Jean Emmanuel Kahn

Efficacy of Biological-Targeted Treatments in Takayasu Arteritis Multicenter, Retrospective Study of 49 Patients

Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P=0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics (P=0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [P<0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [P<0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P=0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile.Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P =0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics ( P =0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [ P <0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [ P <0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P =0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-34}

The Spectrum of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Associated Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia: New Insights Based on a Survey of 44 Cases

AbstractImatinib is the treatment of choice for FIP1L1/PDGFRA (F/P)-associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia (F/P+ CEL), but its optimal dosing, duration, and possibility of discontinuation are still a matter of debate. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with 44 F/P+ CEL patients identified in the French Eosinophil Network and treated with imatinib. The most frequently involved systems were skin (57%), spleen (52%), and lung (45%), and eosinophilic heart disease was observed in 15 patients (34%). Complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained in all patients, and complete molecular response (CMR) in 95% of patients (average initial imatinib dose, 165 mg/d). For 29 patients the imatinib dose was tapered with a maintenance dose of 58 mg/d (±34 mg/d), allowing sustained CHR and CMR. None of the patients developed resistance during a median follow-up of 52.3 months (range, 1.4–97.4 mo). Imatinib was stopped in 11 patients; 6 of the patients subsequently relapsed, but 5 remained in persistent CHR or CMR (range, 9–88 mo). These results confirm that an initial low-dose regimen of imatinib (100 mg/d) followed by a lower maintenance dose can be efficient for obtaining long-term CHR and CMR. Our data also suggest that imatinib can be stopped in some patients without molecular relapse.

Long-term efficacy and safety of cladribine (2-CdA) in adult patients with mastocytosis

Mastocytosis (M) is a clonal myeloid-disabling disorder for which no curative therapy is currently available. Cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine [2-CdA]) is a synthetic purine analog cytoreductive treatment, for which efficacy is mostly reported in advanced M. Here we report, with a long-term follow-up period (>10 years) efficacy and safety in 68 adult patients with M (36 [53%] had indolent M and 32 [47%] had advanced M) treated by 2-CdA (0.14 mg/kg in infusion or subcutaneously, days 1-5; repeated at 4-12 weeks until 1 to 9 courses). Median 2-CdA courses number was 3.7 (1-9). The overall response rate was 72% (complete remission [R]/major/partial R: 0%/47%/25%) and according to indolent/advanced M was 92% (major/partial R: 56%/36%) and 50% (major/partial R: 37.5%/12.5%), respectively. Clinical improvement was observed for 10 of 11 mediator release and 6 of 7 mast cell infiltration-related symptoms including urticaria pigmentosa and organomegaly (P < .02). Serum tryptase levels decreased (P = .01). Median durations of response were 3.71 (0.1-8) and 2.47 (0.5-8.6) years for indolent and aggressive M, respectively. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were lymphopenia (82%), neutropenia (47%), and opportunistic infections (13%). 2-CdA appears to provide a significant efficacy with some toxicity in various M subtypes, mostly in indolent M, refractory to multiple symptomatic therapies.

Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases associated with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A series of 26 cases and literature review

We wanted to describe the characteristics, treatment and outcome of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (SAIDs) associated with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and conducted a French multicenter retrospective study and a literature review. We included 26 cases of CMML (median age 75 years, 54% female), 80% with CMML-1. CPSS score was low (0 or 1) in 75% of cases. SAIDS was systemic vasculitis in 54%. Diagnosis of the 2 diseases was concomitant in 31% cases, and CMML was diagnosed before SAIDs in 12 cases (46%). First line treatment for SAIDs consisted mostly of steroid, with 85% of response. Second-line treatment was needed in 40% cases. Six patients received hypomethylating agents, with 66% response on SAIDs. A literature review found 49 cases of CMML-associated SAIDs, in whom SAIDs was systemic vasculitis in 29% cases. Hence, vasculitis is the most frequent SAIDs associated with CMML. After initial response to steroids, recurrence and steroid-dependence were frequent. Hypomethylating agents may be interesting in this context.

