Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jason H. Steffen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jason H. Steffen.


Nature | 2011

A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11

Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; William J. Borucki; Francois Fressin; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jerome A. Orosz; Jason F. Rowe; Guillermo Torres; William F. Welsh; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Douglas A. Caldwell; Joshua A. Carter; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; William D. Cochran; Jean-Michel Desert; Edward W. Dunham; Michael N. Fanelli; Jonathan J. Fortney; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Jennifer R. Hall; Matthew J. Holman; David G. Koch; David W. Latham

When an extrasolar planet passes in front of (transits) its star, its radius can be measured from the decrease in starlight and its orbital period from the time between transits. Multiple planets transiting the same star reveal much more: period ratios determine stability and dynamics, mutual gravitational interactions reflect planet masses and orbital shapes, and the fraction of transiting planets observed as multiples has implications for the planarity of planetary systems. But few stars have more than one known transiting planet, and none has more than three. Here we report Kepler spacecraft observations of a single Sun-like star, which we call Kepler-11, that reveal six transiting planets, five with orbital periods between 10 and 47 days and a sixth planet with a longer period. The five inner planets are among the smallest for which mass and size have both been measured, and these measurements imply substantial envelopes of light gases. The degree of coplanarity and proximity of the planetary orbits imply energy dissipation near the end of planet formation.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2018

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog with Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25

Susan E. Thompson; Jeffrey L. Coughlin; Kelsey Hoffman; Fergal Mullally; Jessie L. Christiansen; Christopher J. Burke; Steve Bryson; Natalie M. Batalha; Michael R. Haas; Joseph H. Catanzarite; Jason F. Rowe; Geert Barentsen; Douglas A. Caldwell; Bruce D. Clarke; Jon M. Jenkins; Jie Li; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; S. Mathur; Robert L. Morris; Shawn E. Seader; Jeffrey C. Smith; Todd C. Klaus; Joseph D. Twicken; Jeffrey Edward van Cleve; Bill Wohler; R. L. Akeson; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Christopher E. Henze

We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of Kepler time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new in this catalog and include two new candidates in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten new high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs) found by the Kepler Pipeline (Twicken et al. 2016). Because of this automation, we were also able to vet simulated data sets and therefore measure how well the Robovetter separates those TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. Because of these measurements we fully expect that this catalog can be used to accurately calculate the frequency of planets out to Keplers detection limit, which includes temperate, super-Earth size planets around GK dwarf stars in our Galaxy. This paper discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to decide which TCEs are called planet candidates in the DR25 KOI catalog. We also discuss the simulated transits, simulated systematic noise, and simulated astrophysical false positives created in order to characterize the properties of the final catalog. For orbital periods less than 100 d the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates found between 200 and 500 days, our measurements indicate that the Robovetter is 73.5% complete and 37.2% reliable across all searched stars (or 76.7% complete and 50.5% reliable when considering just the FGK dwarf stars). We describe how the measured completeness and reliability varies with period, signal-to-noise, number of transits, and stellar type. Also, we discuss a value called the disposition score which provides an easy way to select a more reliable, albeit less complete, sample of candidates. The entire KOI catalog, the transit fits using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.


The Astronomical Journal | 2016

A Dynamical Analysis of the Kepler-80 System of Five Transiting Planets

Mariah G. MacDonald; Darin Ragozzine; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Matthew J. Holman; Howard Isaacson; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Tsevi Mazeh; Leslie A. Rogers; Jason F. Rowe; Jason H. Steffen; Guillermo Torres

Kepler has discovered hundreds of systems with multiple transiting exoplanets which hold tremendous potential both individually and collectively for understanding the formation and evolution of planetary systems. Many of these systems consist of multiple small planets with periods less than ~50 days known as Systems with Tightly-spaced Inner Planets, or STIPs. One especially intriguing STIP, Kepler-80 (KOI-500), contains five transiting planets: f, d, e, b, and c with periods of 1.0, 3.1, 4.6, 7.1, 9.5 days, respectively. We provide measurements of transit times and a transit timing variation (TTV) dynamical analysis. We find that TTVs cannot reliably detect eccentricities for this system, though mass estimates are not affected. Restricting the eccentricity to a reasonable range, we infer masses for the outer four planets (d, e, b, and c) to be


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016

A Population of planetary systems characterized by short-period, Earth-sized planets

Jason H. Steffen; Jeffrey L. Coughlin

6.75^{+0.69}_{-0.51}


The Astrophysical Journal | 2018

Outcomes of Grazing Impacts between Sub-Neptunes in Kepler Multis

Jason A. Hwang; Sourav Chatterjee; James C. Lombardi; Jason H. Steffen; Frederic A. Rasio

,


The Astronomical Journal | 2018

TTV-determined Masses for Warm Jupiters and Their Close Planetary Companions

D. Wu; Songhu Wang; Ji-Lin Zhou; Jason H. Steffen; Gregory Laughlin

4.13^{+0.81}_{-0.95}


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018

Survivability of Moon Systems Around Ejected Gas Giants

Ian Rabago; Jason H. Steffen

,


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018

Systematic mischaracterization of exoplanetary system dynamical histories from a model degeneracy near mean-motion resonance

John H. Boisvert; Benjamin E. Nelson; Jason H. Steffen

6.93^{+1.05}_{-0.70}


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018

Survival of non-coplanar, closely packed planetary systems after a close encounter

David R. Rice; Frederic A. Rasio; Jason H. Steffen

, and


arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics | 2018

The crucial role of ground-based, Doppler measurements for the future of exoplanet science

Jason H. Steffen; Peter Plavchan; Timothy M. Brown; Eric B. Ford; Andrew W. Howard; Hannah Jang-Condell; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Benjamin E. Nelson; Patrick Newman; Darin Ragozzine

6.74^{+1.23}_{-0.86}

Collaboration


Dive into the Jason H. Steffen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric B. Ford

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew J. Holman

Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Darin Ragozzine

Florida Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David G. Koch

NASA Exoplanet Science Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William F. Welsh

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge