Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal
VU University Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S. Reinders; Evelien R. Spelten; Eileen K. Hutton
BackgroundTwo prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies are offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands on an opt-in basis: the Combined Test (CT) for Down syndrome at twelve weeks, and the Fetal Anomaly Scan (FAS) at around twenty weeks. The CT is free for women who are 36 or older; the FAS is free for all women. We investigated factors associated with the CT and FAS uptake.MethodThis study is part of the DELIVER study that evaluated primary care midwifery in the Netherlands. Associations between the women’s characteristics and the CT and FAS uptake were measured using multivariate and multilevel logistic regression analyses.ResultsOf 5216 participants, 23% had the CT and 90% had the FAS, with uptake rates ranging from 4% to 48% and 62% to 98% respectively between practices. Age (OR: 2.71), income (OR: 1.38), ethnicity (OR: 1.37), being Protestant (OR: 0.25), multiparous (OR: 0.64) and living in the east of the country (OR: 0.31) were associated with CT uptake; education (OR: 1.26), income (OR: 1.66), being Protestant (OR: 0.37) or Muslim (OR: 0.31) and being multiparous (OR: 0.74) were associated with FAS uptake. Among western women with a non-Dutch background, first generation (OR: 2.91), age (OR: 2.00), income (OR: 1.97), being Protestant (OR: 0.32) and living in the east (OR: 0.44) were associated with CT uptake; being Catholic (OR: 0.27), Protestant (OR: 0.13) were associated with FAS uptake. Among non- western women with a non-Dutch background, age (OR: 1.73), income (OR: 1.97) and lacking proficiency in Dutch (OR: 2.18) were associated with CT uptake; higher education (OR: 1.47), being Muslim (OR: 0.37) and first generation (OR: 0.27) were associated with FAS uptake.ConclusionThe uptake of the CT and FAS varied widely between practices. Income, parity and being Protestant were associated with uptake of both tests; ethnicity, age and living in the east were associated with CT uptake, and education and being Muslim with FAS uptake. These findings help to explain some differences between women choosing or declining early and late screening, but not the large variation in test uptake among practices, nor between the Netherlands and other countries.
Midwifery | 2014
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Judith Manniën; Mohammed Ghaly; Pieternel Verhoeven; Eileen K. Hutton; Hans S. Reinders
OBJECTIVE to explore what role religious beliefs of pregnant Muslim women play in their decision-making on antenatal screening, particularly regarding congenital abnormalities and termination, and whether their interpretations of the religious doctrines correspond to the main sources of Islam. DESIGN qualitative pilot study using in-depth interviews with pregnant Muslim women. SETTING one midwifery practice in a medium-sized city near Amsterdam participated in the study. PARTICIPANTS 10 pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin who live in a high density immigrant area and who attended primary midwives for antenatal care were included in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS to explore the role of religion in decision-making on antenatal screening tests, a topic list was constructed, including four subjects: being a (practising) Muslim, the view on unborn life, the view on disabled life and the view on termination. To analyse the interviews, open and axial coding based on the Grounded Theory was used and descriptive and analytical themes were identified and interpreted. FINDINGS all 10 interviewees stated that their faith played a role in their decision-making on antenatal screening, specific to the combined test. They did not consider congenital anomalies as a problem and did not consider termination to be an option in case of a disabled fetus. However, the Islamic jurisprudence considers that termination is allowed if the fetus has serious abnormalities, but only before 19 weeks plus one day of gestation. KEY CONCLUSIONS religious convictions play a role regarding antenatal screening in pregnant Muslim women of Turkish origin. The interviewees did not consider a termination in case of an affected child. Women were unaware that within Islamic tradition there is the possibility of termination if a fetus has serious anomalies. Incomplete knowledge of religious doctrines may be influencing both decisions of antenatal screening and diagnostic tests uptake and of terminating a pregnancy for fetuses with serious anomalies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTISE counsellors should be aware of the role of religious beliefs in the decision-making process on antenatal screening tests.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Judith Manniën; Lisanne A Gitsels; Hans S. Reinders; Pieternel Verhoeven; Mohammed Ghaly; Trudy Klomp; Eileen K. Hutton
BackgroundIn the Netherlands, prenatal screening follows an opting in system and comprises two non-invasive tests: the combined test to screen for trisomy 21 at 12 weeks of gestation and the fetal anomaly scan to detect structural anomalies at 20 weeks. Midwives counsel about prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies and they are increasingly having to counsel women from religious backgrounds beyond their experience. This study assessed midwives’ perceptions and practices regarding taking client’s religious backgrounds into account during counseling. As Islam is the commonest non-western religion, we were particularly interested in midwives’ knowledge of whether pregnancy termination is allowed in Islam.MethodsThis exploratory study is part of the DELIVER study, which evaluated primary care midwifery in the Netherlands between September 2009 and January 2011. A questionnaire was sent to all 108 midwives of the twenty practices participating in the study.ResultsOf 98 respondents (response rate 92%), 68 (69%) said they took account of the client’s religion. The two main reasons for not doing so were that religion was considered irrelevant in the decision-making process and that it should be up to clients to initiate such discussions. Midwives’ own religious backgrounds were independent of whether they paid attention to the clients’ religious backgrounds. Eighty midwives (82%) said they did not counsel Muslim women differently from other women. Although midwives with relatively many Muslim clients had more knowledge of Islamic attitudes to terminating pregnancy in general than midwives with relatively fewer Muslim clients, the specific knowledge of termination regarding trisomy 21 and other congenital anomalies was limited in both groups.ConclusionWhile many midwives took client’s religion into account, few knew much about Islamic beliefs on prenatal screening for congenital anomalies. Midwives identified a need for additional education. To meet the needs of the changing client population, counselors need more knowledge of religious opinions about the termination of pregnancy and the skills to approach religious issues with clients.
Midwifery | 2014
Linda Martin; Eileen K. Hutton; Evelien R. Spelten; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Sandra van Dulmen
Midwifery | 2015
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Judith Manniën; Pieternel Verhoeven; Eileen K. Hutton; Hans S. Reinders
Midwifery | 2015
Linda Martin; Eileen K. Hutton; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Evelien R. Spelten; Fleur Kuiper; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Sandra van Dulmen
Patient Education and Counseling | 2015
Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Evelien R. Spelten; Eileen K. Hutton; Sandra van Dulmen
Midwifery | 2015
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Judith Manniën; Pieternel Verhoeven; Eileen K. Hutton; Hans S. Reinders
Midwifery | 2018
Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Marjon A. de Boer; Meredith Vanstone; Lidewij Henneman
Patient Education and Counseling | 2016
Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Evelien R. Spelten; Eileen K. Hutton; Sandra van Dulmen