Jannifer S. Stromberg

Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer

PURPOSE To overcome radioresistance for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer, a prospective trial of pelvic external beam irradiation (EBRT) interdigitated with dose-escalating conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy was performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 1991 and August 2000, 207 patients were treated with 46 Gy pelvic EBRT and increasing HDR brachytherapy boost doses (5.50-11.5 Gy/fraction) during 5 weeks. The eligibility criteria were pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level >or=10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >or=7, or clinical Stage T2b or higher. Patients were divided into 2 dose levels, low-dose biologically effective dose <93 Gy (58 patients) and high-dose biologically effective dose >93 Gy (149 patients). No patient received hormones. We used the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition for biochemical failure. RESULTS The median age was 69 years. The mean follow-up for the group was 4.4 years, and for the low and high-dose levels, it was 7.0 and 3.4 years, respectively. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rate was 74%, and the overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rate was 92%, 98%, and 68%, respectively. The 5-year biochemical control rate for the low-dose group was 52%; the rate for the high-dose group was 87% (p <0.001). Improvement occurred in the cause-specific survival in favor of the brachytherapy high-dose level (p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis, a low-dose level, higher Gleason score, and higher nadir value were associated with increased biochemical failure. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 gastrointestinal/genitourinary complications ranged from 0.5% to 9%. The actuarial 5-year impotency rate was 51%. CONCLUSION Pelvic EBRT interdigitated with transrectal ultrasound-guided real-time conformal HDR prostate brachytherapy boost is both a precise dose delivery system and a very effective treatment for unfavorable prostate cancer. We demonstrated an incremental beneficial effect on biochemical control and cause-specific survival with higher doses. These results, coupled with the low risk of complications, the advantage of not being radioactive after implantation, and the real-time interactive planning, define a new standard for treatment.

Matched-Pair Analysis of Conformal High–Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost Versus External-Beam Radiation Therapy Alone for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institutions experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.

Treatment outcome with adjuvant and salvage irradiation after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES To determine the factors associated with outcome by reviewing our institutions experience treating patients with external beam radiation therapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy. METHODS Sixty-one patients received RT to the prostatic fossa after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (median dose 59.4 Gy). Thirty-eight patients received adjuvant RT within 6 months of surgery for adverse pathologic findings only. Therapeutic RT was administered to 23 patients either for a persistently elevated postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (n = 2), a rising PSA level more than 6 months after surgery (n = 9), or a biopsy-proven local recurrence (n = 12). Preoperative and preradiation PSA values, Gleason score, pathologic findings, patient age, total RT dose, and indication for RT were analyzed for their impact on biochemical control. The median follow-up was 48 months. RESULTS Patients treated with adjuvant RT achieved 3 and 5-year biochemical control rates of 84% and 67%, respectively. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with biochemical control. No variable was associated with 5-year outcome. The 5-year actuarial rate of biochemical control for patients treated with therapeutic RT was 16%. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with biochemical control. Only a pre-RT PSA level of 2 ng/mL or less was associated with an improved rate of biochemical control at 3 years (80% versus 27%, P = 0.001). However, at 5 years, this difference was not statistically significant. A separate analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors associated with outcome for the entire group of patients. Only the indication for RT (adjuvant versus therapeutic) was associated with 5-year outcome. Patients treated with adjuvant RT had a statistically significant improvement in 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control (67% versus 16%, P <0.001) and disease-free survival (66% versus 46%, P = 0.037) but not in overall survival. There were no statistically significant differences between patient groups with respect to age, preoperative PSA, Gleason score, pathologic T stage, median follow-up, and total RT dose. CONCLUSIONS At our institution, patients treated with adjuvant RT after prostatectomy for adverse pathologic findings achieved excellent rates of biochemical control that were significantly better than that of similar patients treated therapeutically for persistent or rising PSA or clinical local recurrence.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont Phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE We analyzed our institutions experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSION Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

Active breathing control (ABC) for Hodgkin’s disease: reduction in normal tissue irradiation with deep inspiration and implications for treatment☆