Cogan syndrome: Characteristics, outcome and treatment in a French nationwide retrospective study and literature review

BACKGROUND Cogan syndrome is mainly treated with steroids. We aimed to determine the place of DMARDs and biologic-targeted treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a French nationwide retrospective study of patients with Cogan syndrome (n=40) and a literature review of cases (n=22) and analyzed the efficacy of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists. RESULTS We included 62 patients (31 females) (median age 37years [range 2-76]. At diagnosis, 61 patients (98%) had vestibulo-auditory symptoms, particularly bilateral hearing loss in 41% and deafness in 31%. Ocular signs were present in 57 patients (92%), with interstitial keratitis in 31 (51%). The first-line treatment consisted of steroids alone (n=43; 70%) or associated with other immunosuppressive drugs (n=18; 30%). Overall, 13/43 (30%) and 4/18 (22%) patients with steroids alone and with associated immunosuppressive drugs, respectively (p=0.8), showed vestibulo-auditory response; 32/39 (82%) and 15/19 (79%) ocular response; and 23/28 (82%) and 10/14 (71%) general response. Overall 61 patients had used a total of 126 lines of treatment, consisting of steroids alone (n=51 lines), steroids with DMARDs (n=65) and infliximab (n=10). Vestibulo-auditory response was significantly more frequent with infliximab than DMARDs or steroids alone (80% vs 39% and 35%, respectively), whereas ocular, systemic and acute-phase reactant response rates were similar. Infliximab was the only significant predictor of vestibulo-auditory improvement (odds ratio 20.7 [95% confidence interval 1.65; 260], p=0.019). CONCLUSION Infliximab could lead to vestibulo-auditory response in DMARDS and steroid-refractory Cogan syndrome, but prospective studies are necessary.

Cytomegalovirus colitis complicating ulcerative colitis treated with adalimumab

TO THE EDITOR: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)associated colitis frequently occurs in immunocompromised patients, either those with HIV or those treated with immunosuppressive agents. CMV infections have been specifically described in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1], and may be associated with refractory disease [2]. Surprisingly, while anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a agents are a major therapeutic option in refractory IBD, only a few cases of CMV-associated colitis induced by antiTNF agents have been reported in patients with IBD. We report the case of a 39-year-old white woman with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) who developed severe CMV-associated colitis 1 month after the initiation of adalimumab treatment. UC was diagnosed in July 2008. She was initially treated unsuccessfully with mesalazine, and further received topical betamethasone and azathioprin 200 mg/day. She relapsed and required prednisone 70 mg/day. After a transient remission, her condition worsened. A rectosigmoidoscopy showed extensive mucosal abrasion, without evidence of CMV on biopsies. Adalimumab was added (80 mg at Day 0, then 40 mg every 2 weeks) to steroids and azathioprin. The patient was admitted to hospital 1 month after the first injection of adalimumab because she remained febrile, with watery bowel movements. Her heart rate was 130 beats/min and she had no abdominal tenderness. Her laboratory examinations showed a white blood cell count of 7.93 G/l, haemoglobin 11 g/dl and C-reactive protein 125 mg/l. Serological testing was positive for CMV IgG and negative for IgM antibody. A quantitative CMV polymerase chain reaction exhibited a viral load of 1500 copies/ ml. Stool examination and cultures were negative for parasites and enteric pathogens. A rectosigmoidoscopy was performed and showed extensive mucosal abrasions and erythema. The biopsies demonstrated severely active colitis with involvement of CMV. Azathioprine and adalimumab were stopped and the dose of prednisone was lowered to 15 mg/day. The patient was administered intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg twice a day. Her condition improved dramatically and complete viral clearance was observed (CMV viral load < 500 copies/ml). Unfortunately, her condition worsened 1 week later and a total colectomy had to be performed. The operative specimen showed a preperforative colon with evidence of severe flare of UC and absence of CMV involvement. We have reported the first case of proven CMV colitis complicating IBD treated with adalimumab. Suspicion of the involvement of adalimumab in the appearance of CMV colitis was high because biopsies performed before the first injection did not demonstrate CMV involvement, unlike those performed 1 month later. Only two other cases of CMV colitis complicating anti-TNF-a therapy have been reported. The first was a patient who received a single dose of infliximab for a flare of Crohn’s disease and who experienced a disseminated CMV infection [3]. The second case occurred in a patient with Behçet’s syndrome receiving infliximab treatment [4]. CMV colitis can complicate the course of IBD [5] or cause severe flares of the disease. This is why

Inflammatory disorders associated with trisomy 8-myelodysplastic syndromes: French retrospective case-control study

We report cases of myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) with trisomy 8 associated with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (IADs).

