Javier Zueco

Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of de novo coronary artery lesions (START): a four-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that stent implantation in de novo coronary artery lesions would result in lower restenosis rates and better long-term clinical outcomes than balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND Placement of an intracoronary stent, as compared with balloon angioplasty, has proven to reduce the rate of restenosis. However, the long-term clinical benefit of stenting over angioplasty has not been assessed in large randomized trials. METHODS We randomly assigned 452 patients with either stable (129 patients) or unstable (323 patients) angina pectoris to elective stent implantation (229 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (223 patients). Coronary angiography was performed at baseline, immediately after the procedure and six months later. End points were the rate of restenosis at six months and a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularization over four years of follow-up. RESULTS Procedural success rate was achieved in 84% and 95% (balloon angioplasty vs. stent, respectively). The increase in the minimal luminal diameter was greater in the stent group both after the intervention (2.02 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 1.43 +/- 0.6 mm in the angioplasty group; p < 0.0001), and at six-month follow-up (1.98 +/- 0.7 mm vs. 1.63 +/- 0.7 mm; p < 0.001). The corresponding restenosis rates were 22% and 37%, respectively (p < 0.002). After four years, no differences in mortality (2.7% vs. 2.4%) and nonfatal MI (2.2% vs. 2.8%) were found between the stent and the angioplasty groups, respectively. However, the requirement for further revascularization procedures of the target lesions was significantly reduced in the stent group (12% vs. 25% in the angioplasty group; relative risk 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.75, p = 0.0006); most of the repeat procedures (84%) were carried out within six months of entry into the study. CONCLUSIONS Patients who received an intracoronary stent showed a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with conventional balloon angioplasty. The benefit of stenting was maintained four years after implantation, as manifested by a significant reduction in the need for repeat revascularization.

A randomized comparison ofrepeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis of Drug-Eluting Stents: The RIBS IV Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major challenge. OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients presenting with DES-ISR. METHODS The study design of this multicenter randomized clinical trial assumed superiority of EES for the primary endpoint, in-segment minimal lumen diameter at the 6- to 9-month angiographic follow-up. RESULTS A total of 309 patients with DES-ISR from 23 Spanish university hospitals were randomly allocated to DEB (n = 154) or EES (n = 155). At late angiography (median 247 days; 90% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.03 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.6 mm; p < 0.01) (absolute mean difference: 0.23 mm; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.38) [corrected], net lumen gain (1.28 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.01 ± 0.7 mm; p < 0.01), and lower percent diameter stenosis (23 ± 22% vs. 30 ± 22%; p < 0.01) and binary restenosis rate (11% vs. 19%; p = 0.06), compared with patients in the DEB arm. Consistent results were observed in the in-lesion analysis. At the 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), the main clinical outcome measure (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly reduced in the EES arm (10% vs. 18%; p = 0.04; hazard ratio: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.98), mainly driven by a lower need for target vessel revascularization (8% vs. 16%; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS In patients with DES-ISR, EES provided superior long-term clinical and angiographic results compared with DEB. (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent [RIBS IV]; NCT01239940).

Implantation of a drug-eluting stent with a different drug (switch strategy) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis. Results from a prospective multicenter study (RIBS III [Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent]).

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the effectiveness of a strategy of using drug-eluting stents (DES) with a different drug (switch) in patients with DES in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND Treatment of patients with DES ISR remains a challenge. METHODS The RIBS-III (Restenosis Intra-Stent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent) study was a prospective, multicenter study that aimed to assess results of coronary interventions in patients with DES ISR. The use of a different DES was the recommended strategy. The main angiographic endpoint was minimal lumen diameter at 9-month follow-up. The main clinical outcome measure was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS This study included 363 consecutive patients with DES ISR from 12 Spanish sites. The different-DES strategy was used in 274 patients (75%) and alternative therapeutic modalities (no switch) in 89 patients (25%). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups, although lesion length was longer in the switch group. At late angiographic follow-up (77% of eligible patients, median: 278 days) minimal lumen diameter was larger (1.86 ± 0.7 mm vs. 1.40 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.003) and recurrent restenosis rate lower (22% vs. 40%, p = 0.008) in the different-DES group. At the last clinical follow-up (99% of patients, median: 771 days), the combined clinical endpoint occurred less frequently (23% vs. 35%, p = 0.039) in the different-DES group. After adjustment using propensity score analyses, restenosis rate (relative risk: 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21 to 0.80, p = 0.01), minimal lumen diameter (difference: 0.41 mm, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.62, p = 0.001), and the event-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96, p = 0.038) remained significantly improved in the switch group. CONCLUSIONS In patients with DES ISR, the implantation of a different DES provides superior late clinical and angiographic results than do alternative interventional modalities.

Stenting the Stent: Initial Results and Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcome of Coronary Stenting for Patients With In-Stent Restenosis

Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge affecting an increasing number of patients. Conventional angioplasty and debulking techniques are currently used in these patients. However, the potential role of a second stent implantation in this setting (stenting the stent) remains unknown. Therefore, 65 consecutive patients (12 women, aged 62 +/- 11 years) undergoing stent implantation (42 elective and 23 unplanned) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (diffuse [> 10 mm] in 39 [60%]) were studied. Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. Three patients developed hospital complications: 1 died from refractory heart failure and 2 suffered non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. During follow-up (mean 17 +/- 11 months) 1 patient died (noncardiac cause) and only 9 (14%) required target vessel revascularization. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at 1 year was 84%. Using Cox analysis, patients with unstable symptoms, a short time to stent restenosis, nonelective stenting, and B2-C lesions tended to have poorer prognosis. After adjustment, nonelective stenting was associated (adjusted RR 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 10.3, p = 0.09) with an adverse clinical outcome. On quantitative angiography (core lab) restenosis was found in 13 of 43 patients (30%) (75% of those eligible). Logistic regression analysis identify restenosis length (adjusted RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.14, p = 0.04), and time to restenosis (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94, p = 0.01) as the only independent predictors of recurrent restenosis. Thus, repeat coronary stenting is a safe and efficacious strategy for the treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis. Both elective and nonelective stenting provide excellent initial results. The long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of these patients is also favorable.

