Jean-Sébastien Billiard

Fatty liver deposition and sparing: a pictorial review

ObjectiveFatty liver deposition is a very common finding, but it has many atypical patterns of distribution that can represent diagnostic pitfalls. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to review different patterns of fatty liver deposition and sparing.MethodsWe searched our archive retrospectively, reviewed the literature, and identified six patterns of liver steatosis.ResultsSteatosis may be diffuse, geographic, focal, subcapsular, multifocal or perivascular.ConclusionsPrevious knowledge of atypical patterns of steatosis distribution may prevent misdiagnosis of infiltrative disease or focal liver lesions. When an unusual form of fatty liver deposition is suspected on ultrasound or computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging may be used to confirm the diagnosis.

Small and large bowel volvulus: Clues to early recognition and complications

Small and large bowel volvulus are uncommon causes of bowel obstruction with nonspecific clinical manifestations which may delay the diagnosis and increase morbidity. Therefore, radiologists play an important role in promptly establishing the diagnosis, recognizing underlying congenital or acquired risk factors and detecting potentially life-threatening complications. Multidetector CT performed with intravenous contrast is currently the preferred modality for the evaluation of volvulus, which is best appreciated when imaging is perpendicular to the axis of bowel rotation, hence the benefit of multiplanar reformations. In this pictorial essay we review the pathophysiology of the different types of intestinal volvulus, discuss diagnostic criteria for prompt diagnosis of volvulus and emphasize early recognition of the complications.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidelines for the Prevention of Contrast-induced Nephropathy: A Critical Appraisal

Objective The purpose of this study is to critically appraise the Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) guidelines on the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Methods The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) tool is a questionnaire that consists of 23 key items organized in 6 domains (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, editorial independence). Four radiologists read the guidelines and completed the questionnaire independently. To assess the quality of the evidence, the articles listed in the bibliography were reviewed, and the following data were collected and tabulated: the type of contrast, the administration route, and the level of evidence (Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, University of Oxford). Results The highest score was for scope and purpose (92%), whereas the lowest scores were for rigor of development (50%) and applicability (40%). The score for the remaining domains were the following: stakeholder involvement (59%), clarity and presentation (69%), and editorial independence (63%). Although the bibliography of the CAR guidelines list 46 articles, only 33 were deemed pertinent to support the recommendations related to risk stratification or risk reduction of CIN. Only 3 articles dealt specifically with intravenous injection of iodinated contrast. Four articles dealt with ionic contrast, and, in 17 references, the contrast type was not specified. The best evidence (level 1) was in support of risk-reduction recommendations, but, in 8 of the 9 articles cited, the route of administration studied was exclusively intra-arterial. Conclusion It would be appropriate to revisit the topic of CIN and formulate new guidelines. A formal systematic review of the literature should be undertaken and the data extraction should specifically address contrast type and route of administration, as well as the applicability of any recommendations.

LI-RADS for MR Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Performance of Major and Ancillary Features

Purpose To evaluate the performance of major features, ancillary features, and categories of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2014 at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included patients with liver MR imaging and at least one pathologically proved lesion. Between 2004 and 2016, 102 patients (275 observations including 113 HCCs) met inclusion criteria. Two radiologists independently assessed major and ancillary imaging features for each liver observation and assigned a LI-RADS category. Per-lesion estimates of diagnostic performance of major features, ancillary features, and LI-RADS categories were assessed by using generalized estimating equation models. Results Major features (arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, capsule, and threshold growth) had a sensitivity of 88.5%, 60.6%, 32.9%, and 41.6%, and a specificity of 18.6%, 84.8%, 98.8%, and 83.2% for HCC, respectively. Ancillary features (mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion, mosaic architecture, intralesional fat, lesional fat sparing, blood products, and subthreshold growth) had a sensitivity of 62.2%, 54.8%, 9.9%, 30.9%, 23.1%, 2.8%, and 48.3%, and a specificity of 79.4%, 90.6%, 99.4%, 94.2%, 83.1%, 99.3%, and 91.4% for HCC, respectively. The LR-5 or LR-5 V categories had a per-lesion sensitivity of 50.8% and a specificity of 95.8% for HCC, respectively. The LR-4, LR-5, or LR-5 V categories (determined by using major features only vs combination of major and ancillary features) had a per-lesion sensitivity of 75.9% and 87.9% and a per-lesion specificity of 87.5% and 86.2%, respectively. Conclusion The use of ancillary features in combination with major features increases the sensitivity while preserving a high specificity for the diagnosis of HCC.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound for macroscopic hematuria in the era of multidetector computed tomography urography.