Efficacy of Biological-Targeted Treatments in Takayasu Arteritis

Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P=0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics (P=0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [P<0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [P<0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P=0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile.Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P =0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics ( P =0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [ P <0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [ P <0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P =0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-34}

Efficacy of Biological-Targeted Treatments in Takayasu ArteritisCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P=0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics (P=0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [P<0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [P<0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P=0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-&agr; antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile.Background— The goal of this work was to assess the safety and efficacy of biologics (ie, tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab) in patients with Takayasu arteritis. Methods and Results— This was a retrospective, multicenter study of the characteristics and outcomes of 49 patients with Takayasu arteritis (80% female; median age, 42 years [20–55 years] treated by tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists [80%] or tocilizumab [20%]) and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology or Ishikawa criteria. Factors associated with complete response were assessed. Eighty-eight percent of patients with Takayasu arteritis were inadequately controlled with or were intolerant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (median number, 3 [1–5]). Overall response (ie, complete and partial) to biological-targeted treatments at 6 and 12 months was 75% and 83%, respectively. There were significantly lower C-reactive protein levels at the initiation of biological-targeted treatments (22 mg/L [10–46 mg/L] versus 58 mg/L [26–76 mg/L]; P =0.006) and a trend toward fewer immunosuppressants drugs used before biologics ( P =0.054) in responders (ie, complete or partial responders) relative to nonresponders to biological-targeted treatments. C-reactive protein levels and daily prednisone dose significantly decreased after 12 months of biological-targeted treatments (30 versus 6 mg/L [ P <0.05] and 15 versus 7.5 mg [ P <0.05] at baseline and 12 months, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival was 90.9% (83.5%–99%) over the biological treatment period compared with 58.7% (43.3%–79.7%; P =0.0025) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. No difference in efficacy was found between tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and tocilizumab. After a median follow-up of 24 months (2–95 months), 21% of patients experienced adverse effects, with biological-targeted treatments discontinued in 6.6% of cases. Conclusion— This nationwide study shows a high efficacy of biological-targeted treatments in refractory patients with Takayasu arteritis with an acceptable safety profile. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-34}

Quoi de neuf en médecine interne

Resume Parmi les progres diagnostiques de ces trois dernieres annees en medecine interne, le syndrome des anti-synthetases est plus facilement depiste grâce a la vulgarisation des techniques de recherches des anticorps (Ac) anti JO1, anti PL7, anti PL12. Dans deux tiers des cas ces Ac existent alors que le patient n’a pas d’Ac anti-nucleaires et il faut donc les rechercher specifiquement en presence d’une polyarthrite avec myalgies, phenomene de Raynaud, troubles trophiques des extremites (« mains de mecaniciens ») et fibrose pulmonaire. La decouverte d’une mutation asymptomatique de la L ferritine est venue completer l’arbre decisionnel en presence d’une hyperferritinemie. D’abord decrite par les gastro-enterologues japonais, la pancreatite auto-immune avec elevation des immunoglobulines G (IgG) s’integre en fait dans une maladie sclerosante systemique avec elevation des IgG4. Une nouvelle maladie observee chez l’enfant (associant osteites multifocales aseptiques avec periostites, stomatite, et pustulose) est venue enrichir la liste des maladies auto-inflammatoires. Les progres therapeutiques sont essentiellement representes par l’explosion des biotherapies et en particulier quatre qui rendent de grands services en medecine interne : les inhibiteurs de l’Interleukine 1 (anakinra, Canakinumab) pour traiter certaines maladies auto-inflammatoires (cryopirin associated periodic syndromes et anomalies genetiques du recepteur de l’IL-1), un Ac monoclonal anti-IL5 (mepolizumab) pour traiter certains syndromes hypereosinophiliques et l’angeite de Churg et Strauss, les inhibiteurs de l’IL6 pour traiter la maladie de Castleman multi-centrique et la maladie de Still de l’adulte, et un Ac monoclonal dirige contre le vascular endothelial growth factor (Bevacizumab) pour traiter la telangiectasie hemorragique hereditaire (maladie de Rendu Osler).