Jean-Marc Lablanche

Enoxaparin Prevents Death and Cardiac Ischemic Events in Unstable Angina/Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B Trial

BACKGROUND Low-molecular-weight heparins are attractive alternatives to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for management of unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (UA/NQMI). METHODS AND RESULTS Patients (n=3910) with UA/NQMI were randomized to intravenous UFH for >/=3 days followed by subcutaneous placebo injections or uninterrupted antithrombin therapy with enoxaparin during both the acute phase (initial 30 mg intravenous bolus followed by injections of 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours) and outpatient phase (injections every 12 hours of 40 mg for patients weighing <65 kg and 60 mg for those weighing >/=65 kg). The primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization) occurred by 8 days in 14.5% of patients in the UFH group and 12.4% of patients in the enoxaparin group (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.00; P=0. 048) and by 43 days in 19.7% of the UFH group and 17.3% of the enoxaparin group (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00; P=0.048). During the first 72 hours and also throughout the entire initial hospitalization, there was no difference in the rate of major hemorrhage in the treatment groups. During the outpatient phase, major hemorrhage occurred in 1.5% of the group treated with placebo and 2.9% of the group treated with enoxaparin (P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS Enoxaparin is superior to UFH for reducing a composite of death and serious cardiac ischemic events during the acute management of UA/NQMI patients without causing a significant increase in the rate of major hemorrhage. No further relative decrease in events occurred with outpatient enoxaparin treatment, but there was an increase in the rate of major hemorrhage.

Right ventricular ejection fraction is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate heart failure

OBJECTIVES We sought to study the relationship between survival and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) in a subgroup of patients with moderate congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND It has been demonstrated that RVEF is an independent predictor of survival in patients with advanced CHF. METHODS Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and radionuclide angiography (to determine right and left ventricular ejection fraction) were prospectively performed in 205 consecutive patients with moderate CHF (140 patients in New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II, 65 in class III). RESULTS Left ventricular ejection fraction was 29.3%+/-10.1%, RVEF was 37.5%+/-14.6% and peak oxygen consumption (VO2) was 16.2+/-5.4 ml/min/kg (60.2%+/-19% of maximal predicted VO2). After a median follow-up period of 755 days, there were 44 cardiac-related deaths, 3 deaths from noncardiac causes and 15 transplantations of whom 2 were urgent; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that three variables-NYHA classification, percent of maximal predicted VO2 and RVEF-were independent predictors of both survival and event-free cardiac survival. Left ventricular ejection fraction and peak VO2 normalized to body weight had no predictive value. The event-free survival rates from cardiovascular mortality and urgent transplantation at 1 year were 80%, 90% and 95% in patients with an RVEF <25%, with a RVEF > or =25% and <35% and with a RVEF > or =35%, respectively. At 2 years, survival rates were 59%, 77% and 93% in the same subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In addition to the NYHA classification and to the percent of maximal predicted VO2, RVEF is an independent predictor of survival in patients with moderate CHF.

Six-Month Angiographic Outcome After Successful Repeat Percutaneous Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis

BACKGROUND In-stent restenosis is an increasing clinical problem. Discordant results have been published regarding the risk of recurrent restenosis after repeat angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred three consecutive patients (107 vessels) underwent repeat percutaneous intervention for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and were entered in a prospective angiographic follow-up program. Repeat balloon angioplasty was performed at 93 lesions (87%) and additional stenting at 14 lesions (13%). The primary success rate was 98%. Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 85% of eligible patients. Restenosis was determined by quantitative angiography. Restenosis defined as a >50% diameter stenosis at follow-up was observed at 22% of lesions. The rate of target-lesion revascularization at 6 months was 17%. Repeat intervention for diffuse in-stent restenosis and severe stenosis before repeat intervention were associated with significantly higher rates of recurrent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS The overall restenosis rate after repeat intervention for in-stent restenosis is low. The subgroup of patients with diffuse and/or severe in-stent restenosis, however, is at higher risk of recurrent restenosis and may benefit from alternative therapeutic strategies.

Impact of Prehospital Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction on 1-Year Outcome Results From the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry

Background—Limited data are available on the impact of prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) in the “real-world” setting. Methods and Results—Of 443 intensive care units in France, 369 (83%) prospectively collected all cases of infarction (≤48 hours of symptom onset) in November 2000; 1922 patients (median age, 67 years; 73% men) with ST-segment–elevation infarction were included, of whom 180 (9%) received intravenous thrombolysis before hospital admission (PHT). Patients with PHT were younger than those with in-hospital thrombolysis, primary percutaneous interventions, or no reperfusion therapy. Median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 3.6 hours for PHT, 3.5 hours for in-hospital lysis, 3.2 hours for primary percutaneous interventions, and 12 hours for no reperfusion therapy. In-hospital death was 3.3% for PHT, 8.0% for in-hospital lysis, 6.7% for primary percutaneous interventions, and 12.2% for no reperfusion therapy. One-year survival was 94%, 89%, 89%, and 79%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis of predictors of 1-year survival, PHT was associated with a 0.49 relative risk of death (95% CI, 0.24 to 1.00; P=0.05). When the analysis was limited to patients receiving reperfusion therapy, the relative risk of death for PHT was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.25 to 1.08; P=0.08). In patients with PHT admitted in ≤3.5 hours, in-hospital mortality was 0% and 1-year survival was 99%. Conclusions—The 1-year outcome of patients treated with PHT compares favorably with that of patients treated with other modes of reperfusion therapy; this favorable trend persists after multivariate adjustment. Patients with PHT admitted very early have a very high 1-year survival rate.