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for detecting urinary tract neoplasm in the setting of macroscopic hematuria by using multidetector computed tomography urography (MDCTU) and cystoscopy as the reference standard. Methods This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board. Patients with macroscopic hematuria who were investigated with an abdominal or renal ultrasound, an MDCTU, and a cystoscopy between January 2007 and December 2009, were eligible (95 patients). Exclusion criteria were time interval >12 months between index and reference tests or the absence of histopathologic proof of malignancy. Ultrasound results of the remaining 86 patients were collected and compared with the reference standard test, which was the combination of MDCTU for the assessment of upper urinary tract and cystoscopy for assessment of the lower urinary tract. The final diagnosis of neoplasm was based on pathologic findings. Results Urinary tract neoplasm was diagnosed in 20% of the patients (17/86). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of ultrasound for detecting urinary tract neoplasms were 35.3% (6/17), 89.9% (62/69), 46.2% (6/13), 84.9% (62/73), 3.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-9.02), and 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-1.3), respectively. Conclusion Sensitivity of ultrasound for the evaluation of macroscopic hematuria in the era of MDCTU is lower than expected. Results of our study suggest that patients with macroscopic hematuria should undergo MDCTU as first-line imaging modality, with little added benefit from ultrasound.

A primer to common major gastrointestinal post-surgical anatomy on CT—a pictorial review

The post-operative abdomen can be challenging and knowledge of normal post-operative anatomy is important for diagnosing complications. The aim of this pictorial essay is to describe a few selected common, major gastrointestinal surgeries, their clinical indications and depict their normal post-operative computed tomography (CT) appearance. This essay provides some clues to identify the surgeries, which can be helpful especially when surgical history is lacking: recognition of the organ(s) involved, determination of what was resected and familiarity with the type of anastomoses used.

Dilatation of the Bile Duct in Patients After Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study

Purpose Retrospective assessment of impact of cholecystectomy, age, and sex on bile duct (BD) diameter. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed abdominal contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography and laboratory reports of 290 consecutive patients (119 men; mean age, 55.9 years) who presented without cholestasis to the emergency department of our institution between June 2009 and August 2010. BD diameters were measured in 3 locations, by 2 independent observers, twice, at 1-month intervals. Reproducibility and agreement were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses. The effects of cholecystectomy, age, and sex on BD diameter were analysed with linear mixed models. Results BD diameter inter-reader reproducibility and agreement were excellent at the level of the right hepatic artery (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94). Sixty-one patients (21.0%) had a history of cholecystectomy. Among them, the 95th percentile of BD diameters at hepatic artery level was 7.9 mm (<50 years) and 12.3 mm (≥50 years). Among those without cholecystectomy, BD diameter was 6.2 mm (<50 years) and 7.7 mm (≥50 years). Cholecystectomy was associated with significantly larger BD diameters in both age groups (P < .001). Older age was associated with larger BD diameters (P = .004). Sex had no impact on BD diameter (P = .842). Conclusion Patients after cholecystectomy may present with an enlarged BD unrelated to cholestasis. The BD diameter increases with age. Clinicians should rely on cholecystectomy status, age, and laboratory results to determine needs of further investigation.