PURPOSE Active breathing control (ABC) temporarily immobilizes breathing. This may allow a reduction in treatment margins. This planning study assesses normal tissue irradiation and reproducibility using ABC for Hodgkins disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS Five patients underwent CT scans using ABC obtained at the end of normal inspiration (NI), normal expiration (NE), and deep inspiration (DI). DI scans were repeated within the same session and 1-2 weeks later. To simulate mantle radiotherapy, a CTV1 was contoured encompassing the supraclavicular region, mediastinum, hila, and part of the heart. CTV2 was the same as CTV1 but included the whole heart. CTV3 encompassed the spleen and para-aortic lymph nodes. The planning target volume (PTV) was defined as CTV + 9 mm. PTVs were determined at NI, NE, and DI. A composite PTV (comp-PTV) based on the range of NI and NE PTVs was determined to represent the margin necessary for free breathing. Lung dose-mass histograms (DMH) for PTV1 and PTV2 and cardiac dose-volume histograms (DVH) for PTV3 were compared at the three different respiratory phases. RESULTS ABC was well-tolerated by all patients. DI breath-holds ranged from 34 to 45 s. DMHs determined for PTV1 revealed a median reduction in lung mass irradiated at DI of 12% (range, 9-24%; n = 5) compared with simulated free-breathing. PTV2 comparisons also showed a median reduction of 12% lung mass irradiated (range, 8-28%; n = 5). PTV3 analyses revealed the mean volume of heart irradiated decreased from 26% to 5% with deep inspiration (n = 5). Lung volume comparisons between intrasession and intersession DI studies revealed mean variations of 4%. CONCLUSION ABC is well tolerated and reproducible. Radiotherapy delivered at deep inspiration with ABC may decrease normal tissue irradiation in Hodgkins disease patients.

Conformal prostate brachytherapy: Initial experience of a phase I/II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE To improve treatment results on prostatic adenocarcinoma, conformal radiation therapy (CRT) has been used. Two major drawbacks of external CRT are: (a) internal organ motion/daily set-up variations, and (b) exclusion of several patients for CRT based on poor geometrical relationships as identified by three dimensional (3D) treatment planning. To overcome the above problems, we began the first prospective Phase I/II dose-escalating clinical trial of conformal brachytherapy (CB) and concurrent external beam irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty-nine patients with T2b-T3c prostatic adenocarcinoma received 176 transperineal ultrasound-guided conformal high-dose rate (HDR) boost implants. All patients received concomitant external beam pelvic irradiation. Dose escalation of the three HDR-CB fractions proceeded as follows: 5.5 Gy (30 patients), 6 Gy (20 patients), and 6.5 Gy (9 patients). The CB dose was prescribed to the prostate contour as outlined using an online biplanar transrectal ultrasound probe. The urethra, anterior rectal wall, and prostate boundaries were identified individually and outlined at 5 mm intervals from the base to the apex of the gland. The CB using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive online isodose distributions was performed on an outpatient basis. As needles were placed into the prostate, corrections for prostate displacement were recorded and the isodose distributions were recalculated to represent the new relationship between the needles, prostate, and normal structures. No computerized tomography (CT) planning or implant preplanning was required. RESULTS No patient was rejected based on poor geometrical relation of pelvic structures. In every implant performed, prostate displacement was noted. Craniocaudal motion of the gland ranged from 0.5-2.0 cm (mean = 1.0 cm), whereas lateral displacement was 0.1-0.4 cm. With the interactive online planning system, organ motion was immediately detected, accounted for, and corrected prior to each HDR treatment. The rectal dose has ranged from 45 to 87%, and the urethral dose from 97 to 112% of the prostate dose. It is significant to note that operator dependence has been completely removed because the interactive online planning system uniformly guides the physicians. CONCLUSIONS With ultrasound guidance and the interactive online dosimetry system, organ motion (as compared to external beam) is insignificant because it can be corrected during the procedure without increasing target volume margins. Common pitfalls of brachytherapy, including operator dependence and difficulty with reproducibility, have been eliminated with the intraoperative online planning system.

Prostate Volume Reduction With Androgen Deprivation Therapy Before Interstitial Brachytherapy

PURPOSE We assessed the degree of prostate downsizing using androgen deprivation, and determined its relation to clinical and pathological variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS From June 1994 to January 2000, 107 patients with prostate cancer received androgen deprivation before interstitial brachytherapy at our hospital. All charts were reviewed for clinical, pathological and treatment related variables. Prostate volume was measured using transrectal ultrasound. All variables were analyzed with regard to the degree of prostate downsizing. RESULTS Mean percent volume reduction of the prostate was 33% after a 3.7-month average duration of androgen deprivation. Larger prostate volume before androgen deprivation and longer deprivation duration statistically correlated with mean percent volume reduction. Simple linear and multiple regression analyses revealed that these 2 variables remained significant predictors of percent volume reduction. Subgroup analysis indicated that a significant difference was seen in patients who received androgen deprivation with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists alone versus those who received treatment with total androgen blockade (luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists plus antiandrogens 30% versus 35%, p = 0.04), and when prostate volume before androgen deprivation was less than 50 cc versus larger volumes (30% versus 35%, p = 0.01). Of patients with an initial prostate volume of greater than 50 cc 82% achieved a volume of less than 50 cc after androgen deprivation therapy. CONCLUSIONS Androgen deprivation therapy before brachytherapy is a method of downsizing the prostate to overcome anatomical limitations, including larger gland volume and pubic arch interference.