Polymorphisms in the promoter regions of MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9 and MMP-12 genes as determinants of aneurysmal coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES Our hypothesis was that functional polymorphisms in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) genes may act as susceptibility factors for the development of coronary aneurysms (CAs). BACKGROUND Different forms of remodeling have been described at the level of coronary arteries; CA, reported in 1% to 5% of patients with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD), are one of them. Matrix metalloproteinases have been implicated in the pathogenesis of aneurysm development through increased proteolysis of extracellular matrix proteins. METHODS We screened 3,862 patients who underwent coronary angiography and identified 113 patients with CAD with at least one CA (CA group); these patients were matched with 226 patients with CAD without CA (control group). The -1,306 C/T MMP-2, 5A/6A MMP-3, CA-repeat MMP-9 and -82 A/G MMP-12 polymorphisms were determined. RESULTS The MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-12 polymorphisms were not associated with CA. By contrast, the 5A/5A genotype of MMP-3 was significantly more frequent in the CA group than in the control group (31% vs. 18%, p = 0.015); similarly, the MMP-3 5A allele was more frequent in the CA group (p = 0.009). Three variables were independently associated with CA: the MMP-3 5A/5A genotype (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.27 to 3.93]), a previous myocardial infarction (OR = 1.91, 95% CI [1.14 to 3.20]) and a history of aortic aneurysm (OR = 21.06, 95% CI [2.35 to 188]). CONCLUSIONS The MMP-3 5A allele is associated with the occurrence of CA. Our results suggest that an increased proteolysis in the arterial wall may act as a susceptibility factor for the development of CA in patients with coronary atherosclerosis.

D Allele of the Angiotensin I–Converting Enzyme Is a Major Risk Factor for Restenosis After Coronary Stenting

BACKGROUND Although intracoronary stent implantation significantly reduces restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty, a minority of patients still develop restenosis predominantly due to neointimal hyperplasia. Experimental studies suggest that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. In humans, the plasma and cellular levels of ACE are associated with an I/D genetic polymorphism in the ACE gene, DD patients having higher levels. METHODS AND RESULTS We investigated a possible relation between the ACE I/D polymorphism and restenosis in 146 patients who underwent successful implantation of a Palmaz-Schatz stent and had 6-month follow-up angiography. The minimal lumen diameter (MLD) before and after the procedure did not differ significantly among the three groups of genotypes (DD, ID, and II). At follow-up, MLD had a significant inverse relationship to the number of D alleles present (DD, 1.65 +/- 0.71 mm; ID, 1.84 +/- 0.60 mm; II, 2.05 +/- 0.61 mm; P < .007). Late luminal loss during the follow-up period was significantly related to the number of D alleles (DD, 0.89 +/- 0.61 mm; ID, 0.60 +/- 0.52 mm; II, 0.40 +/- 0.53 mm; P < .0001). The relative risk of restenosis (defined as a > 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) approximated by the adjusted odds ratio was 2.00 per number of D alleles (95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 3.88, P < .04). CONCLUSIONS The ACE I/D polymorphism influences the level of late luminal loss after coronary stent implantation. These results suggest that the renin-angiotensin system may be implicated in the pathogenesis of restenosis after coronary stenting.

Effect of Pravastatin on Angiographic Restenosis After Coronary Balloon Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether pravastatin affects clinical or angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND Experimental data and preliminary clinical studies suggest that lipid-lowering drugs might have a beneficial effect on restenosis after coronary angioplasty. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, 695 patients were randomized to receive pravastatin (40 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months after successful balloon angioplasty. All patients received aspirin (100 mg/day). The primary angiographic end point was minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at follow-up, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography. A sample size of 313 patients per group was required to demonstrate a difference of 0.13 mm in MLD between groups (allowing for a two-tailed alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20). To allow for incomplete angiographic follow-up (estimated lost to follow-up rate of 10%), 690 randomized patients were required. Secondary end points were angiographic restenosis rate (restenosis assessed as a categoric variable, > 50% stenosis) and clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization). RESULTS At baseline, clinical, demographic, angiographic and lipid variables did not differ significantly between groups. In patients treated with pravastatin, there was a significant reduction in total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels and a significant increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. At follow-up the MLD (mean +/- SD) was 1.47 +/- 0.62 mm in the placebo group and 1.54 +/- 0.66 mm in the pravastatin group (p = 0.21). Similarly, late loss and net gain did not differ significantly between groups. The restenosis rate (recurrence > 50% stenosis) was 43.8% in the placebo group and 39.2% in the pravastatin group (p = 0.26). Clinical restenosis did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS Although pravastatin has documented efficacy in reducing clinical events and angiographic disease progression in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, this study shows that it has no effect on angiographic outcome at the target site 6 months after coronary angioplasty.

