of pain in a midwestern childrens hospital. Four assessments with each scale were done 1 hr apart by trained observers blinded to pain medications. Data analyses supported high inter-rater reliability, satisfactory discrimination between pain and no-pain observations, and suggested acceptability for all three scales with lower caregiver burden for RIPS and NAPI.
Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing | 1994
Betsy A. Joyce; Julia G. Schade; Juanita Keck; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Tawny Raftery; Susan Moser; Gertrude A. Huster
Pain assessments using three different observational pain assessment tools--the Post Operative Pain Score (POPS), the Nursing Assessment of Pain Intensity (NAPI), and the Pain Rating Scale (PRS)--were made on 98 preverbal children following surgery in an attempt to establish the reliability and validity of the three tools. Two observers (raters) scored pain intensity using each of the three instruments before and after administration of an analgesic. Interrater agreements were satisfactory on all three tools, with Interclass Correlations (ICC) ranging from .71 to .85. T tests supported the discriminant validity of all three tools at the p < .0001 level. The POPS and NAPI had internal consistency reliability alphas ranging from .79 to .88 for the POPS and .59 to .77 for the NAPI. Item analyses suggested specific revisions of the tools that might increase their reliability.
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing | 2013
Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Cynthia S. Johnson; Eric L. Scott; Ukamaka M. Oruche; Laura M. Lindsey; Joan K. Austin; Susan M. Perkins
UNLABELLED Building Our Solutions and Connections (BOSC) focused on enhancing problem-solving skills (PSS) of primary caregivers of children with mental health problems. Aims were determining feasibility, acceptability, and effect size (ES) estimates for depression, burden, personal control, and PSS. METHODS Caregivers were randomized to BOSC (n=30) or wait-list control (WLC) groups (n=31). Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 3 and 6 months post-intervention. RESULTS Three-months post-intervention, ES for burden and personal control were .07 and .08, respectively. ES for depressed caregivers for burden and personal control were 0.14 and 0.19, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Evidence indicates that the intervention had desired effects.
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association | 2013
Ukamaka M. Oruche; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Janet S. Carpenter; Joan K. Austin; Susan M. Perkins; Susan M. Rawl; Eric R. Wright
BACKGROUND: “Systems of care” are strengths-based approaches to treating adolescents and others with disruptive disorders. However, little is known about why some adolescents improve and others do not. OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in personal strengths and family functioning as predictors of behavioral and social functioning among adolescents with disruptive disorders who participated in a system of care program. DESIGN: Secondary analyses of data from 114 adolescents (12-17 years of age) with disruptive disorders and their caregivers who participated in the Dawn Project Evaluation Study. Caregivers completed in-depth interviews conducted by trained data collectors using standardized questionnaires. Baseline and 12- month data are reported here. RESULTS: Improvement in personal strengths was a significant predictor of improvement in adolescent behavioral and social functioning, controlling for demographics (p < .001). CONCLUSION: In adolescents with disruptive disorders, psychiatric nurses should focus on enhancing adolescents’ personal strengths to improve behavioral and social functioning.
Clinical Nurse Specialist | 2012
Ukamaka M. Oruche; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Joan K. Austin; Susan M. Perkins; Eric Scott; Laura M. Lindsey; Kristen Mullins
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe strategies for recruiting participants into an intervention study that focused on improving problem-solving skills in caregivers of children with mental health problems. Background: Caregivers of children with mental health problems report feeling physically and psychologically overwhelmed and have high rates of depression because of the demands of caregiving. Research on the needs of these caregivers and interventions to ameliorate their stress is needed. However, recruiting this population can be particularly difficult because of the stigma of mental illness. Available literature on recruitment of caregivers of persons with physical illness cannot be transferred to caregivers of children with mental health problems because of the different caregiving situations. There is a need to identify effective recruitment strategies to reduce cost and answer research questions. Clinical nurse specialists have the skills to facilitate the recruitment of research participants. We revised and expanded health system referrals, community outreach, and recruiting advertisement (ads). When these strategies did not increase recruitment, radio ads were used. The Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization was selected as a guiding framework. Outcome: Radio ads were the most effective strategy for recruiting caregivers of children with mental health problems for this study. Conclusion: Recruitment was ultimately successful because we were flexible and made decisions consistent with the Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. Implications: Clinical nurse specialists who study this population of caregivers should really consider the use of radio ads and systematically track which recruitment strategies lead to the greatest number of participants screened, eligible, and enrolled into studies.
Journal of Pediatric Health Care | 2001
Betsy A. Joyce; Juanita F. Keck; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | 2005
Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Joan K. Austin
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing | 2008
Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Susan M. Perkins; Eric L. Scott; Jingwei Wu
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing | 2012
Ukamaka M. Oruche; Janis E. Gerkensmeyer; Linda Stephan; Corrine A. Wheeler; Kathleen M. Hanna