Jayram Krishnan

Robotic Ileal Ureter: A Completely Intracorporeal Technique

INTRODUCTION The first laparoscopic case of ileal interposition was reported in 2000, proving the feasibility of the procedure in a minimally invasive fashion by duplicating the principles of open surgery. Robotic applications in urology are expanding worldwide, given the unique features of the robotic platform, which facilitates more advanced laparoscopic procedures. In this study, we report a case of completely intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter and thoroughly describe our technique for this complex minimally invasive procedure. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS A 50-year-old gentleman with a history of right renal stones underwent multiple right ureteroscopies and thereafter developed 2 proximal ureteral strictures of 5 mm. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 71 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Renal scan showed preserved function. The treatment options were discussed, and the patient elected to undergo a robotic ileal ureter interposition. Total operative time was 7 hours, the estimated blood loss was approximately 50 mL, and the patient progressed to regular diet on postoperative day 4 without any problem, being discharged without complications. On the postoperative day 12, a cystogram demonstrated no extravasation, and the Foley catheter was removed. After 1 month, renal scan showed the left kidney with 60.1% and the right kidney with 39.9% of total renal function. At 2 years follow-up, his serum creatinine was 1.14 and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70 mL/min/1.73 m(2). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted laparaoscopic ileal ureter with a completely intracorporeal technique is feasible and appears to be safe. A larger number of procedures using this technique and longer follow-up are needed to further define its role in the treatment of ureteral strictures.

Ipsilateral renal function preservation after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): an objective analysis using mercapto-acetyltriglycine (MAG3) renal scan data and volumetric assessment.

To objectively assess ipsilateral renal function (IRF) preservation and factors influencing it after robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

30-Day Hospital Readmission after Robotic Partial Nephrectomy—Are We Prepared for Medicare Readmission Reduction Program?

PURPOSE After CMS introduced the concept of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, hospitals and health care centers became financially penalized for exceeding specific readmission rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional review board approved database of patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy at our institution and included in our analysis patients who were readmitted to any hospital as an inpatient stay within 30 days from discharge home after robotic partial nephrectomy. RESULTS From March 2006 to March 2013 a total of 627 patients underwent robotic partial nephrectomy at our center and 28 (4.46%) were readmitted within 30 days of surgery. Postoperative bleeding was responsible for 8 (28.5%) readmissions. Pulmonary embolism was reported in 3 cases and retroperitoneal abscess was diagnosed in 2. Urinary leak requiring surgical intervention developed in 2 patients, pneumonia was diagnosed in 2 and 2 patients were readmitted for chest pain. Overall 9 (32.1%) patients presented with major complications requiring intervention. On multivariable analysis Charlson comorbidity index score was the only factor significantly associated with a higher 30-day readmission rate (p = 0.03). If the Charlson score was 5 or greater the chance of hospital readmission would be 2.7 times higher. CONCLUSIONS Increased comorbidity, specifically a Charlson score of 5 or greater, was the only significant predictor of a higher incidence of 30-day readmission. This information can be useful in counseling patients regarding robotic partial nephrectomy and in determining baseline rates if CMS expands the number of conditions they evaluate for excess 30-day readmissions.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush: step-by-step technique and matched comparison with warm ischaemia.

To outline our step‐by‐step technique for intracorporeal renal cooling during robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and Comparative Outcomes