THE ANGIOTENSIN II TYPE 1 RECEPTOR GENE POLYMORPHISM IS ASSOCIATED WITH CORONARY ARTERY VASOCONSTRICTION

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the potential association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor gene polymorphisms on coronary vasomotion in humans. BACKGROUND Abnormal coronary vasomotion plays a role in the clinical expression of coronary atherosclerosis. The components of the renin-angiotensin system are important determinants of vasomotor tone. Furthermore, epidemiologic evidence suggests that these components are involved in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease. Indeed, two genetic polymorphisms of the ACE and AT1 receptor genes were synergistically associated with the occurrence of myocardial infarction. The influence of these genetic polymorphisms on the risk of myocardial infarction may be related, at least in part, to a deleterious effect on coronary vasomotion. METHODS We studied the response of angiographically normal human coronary arteries after intravenous injection of methylergonovine maleate, a potent vasoconstrictor whose effects have been previously explored in various aspects of coronary artery disease. We characterized the ACE and AT1 receptor genotypes in a consecutive series of 140 patients with normal coronary arteries. Coronary vasomotion was assessed with quantitative coronary angiography. RESULTS No effect of the ACE gene polymorphism was detected. Conversely, the patients carrying the AT1 receptor CC genotype (n = 13) had significantly greater vasoconstriction in distal coronary vessels (p < 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The AT1 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with coronary vasomotion in humans.

Effect of the Direct Nitric Oxide Donors Linsidomine and Molsidomine on Angiographic Restenosis After Coronary Balloon Angioplasty The ACCORD Study

BACKGROUND Nitric oxide (NO) donors, in addition to their vasodilator effect, decrease platelet aggregation and inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. These actions could have beneficial effects on restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS In a prospective multicenter, randomized trial, 700 stable coronary patients scheduled for angioplasty received direct NO donors (infusion of linsidomine followed by oral molsidomine) or oral diltiazem. Treatment was started before angioplasty and continued until 12 to 24 hours before follow-up angiography at 6 months. The primary study end point was minimal lumen diameter, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, 6 months after balloon angioplasty. Clinical variables were well matched in both groups. However, despite intracoronary administration of isosorbide dinitrate, the reference diameter in the NO donor group was significantly greater than in the diltiazem group on the preangioplasty, postangioplasty, and follow-up angiograms. Pretreatment with an NO donor was associated with a modest improvement in the immediate angiographic result compared with pretreatment with diltiazem (minimum luminal diameter, 1.94 versus 1.81 mm; P = .001); this improvement was maintained at the 6-month angiographic follow-up (minimal lumen diameter, 1.54 versus 1.38 mm; P = .007). The extent of late luminal narrowing did not differ significantly between groups (loss index in the NO donor and diltiazam groups, 0.35 +/- 0.78 and 0.46 +/- 0.74, respectively; P = .103). Restenosis, defined as a binary variable (> or = 50% stenosis), occurred less often in the NO donor group (38.0% versus 46.5%; P = .026). Combined major clinical events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization) were similar in the two groups (32.2% versus 32.4%). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with linsidomine and molsidomine was associated with a modest improvement in the long-term angiographic result after angioplasty but had no effect on clinical outcome. The improved angiographic result related predominantly to a better immediate procedural result, because late luminal loss did not differ significantly between groups.

Effect of ACE inhibitors on angiographic restenosis after coronary stenting (PARIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND The DD genotype for the angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE I) deletion allele (D) polymorphism is a possible genetic risk factor for restenosis after coronary stent implantation. We aimed to establish whether or not blockade of ACE with high doses of ACE inhibitors could reduce this risk of angiographic restenosis. METHODS We characterised the ACE I/D polymorphism in 345 consecutive patients who were undergoing coronary stenting. 115 had the DD genotype. We assigned 91 of these 115 patients to quinapril 40 mg daily (n=46) or placebo (n=45). Treatment was started within 48 h after stent implantation and continued for 6 months. 79 patients complied with the protocol and underwent follow-up angiography after 6 months. FINDINGS Our primary endpoint of late loss in minimum lumen diameter (a quantitative index of restenosis) was significantly higher in the quinapril group than in the controls (mean 1.11 mm [SD 0.70] vs 0.76 mm [0.60]; p=0.018). Secondary endpoints also showed consistent trends towards increased angiographic restenosis in the treatment group. INTERPRETATION Contrary to our expectations, ACE inhibitor treatment did not reduce restenosis after coronary stent implantation in patients with DD genotype, but was associated with an exaggerated restenotic process when compared with administration of placebo.