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE ASTRO CONSENSUS PANEL DEFINITION OF BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AND CLINICAL OUTCOME FOR PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH EXTERNAL BEAM IRRADIATION

PURPOSE We reviewed our institutions experience treating patients with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure (BF) following radiation therapy correlates with clinical distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1/1/87 and 12/31/92, 568 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital (median total dose 66.6 Gy; range: 60-70.4 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive increases in post-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) after achieving a nadir. Biochemical failure was recorded as the time midway between the nadir and the first rising PSA. Five-year actuarial rates of clinical DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were calculated for patients who were biochemically controlled (BC) versus those who failed biochemically. Median follow-up was 56 months (range: 24-118 months). RESULTS Five-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were significantly greater in patients who were biochemically controlled versus those who were not (p < 0.001). In patients who were BC, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 99%, 99%, 98%, and 99% respectively. For patients who failed biochemically, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 74%, 64%, 89%, and 86% respectively. When stratifying by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage these differences remained significant for DMFS, DFS, and CSS. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that BC was the single most important predictor of clinical outcome for DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were also independent predictors of outcome for DMFS and DFS. CONCLUSIONS The ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF following radiation therapy correlates well with clinical DMFS, DFS, and CSS. These findings suggest that the Consensus Panel definition may be a surrogate for clinical progression and survival and should be considered a valid endpoint for separating successful versus unsuccessful treatment. Additional studies with longer follow-up will be needed to corroborate these findings.

Acute and Subacute Toxicity Associated with Concurrent Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Paclitaxel in Primary Breast Cancer Therapy

The purpose of this study was to describe the toxicity of concurrent standard dose adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and paclitaxel in a series of patients receiving primary breast cancer therapy. From June 1998 to April 1999, 20 patients with breast cancer received concurrent adjuvant radiation and paclitaxel. There were 16 patients (80%) with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage II disease and 4 with stage III disease. Eighteen patients, 12 postmastectomy and 6 breast conservation, were treated with definitive surgery followed by concurrent RT and paclitaxel. Two received concurrent neoadjuvant radiation and paclitaxel. All patients received a doxorubicin‐containing combination prior to radiation and paclitaxel. RT was delivered concurrently with paclitaxel after the completion of all doxorubicin therapy, with all patients receiving at least two cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2) every 3 weeks during RT. Toxicity was graded weekly according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Thirteen patients (65%) developed grade 2 or higher cutaneous toxicity. In the postmastectomy group, 6 of 12 patients (50%) developed grade 2 cutaneous toxicity, and 4 of 12 patients (33%) developed grade 3. RT was discontinued in 1 and placed on hold in 3 of these patients. In the breast‐conservation group, 2 of 6 patients (33%) developed grade 3 toxicity. In the neoadjuvant group, 1 of 2 patients (50%) developed grade 3 toxicity. Four patients (20%) developed radiation pneumonitis, 2 of 12 (17%) in the postmastectomy group and 2 of 6 (33%) in the breast conservation group, with 2 requiring hospitalization and 1 a diagnostic open‐lung biopsy. In this group of patients, standard dose concurrent radiation and paclitaxel resulted in a high incidence of cutaneous and pulmonary toxicity. Concurrent radiation and paclitaxel with these doses and schedule should be approached cautiously until further studies documenting its safety are completed.

Ultrasound-guided high dose rate conformal brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial.

PURPOSE To improve results for locally advanced prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of concurrent external beam irradiation and fractionated iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) conformal boost brachytherapy was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 1991 and February 1994, 99 implants were performed on 33 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital. Using AJCC staging criteria, 9 patients had T2b tumors, 17 patients had T2c tumors, and 7 patients had T3 disease. Patients were treated with (a) 45.6 Gy whole pelvis external irradiation and (b) three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (18 patients) or 6 Gy each (15 patients) to the prostate. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive on-line isodose distributions were performed on an outpatient basis during weeks 1, 2, and 3 of external irradiation. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) morbidity grading system. RESULTS This technique of concurrent external pelvic irradiation and conformal HDR brachytherapy was well tolerated. No significant intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Three patients (9%) experienced Grade 3 acute toxicity (two dysuria and one diarrhea). All toxicities were otherwise Grades 1 or 2 and were primarily as expected from pelvic external irradiation. Persistent implant-related toxicities included Grades 1-2 perineal pain (12%) and hematospermia (15%). Median follow-up time was 13 months. Serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) levels normalized in 91% of patients (29 out of 32) within 1-14 months (median 2.8 months) after irradiation. PSA levels were progressively decreasing in the other three patients at last measurement. Prospectively planned prostatic rebiopsies done at 18 months in the first 10 patients were negative in 9 out of 10 (90%). CONCLUSIONS Acute toxicity has been acceptable with this unique approach using conformal high dose rate Ir-192 boost brachytherapy with concurrent external irradiation. The initial tumor response as assessed by serial PSA measurement and rebiopsy is extremely encouraging. Dose escalation will proceed in accordance with the protocol guidelines. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.