Registro de actividad de la Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista del año 1996

Se presentan los datos del Registro Espanol de Hemodinamica y Cardiologia Intervencionista de la Sociedad Espanola de Cardiologia. El Registro recogela actividad realizada durante el ano 1996 en 81 centros que representan la totalidad de los laboratoriosde hemodinamica. En 73 centros se realizofundamentalmente hemodinamica en adultos y 8 llevaron a cabo exclusivamente actividad pediatrica. Los estudios diagnosticos se han incrementadoen un 10,7% (63.961) respecto al ano 1995, a expensas del aumento de las coronariografias. El volumen de intervenciones coronarias (15.009) ha sido un 21,4% superior al del ano 1995, aumentando a 375 el numero de angioplastias por millon de habitantes. Las cifras de exito (94%) y de complicaciones(2,9%) son similares a las registradas enanos anteriores. En lo que se refiere al empleo de dispositivos, cabe destacar el fuerte y sostenido aumento en la utilizacion de los stents intracoronarios: 7.104 procedimientos (el 47,3% de todas las intervenciones coronarias) y 8.873 protesis implantadas, lo que supone duplicar la actividad del ano 1995 en este campo. El implante del stent fue electivo en el 58% de los casos y la tasa de complicaciones resulto baja (el 1% de oclusion subaguda; el 1,8% de infartoagudo de miocardio y el 0,9% de mortalidad). La aterectomia direccional ha disminuido en un 47% mientras que la aterectomia rotacional ha au mentadoun 10% a pesar de disminuir el numero de centros que la practican. Al igual que en anos anteriores, se observa un ligero descenso en el numero de valvuloplastias en adultos, mientras que el intervencionismo en pediatria (607 procedimientos) ha aumentado un 30% con respecto al Registro anterior.

Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy From 1 to 20 Years After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the main cause of graft loss and death in heart transplant (HTx) recipients surviving >1 year. There is a dual etiology for coronary disease in HTx: classic atherosclerosis and an immunologically mediated disease. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is highly sensitive for CAV detection; however, gray-scale IVUS is of limited value for identification of specific plaque components. We sought to characterize graft coronary artery disease by means of IVUS-virtual histology (IVUS-VH) at different time-points of follow-up and to correlate plaque composition with clinical factors. METHODS In our study we included 67 patients, who were 7.6 +/- 5.7 years post-HTx. IVUS gray-scale evaluation was performed on all patients. IVUS-VH analysis was done in those patients showing intimal thickening >0.5 mm at the three more significant lesions (three cross-sections for each) of the left anterior descending artery. RESULTS IVUS-VH analysis was obtained done on 58 patients (86.5%). We found a significant correlation between time of HTx and IVUS gray-scale parameters (plaque area and plaque burden), with both increasing over time. We also found a significant correlation between time and IVUS-VH-derived plaque components, necrotic core and calcium, which increased with time, and fibrous and fibrofatty components, both decreased at follow-up. IVUS-VH results were also related to donor age and cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS We observed a time-related change in IVUS-VH-derived plaque composition. Necrotic core and calcium, typical atheromatous components, become more prevalent with time after HTx, especially when influenced by cardiovascular risk factors. The presence of a necrotic core in the early stages was linked to older donor age.

Sirolimus‐eluting stents versus bare‐metal stents in patients with in‐stent restenosis: Results of a pooled analysis of two randomized studies

Treatment of patients with in‐stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. We sought to compare results of sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) with those of bare‐metal stents (BMS) in patients with ISR.

Evaluation of direct stent implantation without predilatation by intravascular ultrasound

The present study shows that direct stent implantation without predilatation in selected lesions provides angiographic and ultrasonographic results that could be comparable to those expected with conventional stenting. These results may even safely improve if a balloon-artery ratio of 1.1 to 1.2 is used in combination with implantation pressures of 12 to 16 atm.

Dual antiplatelet therapy versus oral anticoagulation plus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and low-to-moderate thromboembolic risk undergoing coronary stenting: design of the MUSICA-2 randomized trial.

BACKGROUND Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the recommended therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) because it reduces the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI-S). In patients with AF requiring PCI-S, the association of DAPT and OAC carries an increased risk of bleeding, whereas OAC therapy or DAPT alone may not protect against the risk of developing new ischemic or thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVE The MUSICA-2 study will test the hypothesis that DAPT compared with triple therapy (TT) in patients with nonvalvular AF at low-to-moderate risk of stroke (CHADS2 score ≤2) after PCI-S reduces the risk of bleeding and is not inferior to TT for preventing thromboembolic complications. DESIGN The MUSICA-2 is a multicenter, open-label randomized trial that will compare TT with DAPT in patients with AF and CHADS2 score ≤2 undergoing PCI-S. The primary end point is the incidence of stroke or any systemic embolism or major adverse cardiac events: death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization at 1 year of PCI-S. The secondary end point is the combination of any cardiovascular event with major or minor bleeding at 1 year of PCI-S. The calculated sample size is 304 patients. CONCLUSIONS The MUSICA-2 will attempt to determine the most effective and safe treatment in patients with nonvalvular AF and CHADS2 score ≤2 after PCI-S. Restricting TT for AF patients at high risk for stroke may reduce the incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications.