Jean-Luc Auffray

Postprocedural Aortic Regurgitation in Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures Analysis of Predictors and Impact on Long-Term Mortality: Insights From the FRANCE2 Registry

Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P=0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery (P=0.04), larger aortic annulus (P=0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter (P=0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery(P=0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P=0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P=0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2.Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P =0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery ( P =0.04), larger aortic annulus ( P =0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter ( P =0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery( P =0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P =0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P =0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-26}

Von Willebrand Factor Multimers during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND Postprocedural aortic regurgitation occurs in 10 to 20% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) for aortic stenosis. We hypothesized that assessment of defects in high-molecular-weight (HMW) multimers of von Willebrand factor or point-of-care assessment of hemostasis could be used to monitor aortic regurgitation during TAVR. METHODS We enrolled 183 patients undergoing TAVR. Patients with aortic regurgitation after the initial implantation, as identified by means of transesophageal echocardiography, underwent additional balloon dilation to correct aortic regurgitation. HMW multimers and the closure time with adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP), a point-of-care measure of hemostasis, were assessed at baseline and 5 minutes after each step of the procedure. Mortality was evaluated at 1 year. A second cohort (201 patients) was studied to validate the use of CT-ADP in order to identify patients with aortic regurgitation. RESULTS After the initial implantation, HMW multimers normalized in patients without aortic regurgitation (137 patients). Among the 46 patients with aortic regurgitation, normalization occurred in 20 patients in whom additional balloon dilation was successful but did not occur in the 26 patients with persistent aortic regurgitation. A similar sequence of changes was observed with CT-ADP. A CT-ADP value of more than 180 seconds had sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of 92.3%, 92.4%, and 98.6%, respectively, for aortic regurgitation, with similar results in the validation cohort. Multivariable analyses showed that the values for HMW multimers and CT-ADP at the end of TAVR were each associated with mortality at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS The presence of HMW-multimer defects and a high value for a point-of-care hemostatic test, the CT-ADP, were each predictive of the presence of aortic regurgitation after TAVR and were associated with higher mortality 1 year after the procedure. (Funded by Lille 2 University and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02628509.).

Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Restores Endothelium-Dependent Responses After Balloon Injury of Rabbit Arteries

BACKGROUND After experimental angioplasty, partial or complete reendothelialization of the denuded surface occurs; the function of the regenerated endothelium has, however, been shown to be abnormal. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is mitogenic for endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo. We investigated whether chronic administration of bFGF in a rabbit model of balloon denudation might not only improve endothelial regrowth but also restore normal physiological responses to endothelium-dependent agonists. METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-nine New Zealand White rabbits underwent balloon denudation of the right iliac artery. Twenty rabbits received intravenous administration of bFGF (2.5 micrograms twice a week for 2 weeks). Nineteen rabbits receiving saline injections served as controls. Animals were killed on day 28 for assessment of reendothelialization and neointimal thickening and for analysis of in vitro vasoreactivity. Animals in the bFGF group had a significantly (P<.005) greater degree of reendothelialization than controls (115 +/- 13 versus 55 +/- 6 mm2). Neointimal thickening was similar in the two groups. Four weeks after denudation, endothelium-independent responses did not differ significantly between the two groups. In contrast, the maximal endothelium-dependent acetylcholine-induced relaxation of the bFGF-treated animals (Emax, 40 +/- 7%) was significantly greater than that of the control group (Emax, 11 +/- 9%; P<.05). CONCLUSIONS Systemic administration of bFGF restores, in large part, the responses of previously denuded arterial segments to endothelium-dependent vasodilators. Angiogenic growth factors may help to reestablish normal endothelial cell function in patients who have undergone angioplasty.

Echocardiographic follow-up after Ross procedure in 100 patients.

The Ross procedure could provide an ideal aortic valve replacement method in children and young adults. We evaluated midterm echocardiographic results to assess pulmonary homograft function as well as pulmonary autograft dimensions and function. In all, 105 patients (26 women and 79 men) underwent the Ross procedure; median age at implant was 29 years. All patients underwent free root replacement. Transvalvular gradients and autograft dimensions were measured at 3 levels (annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and proximal aorta) at discharge, at 6 months, and annually thereafter. Perioperative mortality was 4.7%. The mean period for echocardiographic follow-up in 100 patients was 32.7 months (range 0.5 to 7 years), during which 4 noncardiac-related deaths occurred. Two patients underwent late reintervention. No moderate or severe regurgitation was recorded. There was 1 case of mild homograft regurgitation and 4 of mild autograft regurgitation at late follow-up. Autograft peak gradients were low and reproducible (5 +/- 2.8 mm Hg at discharge vs 5.5 +/- 3.5 mm Hg at last follow-up, p = NS). Homograft peak gradients increased significantly without severe obstruction (7.8 +/- 5.7 mm Hg at discharge vs 15.8 +/- 9.2 mm Hg at last follow-up). The diameter of the autograft annulus was stable during follow-up, whereas autograft dimensions at sinuses and proximal aorta increased significantly. One group of patients was identified with sinus diameter increases >20% (group A). The 90 remaining patients were classified into group B. The only parameter significantly different between the 2 groups was the sinus diameters measured at discharge (1.74 cm/m2 (group A) vs 1.92 cm/m2 (group B); p = 0.036). In 100 patients and with echocardiographic follow-up for up to 7 years, the Ross procedure showed excellent results. For 10% of patients, we observed a 20% dilation of sinus diameters, but in only 3 patients (3%) was this beyond the upper normal limit.

Functional decline in elderly patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes: Impact on midterm outcome

BACKGROUND Elderly patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are less likely to be enrolled into randomized, controlled trials or receive guideline-recommended therapies, because of a higher burden of comorbidity, including functional decline. AIM To assess the prognostic value of functional decline in a prospective, observational cohort of elderly ACS patients. METHODS ACS patients aged > or = 70 years were enrolled. The ACS definition included ST- and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina pectoris. Clinical admission and laboratory data and echocardiographic variables were recorded. Functional decline was defined as needing assisted care in daily life. The study endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS Overall, 151 patients were enrolled (mean age 78 + or - 5 years; 52% men). Twenty-eight (19%) patients had functional decline. No significant difference in therapeutic management was observed between patients with functional decline and those living independently. Twenty-seven (18%) patients died during follow-up (median 447 days). Functional decline correlated with poor outcome (p = 0.008; hazard ratio [HR] 2.87 [1.31-6.25]). Other prognostic markers were diabetes, Killip class > or = II, elevated E/Ea ratio, C-reactive protein, B-type natriuretic peptide, haemoglobin, glycaemia and no coronary angiography. By multivariable analysis, C-reactive protein >13 mg/L correlated with poor outcome (p = 0.007; HR 4.77 [1.52-14.96]). There was a trend towards correlation between functional decline and poor outcome (p = 0.051; HR = 2.77 [0.99-7.72]). CONCLUSION Functional decline seems to portend poor prognosis in elderly ACS patients. Larger, community-based studies are needed to confirm these findings in a multivariable model.

Post-Procedural Aortic Regurgitation in Balloon-expandable and Self-Expandable TAVR Procedures: Analysis of Predictors and Impact on Long-Term Mortality: Insights from the FRANCE2 Registry

Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P=0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery (P=0.04), larger aortic annulus (P=0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter (P=0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery(P=0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P=0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P=0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2.Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P =0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery ( P =0.04), larger aortic annulus ( P =0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter ( P =0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery( P =0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P =0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P =0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-26}

Spontaneous healing of life-threatening iatrogenic type A aortic dissection

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is a life threatening disease associatedwith a 1 to 4% hourly death rate if left untreated [1]. Although relatively rare, aortic dissection may be caused by left cardiac catheterization. Usually such iatrogenic dissection of the ascending aorta occurs as a consequence of retrograde extension of coronary artery dissection. Here is reported the favourable outcome with medical management of a patient with catheter-induced acute aortic dissection originating from the abdominal aorta and extending to the right coronary artery. A 61-year-old woman was referred to the intensive care unit for the management of a guide catheter-induced aortic dissection. Elective coronary angiography via right femoral artery access was motivated by exercise-induced angina.While it revealed normal left coronary arteries and right coronary dissection, occlusion was documented. Contrast opacification of false lumen was also seen within the abdominal aortic wall. Admission blood cuff pressure was asymmetric (105/50 mm Hg in the right arm and 85/45 mm Hg in the left one). Jugular vein distension was found on physical examination. EKG showed inferior and apical ST segment elevation and reciprocal changes in lateral leads (Fig. 1). Bedside transthoracic echocardiogram showed inferior wall akinesia and left ventricular ejection fraction at 0.45. Neither aortic regurgitation nor pericardial effusion was found. The right ventricle was enlarged and hypokinetic. CT angiography confirmed the retrograde Stanford type A aortic dissection extending proximally from the abdominal aorta below the renal arteries, to the right coronary artery (Fig. 2 a, b, c). No additional entry site for blood flow into the false lumen was found. Conservative treatment strategy was decided due to both high operative risk associated with ongoing acute myocardial infarction and absence of entry tear in the ascending aorta. Peak cardiac troponin I was 132 ng/ml (N b 0.5) at day 2. The patient received morphine, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition, preventive heparin regimen and later on, beta-adrenergic blockade. Repeat CT scan at day 7 showed healing of the ascending aortic dissection (Fig. 2 d, e, f). The patient was discharged at day 9. A third CT scan at 1 month confirmed complete healing of the dissection, showing a normalized aortic wall (Fig. 2 g, h, i). 3D reconstructive CT scan (Fig. 2 j) documented severe aortic calcifications that likely promoted the entry intimal tear. The patient is doing well at three-year follow-up. Acute aortic dissection is a challenging clinical emergency requiring urgent surgical treatment. Iatrogenic aortic dissection due to catheterization was reported in 5 patients (1.7%) amongst the 289 patients presenting with a Stanford type A aortic dissection and in 5 (2.8%) amongst the 175 presenting with type B, in the International Registry of Aortic Dissection [1]. Overall in-hospital mortality of iatrogenic type A aortic dissection is reported to be up to 86% without surgical repair [2]. The majority of type A aortic dissections are related to retrograde extension of coronary dissection to the adjacent aortic wall and often linked with coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention [3]. The incidence of guide catheter induced coronary dissection involving the aortic root is reported to be of 0.02% [4]. Treatment of the primary entry intimal tear by coronary stenting in patients with limited aortic extension [5] and surgical treatment [6] for those with greater aortic involvement have been reported with variable outcomes. In this case the patient had clinical evidence of poor prognosis including acute myocardial infarction and the associated risk of multiple organ failure due to unstable hemodynamic condition and abdominal aortic dissection. Furthermore, she was denied surgical treatment in spite of the “theoretical” Stanford type A aortic dissection presentation. The primary entry tear occurred in the calcified abdominal aorta and the International Journal of Cardiology 177 (2014) e78–e80

Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Postprocedural Aortic Regurgitation in Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures: Analysis of Predictors and Impact on Long-Term Mortality: Insights From the FRANCE2 Registry”

We thank Drs Iqbal and Serruys for their interesting comments on our study.1 Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a very good alternative to conventional surgical replacement in patients with aortic stenosis at increased risk for surgery.2,3 As efficient as it is, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has important limitations, including postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR). Our study was designed to (1) describe the rate of postprocedural AR evaluated at discharge in a large series of consecutive patients treated with balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable devices, (2) analyze the predictors of postprocedural ARs in the overall population for each device, and (3) analyze the impact of postprocedural ARs on clinical outcome. The results of our study1 and others2 demonstrate clearly that postprocedural AR≥moderate as evaluated by echocardiography at discharge is frequent (15%) and is an independent predictor of long-term mortality. Our study demonstrates also that the clinical significance of a postprocedural AR≥moderate is …

Postprocedural Aortic Regurgitation in Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ProceduresCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P=0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery (P=0.04), larger aortic annulus (P=0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter (P=0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery(P=0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P=0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P=0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2.Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P =0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery ( P =0.04), larger aortic annulus ( P =0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter ( P =0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery( P =0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P =0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P =0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-26}

Postprocedural Aortic Regurgitation in Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures

Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P=0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery (P=0.04), larger aortic annulus (P=0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter (P=0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery(P=0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P=0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P=0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2.Background— Significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (AR) is observed in 10% to 20% of cases after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prognostic value and the predictors of such a complication in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) TAVR remain unclear. Methods and Results— TAVR was performed in 3195 consecutive patients at 34 hospitals. Postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 2769 (92%) patients of the eligible population, and these patients constituted the study group. Median follow-up was 306 days (Q1–Q3=178–490). BE and SE devices were implanted in 67.6% (n=1872) and 32.4% (n=897). Delivery was femoral (75.3%) or nonfemoral (24.7%). A postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% and was more frequent in SE (21.5%) than in BE-TAVR (13.0%, P =0.0001). Extensive multivariable analysis confirmed that the use of a SE device was one of the most powerful independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. For BE-TAVR, 8 independent predictors of postprocedural AR≥grade 2 were identified including femoral delivery ( P =0.04), larger aortic annulus ( P =0.0004), and smaller prosthesis diameter ( P =0.0001). For SE-TAVR, 2 independent predictors were identified including femoral delivery( P =0.0001). Aortic annulus and prosthesis diameter were not predictors of postprocedural AR for SE-TAVR. A postprocedural AR≥grade 2, but not a postprocedural AR=grade 1, was a strong independent predictor of 1-year mortality for BE (hazard ratio=2.50; P =0.0001) and SE-TAVR (hazard ratio=2.11; P =0.0001). Although postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was well tolerated in patients with AR≥grade 2 at baseline (1-year mortality=7%), it was associated with a very high mortality in other subgroups: renal failure (43%), AR<grade 2 at baseline (31%), low transaortic gradient (35%), or nonfemoral delivery (45%). Conclusions— Postprocedural AR≥grade 2 was observed in 15.8% of successful TAVR and was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality. The use of the SE device was a powerful independent predictor of postprocedural AR≥grade 2. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-26}