Jean Livet

Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system

Detailed analysis of neuronal network architecture requires the development of new methods. Here we present strategies to visualize synaptic circuits by genetically labelling neurons with multiple, distinct colours. In Brainbow transgenes, Cre/lox recombination is used to create a stochastic choice of expression between three or more fluorescent proteins (XFPs). Integration of tandem Brainbow copies in transgenic mice yielded combinatorial XFP expression, and thus many colours, thereby providing a way to distinguish adjacent neurons and visualize other cellular interactions. As a demonstration, we reconstructed hundreds of neighbouring axons and multiple synaptic contacts in one small volume of a cerebellar lobe exhibiting approximately 90 colours. The expression in some lines also allowed us to map glial territories and follow glial cells and neurons over time in vivo. The ability of the Brainbow system to label uniquely many individual cells within a population may facilitate the analysis of neuronal circuitry on a large scale.

A technicolour approach to the connectome

A central aim of neuroscience is to map neural circuits, in order to learn how they account for mental activities and behaviours and how alterations in them lead to neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, the methods that are currently available for visualizing circuits have severe limitations that make it extremely difficult to extract precise wiring diagrams from histological images. Here we review recent advances in this area, along with some of the opportunities that these advances present and the obstacles that remain.

ETS Gene Pea3 Controls the Central Position and Terminal Arborization of Specific Motor Neuron Pools

The projection of developing axons to their targets is a crucial step in the assembly of neuronal circuits. In the spinal cord, the differentiation of specific motor neuron pools is associated with the expression of ETS class transcription factors, notably PEA3 and ER81. Their initial expression coincides with the arrival of motor axons in the vicinity of muscle targets and depends on limb-derived signals. We show that in Pea3 mutant mice, the axons of specific motor neuron pools fail to branch normally within their target muscles, and the cell bodies of these motor neurons are mispositioned within the spinal cord. Thus, the induction of an intrinsic program of ETS gene expression by peripheral signals is required to coordinate the central position and terminal arborization of specific sets of spinal motor neurons.

Neuronal defects in the hindbrain of Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mutants reflect regulatory interactions among these Hox genes

Hox genes are instrumental in assigning segmental identity in the developing hindbrain. Auto-, cross- and para-regulatory interactions help establish and maintain their expression. To understand to what extent such regulatory interactions shape neuronal patterning in the hindbrain, we analysed neurogenesis, neuronal differentiation and motoneuron migration in Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2 mutant mice. This comparison revealed that neurogenesis and differentiation of specific neuronal subpopulations in r4 was impaired in a similar fashion in all three mutants, but with different degrees of severity. In the Hoxb1 mutants, neurons derived from the presumptive r4 territory were re-specified towards an r2-like identity. Motoneurons derived from that territory resembled trigeminal motoneurons in both their migration patterns and the expression of molecular markers. Both migrating motoneurons and the resident territory underwent changes consistent with a switch from an r4 to r2 identity. Abnormally migrating motoneurons initially formed ectopic nuclei that were subsequently cleared. Their survival could be prolonged through the introduction of a block in the apoptotic pathway. The Hoxa1 mutant phenotype is consistent with a partial misspecification of the presumptive r4 territory that results from partial Hoxb1 activation. The Hoxb2 mutant phenotype is a hypomorph of the Hoxb1 mutant phenotype, consistent with the overlapping roles of these genes in facial motoneuron specification. Therefore, we have delineated the functional requirements in hindbrain neuronal patterning that follow the establishment of the genetic regulatory hierarchy between Hoxa1, Hoxb1 and Hoxb2.

Developmental bias in cleavage-stage mouse blastomeres

BACKGROUND The cleavage-stage mouse embryo is composed of superficially equivalent blastomeres that will generate both the embryonic inner cell mass (ICM) and the supportive trophectoderm (TE). However, it remains unsettled whether the contribution of each blastomere to these two lineages can be accounted for by chance. Addressing the question of blastomere cell fate may be of practical importance, because preimplantation genetic diagnosis requires removal of blastomeres from the early human embryo. To determine whether blastomere allocation to the two earliest lineages is random, we developed and utilized a recombination-mediated, noninvasive combinatorial fluorescent labeling method for embryonic lineage tracing. RESULTS When we induced recombination at cleavage stages, we observed a statistically significant bias in the contribution of the resulting labeled clones to the trophectoderm or the inner cell mass in a subset of embryos. Surprisingly, we did not find a correlation between localization of clones in the embryonic and abembryonic hemispheres of the late blastocyst and their allocation to the TE and ICM, suggesting that TE-ICM bias arises separately from embryonic-abembryonic bias. Rainbow lineage tracing also allowed us to demonstrate that the bias observed in the blastocyst persists into postimplantation stages and therefore has relevance for subsequent development. CONCLUSIONS The Rainbow transgenic mice that we describe here have allowed us to detect lineage-dependent bias in early development. They should also enable assessment of the developmental equivalence of mammalian progenitor cells in a variety of tissues.