LI-RADS Version 2018 Ancillary Features at MRI

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes performance of liver imaging in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as interpretation and reporting of the results. Developed by experts in liver imaging and supported by the American College of Radiology, LI-RADS assigns to observations categories that reflect the relative probability of benignity, HCC, or other malignancy. While category assignment is based mainly on major imaging features, ancillary features may be applied to improve detection and characterization, increase confidence, or adjust LI-RADS categories. Ancillary features are classified as favoring malignancy in general, HCC in particular, or benignity. Those favoring malignancy in general or HCC in particular may be used to upgrade by a maximum of one category up to LR-4; those favoring benignity may be used to downgrade by a maximum of one category. If there are conflicting ancillary features (ie, one or more favoring malignancy and one or more favoring benignity), the category should not be adjusted. Ancillary features may be seen at diagnostic CT, MRI performed with extracellular agents, or MRI performed with hepatobiliary agents, with the exception of one ancillary feature assessed at US. This article focuses on LI-RADS version 2018 ancillary features seen at MRI. Specific topics include rules for ancillary feature application; definitions, rationale, and illustrations with clinical MRI examples; summary of evidence and diagnostic performance; pitfalls; and future directions. ©RSNA, 2018.

Diagnostic performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of anal fistula activity

Objective To evaluate intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences for quantitative characterization of anal fistula activity. Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. One hundred and two patients underwent MRI for clinical suspicion of anal fistula. Forty-three patients with demonstrable anal fistulas met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative analysis included measurement of DCE and IVIM parameters. The reference standard was clinical activity based on medical records. Statistical analyses included Bayesian analysis with Markov Chain Monte Carlo, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Results Brevity of enhancement, defined as the time difference between the wash-in and wash-out, was longer in active than inactive fistulas (p = 0.02). Regression coefficients of multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that brevity of enhancement increased and normalized perfusion area under curve decreased with presence of active fistulas (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). By cross-validation, a logistic regression model that included quantitative perfusion parameters (DCE and IVIM) performed significantly better than IVIM only (p < 0.001). Area under the curves for distinguishing patients with active from those with inactive fistulas were 0.669 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.500, 0.838) for a model with IVIM only, 0.860 (95% CI: 0.742, 0.977) for a model with IVIM and brevity of enhancement, and 0.921 (95% CI: 0.846, 0.997) for a model with IVIM and all DCE parameters. Conclusion The inclusion of brevity of enhancement measured by DCE-MRI improved assessment of anal fistula activity over IVIM-DWI only.

LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features

PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2017 major features, the impact of ancillary features, and categories on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 59 patients (104 observations including 72 HCCs) with clinical suspicion of HCC undergoing CECT between 2013 and 2016. Two radiologists independently assessed major and ancillary imaging features for each liver observation and assigned a LI-RADS category based on major features only and in combination with ancillary features. The composite reference standard included pathology or imaging. Per-lesion estimates of diagnostic performance of major features, ancillary features, and LI-RADS categories were assessed by generalized estimating equation models.ResultsMajor features (arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, capsule, and threshold growth) respectively had a sensitivity of 86.1%, 81.6%, 20.7%, and 26.1% and specificity of 39.3%, 67.9%, 89.9%, and 85.0% for HCC. Ancillary features (ultrasound visibility as discrete nodule, subthreshold growth, and fat in mass more than adjacent liver) respectively had a sensitivity of 42.6%, 50.8%, and 15.1% and a specificity of 79.2%, 66.9%, and 96.4% for HCC. Ancillary features modified the final category in 4 of 104 observations. For HCC diagnosis, categories LR-3, LR-4, LR-5, and LR-TIV (tumor in vein) had a sensitivity of 5.3%, 29.0%, 53.7%, and 10.7%; and a specificity of 49.1%, 84.4%, 97.3%, and 96.4%, respectively.ConclusionOn CT, LR-5 category has near-perfect specificity for the diagnosis of HCC and ancillary features modifies the final category in few observations.