Linda Martin
VU University Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Linda Martin.
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | 2014
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Pieternel Verhoeven; Judith Manniën; Linda Martin; Hans S. Reinders; Evelien R. Spelten; Eileen K. Hutton
BackgroundTwo prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies are offered to all pregnant women in the Netherlands on an opt-in basis: the Combined Test (CT) for Down syndrome at twelve weeks, and the Fetal Anomaly Scan (FAS) at around twenty weeks. The CT is free for women who are 36 or older; the FAS is free for all women. We investigated factors associated with the CT and FAS uptake.MethodThis study is part of the DELIVER study that evaluated primary care midwifery in the Netherlands. Associations between the women’s characteristics and the CT and FAS uptake were measured using multivariate and multilevel logistic regression analyses.ResultsOf 5216 participants, 23% had the CT and 90% had the FAS, with uptake rates ranging from 4% to 48% and 62% to 98% respectively between practices. Age (OR: 2.71), income (OR: 1.38), ethnicity (OR: 1.37), being Protestant (OR: 0.25), multiparous (OR: 0.64) and living in the east of the country (OR: 0.31) were associated with CT uptake; education (OR: 1.26), income (OR: 1.66), being Protestant (OR: 0.37) or Muslim (OR: 0.31) and being multiparous (OR: 0.74) were associated with FAS uptake. Among western women with a non-Dutch background, first generation (OR: 2.91), age (OR: 2.00), income (OR: 1.97), being Protestant (OR: 0.32) and living in the east (OR: 0.44) were associated with CT uptake; being Catholic (OR: 0.27), Protestant (OR: 0.13) were associated with FAS uptake. Among non- western women with a non-Dutch background, age (OR: 1.73), income (OR: 1.97) and lacking proficiency in Dutch (OR: 2.18) were associated with CT uptake; higher education (OR: 1.47), being Muslim (OR: 0.37) and first generation (OR: 0.27) were associated with FAS uptake.ConclusionThe uptake of the CT and FAS varied widely between practices. Income, parity and being Protestant were associated with uptake of both tests; ethnicity, age and living in the east were associated with CT uptake, and education and being Muslim with FAS uptake. These findings help to explain some differences between women choosing or declining early and late screening, but not the large variation in test uptake among practices, nor between the Netherlands and other countries.
Midwifery | 2015
Evelien R. Spelten; Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Eileen K. Hutton; Sandra van Dulmen
BACKGROUND video recording studies have been found to be complex; however very few studies describe the actual introduction and enrolment of the study, the resulting dataset and its interpretation. In this paper we describe the introduction and the use of video recordings of health care provider (HCP)-client interactions in primary care midwifery for research purposes. We also report on the process of data management, data coding and the resulting data set. METHODS we describe our experience in undertaking a study using video recording to assess the interaction of the midwife and her client in the first antenatal consultation, in a real life clinical practice setting in the Netherlands. Midwives from six practices across the Netherlands were recruited to videotape 15-20 intakes. The introduction, complexity of the study and intrusiveness of the study were discussed within the research group. The number of valid recordings and missing recordings was measured; reasons not to participate, non-response analyses, and the inter-rater reliability of the coded videotapes were assessed. Video recordings were supplemented by questionnaires for midwives and clients. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) was used for coding as well as an obstetric topics scale. FINDINGS at the introduction of the study, more initial hesitation in co-operation was found among the midwives than among their clients. The intrusive nature of the recording on the interaction was perceived to be minimal. The complex nature of the study affected recruitment and data collection. Combining the dataset with the questionnaires and medical records proved to be a challenge. The final dataset included videotapes of 20 midwives (7-23 recordings per midwife). Of the 460 eligible clients, 324 gave informed consent. The study resulted in a significant dataset of first antenatal consultations involving recording 269 clients and 194 partners. CONCLUSION video recording of midwife-client interaction was both feasible and challenging and resulted in a unique dataset of recordings of midwife-client interaction. Video recording studies will benefit from a tight design, and vigilant monitoring during the data collection to ensure effective data collection. We provide suggestions to promote successful introduction of video recording for research purposes.
Neuropraxis | 2018
Neeltje M. T. H. Crombag; Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels
SamenvattingPrenatale screening op congenitale afwijkingen is in Nederland vanaf 2007 beschikbaar voor elke zwangere vrouw. Ontwikkelingen en medische vernieuwingen in dit domein volgen elkaar snel op en leiden onder meer tot steeds betere testkarakteristieken. Ondanks dat blijven de dilemma’s voor aanstaande ouders onveranderd complex. Vergeleken met omliggende landen wordt in Nederland relatief weinig gebruikgemaakt van prenatale screening op downsyndroom. In dit artikel beschrijven we kort de geschiedenis van prenatale screening op downsyndroom in Nederland en de achtergrond van het relatief lage deelnamepercentage. Vervolgens beschrijven we welke factoren een rol spelen bij gebruik van prenatale screening op diverse niveaus (overheid, organisatie, maatschappij, zorgverlening), met welke dilemma’s aanstaande ouders te maken krijgen en hoe ouders hierin worden begeleid. Tot slot reflecteren we op de rol van prenatale screening op aangeboren afwijkingen in de Nederlandse gezondheidzorg en maatschappij.
Prenatal Diagnosis | 2013
Linda Martin; S. van Dulmen; Evelien R. Spelten; J. de Jonge; T.P. de Cock; Eileen K. Hutton
Midwifery | 2014
Linda Martin; Eileen K. Hutton; Evelien R. Spelten; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Sandra van Dulmen
Patient Education and Counseling | 2014
Monique T.R. Pereboom; Judith Manniën; Kelly D.J. van Almkerk; Evelien R. Spelten; Janneke T. Gitsels; Linda Martin; Eileen K. Hutton; F.G. Schellevis
Midwifery | 2015
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Judith Manniën; Pieternel Verhoeven; Eileen K. Hutton; Hans S. Reinders
Midwifery | 2015
Linda Martin; Eileen K. Hutton; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Evelien R. Spelten; Fleur Kuiper; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Sandra van Dulmen
Patient Education and Counseling | 2015
Linda Martin; Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Monique T.R. Pereboom; Evelien R. Spelten; Eileen K. Hutton; Sandra van Dulmen
Midwifery | 2015
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Judith Manniën; Pieternel Verhoeven; Eileen K. Hutton; Hans S. Reinders