BACKGROUND Recent evidence supports the use of robotic surgery for the minimally invasive surgical management of adrenal masses. OBJECTIVE To describe a contemporary step-by-step technique of robotic adrenalectomy (RA), to provide tips and tricks to help ensure a safe and effective implementation of the procedure, and to compare its outcomes with those of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of consecutive patients who underwent RA performed by a single surgeon between April 2010 and October 2013. LA cases performed by the same surgeon between January 2004 and May 2010 were considered the control group. SURGICAL PROCEDURE The main steps of our current surgical technique for RA are described in this video tutorial: patient positioning, port placement, and robot docking; exposure of the adrenal gland; identification and control of the adrenal vein; circumferential dissection of the adrenal gland; and specimen retrieval and closure. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Demographic parameters and main surgical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 76 cases (RA: 30; LA: 46) were included in the analysis. Median tumor size on computed tomography (CT) was significantly larger in the LA group (3cm [interquartile range (IQR): 3] vs 4cm [IQR: 3]; p=0.002). A significantly lower median estimated blood loss was recorded for the robotic group (50ml [IQR: 50] vs 100ml [IQR: 288]; p=0.02). The RA group presented five minor complications (16.7%) and one major (Clavien 3b) complication (3.3%), whereas four minor complications (8.7%) and one major (Clavien 3b) complication (2.3%) were observed in the LA group. No significant difference was noted between groups in terms of malignant histology (p=0.66) and positive margin rate (p=0.60). Distribution of pheochromocytomas in the LA group was significantly higher than in the RA group (43.5% vs 16.7%; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS The standardization of each surgical step optimizes the RA procedure. The robotic approach can be applied for a wide range of adrenal indications, recapitulating the safety and effectiveness of open surgery and potentially improving the outcomes of standard laparoscopy. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report we detail our surgical technique for robotic removal of adrenal masses. This procedure has been standardized and can be offered to patients, with excellent outcomes.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for ≥ 7 cm renal masses: a comparative outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE To present our robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) experience for renal masses ≥ 7 cm and compare the surgical outcomes in this cohort with those obtained for small (≤ 4 cm) renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional review board-approved RPN database and identified patients undergoing RPN for tumors ≥ 7 cm. Surgical technique, renal function, oncologic, and pathologic data were analyzed and compared with the RPN for renal masses ≤ 4 cm. RESULTS Overall, 441 patients were identified for the purpose of this study, including 29 cases and 412 controls. Median operative time (200 vs 180 min; P = .005), warm ischemia time (26.5 vs 19 min; P <.001), and estimated blood loss (250 mL [353] vs 150 mL [150]; P <.001) were significantly lower in the control group. Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the case group (37.9% vs 15.8%; P = .005). However, the percentages of major complications (Clavien grade ≥ III) were comparable (18.2% vs 17%; P = .57 for cases and controls respectively). Postoperative blood transfusion was higher for larger tumor group (24.1% vs 4.1%; P <.001). Positive margins were similar between groups (5.9% vs 3.3%; P = .45 for cases and controls respectively). There was no difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate decline between the two groups (12.2% vs 15.8% decline; P = .98). CONCLUSION RPN represents a feasible and safe nephron-sparing surgery approach for highly selected (mostly exophytic growth pattern, polar location, and likelihood of benign histology) renal masses ≥ 7 cm in diameter.

Robotic partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush.

OBJECTIVE To outline our technique for intracorporeal cooling with ice slush during robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), with real-time parenchymal temperature monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven consecutive patients with enhancing solid renal masses suitable for treatment with RPN between September 2013 and January 2014 were included in the analysis. Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative surgical parameters including patient body temperature and ipsilateral kidney temperature with real-time monitoring, and short-term functional outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Median age was 55 years (range, 39-75 years) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 3 (range, 2-4). Median tumor size was 4 cm (range, 2.3-7.1) and RENAL nephrometry score was 9 (range, 5-11). One patient had a solitary kidney. During cooling, the lowest median renal parenchymal temperature was 17.05°C (range, 11°C-26°C) and cold ischemia time was 27.17 minutes (range, 18-49 minutes). Median time to latest postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was 12 days (range, 2-30 days). Median glomerular filtration rate preservation was 81% (range, 47.9%-126%). There was one positive margin. There were no postoperative complications, and no patients experienced a prolonged ileus. The limitations of this study include a small number of patients and short-term follow-up. CONCLUSION RPN with renal hypothermia using intracorporeal ice slush is technically feasible. Our simplified method of introducing the ice slush was free of complications and highly reproducible. The use of a needle temperature probe allowed us to monitor in real time cooling of the renal parenchyma.