A semaphorin code defines subpopulations of spinal motor neurons during mouse development

In the spinal cord, motor neurons (MNs) with similar muscle targets and sensory inputs are grouped together into motor pools. To date, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms that control the establishment of pool‐specific circuitry. Semaphorins, a large family of secreted and cell surface proteins, are important mediators of developmental processes such as axon guidance and cell migration. Here, we used mRNA in situ hybridization to study the expression patterns of semaphorins and their receptors, neuropilins and plexins, in the embryonic mouse spinal cord. Our data show that semaphorins and their receptors are differentially expressed in MNs that lie in distinct locations within the spinal cord. Furthermore, we report a combinatorial expression of class 3 (secreted) semaphorins and their receptors that characterizes distinct motor pools within the brachial and lumbar spinal cord. Finally, we found that a secreted semaphorin, Sema3A, elicits differential collapse responses in topologically distinct subpopulations of spinal MNs. These findings lead us to propose that semaphorins and their receptors might play important roles in the sorting of motor pools and the patterning of their afferent and efferent projections.

Multicolor Brainbow Imaging in Zebrafish

This protocol describes how to use the Brainbow strategy to label neurons in many different hues. The Brainbow system uses a random Cre/lox recombination to create varied combinations of red, blue, and green fluorescent proteins in each cell. The differences in color allow users to follow multiple cells, regardless of how closely they are positioned. This protocol describes how to use Brainbow imaging in zebrafish and provides examples of how to use color as a guide to trace axonal processes. We use the zebrafish trigeminal sensory ganglion as an example and discuss potential modifications for the general use of this technique.

Role of neurotrophic factors in motoneuron development

More than 10 factors from different gene families are now known to enhance motoneuron survival, and to be expressed in a manner consistent with a role in regulating motoneuron numbers during development. We provide evidence that: a) different factors may act on different sub-populations of motoneurons; b) different factors may act in synergy on a given motoneuron. Thus, the functional diversity of motoneurons, and the cellular complexity of their environment, may be reflected in the mechanisms that have evolved to keep them alive.

A dynamic regulation of GDNF-family receptors correlates with a specific trophic dependency of cranial motor neuron subpopulations during development

Glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family ligands promote the survival of developing motor neurons in vivo and in vitro. However, not all neurons survive with any single ligand in culture and GDNF null mutant mice display only a partial motor neuron loss. An interesting possibility is that subpopulations of motor neurons based on their function and/or their myotopic organization require distinct members of GDNF family ligands. Because responsiveness to the different ligands depends on the expression of their cognate ligand‐binding receptor we have herein addressed this issue by examining the expression of GDNF‐family receptors (gfr) during development and in the adult in cranial motor nuclei subpopulations. We have furthermore examined the in vivo role of GDNF for cranial motor neuron subpopulations. The shared ret receptor was expressed in all somatic, branchial and visceral cranial embryonic motor nuclei examined, showing that they are all competent to respond to GDNF family ligands during development. At early stages of development both the GDNF receptor, gfrα1, and the neurturin (NTN) receptor, gfrα2, were expressed in the oculomotor, facial and spinal accessory, and only gfrα1 in the trochlear, superior salivatory, trigeminal, hypoglossal and weakly in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus and the ambiguus nucleus. The abducens nucleus was negative for both gfrα1 and gfrα2. The artemin (ART) receptor, gfrα3, was expressed only in the superior salivatory nucleus. A motor neuron subnuclei‐specific expression of gfrα1 and gfrα2 was seen in the facial and trigeminal nuclei which corresponded to their dependence on GDNF in null mutant mice. We found that the expression was dynamic in these nuclei, which may reflect developmental changes in their trophic factor dependency. Analysis of GDNF null mutant mice revealed that the dynamic receptor expression is regulated by the ligand in vivo, indicating that the acquirement of changes in dependency could be ligand induced. Our results indicate that specific GDNF family ligands support selective muscle–motor neuron circuits during development.

Sparse and combinatorial neuron labelling.

Sparse, random labelling of individual cells is a key approach to study brain circuit organisation and development. An array of methods based on genetic engineering now complements older methods such as Golgi staining, facilitating analysis while providing higher information content. Increasingly refined expression strategies based on transcriptional modulators and site-specific recombinases are used to distribute markers or combinations of markers within specific neuronal subsets. Several trends are emerging: first, increasing labelling density with multiplexed markers to allow more cells to be reliably distinguished; second, using labels to report lineage relationships among defined cells in addition to anatomy; third, coupling cell labelling with genetic manipulations that reveal or perturb cell function. These strategies offer new opportunities for characterizing the fine scale architecture of neuronal circuits, and understanding lineage and functional relations among their cellular components in normal or experimental situations.