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Cystic Renal Masses: A Comparative Analysis of a Matched-paired Cohort

OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for cystic and solid renal neoplasms. METHODS Our RPN database was queried to identify consecutive patients who underwent RPN for cystic and solid renal masses in the period between July 2007 and July 2013. Cystic renal masses were diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Matching was done between the patients with cystic renal masses and patients with solid renal masses (1:1 matching) by age, gender, tumor size, and nephrometry score. RESULTS Of 647 cases, 55 patients with cystic masses (group 1) were matched with 55 patients with solid tumors (group 2). There was no cyst rupture or positive surgical margin observed in group 1. The volume of resected rim of healthy renal parenchyma surrounding the tumor was the same for both groups (P=.9). There was no difference between the groups in terms of percentage of glomerular filtration rate preservation postoperatively (85% vs 86%; P=.94). There was no difference in term of overall complications between the 2 groups. Thirty patients (54.5%) in group 1 and 47 patients (85.5%) in group 2 had renal cell carcinoma (P=.0001). CONCLUSION RPN can be safely and effectively performed when treating a suspicious cystic renal neoplasm with outcomes resembling those obtained for solid masses. Thus, when a cystic renal mass in encountered, nephron-sparing surgery can be offered and RPN represents an effective tool for this approach.

Urine leak in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: analysis of risk factors and role of intraoperative ureteral catheterization

PURPOSE To investigate risk factors for urine leak in patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) and to determine the role of intraoperative ureteral catheterization in preventing this postoperative complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS MIPN procedures done from September 1999 to July 2012 at our Center were reviewed from our IRB-approved database. Patient and tumor characteristics, operative techniques and outcomes were analyzed. Patients with evidence of urine leak were identified. Outcomes were compared between patients with preoperative ureteral catheterization (C-group) and those without (NC-group). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors predicting postoperative urine leak. RESULTS A total of 1,019 cases were included (452 robotic partial nephrectomy cases and 567 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases). Five hundred twenty eight patients (51.8%) were in the C-group, whereas 491 of them (48.2%) in the NC-group. Urine leak occurred in 31(3%) cases, 4.6% in the C-group and 1.4% in the NC-group (p<0.001). Tumors in NC-group had significantly higher RENAL score, shorter operative and warm ischemic times. On multivariable analysis, tumor proximity to collecting system (OR=9.2; p<0.01), surgeons early operative experience (OR=7.8; p<0.01) and preoperative moderate to severe CKD (OR=3.1; p<0.01) significantly increased the odds of the occurrence of a postoperative urine leak. CONCLUSION Clinically significant urine leak after MIPN in a high volume institution setting is uncommon. This event is more likely to occur in cases of renal masses that are close to the collecting system, in patients with preoperative CKD and when operating surgeon is still in the learning curve for the procedure. Our findings suggest that routine intraoperative ureteral catheterization during MIPN does not reduce the probability of postoperative urine leak. In addition, it adds to the overall operative time.

Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Caliceal Diverticulum: A Single-Center Case Series

The aim of this study is to examine the role of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in the management of caliceal diverticula by assessing our single-center outcomes. Between July 2007 and July 2013, 7 of 670 patients underwent RPN procedures as a reason of caliceal diverticula. The indications for RPN in all cases were recurrent urinary tract infection and pain attributed to the diverticulum in addition to failed management by endourologic or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatments. One patient with a calcified diverticulum and another with an unsuccessful SWL treatment underwent RPN without further endourologic intervention. The other five patients had a history of unsuccessful percutaneous nephrolithotomy (one case), ureteroscopy (URS) (two cases), and a combination of SWL+URS (two cases). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. No patient was readmitted postoperatively. Unique features of the robotic platform facilitate the excision of diverticulum and subsequent kidney reconstruction for this benign, but complex pathology.